It's very useful. There are some false positives involving integration
tests in `rustc_pattern_analysis` and `rustc_serialize`. There is also a
false positive involving `rustc_driver_impl`'s
`rustc_randomized_layouts` feature. And I removed a `rustc_span` mention
in a doc comment in `rustc_log` because it wasn't integral to the
comment but caused a dev-dependency.
Continuing the work from #137350.
Removes the unused methods: `expect_variant`, `expect_field`,
`expect_foreign_item`.
Every method gains a `hir_` prefix.
To make room for the moving of `Map::attrs` to `TyCtxt::hir_attrs` in
the next commit. (It makes sense to rename the query, because it has
many fewer uses than the method.)
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #137715 (Allow int literals for pattern types with int base types)
- #138002 (Disable CFI for weakly linked syscalls)
- #138051 (Add support for downloading GCC from CI)
- #138231 (Prevent ICE in autodiff validation by emitting user-friendly errors)
- #138245 (stabilize `ci_rustc_if_unchanged_logic` test for local environments)
- #138256 (Do not feed anon const a type that references generics that it does not have)
- #138284 (Do not write user type annotation for const param value path)
- #138296 (Remove `AdtFlags::IS_ANONYMOUS` and `Copy`/`Clone` condition for anonymous ADT)
- #138352 (miri native_calls: ensure we actually expose *mutable* provenance to the memory FFI can access)
- #138354 (remove redundant `body` arguments)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Allow int literals for pattern types with int base types
r? ``@BoxyUwU``
I also added an error at layout computation time for layouts that contain wrapping ranges (happens at monomorphization time). This is obviously hacky, but at least prevents such types from making it to codegen for now. It made writing the tests for int literals easier as I didn't have to think about that edge case
Basically this PR allows you to stop using transmutes for creating pattern types and instead just use literals:
```rust
let x: pattern_type!(u32 is 5..10) = 7;
```
works, and if the literal is out of range you get a type mismatch because it just stays at the base type and the base type can't be coerced to the pattern type.
cc ``@joshtriplett`` ``@scottmcm``
Add `#[define_opaques]` attribute and require it for all type-alias-impl-trait sites that register a hidden type
Instead of relying on the signature of items to decide whether they are constraining an opaque type, the opaque types that the item constrains must be explicitly listed.
A previous version of this PR used an actual attribute, but had to keep the resolved `DefId`s in a side table.
Now we just lower to fields in the AST that have no surface syntax, instead a builtin attribute macro fills in those fields where applicable.
Note that for convenience referencing opaque types in associated types from associated methods on the same impl will not require an attribute. If that causes problems `#[defines()]` can be used to overwrite the default of searching for opaques in the signature.
One wart of this design is that closures and static items do not have generics. So since I stored the opaques in the generics of functions, consts and methods, I would need to add a custom field to closures and statics to track this information. During a T-types discussion we decided to just not do this for now.
fixes#131298
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to
consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on
distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due
to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's
`workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust
workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts).
This breakage was reported in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>.
This reverts commit 48caf81484, reversing
changes made to c6662879b2.
Move more layouting logic to `rustc_abi`
Move all `LayoutData`-constructing code to `rustc_abi`:
- Infaillible operations get a new `LayoutData` constructor method;
- Faillible ones get a new method on `LayoutCalculator`.
By naming them in `[workspace.lints.rust]` in the top-level
`Cargo.toml`, and then making all `compiler/` crates inherit them with
`[lints] workspace = true`. (I omitted `rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}`,
because they're a bit different.)
The advantages of this over the current approach:
- It uses a standard Cargo feature, rather than special handling in
bootstrap. So, easier to understand, and less likely to get
accidentally broken in the future.
- It works for proc macro crates.
It's a shame it doesn't work for rustc-specific lints, as the comments
explain.
Currently it relies on special treatment of `kw::Empty`, which is really
easy to get wrong. This commit makes the special case clearer in the
type system by using `Option`. It's a bit clumsy, but the synthetic name
handling itself is a bit clumsy; better to make it explicit than sneak
it in.
Fixes#133426.
compiler: add `ExternAbi::is_rustic_abi`
Various parts of the compiler were hand-rolling this extremely simple check that is nonetheless easy to get wrong as the compiler evolves over time. Discourage them from being so "original" again by replacing it with a single implementation on the type that represents these ABIs. This simplifies a surprising amount of code as a result.
Also fixes#132981, an ICE that emerged due to other checks being made stricter.
rename BackendRepr::Vector → SimdVector
For many Rustaceans, "vector" does not imply "SIMD", so let's be more clear in this type that is used pervasively in the compiler.
r? `@workingjubilee`
