The check previously matched this, and suggested adding a missing
`struct`:
pub Foo(...):
It was probably intended to match this instead (semicolon instead of
colon):
pub Foo(...);
Strengthen validation of FFI attributes
Previously, `codegen_attrs` validated the attributes `#[ffi_pure]`, `#[ffi_const]`, and `#[ffi_returns_twice]` to make sure that they were only used on foreign functions. However, this validation was insufficient in two ways:
1. `codegen_attrs` only sees items for which code must be generated, so it was unable to raise errors when the attribute was incorrectly applied to macros and the like.
2. the validation code only checked that the item with the attr was foreign, but not that it was a foreign function, allowing these attributes to be applied to foreign statics as well.
This PR moves the validation to `check_attr`, which sees all items. It additionally changes the validation to ensure that the attribute's target is `Target::ForeignFunction`, only allowing the attributes on foreign functions and not foreign statics. Because these attributes are unstable, there is no risk for backwards compatibility. The changes also ending up making the code much easier to read.
This PR is best reviewed commit by commit. Additionally, I was considering moving the tests to the `attribute` subdirectory, to get them out of the general UI directory. I could do that as part of this PR or a follow-up, as the reviewer prefers.
CC: #58328, #58329
Do not depend on Generator trait when deducing closure signature
1. Do not depend on `Generator` trait when deducing closure signature.
2. Compare the name of the `Generator::Return` associated item, rather than its order in the trait. Seems more stable this way.
Fixing confusion between mod and remainder
Like many programming languages, rust too confuses remainder and modulus. The `%` operator and the associated `Rem` trait is (as the trait name suggests) the remainder, but since most people are linguistically more familiar with the modulus the documentation sometimes claims otherwise. This PR tries to fix this problem in rustc.
If you do `derive(PartialEq)` on a packed struct, the output shown by
`-Zunpretty=expanded` includes expressions like this:
```
{ self.x } == { other.x }
```
This is invalid syntax. This doesn't break compilation, because the AST
nodes are constructed within the compiler. But it does mean anyone using
`-Zunpretty=expanded` output as a guide for hand-written impls could get
a nasty surprise.
This commit fixes things by instead using this form:
```
({ self.x }) == ({ other.x })
```
Modify primary span label for E0308
Looking at the reactions to https://hachyderm.io/`@ekuber/109622160673605438,` a lot of people seem to have trouble understanding the current output, where the primary span label on type errors talks about the specific types that diverged, but these can be deeply nested type parameters. Because of that we could see "expected i32, found u32" in the label while the note said "expected Vec<i32>, found Vec<u32>". This understandably confuses people. I believe that once people learn to read these errors it starts to make more sense, but this PR changes the output to be more in line with what people might expect, without sacrificing terseness.
Fix#68220.
Use `ObligationCtxt::new_in_snapshot` in `satisfied_from_param_env`
We can evaluate nested `ConstEvaluatable` obligations in an evaluation probe, which will ICE if we use `ObligationCtxt::new`.
Fixes#107474Fixes#106666
r? `@BoxyUwU` but feel free to reassign
cc `@JulianKnodt` who i think added this assertion code
Not sure if the rustdoc test is needed, but can't hurt. They're the same root cause, though.
Implement unsizing in the new trait solver
This makes hello world compile! Ignore the first commit, that's just #107146 which is waiting on merge.
I'll leave some comments inline about design choices that might be debatable.
r? `@lcnr` (until we have a new trait solver reviewer group...)
Fix invalid float literal suggestions when recovering an integer
Only suggest adding a zero to integers with a preceding dot when the change will result in a valid floating point literal.
For example, `.0x0` should not be turned into `0.0x0`.
r? nnethercote
Only suggest adding a zero to integers with a preceding dot when the change will
result in a valid floating point literal.
For example, `.0x0` should not be turned into `0.0x0`.
The original tweet in the chain linked to, and thus the through line of links back to Anna's tweet where she named the turbofish (https://web.archive.org/web/20210911061514/https://twitter.com/whoisaldeka/status/914914008225816576) are lost as the user whoisaldeka has deleted their twitter account.
Switching to an archive link preserves this through line, allowing someone to browse back to see the point at which Anna created the turbofish, as was the original intent of including this context.
Don't re-export private/unstable ArgumentV1 from `alloc`.
The `alloc::fmt::ArgumentV1` re-export was marked as `#[stable]` even though the original `core::fmt::ArgumentV1` is `#[unstable]` (and `#[doc(hidden)]`).
(It wasn't usable though:
```
error[E0658]: use of unstable library feature 'fmt_internals': internal to format_args!
--> src/main.rs:4:12
|
4 | let _: alloc::fmt::ArgumentV1 = todo!();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: add `#![feature(fmt_internals)]` to the crate attributes to enable
```
)
Part of #99012
Currently, deriving on packed structs has some non-trivial limitations,
related to the fact that taking references on unaligned fields is UB.
The current approach to field accesses in derived code:
- Normal case: `&self.0`
- In a packed struct that derives `Copy`: `&{self.0}`
- In a packed struct that doesn't derive `Copy`: `&self.0`
Plus, we disallow deriving any builtin traits other than `Default` for any
packed generic type, because it's possible that there might be
misaligned fields. This is a fairly broad restriction.
Plus, we disallow deriving any builtin traits other than `Default` for most
packed types that don't derive `Copy`. (The exceptions are those where the
alignments inherently satisfy the packing, e.g. in a type with
`repr(packed(N))` where all the fields have alignments of `N` or less
anyway. Such types are pretty strange, because the `packed` attribute is
not having any effect.)
This commit introduces a new, simpler approach to field accesses:
- Normal case: `&self.0`
- In a packed struct: `&{self.0}`
In the latter case, this requires that all fields impl `Copy`, which is
a new restriction. This means that the following example compiles under
the old approach and doesn't compile under the new approach.
```
#[derive(Debug)]
struct NonCopy(u8);
#[derive(Debug)
#[repr(packed)]
struct MyType(NonCopy);
```
(Note that the old approach's support for cases like this was brittle.
Changing the `u8` to a `u16` would be enough to stop it working. So not
much capability is lost here.)
However, the other constraints from the old rules are removed. We can now
derive builtin traits for packed generic structs like this:
```
trait Trait { type A; }
#[derive(Hash)]
#[repr(packed)]
pub struct Foo<T: Trait>(T, T::A);
```
To allow this, we add a `T: Copy` bound in the derived impl and a `T::A:
Copy` bound in where clauses. So `T` and `T::A` must impl `Copy`.
We can now also derive builtin traits for packed structs that don't derive
`Copy`, so long as the fields impl `Copy`:
```
#[derive(Hash)]
#[repr(packed)]
pub struct Foo(u32);
```
This includes types that hand-impl `Copy` rather than deriving it, such as the
following, that show up in winapi-0.2:
```
#[derive(Clone)]
#[repr(packed)]
struct MyType(i32);
impl Copy for MyType {}
```
The new approach is simpler to understand and implement, and it avoids
the need for the `unsafe_derive_on_repr_packed` check.
One exception is required for backwards-compatibility: we allow `[u8]`
fields for now. There is a new lint for this,
`byte_slice_in_packed_struct_with_derive`.
Output tree representation on thir-tree
The current output of `-Zunpretty=thir-tree` is really cumbersome to work with, using an actual tree representation should make it easier to see what the thir looks like.
Insert whitespace to avoid ident concatenation in suggestion
This PR tweaks the suggestion of removing misplaced parentheses around trait bounds so as to avoid concatenating two identifiers. Although subtle, this should make outputs less surprising especially when applying the `MachineApplicable` suggestions automatically.
Skip possible where_clause_object_safety lints when checking `multiple_supertrait_upcastable`
Fix#106247
To achieve this, I lifted the `WhereClauseReferencesSelf` out from `object_safety_violations` and move it into `is_object_safe` (which is changed to a new query).
cc `@dtolnay`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106618 (Disable `linux_ext` in wasm32 and fortanix rustdoc builds.)
- #107097 (Fix def-use dominance check)
- #107154 (library/std/sys_common: Define MIN_ALIGN for m68k-unknown-linux-gnu)
- #107397 (Gracefully exit if --keep-stage flag is used on a clean source tree)
- #107401 (remove the usize field from CandidateSource::AliasBound)
- #107413 (make more pleasant to read)
- #107422 (Also erase substs for new infcx in pin move error)
- #107425 (Check for missing space between fat arrow and range pattern)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Check for missing space between fat arrow and range pattern
Fixes#107420
Ideally we wouldn't emit an error about expecting `=>` etc., but I'm not sure how to recover from this.
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics
Also erase substs for new infcx in pin move error
The code originally correctly erased the regions of the type it passed to the newly created infcx. But after the `fn_sig` query was made to return an `EarlyBinder<T>`, some substs that were around were substituted there without erasing their regions. They were then passed into the newly cerated infcx, which caused the ICE.
Fixes#107419
r? compiler-errors who reviewed the original PR adding this diagnostic
Fix def-use dominance check
A definition does not dominate a use in the same statement. For example
in MIR generated for compound assignment x += a (when overflow checks
are disabled).
Use stable metric for const eval limit instead of current terminator-based logic
This patch adds a `MirPass` that inserts a new MIR instruction `ConstEvalCounter` to any loops and function calls in the CFG. This instruction is used during Const Eval to count against the `const_eval_limit`, and emit the `StepLimitReached` error, replacing the current logic which uses Terminators only.
The new method of counting loops and function calls should be more stable across compiler versions (i.e., not cause crates that compiled successfully before, to no longer compile when changes to the MIR generation/optimization are made).
Also see: #103877
Special-case deriving `PartialOrd` for enums with dataless variants
I was able to get slightly better codegen by flipping the derived `PartialOrd` logic for two-variant enums. I also tried to document the implementation of the derive macro to make the special-case logic a little clearer.
```rs
#[derive(PartialEq, PartialOrd)]
pub enum A<T> {
A,
B(T)
}
```
```diff
impl<T: ::core::cmp::PartialOrd> ::core::cmp::PartialOrd for A<T> {
#[inline]
fn partial_cmp(
&self,
other: &A<T>,
) -> ::core::option::Option<::core::cmp::Ordering> {
let __self_tag = ::core::intrinsics::discriminant_value(self);
let __arg1_tag = ::core::intrinsics::discriminant_value(other);
- match ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(&__self_tag, &__arg1_tag) {
- ::core::option::Option::Some(::core::cmp::Ordering::Equal) => {
- match (self, other) {
- (A::B(__self_0), A::B(__arg1_0)) => {
- ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(__self_0, __arg1_0)
- }
- _ => ::core::option::Option::Some(::core::cmp::Ordering::Equal),
- }
+ match (self, other) {
+ (A::B(__self_0), A::B(__arg1_0)) => {
+ ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(__self_0, __arg1_0)
}
- cmp => cmp,
+ _ => ::core::cmp::PartialOrd::partial_cmp(&__self_tag, &__arg1_tag),
}
}
}
```
Godbolt: [Current](https://godbolt.org/z/GYjEzG1T8), [New](https://godbolt.org/z/GoK78qx15)
I'm not sure how common a case comparing two enums like this (such as `Option`) is, and if it's worth the slowdown of adding a special case to the derive. If it causes overall regressions it might be worth just manually implementing this for `Option`.
The code originally correctly erased the regions of the type it passed
to the newly created infcx. But after the `fn_sig` query was made to
return an `EarlyBinder<T>`, some substs that were around were
substituted there without erasing their regions. They were then passed
into the newly cerated infcx, which caused the ICE.
Improve unexpected close and mismatch delimiter hint in TokenTreesReader
Fixes#103882Fixes#68987Fixes#69259
The inner indentation mismatching will be covered by outer block, the new added function `report_error_prone_delim_block` will find out the error prone candidates for reporting.
Remove overlapping parts of multipart suggestions
This PR adds a debug assertion that the parts of a single substitution cannot overlap, fixes a overlapping substitution from the testsuite, and fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106870.
Note that a single suggestion can still have multiple overlapping substitutions / possible edits, we just don't suggest overlapping replacements in a single edit anymore.
I've also included a fix for an unrelated bug where rustfix for `explicit_outlives_requirements` would produce multiple trailing commas for a where clause.
internally change regions to be covariant
Surprisingly, we consider the reference type `&'a T` to be contravaraint in its lifetime parameter. This is confusing and conflicts with the documentation we have in the reference, rustnomicon, and rustc-dev-guide. This also arguably not the correct use of terminology since we can use `&'static u8` in a place where `&' a u8` is expected, this implies that `&'static u8 <: &' a u8` and consequently `'static <: ' a`, hence covariance.
Because of this, when relating two types, we used to switch the argument positions in a confusing way:
`Subtype(&'a u8 <: &'b u8) => Subtype('b <: 'a) => Outlives('a: 'b) => RegionSubRegion('b <= 'a)`
The reason for the current behavior is probably that we wanted `Subtype('b <: 'a)` and `RegionSubRegion('b <= 'a)` to be equivalent, but I don' t think this is a good reason since these relations are sufficiently different in that the first is a relation in the subtyping lattice and is intrinsic to the type-systems, while the the second relation is an implementation detail of regionck.
This PR changes this behavior to use covariance, so..
`Subtype(&'a u8 <: &'b u8) => Subtype('a <: 'b) => Outlives('a: 'b) => RegionSubRegion('b <= 'a) `
Resolves#103676
r? `@lcnr`
Correct suggestions for closure arguments that need a borrow
Fixes#107301 by dealing with binders correctly
Fixes another issue where we were suggesting adding just `&` when we expected `&mut _` in a closure arg
Recover from more const arguments that are not wrapped in curly braces
Recover from some array, borrow, tuple & arithmetic expressions in const argument positions that lack curly braces and provide a suggestion to fix the issue continuing where #92884 left off. Examples of such expressions: `[]`, `[0]`, `[1, 2]`, `[0; 0xff]`, `&9`, `("", 0)` and `(1 + 2) * 3` (we previously did not recover from them).
I am not entirely happy with my current solution because the code that recovers from `[0]` (coinciding with a malformed slice type) and `[0; 0]` (coinciding with a malformed array type) is quite fragile as the aforementioned snippets are actually successfully parsed as types by `parse_ty` since it itself already recovers from them (returning `[⟨error⟩]` and `[⟨error⟩; 0]` respectively) meaning I have to manually look for `TyKind::Err`s and construct a separate diagnostic for the suggestion to attach to (thereby emitting two diagnostics in total).
Fixes#81698.
`@rustbot` label A-diagnostics
r? diagnostics
A definition does not dominate a use in the same statement. For example
in MIR generated for compound assignment x += a (when overflow checks
are disabled).
make `output_filenames` a real query
part of #105462
This may be a perf regression and is not obviously the right way forward. We may store this information in the resolver after freezing it for example.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106904 (Preserve split DWARF files when building archives.)
- #106971 (Handle diagnostics customization on the fluent side (for one specific diagnostic))
- #106978 (Migrate mir_build's borrow conflicts)
- #107150 (`ty::tls` cleanups)
- #107168 (Use a type-alias-impl-trait in `ObligationForest`)
- #107189 (Encode info for Adt in a single place.)
- #107322 (Custom mir: Add support for some remaining, easy to support constructs)
- #107323 (Disable ConstGoto opt in cleanup blocks)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Migrate mir_build's borrow conflicts
This also changes the error message slightly, for two reasons:
- I'm not a fan of saying "value borrowed, by `x`, here"
- it simplifies the error implementation significantly.
Move format_args!() into AST (and expand it during AST lowering)
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/541
This moves FormatArgs from rustc_builtin_macros to rustc_ast_lowering. For now, the end result is the same. But this allows for future changes to do smarter things with format_args!(). It also allows Clippy to directly access the ast::FormatArgs, making things a lot easier.
This change turns the format args types into lang items. The builtin macro used to refer to them by their path. After this change, the path is no longer relevant, making it easier to make changes in `core`.
This updates clippy to use the new language items, but this doesn't yet make clippy use the ast::FormatArgs structure that's now available. That should be done after this is merged.
Use `can_eq` to compare types for default assoc type error
This correctly handles inference variables like `{integer}`. I had to move all of this `note_and_explain` code to `rustc_infer`, it made no sense for it to be in `rustc_middle` anyways.
The commits are reviewed separately.
Fixes#106968
impl DispatchFromDyn for Cell and UnsafeCell
After some fruitful discussion on [Internals](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-dispatchfromdyn-for-cell-2/16520) here's my first PR to rust-lang/rust 🎉
Please let me know if there's something I missed.
This adds `DispatchFromDyn` impls for `Cell`, `UnsafeCell` and `SyncUnsafeCell`.
An existing test is also expanded to test the `Cell` impl (which requires the `UnsafeCell` impl)
The different `RefCell` types can not implement `DispatchFromDyn` since they have more than one (non ZST) field.
**Edit:**
### What:
These changes allow one to make types like `MyRc`(code below), to be object safe method receivers after implementing `DispatchFromDyn` and `Deref` for them.
This allows for code like this:
```rust
struct MyRc<T: ?Sized>(Cell<NonNull<RcBox<T>>>);
/* impls for DispatchFromDyn, CoerceUnsized and Deref for MyRc*/
trait Trait {
fn foo(self: MyRc<Self>);
}
let impls_trait = ...;
let rc = MyRc::new(impls_trait) as MyRc<dyn Trait>;
rc.foo();
```
Note: `Cell` and `UnsafeCell` won't directly become valid method receivers since they don't implement `Deref`. Making use of these changes requires a wrapper type and nightly features.
### Why:
A custom pointer type with interior mutability allows one to store extra information in the pointer itself.
These changes allow for such a type to be a method receiver.
### Examples:
My use case is a cycle aware custom `Rc` implementation that when dropping a cycle marks some references dangling.
On the [forum](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/impl-dispatchfromdyn-for-cell/14762/8) andersk mentioned that they track if a `Gc` reference is rooted with an extra bit in the reference itself.
Fix escaping inference var ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`
Fixes#107158
`point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type` uses `lookup_probe` to adjust the self type of a method receiver -- but that method returns inference variables from inside a probe. That means that the ty vars are no longer valid, so we can't use any infcx methods on them.
Also, pass some extra span info to hack a quick solution to bad labels, resulting in this diagnostic improvement:
```rust
fn example2() {
let mut x = vec![1];
x.push("");
}
```
```diff
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:5:12
|
5 | x.push("");
| ---- ^^
| | |
| | expected integer, found `&str`
- | | this is of type `&'static str`, which causes `x` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>`
| arguments to this method are incorrect
```
(since that "which causes `x` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>` part is wrong)
r? `@estebank`
(we really should make this code better in general, cc #106590, but that's a bit bigger issue that needs some more thinking about)
Teach parser to understand fake anonymous enum syntax
Parse `Ty | OtherTy` in function argument and return types.
Parse type ascription in top level patterns.
Minimally address #100741.
Suggest using a lock for `*Cell: Sync` bounds
I mostly did this for `OnceCell<T>` at first because users will be confused to see that the `OnceCell<T>` in `std` isn't `Sync` but then extended it to `Cell<T>` and `RefCell<T>` as well.
Add hint for missing lifetime bound on trait object when type alias is used
Fix issue #103582.
The problem: When a type alias is used to specify the return type of the method in a trait impl, the suggestion for fixing the problem of "missing lifetime bound on trait object" of the trait impl will not be created. The issue caused by the code which searches for the return trait objects when constructing the hint suggestion is not able to find the trait objects since they are specified in the type alias path instead of the return path of the trait impl.
The solution: Trace the trait objects in the type alias path and provide them along with the alias span to generate the suggestion in case the type alias is used in return type of the method in the trait impl.
Add suggestion to remove if in let..else block
Adds an additional hint to failures where we encounter an else keyword while we're parsing an if-let expression.
This is likely that the user has accidentally mixed if-let and let..else together.
Fixes#103791.
- On compiler-error's suggestion of moving this lower down the stack,
along the path of `report_mismatched_types()`, which is used
by `rustc_hir_analysis` and `rustc_hir_typeck`.
- update ui tests, add test
- add suggestions for references to fn pointers
- modify `TypeErrCtxt::same_type_modulo_infer` to take `T: relate::Relate` instead of `Ty`
Adds an additional hint to failures where we encounter an else keyword
while we're parsing an if-let block.
This is likely that the user has accidentally mixed if-let and let...else
together.
remove error code from `E0789`, add UI test/docs
`E0789` shouldn't have an error code, it's explicitly internal-only and is tiny in scope. (I wonder if we can tighten the standard for this in the RFC?) I also added a UI test and error docs (done like `E0208`, they are "no longer emitted").
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` (shouldn't need a compiler review, it's pretty minor)
Consider doc(alias) when providing typo suggestions
This means that
```rust
impl Foo {
#[doc(alias = "quux")]
fn bar(&self) {}
}
fn main() {
(Foo {}).quux();
}
```
will suggest `bar`. This currently uses the "there is a method with a similar name" help text, because the point where we choose and emit a suggestion is different from where we gather the suggestions. Changes have mainly been made to the latter.
The selection code will now fall back to aliased candidates, but generally only if there is no candidate that matches based on the existing Levenshtein methodology.
Fixes#83968.
This means that
```rust
impl Foo {
#[doc(alias = "quux")]
fn bar(&self) {}
}
fn main() {
(Foo {}).quux();
}
```
will suggest `bar`. This currently uses the "there is a method with a
similar name" help text, because the point where we choose and emit a
suggestion is different from where we gather the suggestions. Changes
have mainly been made to the latter.
The selection code will now fall back to aliased candidates, but
generally only if there is no candidate that matches based on the
existing Levenshtein methodology.
Fixes#83968.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103418 (Add `SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS` to future-incompat report)
- #106113 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API change)
- #106144 (Improve the documentation of `black_box`)
- #106578 (Label closure captures/generator locals that make opaque types recursive)
- #106749 (Update cc to 1.0.77)
- #106935 (Fix `SingleUseLifetime` ICE)
- #107015 (Re-enable building rust-analyzer on riscv64)
- #107029 (Add new bootstrap members to triagebot.toml)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `SEMICOLON_IN_EXPRESSIONS_FROM_MACROS` to future-incompat report
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79813 for a discussion of this lint. This has been warn-by-default for over a year, so adding it to the future-incompat report should help to find libraries that haven't yet updated.
Revert "Make PROC_MACRO_DERIVE_RESOLUTION_FALLBACK a hard error"
This reverts commit 7d82cadd97 aka PR #84022
I am doing this to buy us some time with respect to issue #106337 w.r.t. the 1.67 release.
Remap paths in UI tests by default
If you think this needs further discussions / something RFC-like, please let me know the best forum for that.
This PR runs UI tests with a remapped "src base" directory by default.
Why? Because some UI tests currently depend on the length of the absolute path to the `src/test/ui` directory. Remapping makes the tests independent of the absolute path.
The path to the source file (which is absolute on CI) is part of the type name of closures. `rustc` diagnostic output depends on the length of type names (long type names are truncated). So a long absolute path leads to long closure type names, which leads to truncation and changed diagnostics.
(I initially tried just disabling type name truncation, but that made some error messages stupid long (thousands of characters, IIRC)).
Additional changes:
* All boolean `compiletest` directives now support explicit `no-` versions to disable them.
* Adapt existing tests when necessary:
* Disable remapping for individual tests that fail with it enabled (when there's no obvious alternative fix).
* For tests that already check something remapping related switch to the new option unless we gain something significant by keeping the manual remap.
Passed Windows CI in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/actions/runs/3933100590
Implement some more new solver candidates and fix some bugs
First, fix some bugs:
1. `IndexVec::drain_enumerated(a..b)` does not give us an iterator of index keys + items enumerated from `a..b`, but from `0..(b-a)`... That caused a bug. See first commit for the fix.
2. Implement the `_: Trait` ambiguity hack. I put it in assemble, let me know if it should live elsewhere. This is important, since we otherwise consider `_: Sized` to have no solutions, and nothing passes!
3. Swap `Ambiguity` and `Unimplemented` cases for the new solver. Sorry for accidentally swapping them 😄
4. Check GATs' own predicates during projection confirmation.
Then implement a few builtin traits:
5. Implement `PointerSized`. Pretty independent.
6. Implement `Fn` family of traits for fnptr, fndef, and closures. Closures are currently broken because `FulfillCtxt::relationships` is intentionally left unimplemented. See comment in the test.
r? ```@lcnr```
Change `bindings_with_variant_name` to deny-by-default
Changed the `bindings_with_variant_name` lint to deny-by-default and fixed up the affected tests.
Addresses #103442.
[drop tracking] Visit break expressions
This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102383 by remembering to visit the expression in `break expr` when building the drop tracking CFG. Missing this step was causing an off-by-one error which meant after a number of awaits we'd be
looking for dropped values at the wrong point in the code.
Additionally, this changes the order of traversal for assignment expressions to visit the rhs and then the lhs. This matches what is done elsewhere.
Finally, this improves some of the debugging output (for example, the CFG visualizer) to make it easier to figure out these sorts of issues.
Added const-generic ui test case for issue #106419
This PR adds a test case for #106419 which has been fixed in master by #105292
I also ran the test on f769d34291 (the commit before #105292 was merged)
and it did fail there with the following output.
```
--- stderr -------------------------------
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> /home/patrikk/src/rust/src/test/ui/const-generics/issue-106419-struct-with-multiple-const-params.rs:5:10
|
LL | #[derive(Clone)]
| ^^^^^
| |
| expected `A`, found `B`
| expected `Bar<A, B>` because of return type
|
= note: expected struct `Bar<A, _>`
found struct `Bar<B, _>`
= note: this error originates in the derive macro `Clone` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0308`.
------------------------------------------
```
Recognise double-equals homoglyph
Recognise `⩵` as a homoglyph for `==`.
The first commit switches `char` to `&str`, as all previous homoglyphs corresponded to a single ASCII character, while the second implements the fix.
`@rustbot` label +A-diagnostics +A-parser
Don't treat closures from other crates as local
fixes#104817
r? `@lcnr`
Specialization can prefer an impl for an opaque type over a blanket impls that also matches. If the blanket impl only applies if an auto-trait applies, we look at the hidden type of the opaque type to see if that implements the auto trait. The hidden type can be a closure or generator, and thus we will end up seeing these types in coherence and have to handle them properly.
Don't wf-check non-local RPITs
We were using `ty::is_impl_trait_defn(..).is_none()` to check if we need to add WF obligations for an opaque type.
This is *supposed* to be checking if the type is a TAIT, since RPITs' wfness is implied by wf checking its parent item, but since `is_impl_trait_defn` returns `None` for non-local RPIT and async futures, we unnecessarily consider wf predicates for an RPIT if it is coming from a foreign crate.
Fixes#107036
r? `@oli-obk` but feel free to reassign
even more unify Projection/Opaque handling in region outlives code
edit: This continues ate the same pace as #106829. New changes are described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106910#issuecomment-1383251254.
~This touches `OutlivesBound`, `Component`, `GenericKind` enums.~
r? `@oli-obk` (because of overlap with #95474)
document + UI test `E0208` and make its output more user-friendly
Cleans up `E0208`'s output a lot. It could actually be useful for someone learning about variance now. I also added a UI test for it in `tests/ui/error-codes/` and wrote some docs for it.
r? `@GuillaumeGomez` another error code, can't be bothered to find the issue :P. Obviously there's some compiler stuff, so you'll have to hand it off.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61137.
make `CastError::NeedsDeref` create a `MachineApplicable` suggestion
Fixes#106903
Simple impl for the linked issue. I also made some other small changes:
- `CastError::ErrorGuaranteed` now owns an actual `ErrorGuaranteed`. This better enforces the static guarantees of `ErrorGuaranteed`.
- `CastError::NeedDeref` code simplified a bit, we now just suggest the `*`, instead of the whole expression as well.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105796 (rustdoc: simplify JS search routine by not messing with lev distance)
- #106753 (Make sure that RPITITs are not considered suggestable)
- #106917 (Encode const mir for closures if they're const)
- #107004 (Implement some candidates for the new solver (redux))
- #107023 (Stop using `BREAK` & `CONTINUE` in compiler)
- #107030 (Correct typo)
- #107042 (rustdoc: fix corner cases with "?" JS keyboard command)
- #107045 (rustdoc: remove redundant CSS rule `#settings .setting-line`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Revert "Improve heuristics whether `format_args` string is a source literal"
This reverts commit e6c02aad93 (from #106195).
Keeps the code improvements from the PR and the test (as a known-bug).
Works around #106408 while a proper fix is discussed more thoroughly in #106505, as proposed by `@tmandry.`
Reopens#106191
r? compiler-errors
Do not filter substs in `remap_generic_params_to_declaration_params`.
The relevant filtering should have been performed by borrowck.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105826
r? types
dont randomly use `_` to print out const generic arguments
const generics seem to get printed out as `_` for no reason a lot of the time, as someone who spends a lot of time with const generics this has gotten ✨ very annoying ✨. Latest example would be #106423 where the ICE messaged formatted a `ty::Const` containing no infer vars, as `_`.
For some reason printing of the const argument on arrays was custom instead of using the existing logic for printing `ty::Const`. Additionally the existing logic for printing `ty::Const` would print out `_` for anon consts that are in a separate crate leading to weird diagnostics (see second commit). There ought to be less cases of consts randomly getting printed as `_` hiding valuable info now.
Add 'static lifetime suggestion when GAT implied 'static requirement from HRTB
Fix for issue #105507
The problem:
When generic associated types (GATs) are from higher-ranked trait bounds (HRTB), they are implied 'static requirement (see
[Implied 'static requirement from higher-ranked trait bounds](https://blog.rust-lang.org/2022/10/28/gats-stabilization.html#implied-static-requirement-from-higher-ranked-trait-bounds) for more details). If the user did not explicitly specify the `'static` lifetime when using the GAT, the current error message will only point out the type `does not live long enough` where the type is used, but not where the GAT is specified and how to fix the problem.
The solution:
Add notes at the span where the problematic GATs are specified and suggestions of how to fix the problem by adding `'static` lifetime at the right spans.
Constify `TypeId` ordering impls
Tracking issue: #101871
Adding const ordering to `TypeId` allows rtti crates to optimize some casting scenarios (without transmuting to `u64`). This would also prevent these crates from breaking if the underlying type is changed from `u64` to something different.
Feature gate: `#![feature(const_cmp_type_id)]`
fix: don't emit `E0711` if `staged_api` not enabled
Fixes#106589
Simple fix, added UI test.
As an aside, it seems a lot of features are susceptible to this, `E0711` stands out to me because it's perma-unstable and we are effectively exposing an implementation detail.
make error emitted on `impl &Trait` nicer
Fixes#106694
Turned out to be simpler than I thought, also added UI test.
Before: ([playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=9bda53271ef3a8886793cf427b8cea91))
```text
error: expected one of `:`, ``@`,` or `|`, found `)`
--> src/main.rs:2:22
|
2 | fn foo(_: impl &Trait) {}
| ^ expected one of `:`, ``@`,` or `|`
|
= note: anonymous parameters are removed in the 2018 edition (see RFC 1685)
help: if this is a parameter name, give it a type
|
2 | fn foo(_: impl Trait: &TypeName) {}
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
help: if this is a type, explicitly ignore the parameter name
|
2 | fn foo(_: impl _: &Trait) {}
| ++
error: expected one of `!`, `(`, `)`, `,`, `?`, `for`, `~`, lifetime, or path, found `&`
--> src/main.rs:2:16
|
2 | fn foo(_: impl &Trait) {}
| -^ expected one of 9 possible tokens
| |
| help: missing `,`
error: expected one of `!`, `(`, `,`, `=`, `>`, `?`, `for`, `~`, lifetime, or path, found `&`
--> src/main.rs:3:11
|
3 | fn bar<T: &Trait>(_: T) {}
| ^ expected one of 10 possible tokens
```
After:
```text
error: expected a trait, found type
--> <anon>:2:16
|
2 | fn foo(_: impl &Trait) {}
| -^^^^^
| |
| help: consider removing the indirection
error: expected a trait, found type
--> <anon>:3:11
|
3 | fn bar<T: &Trait>(_: T) {}
| -^^^^^
| |
| help: consider removing the indirection
```
suggestion for attempted integer identifier in patterns
Fixes#106552
Implemented a suggestion on `E0005` that occurs when no bindings are present and the pattern is a literal integer.
Heuristically undo path prefix mappings.
Because the compiler produces better diagnostics if it can find the source of (potentially remapped) dependencies.
The new test fails without the other changes in this PR. Let me know if you have better suggestions for the test directory. I moved the existing remapping test to be in the same location as the new one.
Some more context: I'm exploring running UI tests with remapped paths by default in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105924 and this was one of the issues discovered.
This may also be useful in the context of https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3127 ("New rustc and Cargo options to allow path sanitisation by default").
Emit only one nbsp error per file
Fixes#106101.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106098 for an explanation of how someone would end up with a large number of these nbsp characters in their source code, which is why I think rustc needs to handle this specific case in a friendlier way.
suggest `is_empty` for collections when casting to `bool`
Fixes#106883
Matches on slices, `String` and `str`. It would be nice to do this with something like `Deref<Target=str>` as well, but AFAIK it's not possible in this part of the compiler.
Consolidate two almost duplicated fn info extraction routines
Moves `extract_callable_info` up to trait selection, because it was being (almost) duplicated fully there for similar diagnostic purposes. This also generalizes the diagnostics we can give slightly (see UI test).
Suggestion for type mismatch when we need a u8 but the programmer wrote a char literal
Today Rust just points out that we have a char and we need a u8, but if I wrote 'A' then I could fix this by just writing b'A' instead. This code should detect the case where we're about to report a type mismatch of this kind, and the programmer wrote a char literal, and the char they wrote is ASCII, so therefore just prefixing b to make a byte literal will do what they meant.
I have definitely written this mistake more than once, it's not difficult to figure out what to do, but the compiler might as well tell us anyway.
I provided a test with two simple examples where the suggestion is appropriate, and one where it is not because the char literal is not ASCII, showing that the suggestion is only triggered in the former cases.
I have contributed only a small typo doc fix before, so this is my first substantive rustc change.
