Downgrade const eval dangling ptr in final to future incompat lint
Short term band-aid for issue #121610, downgrading the prior hard error to a future-incompat lint (tracked in issue #122153).
Note we should not mark #121610 as resolved until after this (or something analogous) is beta backported.
extend docs of -Zprint-mono-items
Currently the values one can set this to are not documented anywhere.
I think ideally this flag wouldn't overwrite the collector's behavior, a "print" flag should just print what happens but not change what happens. But our codegen-units tests rely on being able to collect all items without the other side-effects of `-C link-dead-code` and I can't tell whether that reliance is incidental or crucial, so I'm not touching this and just documenting the (messy) status quo.
Safe Transmute: Require that source referent is smaller than destination
`BikeshedIntrinsicFrom` currently models transmute-via-union; i.e., it attempts to provide a `where` bound for this function:
```rust
pub unsafe fn transmute_via_union<Src, Dst>(src: Src) -> Dst {
use core::mem::*;
#[repr(C)]
union Transmute<T, U> {
src: ManuallyDrop<T>,
dst: ManuallyDrop<U>,
}
let transmute = Transmute { src: ManuallyDrop::new(src) };
// SAFETY: The caller must guarantee that the transmutation is safe.
let dst = transmute.dst;
ManuallyDrop::into_inner(dst)
}
```
A quirk of this model is that it admits padding extensions in value-to-value transmutation: The destination type can be bigger than the source type, so long as the excess consists of uninitialized bytes. However, this isn't permissible for reference-to-reference transmutations (introduced in #110662) — extra referent bytes cannot come from thin air.
This PR patches our analysis for reference-to-reference transmutations to require that the destination referent is no larger than the source referent.
r? `@compiler-errors`
pattern analysis: remove `MaybeInfiniteInt::JustAfterMax`
It was inherited from before half-open ranges, but it doesn't pull its weight anymore. We lose a tiny bit of diagnostic precision as can be seen in the test. I'm generally in favor of half-open ranges over explicit `x..=MAX` ranges anyway.
pattern analysis: rename a few types
A few long overdue renames. `ValidityConstraint` was supposed to serve double purpose but I don't need that anymore. I don't know what I was thinking with `TypeCx` I think I was trying to be clever. That's fixed now 😄
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Fix StableMIR `WrappingRange::is_full` computation
`WrappingRange::is_full` computation assumed that to be full the range couldn't wrap, which is not necessarily true.
For example, a range of 1..=0 is a valid representation of a full wrapping range.
compiletest: Allow `only-unix` in test headers
The header `ignore-unix` is already allowed. Also extend tests.
This is needed by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121573 which I am splitting up into smaller and more digestible PRs.
The source referent absolutely must be smaller than the destination
referent of a ref-to-ref transmute; the excess bytes referenced
cannot arise from thin air, even if those bytes are uninitialized.
Represent `Result<usize, Box<T>>` as ScalarPair(i64, ptr)
This allows types like `Result<usize, std::io::Error>` (and integers of differing sign, e.g. `Result<u64, i64>`) to be passed in a pair of registers instead of through memory, like `Result<u64, u64>` or `Result<Box<T>, Box<U>>` are today.
Fixes#97540.
r? `@ghost`
I attempted to do this in a manner that preserved the line numbers to reduce the
review effort on the resulting diff, but we still have to deal with the
ramifications of how a future-incompat lint behaves compared to a hard-error (in
terms of its impact on the diagnostic output).
delay expand macro bang when there has indeterminate path
Related #98291
I will attempt to clarify the root problem through several examples:
Firstly,
```rs
// rustc code.rs --edition=2018
macro_rules! wrap {
() => {
macro_rules! _a {
() => {
"Hello world"
};
}
};
}
wrap!();
use _a as a;
fn main() {
format_args!(_a!());
}
```
The above case will compile successfully because `_a` is defined after the `wrap` expaned, ensuring `_a` can be resolved without any issues.
And,
```rs
// rustc code.rs --edition=2018
macro_rules! wrap {
() => {
macro_rules! _a {
() => {
"Hello world"
};
}
};
}
wrap!();
use _a as a;
fn main() {
format_args!("{}", a!());
}
```
The above example will also compile successfully because the `parse_args` in `expand_format_args_impl` will return a value `MacroInput { fmtstr: Expr::Lit::Str, args: [Expr::MacroCall]}`. Since the graph for `args` will be build lately, `a` will eventually be resolved.
However, in the case of:
```rs
// rustc code.rs --edition=2018
macro_rules! wrap {
() => {
macro_rules! _a {
() => {
"Hello world"
};
}
};
}
wrap!();
use _a as a;
fn main() {
format_args!(a!());
}
```
The result of `parse_args` is `MacroInput {fmtstr: Expr::Lit::Macro, args: [] }`, we attempt to expand `fmtstr` **eagerly** within `expr_to_spanned_string`. Although we have recorded `(root, _a)` into resolutions, `use _a as a` is an indeterminate import, which will not try to resolve under the conditions of `expander.monotonic = false`.
Therefore, I've altered the strategy for resolving indeterminate imports, ensuring it will also resolve during eager expansion. This could be a significant change to the resolution infra. However, I think it's acceptable if the goal of avoiding resolution under eager expansion is to save time.
r? `@petrochenkov`
miri: add some chance to reuse addresses of previously freed allocations
The hope is that this can help us find ABA issues.
Unfortunately this needs rustc changes so I can't easily run the regular benchmark suite. I used `src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs` as a substitute:
```
Before:
Benchmark 1: ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs --args --edition=2021
Time (mean ± σ): 9.570 s ± 0.013 s [User: 9.279 s, System: 0.290 s]
Range (min … max): 9.561 s … 9.579 s 2 runs
After:
Benchmark 1: ./x.py run miri --stage 0 --args src/tools/miri/tests/pass/float_nan.rs --args --edition=2021
Time (mean ± σ): 9.698 s ± 0.046 s [User: 9.413 s, System: 0.279 s]
Range (min … max): 9.666 s … 9.731 s 2 runs
```
That's a ~1.3% slowdown, which seems fine to me. I have seen a lot of noise in this style of benchmarking so I don't quite trust this anyway; we can make further experiments in the Miri repo after this migrated there.
r? `@oli-obk`
`WrappingRange::is_full` computation assumed that to be full the range
couldn't wrap, which is not necessarily true.
For example, a range of 1..=0 is a valid representation of a full
wrapping range.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #121820 (pattern analysis: Store field indices in `DeconstructedPat` to avoid virtual wildcards)
- #121908 (match lowering: don't collect test alternatives ahead of time)
- #122203 (Add `intrinsic_name` to get plain intrinsic name)
- #122226 (coverage: Remove or migrate all unstable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage`)
- #122255 (Use `min_exhaustive_patterns` in core & std)
- #122360 ( Don't Create `ParamCandidate` When Obligation Contains Errors )
- #122383 (Enable PR tracking review assignment for rust-lang/rust)
- #122386 (Move `Once` implementations to `sys`)
- #122400 (Fix ICE in diagnostics for parenthesized type arguments)
- #122410 (rustdoc: do not preload fonts when browsing locally)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc: do not preload fonts when browsing locally
First PR, please let me know if I'm doing anything wrong.
As noted in #98769, currently `cargo doc --open` on macOS/Safari (17.2.1) doesn't load fonts due to a CORS issue. (webkit issue [here](https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249887)). This patch moves the font preloads inside a js if statement as suggested in the GitHub issue.
I tried something more elegant with iterating over a tera array of fonts, but ran into issues, so here's the dumb fix. Only thing to note is that the font path is interpolated into a template string, so HTML escaping works fine, but it will break if there's a backtick or `${` in the font path. Not sure if this is a big deal.
Enable PR tracking review assignment for rust-lang/rust
This flag enables tracking pull requests review assignment to Rust contributors.
The URL pointing to the documentation will become real once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-forge/pull/729 is merged
r? ``@jackh726``
cc: ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Don't Create `ParamCandidate` When Obligation Contains Errors
Fixes#121941
I'm not sure if I understand this correctly but this bug was caused by an error type incorrectly matching against `ParamCandidate`. This was introduced by the changes made in #72621 (figured using cargo-bisect-rustc).
This PR fixes it by skipping `ParamCandidate` generation when an error type is involved. Also, this is similar to #73005 but addresses `ParamCandidate` instead of `ImplCandidate`.
Use `min_exhaustive_patterns` in core & std
[`min_exhaustive_patterns`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119612) provides a subset of the functionality of [`exhaustive_patterns`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51085) which is likely to be stabilized much earlier than the full feature.
The subset covers all the compiler and std use cases. `compiler/` [already uses it](9dd6eda778); this PR switches `std` over.
coverage: Remove or migrate all unstable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage`
(This PR was substantially overhauled from its original version, which migrated all of the existing unstable values intact.)
This PR takes the three nightly-only values that are currently accepted by `-Cinstrument-coverage`, completely removes two of them (`except-unused-functions` and `except-unused-generics`), and migrates the third (`branch`) over to a newly-introduced unstable flag `-Zcoverage-options`.
I have a few motivations for wanting to do this:
- It's unclear whether anyone actually uses the `except-unused-*` values, so this serves as an opportunity to either remove them, or prompt existing users to object to their removal.
- After #117199, the stable values of `-Cinstrument-coverage` treat it as a boolean-valued flag, so having nightly-only extra values feels out-of-place.
- Nightly-only values also require extra ad-hoc code to make sure they aren't accidentally exposed to stable users.
- The new system allows multiple different settings to be toggled independently, which isn't possible in the current single-value system.
- The new system makes it easier to introduce new behaviour behind an unstable toggle, and then gather nightly-user feedback before possibly making it the default behaviour for all users.
- The new system also gives us a convenient place to put relatively-narrow options that won't ever be the default, but that nightly users might still want access to.
- It's likely that we will eventually want to give stable users more fine-grained control over coverage instrumentation. The new flag serves as a prototype of what that stable UI might eventually look like.
The `branch` option is a placeholder that currently does nothing. It will be used by #122322 to opt into branch coverage instrumentation.
---
I see `-Zcoverage-options` as something that will exist more-or-less indefinitely, though individual sub-options might come and go as appropriate. I think there will always be some demand for nightly-only toggles, so I don't see `-Zcoverage-options` itself ever being stable, though we might eventually stabilize something similar to it.
