On function and method calls in patterns, link to the book
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> f889.rs:3:13
|
3 | let (x, y.drop()) = (1, 2);
| ^^^^^^^^ not a pattern
|
= note: arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
error[E0532]: expected a pattern, found a function call
--> f889.rs:2:13
|
2 | let (x, drop(y)) = (1, 2);
| ^^^^ not a tuple struct or tuple variant
|
= note: function calls are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
```
Fix#97200.
Do not consider match/let/ref of place that evaluates to `!` to diverge, disallow coercions from them too
Fixes#117288.
This PR implements a heuristic which disables two things that are currently being performed on the HIR when we have **expressions that involve place-like expressions that point to `!`**. Specifically, it will (in certain cases explained below):
### (1.) Disable the `NeverToAny` coercion we implicitly insert for `!`.
Which fixes this inadvertent, sneaky unsoundness:
```
unsafe {
let x: *const ! = &0 as *const u8 as *const !;
let _: () = *x;
}
```
which is UB because currently rust emits an *implicit* NeverToAny coercion even though we really shouldn't be, since there's no read of the value pointed by `x`.
### (2.) Disable the logic which considers expression which evaluate to `!` to diverge, which affects the type returned by the containing block.
Which fixes this unsoundness:
```
fn make_up_a_value<T>() -> T {
unsafe {
let x: *const ! = &0 as *const u8 as *const !;
let _ = *x;
}
}
```
We disable these two operations **if** the expression is a place-like expression (locals, statics, field projections, index operations, and deref operations), and if the parent expression is either:
(1.) the LHS of an assignment
(2.) AddrOf
(3.) A match or let **unless** all of the *patterns consitute a read*, which is explained below:
And finally, a pattern currently is considered to constitute a read **unless** it is a wildcard, or an OR pattern. An OR pattern is considered to constitute a read if all of its subpatterns constitute a read, to remain as conservative as possible in cases like `_ | subpat` or `subpat | _`.
All other patterns are considered currently to constitute a read. Specifically, because `NeverToAny` is a coercion performed on a *value* and not a *place*, `Struct { .. }` on a `!` type must be a coercion currently, and we currently rely on this behavior to allow us to perform coercions like `let _: i32 = x;` where `x: !`.
This is already considered UB by [miri](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=daf3a2246433fe43fdc07d1389c276c9), but also means it does not affect the preexisting UB in this case:
```
let Struct { .. } = *never_ptr;
```
Even though it's likely up for debate since we're not actually reading any data out of the struct, it almost certainly causes inference changes which I do *NOT* want to fix in this PR.
```
error: expected a pattern, found an expression
--> f889.rs:3:13
|
3 | let (x, y.drop()) = (1, 2); //~ ERROR
| ^^^^^^^^ not a pattern
|
= note: arbitrary expressions are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
error[E0532]: expected a pattern, found a function call
--> f889.rs:2:13
|
2 | let (x, drop(y)) = (1, 2); //~ ERROR
| ^^^^ not a tuple struct or tuple variant
|
= note: function calls are not allowed in patterns: <https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-00-patterns.html>
```
Fix#97200.
Initial support for riscv32{e|em|emc}_unknown_none_elf
We have a research prototype of an RV32EMC target and have been successfully running the e, em, emc programs on it. I'm hoping upstreaming this configuration would make the target maintenance slightly easier.
Configuration is based on the respective {i, im, imc} variants. As defined in RISC-V Unprivileged Spec. 20191213, the only change in RVE wrt. RVI is to reduce the number of integer registers to 16 (x0-x15), which also implies
- 2 callee saved registers instead of 12
- 32-bit / 4-byte stack alignment instead of 128 bits / 16 bytes
My initial presumption is that this will not impact how the target is defined for the compiler but only becomes relevant at the runtime level. I am willing to investigate, though.
EDIT: LLVM is now told about the presumed 32-bit stack alignment.
`@Disasm` `@romancardenas`
Make opaque types regular HIR nodes
Having opaque types as HIR owner introduces all sorts of complications. This PR proposes to make them regular HIR nodes instead.
I haven't gone through all the test changes yet, so there may be a few surprises.
Many thanks to `@camelid` for the first draft.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129023Fixes#129099Fixes#125843Fixes#119716Fixes#121422
Account for `impl Trait {` when `impl Trait for Type {` was intended
On editions where bare traits are never allowed, detect if the user has written `impl Trait` with no type, silence any dyn-compatibility errors, and provide a structured suggestion for the potentially missing type:
```
error[E0782]: trait objects must include the `dyn` keyword
--> $DIR/missing-for-type-in-impl.rs:8:6
|
LL | impl Foo<i64> {
| ^^^^^^^^
|
help: add `dyn` keyword before this trait
|
LL | impl dyn Foo<i64> {
| +++
help: you might have intended to implement this trait for a given type
|
LL | impl Foo<i64> for /* Type */ {
| ++++++++++++++
```
CC #131051.
Add support for reborrowing pinned method receivers
This builds on #130526 to add pinned reborrowing for method receivers. This enables the folllowing examples to work:
```rust
#![feature(pin_ergonomics)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
use std::pin::Pin;
pub struct Foo;
impl Foo {
fn foo(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {
}
fn baz(self: Pin<&Self>) {
}
}
pub fn bar(x: Pin<&mut Foo>) {
x.foo();
x.foo();
x.baz(); // Pin<&mut Foo> is downgraded to Pin<&Foo>
}
pub fn baaz(x: Pin<&Foo>) {
x.baz();
x.baz();
}
```
This PR includes the original one, which is currently in the commit queue, but the only code changes are in the latest commit (d3c53aaa5c6fcb1018c58d229bc5d92202fa6880).
#130494
r? `@compiler-errors`
Check elaborated projections from dyn don't mention unconstrained late bound lifetimes
Check that the projections that are *not* explicitly written but which we deduce from elaborating the principal of a `dyn` *also* do not reference unconstrained late-bound lifetimes, just like the ones that the user writes by hand.
That is to say, given:
```
trait Foo<T>: Bar<Assoc = T> {}
trait Bar {
type Assoc;
}
```
The type `dyn for<'a> Foo<&'a T>` (basically) elaborates to `dyn for<'a> Foo<&'a T> + for<'a> Bar<Assoc = &'a T>`[^1]. However, the `Bar` projection predicate is not well-formed, since `'a` must show up in the trait's arguments to be referenced in the term of a projection. We must error in this situation[^well], or else `dyn for<'a> Foo<&'a T>` is unsound.
We already detect this for user-written projections during HIR->rustc_middle conversion, so this largely replicates that logic using the helper functions that were already conveniently defined.
---
I'm cratering this first to see the fallout; if it's minimal or zero, then let's land it as-is. If not, the way that this is implemented is very conducive to an FCW.
---
Fixes#130347
[^1]: We don't actually elaborate it like that in rustc; we only keep the principal trait ref `Foo<&'a T>` and the projection part of `Bar<Assoc = ...>`, but it's useful to be a bit verbose here for the purpose of explaining the issue.
[^well]: Well, we could also make `dyn for<'a> Foo<&'a T>` *not* implement `for<'a> Bar<Assoc = &'a T>`, but this is inconsistent with the case where the user writes `Assoc = ...` in the type itself, and it overly complicates the implementation of trait objects' built-in impls.
On editions where bare traits are never allowed, detect if the user has
written `impl Trait` with no type, silence any dyn-compatibility errors,
and provide a structured suggestion for the potentially missing type:
```
error[E0782]: trait objects must include the `dyn` keyword
--> $DIR/missing-for-type-in-impl.rs:8:6
|
LL | impl Foo<i64> {
| ^^^^^^^^
|
help: add `dyn` keyword before this trait
|
LL | impl dyn Foo<i64> {
| +++
help: you might have intended to implement this trait for a given type
|
LL | impl Foo<i64> for /* Type */ {
| ++++++++++++++
```
Fix `target_abi` in `sparc-unknown-none-elf`
This was previously set to `target_abi = "elf"`, but `elf` is not used elsewhere as a target ABI (even though there's many targets that have it in their name), so I've removed it.
CC target maintainer ``@jonathanpallant,`` what do you think about this?
``@rustbot`` label O-SPARC
Stabilize the `map`/`value` methods on `ControlFlow`
And fix the stability attribute on the `pub use` in `core::ops`.
libs-api in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/75744#issuecomment-2231214910 seemed reasonably happy with naming for these, so let's try for an FCP.
Summary:
```rust
impl<B, C> ControlFlow<B, C> {
pub fn break_value(self) -> Option<B>;
pub fn map_break<T>(self, f: impl FnOnce(B) -> T) -> ControlFlow<T, C>;
pub fn continue_value(self) -> Option<C>;
pub fn map_continue<T>(self, f: impl FnOnce(C) -> T) -> ControlFlow<B, T>;
}
```
Resolves#75744
``@rustbot`` label +needs-fcp +t-libs-api -t-libs
---
Aside, in case it keeps someone else from going down the same dead end: I looked at the `{break,continue}_value` methods and tried to make them `const` as part of this, but that's disallowed because of not having `const Drop`, so put it back to not even unstably-const.
This was previously set to `target_abi = "elf"`, but `elf` is not used
elsewhere as a target ABI (even though there's many targets that have it
in their name).
Implement RFC3695 Allow boolean literals as cfg predicates
This PR implements https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3695: allow boolean literals as cfg predicates, i.e. `cfg(true)` and `cfg(false)`.
r? `@nnethercote` *(or anyone with parser knowledge)*
cc `@clubby789`
Avoid ICE in coverage builds with bad `#[coverage(..)]` attributes
This code can sometimes witness malformed coverage attributes in builds that are going to fail, so use `span_delayed_bug` to avoid an inappropriate ICE in that case.
Fixes#127880.
Don't give method suggestions when method probe fails due to bad implementation of `Deref`
If we have a bad `Deref` impl, we used to bail with `MethodError::NoMatch`, which makes the error reporting code think that there was no applicable method (and thus try to suggest importing something, even if it's in scope).
Suppress this error, which fixes#131003.
Add `get_line` confusable to `Stdin::read_line()`
This pull request resolves https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131091
---
I've updated tests for `tests/ui/attributes/rustc_confusables_std_cases` in order to verify this change is working as intended.
Before I submitted this pull request, I had a pull request to my local fork. If you're interested in seeing the conversation on that PR, go to https://github.com/JakenHerman/rust/pull/1.
---
**Testing**:
Run `./x.py test tests/ui/attributes/rustc_confusables_std_cases.rs`
This code can sometimes witness malformed coverage attributes in builds that
are going to fail, so use `span_delayed_bug` to avoid an inappropriate ICE in
that case.
add caching to most type folders, rm region uniquification
Fixes the new minimization of the hang in nalgebra and nalgebra itself :3
this is a bit iffy, especially the cache in `TypeRelating`. I believe all the caches are correct, but it definitely adds some non-local complexity in places. The first commit removes region uniquification, reintroducing the ICE from https://github.com/rust-lang/trait-system-refactor-initiative/issues/27. This does not affect coherence and I would like to fix this by introducing OR-region constraints
r? `@compiler-errors`
