doc: add note about panicking examples for strict_overflow_ops
The first commit adds a note before the panicking examples for strict_overflow_ops to make it clearer that the following examples should panic and why, without needing the reader to hover the mouse over the information icon.
The second commit adds panicking examples for division by zero operations for strict division operations on unsigned numbers. The signed numbers already have two panicking examples each: one for division by zero and one for overflowing division (`MIN/-1`); this commit includes the division by zero examples for the unsigned numbers.
Only point out non-diverging arms for match suggestions
Fixes#121144
There is no reason to point at diverging arms, which will always coerce to whatever is the match block's evaluated type.
This also removes the suggestion from #106601, since as I pointed out in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72634#issuecomment-1946210898 the added suggestion is not firing in the right cases, but instead only when one of the match arms already *actually* evaluates to `()`.
r? estebank
Make `async Fn` trait kind errors better
1. Make it so that async closures with the wrong closurekind actually report a useful error
2. Explain why async closures can sometimes not implement `Fn`/`FnMut` (because they capture things)
r? oli-obk
Add an ErrorGuaranteed to ast::TyKind::Err (attempt 2)
This makes it more like `hir::TyKind::Err`, and avoids a `has_errors` assertion in `LoweringContext::lower_ty_direct`.
r? ```@oli-obk```
Add extra indent spaces for rust-playground link
Fixes#120998
Seems add `rustfmt` for this is somehow too heavy,
only adding indent spaces at the starting of each line of code seems good enough.
Consider principal trait ref's auto-trait super-traits in dyn upcasting
Given traits like:
```rust
trait Subtrait: Supertrait + Send {}
trait Supertrait {}
```
We should be able to upcast `dyn Subtrait` to `dyn Supertrait + Send`. This is not currently possible, because when upcasting, we look at the list of auto traits in the object type (`dyn Subtrait`, which has no auto traits in its bounds) and compare them to the target's auto traits (`dyn Supertrait + Send`, which has `Send` in its bound).
Since the target has auto traits that are not present in the source, the upcasting fails. This is overly restrictive, since `dyn Subtrait` will always implement `Send` via its built-in object impl. I propose to loosen this restriction here.
r? types
---
### ~~Aside: Fix this in astconv instead?~~
### edit: This causes too many failures. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119825#issuecomment-1890847150
We may also fix this by by automatically elaborating all auto-trait supertraits during `AstConv::conv_object_ty_poly_trait_ref`. That is, we can make it so that `dyn Subtrait` is elaborated into the same type of `dyn Subtrait + Send`.
I'm open to considering this solution instead, but it would break coherence in the following example:
```rust
trait Foo: Send {}
trait Bar {}
impl Bar for dyn Foo {}
impl Bar for dyn Foo + Send {}
//~^ This would begin to be an overlapping impl.
```
Waker::will_wake: Compare vtable address instead of its content
Optimize will_wake implementation by comparing vtable address instead of its content.
The existing best practice to avoid false negatives from will_wake is to define a waker vtable as a static item. That approach continues to works with the new implementation.
While this potentially changes the observable behaviour, the function is documented to work on a best-effort basis. The PartialEq impl for RawWaker remains as it was.
Add `ErrorGuaranteed` to `ast::LitKind::Err`, `token::LitKind::Err`.
Similar to recent work doing the same for `ExprKind::Err` (#120586) and `TyKind::Err` (#121109).
r? `@oli-obk`
Fix msg for verbose suggestions with confusable capitalization
When encountering a verbose/multipart suggestion that has changes that are only caused by different capitalization of ASCII letters that have little differenciation, expand the message to highlight that fact (like we already do for inline suggestions).
The logic to do this was already present, but implemented incorrectly.
Implicitly enable evex512 if avx512 is enabled
LLVM 18 requires the evex512 feature to allow use of zmm registers. LLVM automatically sets it when using a generic CPU, but not when `-C target-cpu` is specified. This will result either in backend legalization crashes, or code unexpectedly using ymm instead of zmm registers.
For now, make sure that `avx512*` features imply `evex512`. Long term we'll probably have to deal with the AVX10 mess somehow.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121081.
r? `@Amanieu`
std::thread update freebsd stack guard handling.
up to now, it had been assumed the stack guard setting default is not touched in the field but some user might just want to disable it or increase it. checking it once at runtime should be enough.
Fix BTreeMap's Cursor::remove_{next,prev}
These would incorrectly leave `current` as `None` after a failed attempt to remove an element (due to the cursor already being at the start/end).
Store static initializers in metadata instead of the MIR of statics.
This means that adding generic statics would be even more difficult, as we can't evaluate statics from other crates anymore, but the subtle issue I have encountered make me think that having this be an explicit problem is better.
The issue is that
```rust
static mut FOO: &mut u32 = &mut 42;
static mut BAR = unsafe { FOO };
```
gets different allocations, instead of referring to the same one. This is also true for non-static mut, but promotion makes `static FOO: &u32 = &42;` annoying to demo.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61345
## Why is this being done?
In order to ensure all crates see the same nested allocations (which is the last issue that needs fixing before we can stabilize [`const_mut_refs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57349)), I am working on creating anonymous (from the Rust side, to LLVM it's like a regular static item) static items for the nested allocations in a static. If we evaluate the static item in a downstream crate again, we will end up duplicating its nested allocations (and in some cases, like the `match` case, even duplicate the main allocation).
Instead we re-use the static's alloc id within the interpreter for its initializer to refer to the `Allocation` that only exists within the interpreter.
Rollup of 10 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #111106 (Add known issue of let binding to format_args doc)
- #118749 (Make contributing to windows bindings easier)
- #120982 (Add APIs for fetching foreign items )
- #121022 (rustdoc: cross-crate re-exports: correctly render late-bound params in source order even if early-bound params are present)
- #121082 (Clarified docs on non-atomic oprations on owned/mut refs to atomics)
- #121084 (Make sure `tcx.create_def` also depends on the forever red node, instead of just `tcx.at(span).create_def`)
- #121098 (Remove unnecessary else block from `thread_local!` expanded code)
- #121105 (Do not report overflow errors on ConstArgHasType goals)
- #121116 (Reinstate some delayed bugs.)
- #121122 (Enforce coroutine-closure layouts are identical)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Enforce coroutine-closure layouts are identical
Enforce that for an async closure, the by-ref and by-move coroutine layouts are identical. This is just a sanity check to make sure that optimizations aren't doing anything fishy.
r? oli-obk
Reinstate some delayed bugs.
These were changed to `has_errors` assertions in #121071 because that seemed reasonable, but evidently not.
Fixes#121103.
Fixes#121108.
Do not report overflow errors on ConstArgHasType goals
This is 10% of a fix for #121090, since it at least means that we no longer mention the `ConstArgHasType` goal as the cause for the overflow. Instead, now we mention:
```
overflow evaluating the requirement `{closure@$DIR/overflow-during-mono.rs:13:41: 13:44}: Sized`
```
which is not much better, but slightly.
r? oli-obk
Make sure `tcx.create_def` also depends on the forever red node, instead of just `tcx.at(span).create_def`
oversight from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/119136
Not actually an issue, because all uses of `tcx.create_def` were in the resolver, which is `eval_always`, but still good to harden against future uses of `create_def`
cc `@petrochenkov` `@WaffleLapkin`
Clarified docs on non-atomic oprations on owned/mut refs to atomics
I originally misinterpreted the documentation to mean that the compiler can/will automatically optimise away atomic operations whenever the data is owned or mutably referenced.
On re-reading I think it is not technically incorrect, but specifically mentioning _how_ the atomic operations can be avoided also prevents this misunderstanding.
