Refine `instruction_set` MIR inline rules
Previously an exact match of the `instruction_set` attribute was required for an MIR inline to be considered. This change checks for an exact match *only* if the callee sets an `instruction_set` in the first place. When the callee does not declare an instruction set then it is considered to be platform agnostic code and it's allowed to be inline'd into the caller.
cc ``@oli-obk``
[Edit] Zulip Context: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/189540-t-compiler.2Fwg-mir-opt/topic/What.20exactly.20does.20the.20MIR.20optimizer.20do.3F
Previously an exact match of the `instruction_set` attribute was required for an MIR inline to be considered. This change checks for an exact match *only* if the callee sets an `instruction_set` in the first place. When the callee does not declare an instruction set then it is considered to be platform agnostic code and it's allowed to be inline'd into the caller.
Check projection types before inlining MIR
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100550
I'm very unhappy with this solution, having to duplicate MIR validation code, but at least it removes the ICE.
r? `@compiler-errors`
This created unexpected diagnostics while compiling alga:
cannot satisfy `<Self as Module>::Ring == _`
Turns out that we don't need this diagnostic as we disable inlining when
it would trigger an ICE.
And likewise for the `Const::val` method.
Because its type is called `ConstKind`. Also `val` is a confusing name
because `ConstKind` is an enum with seven variants, one of which is
called `Value`. Also, this gives consistency with `TyS` and `PredicateS`
which have `kind` fields.
The commit also renames a few `Const` variables from `val` to `c`, to
avoid confusion with the `ConstKind::Value` variant.
move processing of `source_scope_data` into `MutVisitor`'s impl of `Integrator` when inline
This PR fixes the FIXME in the inline mir-opt which moves processing of `source_scope_data` into `MutVisitor`'s impl of `Integrator` when inline
Add a query for checking whether a function is an intrinsic.
work towards #93145
This will reduce churn when we add more ways to declare intrinsics
r? `@scottmcm`
Spellchecking compiler comments
This PR cleans up the rest of the spelling mistakes in the compiler comments. This PR does not change any literal or code spelling issues.
This allows to compute the `BodyOwnerKind` from `DefKind` only, and
removes a direct dependency of some MIR queries onto HIR.
As a side effect, it also simplifies metadata, since we don't need 4
flavours of `EntryKind::*Static` any more.
Adopt let else in more places
Continuation of #89933, #91018, #91481, #93046, #93590, #94011.
I have extended my clippy lint to also recognize tuple passing and match statements. The diff caused by fixing it is way above 1 thousand lines. Thus, I split it up into multiple pull requests to make reviewing easier. This is the biggest of these PRs and handles the changes outside of rustdoc, rustc_typeck, rustc_const_eval, rustc_trait_selection, which were handled in PRs #94139, #94142, #94143, #94144.
