Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101357 (Include enum path in variant suggestion)
- #101434 (Update `SessionDiagnostic::into_diagnostic` to take `Handler` instead of `ParseSess`)
- #101445 (Suggest introducing an explicit lifetime if it does not exist)
- #101457 (Recover from using `;` as separator between fields)
- #101462 (Rustdoc-Json: Store Variant Fields as their own item.)
- #101471 (Report number of delayed bugs properly with `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`)
- #101473 (Add more size assertions for MIR types.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The x86 `pause` instruction was introduced with sse2, but because it is encoded as `rep nop`, it works just fine on cpu's without sse2 support. It just doesn't do anything.
This CSS still matches sometimes, as you can see in
<https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.63.0/std/collections/enum.TryReserveErrorKind.html#variant.AllocError.fields>,
but since nothing else is setting `margin-top`, putting it back to `initial`
does nothing.
This selector was added in 2fd378b82b (but it
was called `.stability` instead of `.item-info` at the time), probably as an
override for the selector immediately above it that sets a negative margin.
That negative margin was removed in 593d6d1cb1.
This code was added in 96ef2f8ab9 to improve
rendering of the search results table, but results have not used a table
since b615c0c854 switched it to rendering with
`<div>` tags.
Report number of delayed bugs properly with `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`
Report the number of delayed bugs that went into the `-Ztreat-errr-as-bug=N` being triggered, even if we don't count it in the err_count in regular diagnostic output.
Sometimes we have a session that creates a few diagnostics, perhaps: Error, Delay bug, Error, then Delay bug.
If I ran `-Ztreat-err-as-bug=3`, then I will now see "aborting after 2 errors and 1 delayed bugs" instead of just "after 2 errors" which is confusing since I passed `3`.
Recover from using `;` as separator between fields
Partially fixes#101440 (only for record structs).
Doing that for tuple structs is harder as their parsing passes through a bunch of helper functions. I don't know how to do that. But [their error message is better anyway](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=cc6ee8bb2593596c0cea89d49e79bcb4) and suggests using a comma, even if it doesn't suggest replacing the semicolon with it.
Update `SessionDiagnostic::into_diagnostic` to take `Handler` instead of `ParseSess`
Suggested by the team in [this Zulip Topic](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20SessionDiagnostic.20on.20Handler).
`Handler` already has almost all the capabilities of `ParseSess` when it comes to diagnostic emission, in this migration we only needed to add the ability to access `source_map` from the emitter in order to get a `Snippet` and the `start_point`. Not sure if adding these two methods [`span_to_snippet_from_emitter` and `span_start_point_from_emitter`] is the best way to address this gap.
P.S. If this goes in the right direction, then we probably may want to move `SessionDiagnostic` to `rustc_errors` and rename it to `DiagnosticHandler` or something similar.
r? `@davidtwco`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Document eager evaluation of `bool::then_some` argument
I encountered this earlier today and thought maybe `bool::then_some` could use a little addition to the documentation.
It's pretty obvious with familiarity and from looking at the implementation, but the argument for `then_some` is eagerly evaluated, which means if you do the following (as I did), you can have a problem:
```rust
// Oops!
let _ = something
.has_another_thing()
.then_some(something.another_thing_or_panic());
```
A note, similar to other methods with eagerly-evaluated arguments and a lazy alternative (`Option::or`, for example), could help point this out to people who forget (like me)!
Suggest removing unnecessary prefix let in patterns
Helps with #101291, though I think `@estebank` probably wants this:
> Finally, I think it'd be nice if we could detect that we don't know for sure and "just" swallow the rest of the expression (find the next ; accounting for nested braces) or the end of the item (easier).
... to be implemented before we close that issue out completely.
Point out when a callable is not actually callable because its return is not sized
Fixes#100755
I didn't add a UI test for that one because it's equivalent to the UI test that already exists in the suite.
