Auto merge of #101485 - GuillaumeGomez:rollup-68p9di4, r=GuillaumeGomez

Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #101357 (Include enum path in variant suggestion)
 - #101434 (Update `SessionDiagnostic::into_diagnostic` to take `Handler` instead of `ParseSess`)
 - #101445 (Suggest introducing an explicit lifetime if it does not exist)
 - #101457 (Recover from using `;` as separator between fields)
 - #101462 (Rustdoc-Json: Store Variant Fields as their own item.)
 - #101471 (Report number of delayed bugs properly with `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`)
 - #101473 (Add more size assertions for MIR types.)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This commit is contained in:
bors 2022-09-06 18:10:14 +00:00
commit 78a891d364
89 changed files with 707 additions and 384 deletions

View File

@ -63,7 +63,12 @@ fn handle_errors(sess: &ParseSess, span: Span, error: AttrError) {
sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::MultipleStabilityLevels { span });
}
AttrError::UnsupportedLiteral(reason, is_bytestr) => {
sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::UnsupportedLiteral { span, reason, is_bytestr });
sess.emit_err(session_diagnostics::UnsupportedLiteral {
span,
reason,
is_bytestr,
start_point_span: sess.source_map().start_point(span),
});
}
}
}

View File

@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
use std::num::IntErrorKind;
use rustc_ast as ast;
use rustc_errors::{error_code, fluent, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed};
use rustc_errors::{
error_code, fluent, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler,
};
use rustc_macros::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_session::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
use crate::UnsupportedLiteralReason;
@ -49,9 +51,9 @@ pub(crate) struct UnknownMetaItem<'a> {
// Manual implementation to be able to format `expected` items correctly.
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for UnknownMetaItem<'_> {
fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let expected = self.expected.iter().map(|name| format!("`{}`", name)).collect::<Vec<_>>();
let mut diag = sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err_with_code(
let mut diag = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
self.span,
fluent::attr::unknown_meta_item,
error_code!(E0541),
@ -204,11 +206,12 @@ pub(crate) struct UnsupportedLiteral {
pub span: Span,
pub reason: UnsupportedLiteralReason,
pub is_bytestr: bool,
pub start_point_span: Span,
}
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for UnsupportedLiteral {
fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err_with_code(
fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
self.span,
match self.reason {
UnsupportedLiteralReason::Generic => fluent::attr::unsupported_literal_generic,
@ -224,7 +227,7 @@ impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for UnsupportedLiteral {
);
if self.is_bytestr {
diag.span_suggestion(
sess.source_map().start_point(self.span),
self.start_point_span,
fluent::attr::unsupported_literal_suggestion,
"",
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,

View File

@ -1250,14 +1250,14 @@ impl HandlerInner {
fn treat_err_as_bug(&self) -> bool {
self.flags.treat_err_as_bug.map_or(false, |c| {
self.err_count()
+ self.lint_err_count
+ self.delayed_span_bugs.len()
+ self.delayed_good_path_bugs.len()
>= c.get()
self.err_count() + self.lint_err_count + self.delayed_bug_count() >= c.get()
})
}
fn delayed_bug_count(&self) -> usize {
self.delayed_span_bugs.len() + self.delayed_good_path_bugs.len()
}
fn print_error_count(&mut self, registry: &Registry) {
self.emit_stashed_diagnostics();
@ -1412,12 +1412,7 @@ impl HandlerInner {
// incrementing `err_count` by one, so we need to +1 the comparing.
// FIXME: Would be nice to increment err_count in a more coherent way.
if self.flags.treat_err_as_bug.map_or(false, |c| {
self.err_count()
+ self.lint_err_count
+ self.delayed_span_bugs.len()
+ self.delayed_good_path_bugs.len()
+ 1
>= c.get()
self.err_count() + self.lint_err_count + self.delayed_bug_count() + 1 >= c.get()
}) {
// FIXME: don't abort here if report_delayed_bugs is off
self.span_bug(sp, msg);
@ -1518,14 +1513,24 @@ impl HandlerInner {
if self.treat_err_as_bug() {
match (
self.err_count() + self.lint_err_count,
self.delayed_bug_count(),
self.flags.treat_err_as_bug.map(|c| c.get()).unwrap_or(0),
) {
(1, 1) => panic!("aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`"),
(0 | 1, _) => {}
(count, as_bug) => panic!(
"aborting after {} errors due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug={}`",
count, as_bug,
),
(1, 0, 1) => panic!("aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`"),
(0, 1, 1) => panic!("aborting due delayed bug with `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`"),
(count, delayed_count, as_bug) => {
if delayed_count > 0 {
panic!(
"aborting after {} errors and {} delayed bugs due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug={}`",
count, delayed_count, as_bug,
)
} else {
panic!(
"aborting after {} errors due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug={}`",
count, as_bug,
)
}
}
}
}
}

View File

@ -2395,19 +2395,23 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
type_param_span: Option<(Span, bool)>,
bound_kind: GenericKind<'tcx>,
sub: S,
add_lt_sugg: Option<(Span, String)>,
) {
let msg = "consider adding an explicit lifetime bound";
if let Some((sp, has_lifetimes)) = type_param_span {
let suggestion =
if has_lifetimes { format!(" + {}", sub) } else { format!(": {}", sub) };
err.span_suggestion_verbose(
sp,
&format!("{}...", msg),
suggestion,
let mut suggestions = vec![(sp, suggestion)];
if let Some(add_lt_sugg) = add_lt_sugg {
suggestions.push(add_lt_sugg);
}
err.multipart_suggestion_verbose(
format!("{msg}..."),
suggestions,
Applicability::MaybeIncorrect, // Issue #41966
);
} else {
let consider = format!("{} `{}: {}`...", msg, bound_kind, sub,);
let consider = format!("{} `{}: {}`...", msg, bound_kind, sub);
err.help(&consider);
}
}
@ -2423,7 +2427,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
};
let mut sugg =
vec![(sp, suggestion), (span.shrink_to_hi(), format!(" + {}", new_lt))];
if let Some(lt) = add_lt_sugg {
if let Some(lt) = add_lt_sugg.clone() {
sugg.push(lt);
sugg.rotate_right(1);
}
@ -2529,7 +2533,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
// for the bound is not suitable for suggestions when `-Zverbose` is set because it
// uses `Debug` output, so we handle it specially here so that suggestions are
// always correct.
binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, name);
binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, name, None);
err
}
@ -2542,7 +2546,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
"{} may not live long enough",
labeled_user_string
);
binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, "'static");
binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, "'static", None);
err
}
@ -2576,7 +2580,13 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
new_binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span);
}
_ => {
binding_suggestion(&mut err, type_param_span, bound_kind, new_lt);
binding_suggestion(
&mut err,
type_param_span,
bound_kind,
new_lt,
add_lt_sugg,
);
}
}
}

View File

@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
multi_suggestions,
bad_label,
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0283 => AmbigousImpl {
span,
source_kind,
@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
multi_suggestions,
bad_label,
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0284 => AmbigousReturn {
span,
source_kind,
@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
multi_suggestions,
bad_label,
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
}
}
@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
multi_suggestions,
bad_label: None,
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0283 => AmbigousImpl {
span,
source_kind,
@ -547,7 +547,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
multi_suggestions,
bad_label: None,
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
TypeAnnotationNeeded::E0284 => AmbigousReturn {
span,
source_kind,
@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
multi_suggestions,
bad_label: None,
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess),
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic),
}
}
@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> InferCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
span,
generator_kind: GeneratorKindAsDiagArg(kind),
}
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess)
.into_diagnostic(&self.tcx.sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic)
}
}

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
use rustc_errors::{fluent, AddSubdiagnostic, ErrorGuaranteed};
use rustc_errors::{fluent, AddSubdiagnostic, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler};
use rustc_macros::{SessionDiagnostic, SessionSubdiagnostic};
use rustc_session::{lint::Level, parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_session::{lint::Level, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
@ -122,9 +122,9 @@ pub struct CheckNameUnknown {
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for CheckNameUnknown {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
sess: &ParseSess,
handler: &Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::lint::check_name_unknown);
let mut diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::lint::check_name_unknown);
diag.code(rustc_errors::error_code!(E0602));
if let Some(suggestion) = self.suggestion {
diag.help(fluent::lint::help);

View File

@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ impl<'a> SessionDiagnosticDerive<'a> {
{
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
#sess: &'__session_diagnostic_sess rustc_session::parse::ParseSess
#sess: &'__session_diagnostic_sess rustc_errors::Handler
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'__session_diagnostic_sess, G> {
use rustc_errors::IntoDiagnosticArg;
#implementation

View File

@ -424,9 +424,9 @@ pub(crate) struct MultipleCandidates {
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for MultipleCandidates {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::multiple_candidates);
let mut diag = handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::multiple_candidates);
diag.set_arg("crate_name", self.crate_name);
diag.set_arg("flavor", self.flavor);
diag.code(error_code!(E0465));
@ -540,9 +540,9 @@ pub struct InvalidMetadataFiles {
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for InvalidMetadataFiles {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::invalid_meta_files);
let mut diag = handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::invalid_meta_files);
diag.set_arg("crate_name", self.crate_name);
diag.set_arg("add_info", self.add_info);
diag.code(error_code!(E0786));
@ -568,9 +568,9 @@ pub struct CannotFindCrate {
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for CannotFindCrate {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::cannot_find_crate);
let mut diag = handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::metadata::cannot_find_crate);
diag.set_arg("crate_name", self.crate_name);
diag.set_arg("add_info", self.add_info);
diag.set_arg("locator_triple", self.locator_triple.triple());

View File

@ -839,10 +839,6 @@ pub struct LocalDecl<'tcx> {
pub source_info: SourceInfo,
}
// `LocalDecl` is used a lot. Make sure it doesn't unintentionally get bigger.
#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
static_assert_size!(LocalDecl<'_>, 56);
/// Extra information about a some locals that's used for diagnostics and for
/// classifying variables into local variables, statics, etc, which is needed e.g.
/// for unsafety checking.
@ -1317,10 +1313,6 @@ pub struct Statement<'tcx> {
pub kind: StatementKind<'tcx>,
}
// `Statement` is used a lot. Make sure it doesn't unintentionally get bigger.
#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
static_assert_size!(Statement<'_>, 32);
impl Statement<'_> {
/// Changes a statement to a nop. This is both faster than deleting instructions and avoids
/// invalidating statement indices in `Location`s.
@ -2900,3 +2892,17 @@ impl Location {
}
}
}
// Some nodes are used a lot. Make sure they don't unintentionally get bigger.
#[cfg(all(target_arch = "x86_64", target_pointer_width = "64"))]
mod size_asserts {
use super::*;
use rustc_data_structures::static_assert_size;
// These are in alphabetical order, which is easy to maintain.
static_assert_size!(BasicBlockData<'_>, 144);
static_assert_size!(LocalDecl<'_>, 56);
static_assert_size!(Statement<'_>, 32);
static_assert_size!(StatementKind<'_>, 16);
static_assert_size!(Terminator<'_>, 112);
static_assert_size!(TerminatorKind<'_>, 96);
}

View File

@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, AdtDef, Ty, UpvarSubsts};
use rustc_middle::ty::{CanonicalUserType, CanonicalUserTypeAnnotation};
use rustc_span::def_id::LocalDefId;
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol, DUMMY_SP};
use rustc_span::{sym, Span, Symbol, DUMMY_SP};
use rustc_target::abi::VariantIdx;
use rustc_target::asm::InlineAsmRegOrRegClass;
use std::fmt;
@ -695,17 +695,32 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for Pat<'tcx> {
Ok(())
}
PatKind::Variant { ref subpatterns, .. } | PatKind::Leaf { ref subpatterns } => {
let variant = match self.kind {
PatKind::Variant { adt_def, variant_index, .. } => {
Some(adt_def.variant(variant_index))
}
_ => self.ty.ty_adt_def().and_then(|adt| {
if !adt.is_enum() { Some(adt.non_enum_variant()) } else { None }
let variant_and_name = match self.kind {
PatKind::Variant { adt_def, variant_index, .. } => ty::tls::with(|tcx| {
let variant = adt_def.variant(variant_index);
let adt_did = adt_def.did();
let name = if tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Option) == Some(adt_did)
|| tcx.get_diagnostic_item(sym::Result) == Some(adt_did)
{
variant.name.to_string()
} else {
format!("{}::{}", tcx.def_path_str(adt_def.did()), variant.name)
};
Some((variant, name))
}),
_ => self.ty.ty_adt_def().and_then(|adt_def| {
if !adt_def.is_enum() {
ty::tls::with(|tcx| {
Some((adt_def.non_enum_variant(), tcx.def_path_str(adt_def.did())))
})
} else {
None
}
}),
};
if let Some(variant) = variant {
write!(f, "{}", variant.name)?;
if let Some((variant, name)) = &variant_and_name {
write!(f, "{}", name)?;
// Only for Adt we can have `S {...}`,
// which we handle separately here.
@ -730,8 +745,9 @@ impl<'tcx> fmt::Display for Pat<'tcx> {
}
}
let num_fields = variant.map_or(subpatterns.len(), |v| v.fields.len());
if num_fields != 0 || variant.is_none() {
let num_fields =
variant_and_name.as_ref().map_or(subpatterns.len(), |(v, _)| v.fields.len());
if num_fields != 0 || variant_and_name.is_none() {
write!(f, "(")?;
for i in 0..num_fields {
write!(f, "{}", start_or_comma())?;

View File

@ -754,8 +754,8 @@ fn lint_non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns<'p, 'tcx>(
hir_id: HirId,
witnesses: Vec<DeconstructedPat<'p, 'tcx>>,
) {
let joined_patterns = joined_uncovered_patterns(cx, &witnesses);
cx.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(NON_EXHAUSTIVE_OMITTED_PATTERNS, hir_id, sp, |build| {
let joined_patterns = joined_uncovered_patterns(cx, &witnesses);
let mut lint = build.build("some variants are not matched explicitly");
lint.span_label(sp, pattern_not_covered_label(&witnesses, &joined_patterns));
lint.help(

View File

@ -47,9 +47,10 @@ pub struct UnusedGenericParams {
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for UnusedGenericParams {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
sess: &'_ rustc_session::parse::ParseSess,
handler: &'_ rustc_errors::Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::monomorphize::unused_generic_params);
let mut diag =
handler.struct_err(rustc_errors::fluent::monomorphize::unused_generic_params);
diag.set_span(self.span);
for (span, name) in self.param_spans.into_iter().zip(self.param_names) {
// FIXME: I can figure out how to do a label with a fluent string with a fixed message,

View File

@ -1997,7 +1997,7 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
return Err(MissingSemicolonBeforeArray {
open_delim: open_delim_span,
semicolon: prev_span.shrink_to_hi(),
}.into_diagnostic(self.sess));
}.into_diagnostic(&self.sess.span_diagnostic));
}
Ok(_) => (),
Err(err) => err.cancel(),
@ -2745,7 +2745,8 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
fn parse_try_block(&mut self, span_lo: Span) -> PResult<'a, P<Expr>> {
let (attrs, body) = self.parse_inner_attrs_and_block()?;
if self.eat_keyword(kw::Catch) {
Err(CatchAfterTry { span: self.prev_token.span }.into_diagnostic(self.sess))
Err(CatchAfterTry { span: self.prev_token.span }
.into_diagnostic(&self.sess.span_diagnostic))
} else {
let span = span_lo.to(body.span);
self.sess.gated_spans.gate(sym::try_blocks, span);

View File

@ -1526,6 +1526,17 @@ impl<'a> Parser<'a> {
if self.token == token::Comma {
seen_comma = true;
}
if self.eat(&token::Semi) {
let sp = self.prev_token.span;
let mut err = self.struct_span_err(sp, format!("{adt_ty} fields are separated by `,`"));
err.span_suggestion_short(
sp,
"replace `;` with `,`",
",",
Applicability::MachineApplicable,
);
return Err(err);
}
match self.token.kind {
token::Comma => {
self.bump();

View File

@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ pub(crate) fn report_cycle<'a>(
stack_count,
};
cycle_diag.into_diagnostic(&sess.parse_sess)
cycle_diag.into_diagnostic(&sess.parse_sess.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn print_query_stack<CTX: QueryContext>(

View File

@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ impl ParseSess {
&'a self,
err: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
err.into_diagnostic(self)
err.into_diagnostic(&self.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn emit_err<'a>(&'a self, err: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a>) -> ErrorGuaranteed {
@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ impl ParseSess {
&'a self,
warning: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, ()>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()> {
warning.into_diagnostic(self)
warning.into_diagnostic(&self.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn emit_warning<'a>(&'a self, warning: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, ()>) {
@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ impl ParseSess {
&'a self,
fatal: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, !>,
) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, !> {
fatal.into_diagnostic(self)
fatal.into_diagnostic(&self.span_diagnostic)
}
pub fn emit_fatal<'a>(&'a self, fatal: impl SessionDiagnostic<'a, !>) -> ! {

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ use rustc_errors::json::JsonEmitter;
use rustc_errors::registry::Registry;
use rustc_errors::{
error_code, fallback_fluent_bundle, DiagnosticBuilder, DiagnosticId, DiagnosticMessage,
EmissionGuarantee, ErrorGuaranteed, FluentBundle, LazyFallbackBundle, MultiSpan,
EmissionGuarantee, ErrorGuaranteed, FluentBundle, Handler, LazyFallbackBundle, MultiSpan,
};
use rustc_macros::HashStable_Generic;
pub use rustc_span::def_id::StableCrateId;
@ -220,9 +220,9 @@ pub struct PerfStats {
/// `#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]` -- see [rustc_macros::SessionDiagnostic].
#[rustc_diagnostic_item = "SessionDiagnostic"]
pub trait SessionDiagnostic<'a, T: EmissionGuarantee = ErrorGuaranteed> {
/// Write out as a diagnostic out of `sess`.
/// Write out as a diagnostic out of `Handler`.
#[must_use]
fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, T>;
fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, T>;
}
impl Session {

View File

@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
use rustc_errors::{fluent, ErrorGuaranteed};
use rustc_errors::{fluent, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler};
use rustc_macros::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_middle::ty::{PolyTraitRef, Ty, Unevaluated};
use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, Limit, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_session::{Limit, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_span::{Span, Symbol};
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
@ -69,9 +69,9 @@ pub struct NegativePositiveConflict<'a> {
impl SessionDiagnostic<'_> for NegativePositiveConflict<'_> {
fn into_diagnostic(
self,
sess: &ParseSess,
handler: &Handler,
) -> rustc_errors::DiagnosticBuilder<'_, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::trait_selection::negative_positive_conflict);
let mut diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::trait_selection::negative_positive_conflict);
diag.set_arg("trait_desc", self.trait_desc);
diag.set_arg(
"self_desc",

View File

@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ impl<'o, 'tcx> dyn AstConv<'tcx> + 'o {
self.tcx().sess.emit_err(MissingTypeParams {
span,
def_span: self.tcx().def_span(def_id),
span_snippet: self.tcx().sess.source_map().span_to_snippet(span).ok(),
missing_type_params,
empty_generic_args,
});

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
//! Errors emitted by typeck.
use rustc_errors::{error_code, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed};
use rustc_errors::{error_code, Applicability, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler};
use rustc_macros::{LintDiagnostic, SessionDiagnostic, SessionSubdiagnostic};
use rustc_middle::ty::Ty;
use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_session::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_span::{symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol};
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
@ -244,14 +244,15 @@ pub struct UnconstrainedOpaqueType {
pub struct MissingTypeParams {
pub span: Span,
pub def_span: Span,
pub span_snippet: Option<String>,
pub missing_type_params: Vec<Symbol>,
pub empty_generic_args: bool,
}
// Manual implementation of `SessionDiagnostic` to be able to call `span_to_snippet`.
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for MissingTypeParams {
fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut err = sess.span_diagnostic.struct_span_err_with_code(
fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
let mut err = handler.struct_span_err_with_code(
self.span,
rustc_errors::fluent::typeck::missing_type_params,
error_code!(E0393),
@ -269,12 +270,9 @@ impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a> for MissingTypeParams {
err.span_label(self.def_span, rustc_errors::fluent::typeck::label);
let mut suggested = false;
if let (Ok(snippet), true) = (
sess.source_map().span_to_snippet(self.span),
// Don't suggest setting the type params if there are some already: the order is
// tricky to get right and the user will already know what the syntax is.
self.empty_generic_args,
) {
// Don't suggest setting the type params if there are some already: the order is
// tricky to get right and the user will already know what the syntax is.
if let Some(snippet) = self.span_snippet && self.empty_generic_args {
if snippet.ends_with('>') {
// The user wrote `Trait<'a, T>` or similar. To provide an accurate suggestion
// we would have to preserve the right order. For now, as clearly the user is

View File

@ -144,10 +144,10 @@ while work_list:
) - visited
elif item["kind"] == "variant":
if item["inner"]["variant_kind"] == "tuple":
for ty in item["inner"]["variant_inner"]:
check_type(ty)
for field_id in filter(None, item["inner"]["variant_inner"]):
work_list.add(field_id)
elif item["inner"]["variant_kind"] == "struct":
work_list |= set(item["inner"]["variant_inner"]) - visited
work_list |= set(item["inner"]["variant_inner"]["fields"]) - visited
elif item["kind"] in ("function", "method"):
check_generics(item["inner"]["generics"])
check_decl(item["inner"]["decl"])

View File

@ -663,17 +663,11 @@ impl FromWithTcx<clean::Variant> for Variant {
use clean::Variant::*;
match variant {
CLike(disr) => Variant::Plain(disr.map(|disr| disr.into_tcx(tcx))),
Tuple(fields) => Variant::Tuple(
fields
.into_iter()
.filter_map(|f| match *f.kind {
clean::StructFieldItem(ty) => Some(ty.into_tcx(tcx)),
clean::StrippedItem(_) => None,
_ => unreachable!(),
})
.collect(),
),
Struct(s) => Variant::Struct(ids(s.fields, tcx)),
Tuple(fields) => Variant::Tuple(ids_keeping_stripped(fields, tcx)),
Struct(s) => Variant::Struct {
fields_stripped: s.has_stripped_entries(),
fields: ids(s.fields, tcx),
},
}
}
}
@ -796,3 +790,19 @@ fn ids(items: impl IntoIterator<Item = clean::Item>, tcx: TyCtxt<'_>) -> Vec<Id>
.map(|i| from_item_id_with_name(i.item_id, tcx, i.name))
.collect()
}
fn ids_keeping_stripped(
items: impl IntoIterator<Item = clean::Item>,
tcx: TyCtxt<'_>,
) -> Vec<Option<Id>> {
items
.into_iter()
.map(|i| {
if !i.is_stripped() && !i.is_keyword() {
Some(from_item_id_with_name(i.item_id, tcx, i.name))
} else {
None
}
})
.collect()
}

View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use std::path::PathBuf;
use serde::{Deserialize, Serialize};
/// rustdoc format-version.
pub const FORMAT_VERSION: u32 = 19;
pub const FORMAT_VERSION: u32 = 20;
/// A `Crate` is the root of the emitted JSON blob. It contains all type/documentation information
/// about the language items in the local crate, as well as info about external items to allow
@ -308,9 +308,36 @@ pub struct Enum {
#[serde(rename_all = "snake_case")]
#[serde(tag = "variant_kind", content = "variant_inner")]
pub enum Variant {
/// A variant with no parentheses, and possible discriminant.
///
/// ```rust
/// enum Demo {
/// PlainVariant,
/// PlainWithDiscriminant = 1,
/// }
/// ```
Plain(Option<Discriminant>),
Tuple(Vec<Type>),
Struct(Vec<Id>),
/// A variant with unnamed fields.
///
/// Unlike most of json, `#[doc(hidden)]` fields will be given as `None`
/// instead of being ommited, because order matters.
///
/// ```rust
/// enum Demo {
/// TupleVariant(i32),
/// EmptyTupleVariant(),
/// }
/// ```
Tuple(Vec<Option<Id>>),
/// A variant with named fields.
///
/// ```rust
/// enum Demo {
/// StructVariant { x: i32 },
/// EmptyStructVariant {},
/// }
/// ```
Struct { fields: Vec<Id>, fields_stripped: bool },
}
#[derive(Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, Serialize, Deserialize)]

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
// @has "$.index[*][?(@.name=='ParseError')]"
// @has "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')]"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_inner" []
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='UnexpectedEndTag')].inner.variant_inner" [null]
pub enum ParseError {
UnexpectedEndTag(#[doc(hidden)] u32),

View File

@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
// ignore-tidy-linelength
#![feature(no_core)]
#![no_core]
pub enum Foo {
// @set Unit = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Unit')].id"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Unit')].inner.variant_kind" '"plain"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Unit')].inner.variant_inner" null
Unit,
// @set Named = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Named')].id"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Named')].inner.variant_kind" '"struct"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Named')].inner.variant_inner" '{"fields": [], "fields_stripped": false}'
Named {},
// @set Tuple = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Tuple')].id"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Tuple')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Tuple')].inner.variant_inner" []
Tuple(),
// @set NamedField = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].id"
// @set x = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='x' && @.kind=='struct_field')].id"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].inner.variant_kind" '"struct"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].inner.variant_inner.fields[*]" $x
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='NamedField')].inner.variant_inner.fields_stripped" false
NamedField { x: i32 },
// @set TupleField = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TupleField')].id"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TupleField')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @set tup_field = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='0' && @.kind=='struct_field')].id"
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TupleField')].inner.variant_inner[*]" $tup_field
TupleField(i32),
}
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[0]" $Unit
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[1]" $Named
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[2]" $Tuple
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[3]" $NamedField
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[4]" $TupleField
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Foo')].inner.variants[*]" 5

View File

@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
pub enum Foo {
Variant {
#[doc(hidden)]
a: i32,
// @set b = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='b')].id"
b: i32,
#[doc(hidden)]
x: i32,
// @set y = "$.index[*][?(@.name=='y')].id"
y: i32,
},
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_kind" '"struct"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields_stripped" true
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields[0]" $b
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields[1]" $y
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Variant')].inner.variant_inner.fields[*]" 2
}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
#![feature(no_core)]
#![no_core]
// @set 1.1.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='1.1.0')].id"
// @set 2.1.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.0')].id"
// @set 2.1.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.1')].id"
// @set 2.2.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.2.1')].id"
// @set 2.3.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.3.0')].id"
// @set 3.1.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.1')].id"
// @set 3.1.2 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.2')].id"
// @set 3.2.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.0')].id"
// @set 3.2.2 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.2')].id"
// @set 3.3.0 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.0')].id"
// @set 3.3.1 = "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.1')].id"
pub enum EnumWithStrippedTupleVariants {
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='None')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='None')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 0
None(),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='One')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='One')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 1
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='One')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $1.1.0
One(/** 1.1.0*/ bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='OneHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='OneHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 1
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='OneHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
OneHidden(#[doc(hidden)] bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $2.1.0
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Two')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $2.1.1
Two(/** 2.1.0*/ bool, /** 2.1.1*/ bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoLeftHidden')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $2.2.1
TwoLeftHidden(#[doc(hidden)] bool, /** 2.2.1*/ bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $2.3.0
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoRightHidden')].inner.variant_inner[1]" null
TwoRightHidden(/** 2.3.0*/ bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 2
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='TwoBothHidden')].inner.variant_inner[1]" null
TwoBothHidden(#[doc(hidden)] bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 3
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[0]" null
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $3.1.1
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three1')].inner.variant_inner[2]" $3.1.2
Three1(#[doc(hidden)] bool, /** 3.1.1*/ bool, /** 3.1.2*/ bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 3
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $3.2.0
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[1]" null
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three2')].inner.variant_inner[2]" $3.2.2
Three2(/** 3.2.0*/ bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool, /** 3.2.2*/ bool),
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_kind" '"tuple"'
// @count "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[*]" 3
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[0]" $3.3.0
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[1]" $3.3.1
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.name=='Three3')].inner.variant_inner[2]" null
Three3(/** 3.3.0*/ bool, /** 3.3.1*/ bool, #[doc(hidden)] bool),
}
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='1.1.0')].name" '"0"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.0')].name" '"0"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.1')].name" '"1"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.2.1')].name" '"1"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.3.0')].name" '"0"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.1')].name" '"1"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.2')].name" '"2"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.0')].name" '"0"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.2')].name" '"2"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.0')].name" '"0"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.1')].name" '"1"'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='1.1.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.1.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.2.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='2.3.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.1.2')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.2.2')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.0')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'
// @is "$.index[*][?(@.docs=='3.3.1')].inner" '{"kind": "primitive", "inner": "bool"}'

View File

@ -11,9 +11,11 @@ extern crate rustc_macros;
extern crate rustc_session;
extern crate rustc_span;
use rustc_errors::{AddSubdiagnostic, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, fluent};
use rustc_errors::{
AddSubdiagnostic, Diagnostic, DiagnosticBuilder, ErrorGuaranteed, Handler, fluent
};
use rustc_macros::{SessionDiagnostic, SessionSubdiagnostic};
use rustc_session::{parse::ParseSess, SessionDiagnostic};
use rustc_session::SessionDiagnostic;
use rustc_span::Span;
#[derive(SessionDiagnostic)]
@ -33,8 +35,8 @@ struct Note {
pub struct UntranslatableInSessionDiagnostic;
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> for UntranslatableInSessionDiagnostic {
fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
//~^ ERROR diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
}
}
@ -42,8 +44,8 @@ impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> for UntranslatableInSessionDiagn
pub struct TranslatableInSessionDiagnostic;
impl<'a> SessionDiagnostic<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> for TranslatableInSessionDiagnostic {
fn into_diagnostic(self, sess: &'a ParseSess) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
sess.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path)
fn into_diagnostic(self, handler: &'a Handler) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ErrorGuaranteed> {
handler.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path)
}
}
@ -64,11 +66,11 @@ impl AddSubdiagnostic for TranslatableInAddSubdiagnostic {
}
}
pub fn make_diagnostics<'a>(sess: &'a ParseSess) {
let _diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
pub fn make_diagnostics<'a>(handler: &'a Handler) {
let _diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
//~^ ERROR diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
//~^ ERROR diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
//~^^ ERROR diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
}
@ -76,6 +78,6 @@ pub fn make_diagnostics<'a>(sess: &'a ParseSess) {
// Check that `rustc_lint_diagnostics`-annotated functions aren't themselves linted.
#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]
pub fn skipped_because_of_annotation<'a>(sess: &'a ParseSess) {
let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic"); // okay!
pub fn skipped_because_of_annotation<'a>(handler: &'a Handler) {
let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic"); // okay!
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error: diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:37:14
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:39:17
|
LL | sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
| ^^^^^^^^^^
LL | handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic")
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:6:9
@ -11,16 +11,16 @@ LL | #![deny(rustc::untranslatable_diagnostic)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:54:14
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:56:14
|
LL | diag.note("untranslatable diagnostic");
| ^^^^
error: diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:68:22
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:70:25
|
LL | let _diag = sess.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
LL | let _diag = handler.struct_err(fluent::parser::expect_path);
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:7:9
@ -29,16 +29,16 @@ LL | #![deny(rustc::diagnostic_outside_of_impl)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: diagnostics should only be created in `SessionDiagnostic`/`AddSubdiagnostic` impls
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:71:22
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:73:25
|
LL | let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
| ^^^^^^^^^^
LL | let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
| ^^^^^^^^^^
error: diagnostics should be created using translatable messages
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:71:22
--> $DIR/diagnostics.rs:73:25
|
LL | let _diag = sess.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
| ^^^^^^^^^^
LL | let _diag = handler.struct_err("untranslatable diagnostic");
| ^^^^^^^^^^
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors

View File

@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ fn main() {
let _a = || { match l1 { L1::A => (), L1::B => () } };
// (except if the match is already non-exhaustive)
let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => () } };
//~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered [E0004]
//~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `L1::B` not covered [E0004]
// l2 should not be captured as it is a non-exhaustive SingleVariant
// defined in this crate

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `L1::B` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:26:25
|
LL | let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => () } };
| ^^ pattern `B` not covered
| ^^ pattern `L1::B` not covered
|
note: `L1` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:12:14
@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ LL | enum L1 { A, B }
= note: the matched value is of type `L1`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL | let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => (), B => todo!() } };
| ++++++++++++++
LL | let _b = || { match l1 { L1::A => (), L1::B => todo!() } };
| ++++++++++++++++++
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `E1` is non-empty
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:37:25

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ enum Helper<T, U> {
fn transmute<T, U>(t: T) -> U {
let Helper::U(u) = Helper::T(t, []);
//~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `T(_, _)` not covered
//~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Helper::T(_, _)` not covered
u
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `T(_, _)` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Helper::T(_, _)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-never-array.rs:10:9
|
LL | let Helper::U(u) = Helper::T(t, []);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `T(_, _)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Helper::T(_, _)` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Terminator::HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
--> $DIR/E0004.rs:9:11
|
LL | match x {
| ^ pattern `HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
| ^ pattern `Terminator::HastaLaVistaBaby` not covered
|
note: `Terminator` defined here
--> $DIR/E0004.rs:2:5
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ LL | HastaLaVistaBaby,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Terminator::TalkToMyHand => {}
LL + HastaLaVistaBaby => todo!()
LL + Terminator::HastaLaVistaBaby => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ fn main() {
Foo::A => {}
Foo::B => {}
}
//~^^^^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
//~^^^^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::C` not covered
match Foo::A {
Foo::A => {}

View File

@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ LL | #[warn(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns)]
= note: see issue #89554 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89554> for more information
= help: add `#![feature(non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint)]` to the crate attributes to enable
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::C` not covered
--> $DIR/feature-gate-non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint.rs:20:11
|
LL | match Foo::A {
| ^^^^^^ pattern `C` not covered
| ^^^^^^ pattern `Foo::C` not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/feature-gate-non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns_lint.rs:12:15
@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ LL | A, B, C,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Foo::B => {}
LL + C => todo!()
LL + Foo::C => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error; 10 warnings emitted

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Enum::B` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-94866.rs:10:11
|
LL | match Enum::A {
| ^^^^^^^ pattern `B` not covered
| ^^^^^^^ pattern `Enum::B` not covered
|
note: `Enum` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-94866.rs:7:16
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ LL | enum Enum { A, B }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Enum::A => m!(),
LL + B => todo!()
LL + Enum::B => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
fn no_restriction<T>(x: &()) -> &() {
with_restriction::<T>(x) //~ ERROR the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
}
fn with_restriction<'b, T: 'b>(x: &'b ()) -> &'b () {
x
}
fn main() {}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
error[E0311]: the parameter type `T` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/suggest-introducing-and-adding-missing-lifetime.rs:2:5
|
LL | with_restriction::<T>(x)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
note: the parameter type `T` must be valid for the anonymous lifetime defined here...
--> $DIR/suggest-introducing-and-adding-missing-lifetime.rs:1:25
|
LL | fn no_restriction<T>(x: &()) -> &() {
| ^^^
note: ...so that the type `T` will meet its required lifetime bounds
--> $DIR/suggest-introducing-and-adding-missing-lifetime.rs:2:5
|
LL | with_restriction::<T>(x)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
LL | fn no_restriction<'a, T: 'a>(x: &()) -> &() {
| +++ ++++
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ fn main() {
match l { L::A => (), L::B => () };
// (except if the match is already non-exhaustive)
match l { L::A => () };
//~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered [E0004]
//~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `L::B` not covered [E0004]
// E1 is not visibly uninhabited from here
let (e1, e2) = bar();

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `L::B` not covered
--> $DIR/match_non_exhaustive.rs:23:11
|
LL | match l { L::A => () };
| ^ pattern `B` not covered
| ^ pattern `L::B` not covered
|
note: `L` defined here
--> $DIR/match_non_exhaustive.rs:10:13
@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ LL | enum L { A, B }
= note: the matched value is of type `L`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL | match l { L::A => (), B => todo!() };
| ++++++++++++++
LL | match l { L::A => (), L::B => todo!() };
| +++++++++++++++++
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: type `E1` is non-empty
--> $DIR/match_non_exhaustive.rs:28:11

View File

@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
struct Foo {
foo: i32;
//~^ ERROR struct fields are separated by `,`
}
union Bar { //~ ERROR
foo: i32;
//~^ ERROR union fields are separated by `,`
}
enum Baz {
Qux { foo: i32; }
//~^ ERROR struct fields are separated by `,`
}
fn main() {}

View File

@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
error: struct fields are separated by `,`
--> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:2:13
|
LL | foo: i32;
| ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
error: union fields are separated by `,`
--> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:7:13
|
LL | foo: i32;
| ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
error: struct fields are separated by `,`
--> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:12:19
|
LL | Qux { foo: i32; }
| ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
error: unions cannot have zero fields
--> $DIR/recover-field-semi.rs:6:1
|
LL | / union Bar {
LL | | foo: i32;
LL | |
LL | | }
| |_^
error: aborting due to 4 previous errors

View File

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
struct S {
bar: ();
//~^ ERROR expected `,`, or `}`, found `;`
//~^ ERROR struct fields are separated by `,`
}
fn main() {}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error: expected `,`, or `}`, found `;`
error: struct fields are separated by `,`
--> $DIR/removed-syntax-field-semicolon.rs:2:12
|
LL | bar: ();
| ^
| ^ help: replace `;` with `,`
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -22,22 +22,22 @@ fn main() {
HiddenEnum::A => {}
HiddenEnum::C => {}
}
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` not covered
match HiddenEnum::A {
HiddenEnum::A => {}
}
//~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `_` not covered
//~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` and `_` not covered
match None {
None => {}
Some(HiddenEnum::A) => {}
}
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(HiddenEnum::B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
match InCrate::A {
InCrate::A => {}
InCrate::B => {}
}
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `InCrate::C` not covered
}

View File

@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ LL ~ HiddenEnum::B => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:21:11
|
LL | match HiddenEnum::A {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `B` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `HiddenEnum::B` not covered
|
note: `HiddenEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/hidden.rs:3:5
@ -34,14 +34,14 @@ LL | B,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ HiddenEnum::C => {}
LL + B => todo!()
LL + HiddenEnum::B => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `_` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `HiddenEnum::B` and `_` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:27:11
|
LL | match HiddenEnum::A {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `B` and `_` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `HiddenEnum::B` and `_` not covered
|
note: `HiddenEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/hidden.rs:3:5
@ -55,14 +55,14 @@ LL | B,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ HiddenEnum::A => {}
LL + B | _ => todo!()
LL + HiddenEnum::B | _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(HiddenEnum::B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:32:11
|
LL | match None {
| ^^^^ patterns `Some(B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
| ^^^^ patterns `Some(HiddenEnum::B)` and `Some(_)` not covered
|
note: `Option<HiddenEnum>` defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
@ -76,14 +76,14 @@ LL | Some(#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")] T),
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ Some(HiddenEnum::A) => {}
LL + Some(B) | Some(_) => todo!()
LL + Some(HiddenEnum::B) | Some(_) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `InCrate::C` not covered
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:38:11
|
LL | match InCrate::A {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `C` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `InCrate::C` not covered
|
note: `InCrate` defined here
--> $DIR/doc-hidden-non-exhaustive.rs:11:5
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ LL | C,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ InCrate::B => {}
LL + C => todo!()
LL + InCrate::C => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors

View File

@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ LL | union NonEmptyUnion2 {
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyUnion2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:83:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
@ -121,11 +121,11 @@ LL | Foo(bool),
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum1`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:84:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
@ -139,11 +139,11 @@ LL | Bar,
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or multiple match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:85:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6
@ -238,11 +238,11 @@ LL ~ _ if false => {}
LL + NonEmptyUnion2 { .. } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:92:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
@ -255,14 +255,14 @@ LL | Foo(bool),
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
LL + Foo(_) => todo!()
LL + NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:93:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
@ -277,14 +277,14 @@ LL | Bar,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
LL + Foo(_) | Bar => todo!()
LL + NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_) | NonEmptyEnum2::Bar => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:94:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6

View File

@ -105,11 +105,11 @@ LL | union NonEmptyUnion2 {
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyUnion2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:83:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
@ -121,11 +121,11 @@ LL | Foo(bool),
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum1`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:84:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
@ -139,11 +139,11 @@ LL | Bar,
= note: the matched value is of type `NonEmptyEnum2`
= help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or multiple match arms
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:85:20
|
LL | match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6
@ -238,11 +238,11 @@ LL ~ _ if false => {}
LL + NonEmptyUnion2 { .. } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:92:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo(_)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum1` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:24:5
@ -255,14 +255,14 @@ LL | Foo(bool),
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
LL + Foo(_) => todo!()
LL + NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:93:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum2` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:27:5
@ -277,14 +277,14 @@ LL | Bar,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ _ if false => {}
LL + Foo(_) | Bar => todo!()
LL + NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_) | NonEmptyEnum2::Bar => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:94:24
|
LL | match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `NonEmptyEnum5` defined here
--> $DIR/empty-match.rs:30:6

View File

@ -80,16 +80,16 @@ fn main() {
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyStruct2(true)); //~ ERROR type `NonEmptyStruct2` is non-empty
match_no_arms!((NonEmptyUnion1 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR type `NonEmptyUnion1` is non-empty
match_no_arms!((NonEmptyUnion2 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR type `NonEmptyUnion2` is non-empty
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` not covered
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
match_no_arms!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
match_guarded_arm!(0u8); //~ ERROR `_` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyStruct1); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyStruct1` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyStruct2(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyStruct2(_)` not covered
match_guarded_arm!((NonEmptyUnion1 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyUnion1 { .. }` not covered
match_guarded_arm!((NonEmptyUnion2 { foo: () })); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyUnion2 { .. }` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `Foo(_)` and `Bar` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `V1`, `V2`, `V3` and 2 more not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum1::Foo(_)` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(true)); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum2::Foo(_)` and `NonEmptyEnum2::Bar` not covered
match_guarded_arm!(NonEmptyEnum5::V1); //~ ERROR `NonEmptyEnum5::V1`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V2`, `NonEmptyEnum5::V3` and 2 more not covered
}

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ pub enum V {
fn main() {
match (T::T1(()), V::V2(true)) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(T1(()), V2(_))` and `(T2(()), V1(_))` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::T1(()), V::V2(_))` and `(T::T2(()), V::V1(_))` not covered
(T::T1(()), V::V1(i)) => (),
(T::T2(()), V::V2(b)) => (),
}

View File

@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(T1(()), V2(_))` and `(T2(()), V1(_))` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::T1(()), V::V2(_))` and `(T::T2(()), V::V1(_))` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-15129.rs:12:11
|
LL | match (T::T1(()), V::V2(true)) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(T1(()), V2(_))` and `(T2(()), V1(_))` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(T::T1(()), V::V2(_))` and `(T::T2(()), V::V1(_))` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(T, V)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ (T::T2(()), V::V2(b)) => (),
LL ~ (T1(()), V2(_)) | (T2(()), V1(_)) => todo!(),
LL ~ (T::T1(()), V::V2(_)) | (T::T2(()), V::V1(_)) => todo!(),
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ enum Thing {
fn main() {
let Thing::Foo(y) = Thing::Foo(1);
//~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Bar` and `Baz` not covered
//~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Thing::Bar` and `Thing::Baz` not covered
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Bar` and `Baz` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Thing::Bar` and `Thing::Baz` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-31561.rs:8:9
|
LL | let Thing::Foo(y) = Thing::Foo(1);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Bar` and `Baz` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Thing::Bar` and `Thing::Baz` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(B, _)`, `(C, _)`, `(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(Enum::B, _)`, `(Enum::C, _)`, `(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:10:11
|
LL | match (A, ()) {
| ^^^^^^^ patterns `(B, _)`, `(C, _)`, `(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^ patterns `(Enum::B, _)`, `(Enum::C, _)`, `(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(Enum, ())`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ LL ~ (A, _) => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(_, B)`, `(_, C)`, `(_, D)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(_, Enum::B)`, `(_, Enum::C)`, `(_, Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:14:11
|
LL | match (A, A) {
| ^^^^^^ patterns `(_, B)`, `(_, C)`, `(_, D)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^ patterns `(_, Enum::B)`, `(_, Enum::C)`, `(_, Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(Enum, Enum)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
@ -24,11 +24,11 @@ LL ~ (_, A) => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:18:11
|
LL | match ((A, ()), ()) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `((Enum, ()), ())`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
@ -37,11 +37,11 @@ LL ~ ((A, ()), _) => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:22:11
|
LL | match ((A, ()), A) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `((Enum, ()), Enum)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
@ -50,11 +50,11 @@ LL ~ ((A, ()), _) => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:26:11
|
LL | match ((A, ()), ()) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((B, _), _)`, `((C, _), _)`, `((D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `((Enum::B, _), _)`, `((Enum::C, _), _)`, `((Enum::D, _), _)` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `((Enum, ()), ())`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms
@ -63,11 +63,11 @@ LL ~ ((A, _), _) => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `S(B, _)`, `S(C, _)`, `S(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `S(Enum::B, _)`, `S(Enum::C, _)`, `S(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:31:11
|
LL | match S(A, ()) {
| ^^^^^^^^ patterns `S(B, _)`, `S(C, _)`, `S(D, _)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^ patterns `S(Enum::B, _)`, `S(Enum::C, _)`, `S(Enum::D, _)` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `S` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:6:8
@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ LL ~ S(A, _) => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Sd { x: B, .. }`, `Sd { x: C, .. }`, `Sd { x: D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Sd { x: Enum::B, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::C, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:35:11
|
LL | match (Sd { x: A, y: () }) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Sd { x: B, .. }`, `Sd { x: C, .. }`, `Sd { x: D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Sd { x: Enum::B, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::C, .. }`, `Sd { x: Enum::D, .. }` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `Sd` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:7:8
@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ LL ~ Sd { x: A, y: _ } => {}
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(B)`, `Some(C)`, `Some(D)` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Enum::B)`, `Some(Enum::C)`, `Some(Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-35609.rs:39:11
|
LL | match Some(A) {
| ^^^^^^^ patterns `Some(B)`, `Some(C)`, `Some(D)` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^ patterns `Some(Enum::B)`, `Some(Enum::C)`, `Some(Enum::D)` and 2 more not covered
|
note: `Option<Enum>` defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Bar { bar: C, .. }`, `Bar { bar: D, .. }`, `Bar { bar: E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::C, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::D, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-39362.rs:10:11
|
LL | match f {
| ^ patterns `Bar { bar: C, .. }`, `Bar { bar: D, .. }`, `Bar { bar: E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
| ^ patterns `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::C, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::D, .. }`, `Foo::Bar { bar: Bar::E, .. }` and 1 more not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-39362.rs:2:5

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `C(QA)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `P::C(PC::QA)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-40221.rs:11:11
|
LL | match proto {
| ^^^^^ pattern `C(QA)` not covered
| ^^^^^ pattern `P::C(PC::QA)` not covered
|
note: `P` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-40221.rs:2:5
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ LL | C(PC),
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ P::C(PC::Q) => (),
LL ~ C(QA) => todo!(),
LL ~ P::C(PC::QA) => todo!(),
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ impl Tag {
fn main() {
match Tag::ExifIFDPointer {
//~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Exif, _)` not covered
//~^ ERROR: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Context::Exif, _)` not covered
Tag::ExifIFDPointer => {}
}
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Exif, _)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tag(Context::Exif, _)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-50900.rs:15:11
|
LL | match Tag::ExifIFDPointer {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Tag(Exif, _)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Tag(Context::Exif, _)` not covered
|
note: `Tag` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-50900.rs:2:12
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ LL | pub struct Tag(pub Context, pub u16);
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Tag::ExifIFDPointer => {}
LL + Tag(Exif, _) => todo!()
LL + Tag(Context::Exif, _) => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ enum Foo {
fn main() {
match Foo::A(true) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `A(false)`, `B(false)` and `C(false)` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::A(false)`, `Foo::B(false)` and `Foo::C(false)` not covered
Foo::A(true) => {}
Foo::B(true) => {}
Foo::C(true) => {}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A(false)`, `B(false)` and `C(false)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo::A(false)`, `Foo::B(false)` and `Foo::C(false)` not covered
--> $DIR/issue-56379.rs:8:11
|
LL | match Foo::A(true) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `A(false)`, `B(false)` and `C(false)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Foo::A(false)`, `Foo::B(false)` and `Foo::C(false)` not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/issue-56379.rs:2:5
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ LL | C(bool),
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ Foo::C(true) => {}
LL + A(false) | B(false) | C(false) => todo!()
LL + Foo::A(false) | Foo::B(false) | Foo::C(false) => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ fn main() {
let y = Some(X::A);
match (x, y) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, Some(A))`, `(A, Some(B))`, `(B, Some(B))` and 2
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(X::A, Some(X::A))`, `(X::A, Some(X::B))`, `(X::B, Some(X::B))` and 2
//~| more not covered
(_, None) => false,
(v, Some(w)) if v == w => true,

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, Some(A))`, `(A, Some(B))`, `(B, Some(B))` and 2 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(X::A, Some(X::A))`, `(X::A, Some(X::B))`, `(X::B, Some(X::B))` and 2 more not covered
--> $DIR/issue-72377.rs:8:11
|
LL | match (x, y) {
| ^^^^^^ patterns `(A, Some(A))`, `(A, Some(B))`, `(B, Some(B))` and 2 more not covered
| ^^^^^^ patterns `(X::A, Some(X::A))`, `(X::A, Some(X::B))`, `(X::B, Some(X::B))` and 2 more not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(X, Option<X>)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern as shown, or multiple match arms

View File

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ const EAST: Direction = East;
fn nonexhaustive_2() {
match Some(Some(North)) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(West))` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(Direction::West))` not covered
Some(NONE) => (),
Some(Some(North)) => (),
Some(Some(EAST)) => (),
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ const STATIC_FOO: Foo = Foo { bar: None, baz: NEW_FALSE };
fn nonexhaustive_3() {
match (Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }) {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }`
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) }`
Foo { bar: None, baz: NewBool(true) } => (),
Foo { bar: _, baz: NEW_FALSE } => (),
Foo { bar: Some(West), baz: NewBool(true) } => (),

View File

@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ LL ~ (false, true) => (),
LL + (true, false) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(West))` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Some(Some(Direction::West))` not covered
--> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:29:11
|
LL | match Some(Some(North)) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Some(Some(West))` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Some(Some(Direction::West))` not covered
|
note: `Option<Option<Direction>>` defined here
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/option.rs:LL:COL
@ -32,14 +32,14 @@ LL | Some(#[stable(feature = "rust1", since = "1.0.0")] T),
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ None => (),
LL + Some(Some(West)) => todo!()
LL + Some(Some(Direction::West)) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
--> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:48:11
|
LL | match (Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) }` not covered
|
note: `Foo` defined here
--> $DIR/match-arm-statics-2.rs:40:8
@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ LL | struct Foo {
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Foo { bar: Some(EAST), .. } => (),
LL + Foo { bar: Some(North), baz: NewBool(true) } => todo!()
LL + Foo { bar: Some(Direction::North), baz: NewBool(true) } => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 3 previous errors

View File

@ -35,43 +35,43 @@ enum E {
fn by_val(e: E) {
let e1 = e.clone();
match e1 { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `B` and `C` not covered
match e1 { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `E`
E::A => {}
}
let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `B` and `C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `B` and `C` not covered
let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `E`
}
fn by_ref_once(e: &E) {
match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&B` and `&C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&E`
E::A => {}
}
let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&B` and `&C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
let E::A = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&E`
}
fn by_ref_thrice(e: & &mut &E) {
match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
match e { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
//~^ NOTE patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&&mut &E`
E::A => {}
}
let E::A = e;
//~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
//~| NOTE patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
//~^ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `&&mut &E`
@ -89,15 +89,15 @@ enum Opt {
}
fn ref_pat(e: Opt) {
match e {//~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `None` not covered
//~^ NOTE pattern `None` not covered
match e {//~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Opt::None` not covered
//~^ NOTE pattern `Opt::None` not covered
//~| NOTE the matched value is of type `Opt`
Opt::Some(ref _x) => {}
}
let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `None` not covered
let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Opt::None` not covered
//~^ NOTE the matched value is of type `Opt`
//~| NOTE pattern `None` not covered
//~| NOTE pattern `Opt::None` not covered
//~| NOTE `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with
//~| NOTE for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:38:11
|
LL | match e1 {
| ^^ patterns `B` and `C` not covered
| ^^ patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
|
note: `E` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5
@ -19,14 +19,14 @@ LL | C
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ E::A => {}
LL + B | C => todo!()
LL + E::B | E::C => todo!()
|
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `B` and `C` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:44:9
|
LL | let E::A = e;
| ^^^^ patterns `B` and `C` not covered
| ^^^^ patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variants that aren't matched
LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() }
| ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&B` and `&C` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:52:11
|
LL | match e {
| ^ patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
| ^ patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
|
note: `E` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5
@ -68,14 +68,14 @@ LL | C
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ E::A => {}
LL + &B | &C => todo!()
LL + &E::B | &E::C => todo!()
|
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&B` and `&C` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:58:9
|
LL | let E::A = e;
| ^^^^ patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered
| ^^^^ patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
@ -96,11 +96,11 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variants that aren't matched
LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() }
| ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:66:11
|
LL | match e {
| ^ patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
| ^ patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
|
note: `E` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5
@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ LL | C
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ E::A => {}
LL + &&mut &B | &&mut &C => todo!()
LL + &&mut &E::B | &&mut &E::C => todo!()
|
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:72:9
|
LL | let E::A = e;
| ^^^^ patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered
| ^^^^ patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variants that aren't matched
LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() }
| ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `None` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Opt::None` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:92:11
|
LL | match e {
| ^ pattern `None` not covered
| ^ pattern `Opt::None` not covered
|
note: `Opt` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:84:5
@ -163,14 +163,14 @@ LL | None,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Opt::Some(ref _x) => {}
LL + None => todo!()
LL + Opt::None => todo!()
|
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `None` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Opt::None` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:98:9
|
LL | let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `None` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Opt::None` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html

View File

@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ fn match_nested_vecs<'a, T>(l1: Option<&'a [T]>, l2: Result<&'a [T], ()>) -> &'s
fn main() {
let x = T::A(U::C);
match x { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `A(C)` not covered
match x { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A(U::C)` not covered
T::A(U::D) => { panic!("hello"); }
T::B => { panic!("goodbye"); }
}

View File

@ -11,11 +11,11 @@ LL ~ (None, Ok(&[_, _, ..])) => "None, Ok(at least two elements)",
LL + (Some(&[]), Err(_)) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A(C)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A(U::C)` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match-nested.rs:15:11
|
LL | match x {
| ^ pattern `A(C)` not covered
| ^ pattern `T::A(U::C)` not covered
|
note: `T` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match-nested.rs:1:10
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ LL | enum T { A(U), B }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ T::B => { panic!("goodbye"); }
LL + A(C) => todo!()
LL + T::A(U::C) => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors

View File

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ enum T { A, B }
fn main() {
let x = T::A;
match x { T::B => { } } //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `A` not covered
match x { T::B => { } } //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A` not covered
match true { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `false` not covered
true => {}
}
@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ fn main() {
// and `(_, _, 5_i32..=i32::MAX)` not covered
(_, _, 4) => {}
}
match (T::A, T::A) { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, A)` and `(B, B)` not covered
match (T::A, T::A) { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::A, T::A)` and `(T::B, T::B)` not covered
(T::A, T::B) => {}
(T::B, T::A) => {}
}
match T::A { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
match T::A { //~ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `T::B` not covered
T::A => {}
}
// This is exhaustive, though the algorithm got it wrong at one point

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `T::A` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:7:11
|
LL | match x { T::B => { } }
| ^ pattern `A` not covered
| ^ pattern `T::A` not covered
|
note: `T` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:3:10
@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ LL | enum T { A, B }
= note: the matched value is of type `T`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL | match x { T::B => { }, A => todo!() }
| ++++++++++++++
LL | match x { T::B => { }, T::A => todo!() }
| +++++++++++++++++
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `false` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:8:11
@ -62,24 +62,24 @@ LL ~ (_, _, 4) => {}
LL + (_, _, i32::MIN..=3_i32) | (_, _, 5_i32..=i32::MAX) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(A, A)` and `(B, B)` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `(T::A, T::A)` and `(T::B, T::B)` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:18:11
|
LL | match (T::A, T::A) {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(A, A)` and `(B, B)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `(T::A, T::A)` and `(T::B, T::B)` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `(T, T)`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ (T::B, T::A) => {}
LL + (A, A) | (B, B) => todo!()
LL + (T::A, T::A) | (T::B, T::B) => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `T::B` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:22:11
|
LL | match T::A {
| ^^^^ pattern `B` not covered
| ^^^^ pattern `T::B` not covered
|
note: `T` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-match.rs:3:13
@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ LL | enum T { A, B }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ T::A => {}
LL + B => todo!()
LL + T::B => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `[]` not covered

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ enum Color {
fn enum_with_single_missing_variant() {
match Color::Red {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Red` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::Red` not covered
Color::CustomRGBA { .. } => (),
Color::Green => ()
}
@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ enum Direction {
fn enum_with_multiple_missing_variants() {
match Direction::North {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `East`, `South` and `West` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Direction::East`, `Direction::South` and `Direction::West` not covered
Direction::North => ()
}
}
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ enum ExcessiveEnum {
fn enum_with_excessive_missing_variants() {
match ExcessiveEnum::First {
//~^ ERROR `Second`, `Third`, `Fourth` and 8 more not covered
//~^ ERROR `ExcessiveEnum::Second`, `ExcessiveEnum::Third`, `ExcessiveEnum::Fourth` and 8 more not covered
ExcessiveEnum::First => ()
}
@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ fn enum_with_excessive_missing_variants() {
fn enum_struct_variant() {
match Color::Red {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
Color::Red => (),
Color::Green => (),
Color::CustomRGBA { a: false, r: _, g: _, b: 0 } => (),
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ enum Enum {
fn vectors_with_nested_enums() {
let x: &'static [Enum] = &[Enum::First, Enum::Second(false)];
match *x {
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `[Second(true), Second(false)]` not covered
//~^ ERROR non-exhaustive patterns: `[Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)]` not covered
[] => (),
[_] => (),
[Enum::First, _] => (),

View File

@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ LL ~ Foo { first: false, second: Some([1, 2, 3, 4]) } => (),
LL + Foo { first: false, second: Some([_, _, _, _]) } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Red` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::Red` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:23:11
|
LL | match Color::Red {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Red` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Color::Red` not covered
|
note: `Color` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:17:5
@ -33,14 +33,14 @@ LL | Red,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Color::Green => (),
LL + Red => todo!()
LL + Color::Red => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `East`, `South` and `West` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Direction::East`, `Direction::South` and `Direction::West` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:35:11
|
LL | match Direction::North {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `East`, `South` and `West` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Direction::East`, `Direction::South` and `Direction::West` not covered
|
note: `Direction` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:31:12
@ -56,14 +56,14 @@ LL | North, East, South, West
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ Direction::North => (),
LL + East | South | West => todo!()
LL + Direction::East | Direction::South | Direction::West => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Second`, `Third`, `Fourth` and 8 more not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `ExcessiveEnum::Second`, `ExcessiveEnum::Third`, `ExcessiveEnum::Fourth` and 8 more not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:46:11
|
LL | match ExcessiveEnum::First {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Second`, `Third`, `Fourth` and 8 more not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `ExcessiveEnum::Second`, `ExcessiveEnum::Third`, `ExcessiveEnum::Fourth` and 8 more not covered
|
note: `ExcessiveEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:41:6
@ -77,11 +77,11 @@ LL ~ ExcessiveEnum::First => (),
LL + _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:54:11
|
LL | match Color::Red {
| ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. }` not covered
|
note: `Color` defined here
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:19:5
@ -95,20 +95,20 @@ LL | CustomRGBA { a: bool, r: u8, g: u8, b: u8 }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ Color::CustomRGBA { a: false, r: _, g: _, b: _ } => (),
LL + CustomRGBA { a: true, .. } => todo!()
LL + Color::CustomRGBA { a: true, .. } => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `[Second(true), Second(false)]` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `[Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)]` not covered
--> $DIR/non-exhaustive-pattern-witness.rs:70:11
|
LL | match *x {
| ^^ pattern `[Second(true), Second(false)]` not covered
| ^^ pattern `[Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)]` not covered
|
= note: the matched value is of type `[Enum]`
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ [_, _, ref tail @ .., _] => (),
LL + [Second(true), Second(false)] => todo!()
LL + [Enum::Second(true), Enum::Second(false)] => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `((), false)` not covered

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ fn main() {
match UnstableEnum::Stable {
UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
}
//~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Stable2` and `_` not covered
//~^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Stable2` and `_` not covered
match UnstableEnum::Stable {
UnstableEnum::Stable => {}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Stable2` and `_` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Stable2` and `_` not covered
--> $DIR/stable-gated-patterns.rs:8:11
|
LL | match UnstableEnum::Stable {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Stable2` and `_` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `UnstableEnum::Stable2` and `_` not covered
|
note: `UnstableEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/unstable.rs:9:5
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ LL | Stable2,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
LL + Stable2 | _ => todo!()
LL + UnstableEnum::Stable2 | _ => todo!()
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `_` not covered

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `A::B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
--> $DIR/struct-like-enum-nonexhaustive.rs:8:11
|
LL | match x {
| ^ pattern `B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
| ^ pattern `A::B { x: Some(_) }` not covered
|
note: `A` defined here
--> $DIR/struct-like-enum-nonexhaustive.rs:2:5
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ LL | B { x: Option<isize> },
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ A::B { x: None } => {}
LL + B { x: Some(_) } => todo!()
LL + A::B { x: Some(_) } => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ fn main() {
UnstableEnum::Stable => {}
UnstableEnum::Stable2 => {}
}
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `Unstable` not covered
//~^^^^ non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
// Ok: all variants are explicitly matched
match UnstableEnum::Stable {

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Unstable` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
--> $DIR/unstable-gated-patterns.rs:10:11
|
LL | match UnstableEnum::Stable {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Unstable` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
|
note: `UnstableEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/unstable.rs:11:5
@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ LL | Unstable,
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown
|
LL ~ UnstableEnum::Stable2 => {}
LL + Unstable => todo!()
LL + UnstableEnum::Unstable => todo!()
|
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ fn empty_non_exhaustive(x: EmptyNonExhaustiveEnum) {
fn main() {
match NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit {}
//~^ ERROR `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
//~^ ERROR `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit`, `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
match NormalEnum::Unit {}
//~^ ERROR `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
//~^ ERROR `NormalEnum::Unit`, `NormalEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NormalEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered [E0004]
}

View File

@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ note: the lint level is defined here
LL | #![deny(unreachable_patterns)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit`, `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:33:11
|
LL | match NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit`, `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `NonExhaustiveEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:5:5
@ -33,15 +33,15 @@ LL | Struct { field: u32 }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit {
LL + Unit | Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit | NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_) | NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + }
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `NormalEnum::Unit`, `NormalEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NormalEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:35:11
|
LL | match NormalEnum::Unit {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `Unit`, `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ patterns `NormalEnum::Unit`, `NormalEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NormalEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `NormalEnum` defined here
--> $DIR/enum_same_crate_empty_match.rs:14:5
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ LL | Struct { field: u32 }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match NormalEnum::Unit {
LL + Unit | Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + NormalEnum::Unit | NormalEnum::Tuple(_) | NormalEnum::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + }
|

View File

@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:58:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:57:16
@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:65:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `Tuple(_)` not covered
| ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:64:16
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:75:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `Unit` not covered
| ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveEnum::Unit` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:74:16
@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:92:32
|
LL | NestedNonExhaustive::A(_) => {}
| ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^ patterns `NonExhaustiveEnum::Tuple(_)` and `NonExhaustiveEnum::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:89:12
@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:94:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `C` not covered
| ^ pattern `NestedNonExhaustive::C` not covered
|
= help: ensure that all variants are matched explicitly by adding the suggested match arms
= note: the matched value is of type `NestedNonExhaustive` and the `non_exhaustive_omitted_patterns` attribute was found
@ -146,7 +146,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:132:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `A(_)` not covered
| ^ pattern `NonExhaustiveSingleVariant::A(_)` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:130:12
@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:144:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `Unstable` not covered
| ^ pattern `UnstableEnum::Unstable` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:143:16
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:168:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `Unstable2` not covered
| ^ pattern `OnlyUnstableEnum::Unstable2` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/omitted-patterns.rs:165:12

View File

@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ error: some variants are not matched explicitly
--> $DIR/stable-omitted-patterns.rs:23:9
|
LL | _ => {}
| ^ pattern `Stable2` not covered
| ^ pattern `UnstableEnum::Stable2` not covered
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/stable-omitted-patterns.rs:22:16

View File

@ -55,11 +55,11 @@ LL + _ => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/match.rs:31:11
|
LL | match x {}
| ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^ patterns `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `UninhabitedVariants` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/uninhabited.rs:17:23
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ LL | #[non_exhaustive] Struct { x: ! }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match x {
LL + Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_) | UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|

View File

@ -36,11 +36,11 @@ LL + _ => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/match_same_crate.rs:38:11
|
LL | match x {}
| ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^ patterns `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `UninhabitedVariants` defined here
--> $DIR/match_same_crate.rs:16:23
@ -55,7 +55,7 @@ LL | #[non_exhaustive] Struct { x: ! }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match x {
LL + Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_) | UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|

View File

@ -55,11 +55,11 @@ LL + _ => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
--> $DIR/match_with_exhaustive_patterns.rs:34:11
|
LL | match x {}
| ^ patterns `Tuple(_)` and `Struct { .. }` not covered
| ^ patterns `UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_)` and `UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. }` not covered
|
note: `UninhabitedVariants` defined here
--> $DIR/auxiliary/uninhabited.rs:17:23
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ LL | #[non_exhaustive] Struct { x: ! }
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL ~ match x {
LL + Tuple(_) | Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL + UninhabitedVariants::Tuple(_) | UninhabitedVariants::Struct { .. } => todo!(),
LL ~ }
|

View File

@ -22,8 +22,8 @@ LL | | });
| |______^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
LL | fn func<T: Test + 'a>(foo: &Foo, t: T) {
| ++++
LL | fn func<'a, T: Test + 'a>(foo: &Foo, t: T) {
| +++ ++++
error: aborting due to previous error

View File

@ -47,8 +47,10 @@ LL | | }
| |_____^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
LL | G: Get<T> + 'a,
| ++++
LL ~ fn bar<'a, G, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_
LL | where
LL ~ G: Get<T> + 'a,
|
error[E0311]: the parameter type `G` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:52:5
@ -74,8 +76,8 @@ LL | | }
| |_____^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
LL | fn qux<'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_
| ++++
LL | fn qux<'b, 'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_
| +++ ++++
error[E0311]: the parameter type `G` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:61:9
@ -101,8 +103,8 @@ LL | | }
| |_________^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
LL | fn qux<'b, G: Get<T> + 'b + 'c, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ {
| ++++
LL | fn qux<'c, 'b, G: Get<T> + 'b + 'c, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ {
| +++ ++++
error[E0311]: the parameter type `G` may not live long enough
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:73:5
@ -130,8 +132,8 @@ LL | | }
| |_____^
help: consider adding an explicit lifetime bound...
|
LL | fn bat<'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ + 'a
| ++++
LL | fn bat<'b, 'a, G: 'a + 'b, T>(g: G, dest: &mut T) -> impl FnOnce() + '_ + 'a
| +++ ++++
error[E0621]: explicit lifetime required in the type of `dest`
--> $DIR/missing-lifetimes-in-signature.rs:73:5

View File

@ -24,5 +24,5 @@ enum Foo {
fn main() {
let x: Foo = Foo::D(123, 456);
let Foo::D(_y, _z) = x; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `A(_)` not covered
let Foo::D(_y, _z) = x; //~ ERROR refutable pattern in local binding: `Foo::A(_)` not covered
}

View File

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `A(_)` not covered
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Foo::A(_)` not covered
--> $DIR/uninhabited-irrefutable.rs:27:9
|
LL | let Foo::D(_y, _z) = x;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `A(_)` not covered
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Foo::A(_)` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html