Otherwise something that ought to seemingly work like `//[x86]
needs-llvm-components: x86` or `//[nll_beyond]should-fail` do not get
evaluated properly.
Herein we verify that all of the tests that specify a `--target`
compile-flag, are also annotated with the minimal set of required llvm
components necessary to run that test.
Fix use placement for suggestions near main.
This fixes an edge case for the suggestion to add a `use`. When running with `--test`, the `main` function will be annotated with an `#[allow(dead_code)]` attribute. The `UsePlacementFinder` would end up using the dummy span of that synthetic attribute. If there are top-level inner attributes, this would place the `use` in the wrong position. The solution here is to ignore attributes with dummy spans.
In the process of working on this, I discovered that the `use_suggestion_placement` test was broken. `UsePlacementFinder` is unaware of active attributes. Attributes like `#[derive]` don't exist in the AST since they are removed. Fixing that is difficult, since the AST does not retain enough information. I considered trying to place the `use` towards the top of the module after any `extern crate` items, but I couldn't find a way to get a span for the start of a module block (the `mod` span starts at the `mod` keyword, and it seems tricky to find the spot just after the opening bracket and past inner attributes). For now, I just put some comments about the issue. This appears to have been a known issue in #44215 where the test for it was introduced, and the fix seemed to be deferred to later.
Permit zero non-zero-field on transparent types
Fixes#77841
This makes the transparent fields meet the below:
> * A `repr(transparent)` type `T` must meet the following rules:
> * It may have any number of 1-ZST fields
> * In addition, it may have at most one other field of type U
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Update cargo
This also updates `opener` used in bootstrap (to try to keep dependencies unified).
18 commits in 44456677b5d1d82fe981c955dc5c67734b31f340..9233aa06c801801cff75df65df718d70905a235e
2021-06-12 18:00:01 +0000 to 2021-06-22 21:32:55 +0000
- Detect incorrectly named cargo.toml (rust-lang/cargo#9607)
- Unify weak and namespaced features. (rust-lang/cargo#9574)
- Change `rustc-cdylib-link-arg` error to a warning. (rust-lang/cargo#9563)
- Updates to future-incompatible reporting. (rust-lang/cargo#9606)
- Add a compatibility notice for diesel and the new resolver. (rust-lang/cargo#9602)
- Don't allow config env to modify vars set by cargo (rust-lang/cargo#9579)
- Disambiguate is_symlink. (rust-lang/cargo#9604)
- Update opener requirement from 0.4 to 0.5 (rust-lang/cargo#9583)
- Avoid quadratic complexity when splitting output into lines (rust-lang/cargo#9586)
- Bump to 0.56.0, update changelog (rust-lang/cargo#9597)
- Fix dep-info files including non-local build script paths. (rust-lang/cargo#9596)
- Relax doc collision error. (rust-lang/cargo#9595)
- Handle "jobs = 0" case in cargo config files (rust-lang/cargo#9584)
- Enhancements to testsuite error output. (rust-lang/cargo#9589)
- Fix typo (rust-lang/cargo#9590)
- Enable support for fix --edition for 2021. (rust-lang/cargo#9588)
- Add more details for installing git repository errors (rust-lang/cargo#9582)
- More information for links conflicting (rust-lang/cargo#9568)
Support lowercase error codes in `--explain`
This enables `rustc --explain` to accept a lowercase error code. Thus, for instance, `rustc --explain e0573` would be valid after this change, where before a user would have needed to do `rustc --explain E0573`. Although the upper case form of an error code is canonical, the user may prefer the easier-to-type lowercase form, and there's nothing to be gained by forcing them to type the upper case version.
Resolves#86518.
Document associativity of iterator folds.
Document the associativity of `Iterator::fold` and
`DoubleEndedIterator::rfold` and add examples demonstrating this.
Add links to direct users to the fold of the opposite associativity.
Error code cleanup and enforce checks
Fixes#86097.
It now checks if an error code is unused, and if so, will report an error if the error code wasn't commented out in the `error_codes.rs` file. It also checks that the constant used in the tidy check is up-to-date.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Check whether the closure's owner is an ADT in thir-unsafeck
This pull request fixes#85871. The code in `rustc_mir_build/src/check_unsafety.rs` incorrectly assumes that a closure's owner always has a body, but only functions, closures, and constants have bodies, whereas a closure can also appear inside a struct or enum:
```rust
struct S {
arr: [(); match || 1 { _ => 42 }]
}
enum E {
A([(); { || 1; 42 }])
}
```
This pull request fixes the resulting ICE by checking whether the closure's owner is an ADT and only deferring to `thir_check_unsafety(owner)` if it isn't.
Fix crate filter search reset
I found a fun bug when using rustdoc recently: I made a search, cut the search input content, changed the crate filter, pasted back the input content. To my surprise, the crate filter wasn't applied. It's because that our search input was empty when receiving the `<select>` "onchange" event. To fix this issue, I reset the `currentResults` variable to `null`.
It's using the first commit from #86542 so it needs to wait for it before getting merged.
r? `@jsha`
Better errors for Debug and Display traits
Currently, if someone tries to pass value that does not implement `Debug` or `Display` to a formatting macro, they get a very verbose and confusing error message. This PR changes the error messages for missing `Debug` and `Display` impls to be less overwhelming in this case, as suggested by #85844. I was a little less aggressive in changing the error message than that issue proposed. Still, this implementation would be enough to reduce the number of messages to be much more manageable.
After this PR, information on the cause of an error involving a `Debug` or `Display` implementation would suppressed if the requirement originated within a standard library macro. My reasoning was that errors originating from within a macro are confusing when they mention details that the programmer can't see, and this is particularly problematic for `Debug` and `Display`, which are most often used via macros. It is possible that either a broader or a narrower criterion would be better. I'm quite open to any feedback.
Fixes#85844.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #86223 (Specify the kind of the item for E0121)
- #86521 (Add comments around code where ordering is important due for panic-safety)
- #86523 (Improvements to intra-doc link macro disambiguators)
- #86542 (Line numbers aligned with content)
- #86549 (Add destructuring example of E0508)
- #86557 (Update books)
Failed merges:
- #86548 (Fix crate filter search reset)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Line numbers aligned with content
We had the issue a few times in the past where the source code pages' content wasn't aligned with the line numbers but completely below. This test will prevent this change to go unnoticed.
The first commit comes from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86541 so it needs it to be merged first.
r? `@jsha`
Improvements to intra-doc link macro disambiguators
A few small improvements around macro disambiguators:
- display the link text as it was entered: previously `[macro!()]` would be displayed without the parantheses (fixes#86309)
- support `!{}` and `![]` as macro disambiguators (fixes#86310)
r? `@jyn514` cc `@Manishearth` `@camelid`
Add comments around code where ordering is important due for panic-safety
Iterators contain arbitrary code which may panic. Unsafe code has to be
careful to do its state updates at the right point between calls that may panic.
As requested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86452#discussion_r655153948
r? `@RalfJung`
Re-add support for parsing (and pretty-printing) inner-attributes in match body
Re-add support for parsing (and pretty-printing) inner-attributes within body of a `match`.
In other words, we can do `match EXPR { #![inner_attr] ARM_1 ARM_2 ... }` again.
I believe this unbreaks the only four crates that crater flagged as broken by PR #83312.
(I am putting this up so that the lang-team can check it out and decide whether it changes their mind about what to do regarding PR #83312.)
Fix emit path hashing
With `--emit KIND=PATH`, the PATH should not affect hashes used for dependency tracking. It does not with other ways of specifying output paths (`-o` or `--out-dir`).
Also updates `rustc -Zls` to print more info about crates, which is used here to implement a `run-make` test.
It seems there was already a test explicitly checking that `OutputTypes` hash *is* affected by the path. I think this behaviour is wrong, so I updated the test.
Iterators contain arbitrary code which may panic. Unsafe code has to be
careful to do its state updates at the right point between calls
that may panic.
Disambiguate between SourceFiles from different crates even if they have the same path
This PR fixes an ICE that can occur when the compiler encounters a source file that is part of both the local crate and an upstream crate:
1. While importing source files from an upstream crate the compiler creates a `SourceFile` entry for `foo.rs` in the `SourceMap`. Since this is an imported source file its `src` field is `None`.
2. At a later point the parser encounters `foo.rs` again. It tells the `SourceMap` to load the file but because we already have an entry for `foo.rs` the `SourceMap` will return the existing version with `src == None`.
3. The parser proceeds under the assumption that `src.is_some()` and panics when actually trying to use the file's contents.
This PR fixes the issue by adding the source file's associated `CrateNum` to the `SourceMap`'s interning key. As a consequence the two instances of the file will each have a separate entry in the `SourceMap`. They just happen to share the same file path. This approach seemed less problematic to me than trying to mutate the `SourceFile` after it had already been created.
Another, more involved, approach might be to merge the `src` and the `external_src` field.
Fixes#85955
Mark some edition tests as check-pass
## Overview
This helps with #62277. In short, there are some tests that were marked as `build-pass` when it was unclear whether `check-pass` might be more appropriate. This PR marks some of those tests as `compile-pass`, in addition to making some incidental formatting improvements.
## A brief explanation of why this is correct
These tests fall into a few buckets.
`src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-edition-keyword-ident-lint.rs`
`src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-decl-macros-unlinted.rs`
`src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-idents-in-macros-unlinted.rs`
`src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/dyn-2015-no-warnings-without-lints.rs`
`src/test/ui/dyn-keyword/issue-56327-dyn-trait-in-macro-is-okay.rs`
These test a lint for a keyword added in a new edition and the corresponding changes in keyword rules.
`src/test/ui/editions/edition-feature-ok.rs`
This checks that a feature related to an edition transition is valid.
`src/test/ui/editions/edition-imports-virtual-2015-ambiguity.rs`
This checks that imports between editions work correctly.
`src/test/ui/editions/edition-keywords-2015-2015-expansion.rs`
`src/test/ui/editions/edition-keywords-2018-2015-expansion.rs`
This checks the interaction between a change in keyword status over editions and macros.
All of the things being tested come before linking and codegen, so it is safe to use `check-pass` for them.
Fix `unused_unsafe` around `await`
Enables `unused_unsafe` lint for `unsafe { future.await }`.
The existing test for this is `unsafe { println!() }`, so I assume that `println!` used to contain compiler-generated unsafe but this is no longer true, and so the existing test is broken. I replaced the test with `unsafe { ...await }`. I believe `await` is currently the only instance of compiler-generated unsafe.
Reverts some parts of #85421, but the issue predates that PR.
