commit c547d5fabcd756515afa7263ee5304965bb4c497
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 11:22:23 2020 +0000
test: updating ui/hygiene/panic-location.rs expected
commit 2af03769c4ffdbbbad75197a1ad0df8c599186be
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 10:43:30 2020 +0000
fix: documentation unresolved link
commit c4b0df361ce27d7392d8016229f2e0265af32086
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:58:31 2020 +0000
style: compiling with Rust's style guidelines
commit bdd2de5f3c09b49a18e3293f2457fcab25557c96
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:56:31 2020 +0000
refactor: removing ignore-tidy-filelength
commit fcc4b3bc41f57244c65ebb8e4efe4cbc9460b5a9
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:51:35 2020 +0000
refactor: moving trait RingSlices to ring_slices.rs
commit 2f0cc539c06d8841baf7f675168f68ca7c21e68e
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:46:09 2020 +0000
refactor: moving struct PairSlices to pair_slices.rs
commit a55d3ef1dab4c3d85962b3a601ff8d1f7497faf2
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:31:45 2020 +0000
refactor: moving struct Iter to iter.rs
commit 76ab33a12442a03726f36f606b4e0fe70f8f246b
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:24:32 2020 +0000
refactor: moving struct IntoIter into into_iter.rs
commit abe0d9eea2933881858c3b1bc09df67cedc5ada5
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 02:19:07 2020 +0000
refactor: moving struct IterMut into iter_mut.rs
commit 70ebd6420335e1895e2afa2763a0148897963e24
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 01:49:15 2020 +0000
refactor: moved macros into macros.rs
commit b08dd2add994b04ae851aa065800bd8bd6326134
Author: C <DeveloperC@protonmail.com>
Date: Sat Oct 31 01:05:36 2020 +0000
refactor: moving vec_deque.rs to vec_deque/mod.rs
Update cargo
Fixing an important publish bug.
2 commits in 8662ab427a8d6ad8047811cc4d78dbd20dd07699..2af662e22177a839763ac8fb70d245a680b15214
2020-11-12 03:47:53 +0000 to 2020-11-12 19:04:56 +0000
- Fix publishing with optional dependencies. (rust-lang/cargo#8853)
- Minor typo in features.md (rust-lang/cargo#8851)
Rustdoc check option
The ultimate goal behind this option would be to have `rustdoc --check` being run when you use `cargo check` as a second step.
r? `@jyn514`
Add type to `ConstKind::Placeholder`
I simply threaded `<'tcx>` through everything that required it. I'm not sure whether this is the correct thing to do, but it seems to work.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Eliminate some temporary vectors
This PR changes `get_item_attrs` and `get_item_variances` to return iterator impls instead of vectors. On top of that, this PR replaces some seemingly unnecessary vectors with iterators or SmallVec, and also reserves space where we know (the minimum) number of elements that will be inserted. This change hopes to remove a few heap allocations and unnecessary copies.
Bump version number to 1.50.0
First PR of the release process of Rust 1.48.0. All PRs landed after this one will be included in Rust 1.50.0.
r? `@ghost`
cc `@rust-lang/release`
While reading some parts of the pretty printer code, I noticed this old comment
which seemed out of place. The `use_once_payload` this outdated comment mentions
was removed in 2017 in 40f03a1e0d, so this
completes the work by removing the comment.
During inlining, the callee body is normalized and has types revealed,
but some of locals corresponding to the arguments might come from the
caller body which is not. As a result the caller body does not pass
validation without additional normalization.
The optimization conflates empty token streams with unknown token stream, which is at least suspicious, and doesn't affect performance because 0-length token streams are very rare.
The inliner looks if a sanitizer is enabled before considering
`no_sanitize` attribute as possible source of incompatibility.
The MIR inlining could happen in a crate with sanitizer disabled, but
code generation in a crate with sanitizer enabled, thus the attribute
would be incorrectly ignored.
To avoid the issue never inline functions with different `no_sanitize`
attributes.
extend min_const_generics param ty tests
Apparently we never tested for `u128` and `i128` before this, so I added a test for all types which are allowed.
r? ``@varkor``
Update cargo
5 commits in d5556aeb8405b1fe696adb6e297ad7a1f2989b62..8662ab427a8d6ad8047811cc4d78dbd20dd07699
2020-11-04 22:20:36 +0000 to 2020-11-12 03:47:53 +0000
- Check if rust-src contains a vendor dir, and patch it in (rust-lang/cargo#8834)
- Improve performance of almost fresh builds (rust-lang/cargo#8837)
- Use u32/64::to/from_le_bytes instead of bit fiddling (rust-lang/cargo#8847)
- Avoid constructing an anyhow::Error when not necessary (rust-lang/cargo#8844)
- Skip extracting .cargo-ok files from packages (rust-lang/cargo#8835)
Add asm register information for SPIR-V
As discussed in [zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Defining.20asm!.20for.20new.20architecture), we at [rust-gpu](https://github.com/EmbarkStudios/rust-gpu) would like to support `asm!` for our SPIR-V backend. However, we cannot do so purely without frontend support: [this match](d4ea0b3e46/compiler/rustc_target/src/asm/mod.rs (L185)) fails and so `asm!` is not supported ([error reported here](d4ea0b3e46/compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/expr.rs (L1095))). To resolve this, we need to stub out register information for SPIR-V to support getting the `asm!` content all the way to [`AsmBuilderMethods::codegen_inline_asm`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_codegen_ssa/traits/trait.AsmBuilderMethods.html#tymethod.codegen_inline_asm), at which point the rust-gpu backend can do all the parsing and codegen that is needed.
This is a pretty weird PR - adding support for a backend that isn't in-tree feels pretty gross to me, but I don't see an easy way around this. ``@Amanieu`` said I should submit it anyway, so, here we are! Let me know if this needs to go through a more formal process (MCP?) and what I should do to help this along.
I based this off the [wasm asm PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/78684), which unfortunately this PR conflicts with that one quite a bit, sorry for any merge conflict pain :(
---
Some open questions:
- What do we call the register class? Some context, SPIR-V is an SSA-based IR, there are "instructions" that create IDs (referred to as `<id>` in the spec), which can be referenced by other instructions. So, `reg` isn't exactly accurate, they're SSA IDs, not re-assignable registers.
- What happens when a SPIR-V register gets to the LLVM backend? Right now it's a `bug!`, but should that be a `sess.fatal()`? I'm not sure if it's even possible to reach that point, maybe there's a check that prevents the `spirv` target from even reaching that codepath.
Improve BinaryHeap performance
By changing the condition in the loops from `child < end` to `child < end - 1` we're guaranteed that `right = child + 1 < end` and since finding the index of the biggest sibling can be done with an arithmetic operation we can remove a branch from the loop body. The case where there's no right child, i.e. `child == end - 1` is instead handled outside the loop, after it ends; note that if the loops ends early we can use `return` instead of `break` since the check `child == end - 1` will surely fail.
I've also removed a call to `<[T]>::swap` that was hiding a bound check that [wasn't being optimized by LLVM](https://godbolt.org/z/zrhdGM).
A quick benchmarks on my pc shows that the gains are pretty significant:
|name |before ns/iter |after ns/iter |diff ns/iter |diff % |speedup |
|---------------------|----------------|---------------|--------------|----------|--------|
|find_smallest_1000 | 352,565 | 260,098 | -92,467 | -26.23% | x 1.36 |
|from_vec | 676,795 | 473,934 | -202,861 | -29.97% | x 1.43 |
|into_sorted_vec | 469,511 | 304,275 | -165,236 | -35.19% | x 1.54 |
|pop | 483,198 | 373,778 | -109,420 | -22.64% | x 1.29 |
The other 2 benchmarks for `BinaryHeap` (`peek_mut_deref_mut` and `push`) weren't impacted and as such didn't show any significant change.
Implement destructuring assignment for structs and slices
This is the second step towards implementing destructuring assignment (RFC: rust-lang/rfcs#2909, tracking issue: #71126). This PR is the second part of #71156, which was split up to allow for easier review.
Note that the first PR (#78748) is not merged yet, so it is included as the first commit in this one. I thought this would allow the review to start earlier because I have some time this weekend to respond to reviews. If ``@petrochenkov`` prefers to wait until the first PR is merged, I totally understand, of course.
This PR implements destructuring assignment for (tuple) structs and slices. In order to do this, the following *parser change* was necessary: struct expressions are not required to have a base expression, i.e. `Struct { a: 1, .. }` becomes legal (in order to act like a struct pattern).
Unfortunately, this PR slightly regresses the diagnostics implemented in #77283. However, it is only a missing help message in `src/test/ui/issues/issue-77218.rs`. Other instances of this diagnostic are not affected. Since I don't exactly understand how this help message works and how to fix it yet, I was hoping it's OK to regress this temporarily and fix it in a follow-up PR.
Thanks to ``@varkor`` who helped with the implementation, particularly around the struct rest changes.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
