abort immediately on bad mem::zeroed/uninit
Now that we have non-unwinding panics, let's use them for these assertions. This re-establishes the property that `mem::uninitialized` and `mem::zeroed` will never unwind -- the earlier approach of causing panics here sometimes led to hard-to-debug segfaults when the surrounding code was not able to cope with the unexpected unwinding.
Cc `@bjorn3` I did not touch cranelift but I assume it needs a similar patch. However it has a `codegen_panic` abstraction that I did not want to touch since I didn't know how else it is used.
add ptr::from_{ref,mut}
We have methods to avoid almost all `as` casts around raw pointer handling, except for the initial cast from reference to raw pointer. These new methods close that gap.
(I also moved `null_mut` next to `null` to keep the file consistently organized.)
r? libs-api
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106116
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105465 (Improve top-level docs)
- #105872 (Suggest remove last method call when type coerce with expected type)
- #106032 (std: only use LFS function on glibc)
- #106078 (Provide more context on FileCheck failures)
- #106100 (Codegen test for derived `<` on trivial newtype [TEST ONLY])
- #106109 (rustdoc: make line number CSS for doc comment and scraped the same)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
char: µoptimise UTF-16 surrogates decoding
According to Godbolt¹, on x86_64 using binary and produces slightly
better code than using subtraction. Readability of both is pretty
much equivalent so might just as well use the shorter option.
¹ https://rust.godbolt.org/z/9jM3ejbMx
According to Godbolt¹, on x86_64 using binary and produces slightly
better code than using subtraction. Readability of both is pretty
much equivalent so might just as well use the shorter option.
¹ https://rust.godbolt.org/z/9jM3ejbMx
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #105584 (add assert messages if chunks/windows are length 0)
- #105602 (interpret: add read_machine_[ui]size convenience methods)
- #105824 (str.lines() docstring: clarify that line endings are not returned)
- #105980 (Refer to "Waker" rather than "RawWaker" in `drop` comment)
- #105986 (Fix typo in reading_half_a_pointer.rs)
- #105995 (Add regression test for #96530)
- #106008 (Sort lint_groups in no_lint_suggestion)
- #106014 (Add comment explaining what the scrape-examples-toggle.goml GUI test is about)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Clarify that raw retags are not permitted in Mir
Not sure when this changed, but documentation and the validator needed to be updated. This also removes raw retags from custom mir.
cc rust-lang/miri#2735
r? `@RalfJung`
Refer to "Waker" rather than "RawWaker" in `drop` comment
In my view this is technically more correct as `Waker` actually implements `Drop` (which calls the `drop` method) whereas `RawWaker` does not.
str.lines() docstring: clarify that line endings are not returned
Previously, the str.lines() docstring stated that lines are split at line endings, but not whether those were returned or not. This new version of the docstring states this explicitly, avoiding the need of getting to doctests to get an answer to this FAQ.
Rename `assert_uninit_valid` intrinsic
It's not about "uninit" anymore but about "filling with 0x01 bytes" so the name should at least try to reflect that.
This is actually not fully correct though, as it does still panic for all uninit with `-Zstrict-init-checks`. I'm not sure what the best way is to deal with that not causing confusion. I guess we could just remove the flag? I don't think having it makes a lot of sense anymore with the direction that we have chose to go. It could be relevant again if #100423 lands so removing it may be a bit over eager.
r? `@RalfJung`
Implement `From<bool>` for f32, f64
As is required for trait implementations, these are insta-stable. Given there is a release tomorrow and this needs FCP, I set 1.65 as the stable version.
`@rustbot` label +A-floating-point +C-feature-request +needs-fcp +relnotes +S-waiting-on-review +T-libs-api -T-libs
Implement va_list and va_arg for s390x FFI
Following the s390x ELF ABI and based on the clang implementation, provide appropriate definitions of va_list in library/core/src/ffi/mod.rs and va_arg handling in compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/va_arg.rs.
Fixes the following test cases on s390x:
src/test/run-make-fulldeps/c-link-to-rust-va-list-fn src/test/ui/abi/variadic-ffi.rs
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84628.
Following the s390x ELF ABI and based on the clang implementation,
provide appropriate definitions of va_list in library/core/src/ffi/mod.rs
and va_arg handling in compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/va_arg.rs.
Fixes the following test cases on s390x:
src/test/run-make-fulldeps/c-link-to-rust-va-list-fn
src/test/ui/abi/variadic-ffi.rs
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84628.
Revert "Replace usage of `ResumeTy` in async lowering with `Context`"
Reverts rust-lang/rust#105250
Fixes: #105501
Following instructions from [forge](https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/reviews.html#reverts).
This change introduced a breaking change that is not actionable nor relevant, and is blocking updates to our toolchain. Along with other comments on the CL marking issues that are fixed by reverts, reverting is best until these issues can be resolved
cc. `@Swatinem`
docs: improve pin docs
Override https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104195 with a full cleanup of the git history, now it should be ready to be merged.
r? ``@eholk``
``@rustbot`` label +A-async-await
Realistic `Path::as_mut_os_str` doctest
With "Implement DerefMut for PathBuf" (#105018) now merged, it's
possible to exercise `Path::as_mut_os_str` (#105002) without going
through `into_boxed_path`.
Use a more efficient `Once` on platforms without threads
The current implementation uses an atomic queue and spins rather than panicking when calling `call_once` recursively. Since concurrency is not supported on platforms like WASM, `Once` can be implemented much more efficiently using just a single non-atomic state variable.
fs: Fix#50619 (again) and add a regression test
Bug #50619 was fixed by adding an end_of_stream flag in #50630.
Unfortunately, that fix only applied to the readdir_r() path. When I
switched Linux to use readdir() in #92778, I inadvertently reintroduced
the bug on that platform. Other platforms that had always used
readdir() were presumably never fixed.
This patch enables end_of_stream for all platforms, and adds a
Linux-specific regression test that should hopefully prevent the bug
from being reintroduced again.
std::fmt: Use args directly in example code
The lint "clippy::uninlined_format_args" recommends inline variables in format strings. Fix two places in the docs that do not do this. I noticed this because I copy/pasted one example in to my project, then noticed this lint error. This fixes:
```
error: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> src/main.rs:30:22
|
30 | let string = format!("{:.*}", decimals, magnitude);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> src/main.rs:39:2
|
39 | write!(&mut io::stdout(), "{}", args).unwrap();
```
Support call and drop terminators in custom mir
The only caveat with this change is that cleanup blocks are not supported. I would like to add them, but it's not quite clear to me what the best way to do that is, so I'll have to think about it some more.
r? ``@oli-obk``
Allow blocking `Command::output`
### Problem
Currently, `Command::output` is internally implemented using `Command::spawn`. This is problematic because some targets (like UEFI) do not actually support multitasking and thus block while the program is executing. This coupling does not make much sense as `Command::output` is supposed to block until the execution is complete anyway and thus does not need to rely on a non-blocking `Child` or any other intermediate.
### Solution
This PR moves the implementation of `Command::output` to `std::sys`. This means targets can choose to implement only `Command::output` without having to implement `Command::spawn`.
### Additional Information
This was originally conceived when working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100316. Currently, the only target I know about that will benefit from this change is UEFI.
This PR can also be used to implement more efficient `Command::output` since the intermediate `Process` is not actually needed anymore, but that is outside the scope of this PR.
Since this is not a public API change, I'm not sure if an RFC is needed or not.
The lint "clippy::uninlined_format_args" recommends inline
variables in format strings. Fix two places in the docs that do
not do this. I noticed this because I copy/pasted one example in
to my project, then noticed this lint error. This fixes:
error: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> src/main.rs:30:22
|
30 | let string = format!("{:.*}", decimals, magnitude);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: variables can be used directly in the `format!` string
--> src/main.rs:39:2
|
39 | write!(&mut io::stdout(), "{}", args).unwrap();
Previously, the str.lines() docstring stated that lines are split at line
endings, but not whether those were returned or not. This new version of the
docstring states this explicitly, avoiding the need of getting to doctests to
get an answer to this FAQ.
