continue `TypingMode` refactor
There are still quite a few places which (indirectly) rely on the `Reveal` of a `ParamEnv`, but we're slowly getting there
r? `@compiler-errors`
compiler: Move `rustc_target::spec::abi::Abi` to `rustc_abi::ExternAbi`
Lift `enum Abi` from its rather odd place in the middle of rustc_target, and make it available again from rustc_abi. You know, the crate where you would expect the enum that describes all the ABIs to be? The platform-neutral ones, at least. This will help further refactoring of how we handle ABIs in the near future[^0].
Rename `Abi` to `ExternAbi` because quite a lot of the compiler overloads the concept of "ABI" enough that the existing name is imprecise and it is often renamed _anyway_. Often this was to avoid conflicts with the *other* type formerly known as `Abi` (now named BackendRepr[^1]), but sometimes it is just for clarity, and this name seems more self-explanatory. It does get reexported, though, using its old name, to reduce the odds of merge-conflicting over the entire tree.
All of `ExternAbi`'s friends come along for the ride, which costs adding some optional dependencies to the rustc_abi crate. However, all of this also allows simply moving three crates entirely off rustc_target:
- rustc_hir_pretty
- rustc_lint_defs
- rustc_mir_build
This odd selection is mostly to demonstrate a secondary motivation: The majority of the front-end of the compiler should be as target-agnostic as possible, and it is easier to assure this if they simply don't depend on the crate that describes targets. Note that I didn't migrate crates that don't benefit from it in this way yet, and I didn't survey every last crate.
[^0]: This is being undertaken as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119183
[^1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132246
Improve missing_abi lint
This is for the migration lint for https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3722
It is not yet marked as an edition migration lint, because `Edition2027` doesn't exist yet.
The lint now includes a machine applicable suggestion:
```
warning: extern declarations without an explicit ABI are deprecated
--> src/main.rs:3:1
|
3 | extern fn a() {}
| ^^^^^^ help: explicitly specify the C ABI: `extern "C"`
|
```
Fix validation when lowering `?` trait bounds
Pass the unlowered (`rustc_hir`) polarity to `lower_poly_trait_ref`.
This allows us to actually *validate* that generic args are actually valid on `?Trait` paths. This actually regressed in #113671 because that PR changed the behavior where we were inadvertently re-lowering paths as `BoundPolarity::Positive`, which was also coincidentally the only place we were enforcing the generics on `?Trait` paths were correct.
Fix `target_os` for `mipsel-sony-psx`
Previously set to `target_os = "none"` and `target_env = "psx"` in [the PR introducing the target](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/102689/), but although the Playstation 1 is _close_ to a bare metal target in some regards, it's still very much an operating system, so we should instead set `target_os = "psx"`.
This also matches the `mipsel-sony-psp` target, which sets `target_os = "psp"`.
CC target maintainer ``@ayrtonm.``
If there's any code out there that uses `cfg(target_env = "psx")`, they can use `cfg(any(target_os = "psx", target_env = "psx"))` until they bump their MSRV to a version where this is fully fixed.
Mark `simplify_aggregate_to_copy` mir-opt as unsound
Mark the `simplify_aggregate_to_copy` mir-opt added in #128299 as unsound as it seems to miscompile the MCVE reported in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132353. The mir-opt can be re-enabled once this case is fixed.
```rs
fn pop_min(mut score2head: Vec<Option<usize>>) -> Option<usize> {
loop {
if let Some(col) = score2head[0] {
score2head[0] = None;
return Some(col);
}
}
}
fn main() {
let min = pop_min(vec![Some(1)]);
println!("min: {:?}", min);
// panic happens here on beta in release mode
// but not in debug mode
min.unwrap();
}
```
This MCVE is included as a `run-pass` ui regression test in the first commit. I built the ui test with a nightly manually, and can reproduce the behavioral difference with `-C opt-level=0` and `-C opt-level=1`. Locally, this ui test will fail unless it was run on a compiler built with the second commit marking the mir-opt as unsound thus disabling it by default.
This PR **partially reverts** commit e7386b3, reversing changes made to 02b1be1. The mir-opt implementation is just marked as unsound but **not** reverted to make reland reviews easier. Test changes are **reverted if they were not pure additions**. Tests added by the original PR received `-Z unsound-mir-opts` compile-flags.
cc `@DianQK` `@cjgillot` (PR author and reviewer of #128299)
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130693 (Add `minicore` test auxiliary and support `//@ add-core-stubs` directive in ui/assembly/codegen tests)
- #132316 (CI: use free runners for 3 fast windows jobs)
- #132354 (Add `lp64e` RISC-V ABI)
- #132395 (coverage: Avoid ICE when `coverage_cx` is unexpectedly unavailable)
- #132396 (CI: use free runners for x86_64-gnu-tools and x86_64-rust-for-linux)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
coverage: Avoid ICE when `coverage_cx` is unexpectedly unavailable
In #132124, `coverage_cx()` was changed to panic if the context was unavailable, under the assumption that it would always be available whenever coverage instrumentation is enabled.
However, there have been reports of this change causing ICEs in `polars` CI.
I don't yet understand why this is happening, but for now it seems wisest to revert that part of the change, restoring the two early returns that had been replaced with panics.
Add `lp64e` RISC-V ABI
This PR adds support for the `lp64e` RISC-V ABI, which is the 64-bit equivalent of the `ilp32e` ABI that is already supported.
For reference, this ABI was originally added to LLVM in [this PR](https://reviews.llvm.org/D70401).
Add `minicore` test auxiliary and support `//@ add-core-stubs` directive in ui/assembly/codegen tests
Context: [Real cross-compiling tests instead of `#![no_core]` silliness #130375](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130375)
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/786
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131485
This prototype PR is subject to further changes based on feedback.
### New `minicore` test auxiliary and `//@ add-core-stubs` compiletest directive
This PR introduces a prototype implementation of a `minicore` auxiliary test helper that provides `core` stubs for `#![no_core]` ui/assembly/codegen tests that need to build but not run on both the host platform and the cross-compiled target platform.
Key summary:
- `tests/auxiliary/minicore.rs` contains stub definitions of `core` items intended for consumption by `check-pass`/`build-pass` tests that want the typical prelude items like `Copy` to be stubbed out under `#![no_core]` scenarios, so that the test can be built (not run) for cross-compiled target platforms. Such tests don't want nor need full `-Z build-std` (e.g. `tests/ui/abi/compatibility.rs`).
- `minicore` is intended for `core` items **only**, not `std`- or `alloc`-exclusive items. If stubs for `alloc` or `std` are wanted, they should be provided by an additional directive and test auxiliary, and not be conflated with `minicore` or `core` stubs. This is because a wider range of tests can benefit from `core`-only stubs.
### Implementation
- The `minicore` auxiliary is a single source file `tests/auxiliary/minicore.rs`.
- The path to `minicore` is made avaiable from bootstrap to compiletest via the `--minicore-path` compiletest flag.
- `minicore` is then built on-demand via the `//@ add-core-stubs` compiletest directive, for each test revision for the given target platform (this distinction is important for when host platform != target platform in cross-compilation scenario).
- `minicore` is then made available to the test as an [extern prelude].
[extern prelude]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/names/preludes.html#extern-prelude
### Example usage
```rs
// tests/ui/abi/my-abi-test.rs
//@ check-pass
//@ add-core-stubs
//@ compile-flags: --target i686-unknown-linux-gnu
//@ needs-llvm-components: x86
#![feature(no_core, lang_items)]
#![no_std]
#![no_core]
#![allow(unused, internal_features)]
extern crate minicore;
use minicore::*;
#[lang = "clone"]
pub trait Clone: Sized { // `Sized` is provided by `minicore`
fn clone(&self) -> Self;
}
```
### Implementation steps
- [x] 1. Add an initial `minicore` test auxiliary.
- [x] 2. Build `minicore` in bootstrap.
- [x] 3. Setup a `--minicore-path` compiletest cli flag and pass `minicore` build artifact path from bootstrap to compiletest.
- [x] 4. Assert `add-core-stubs` is mutually incompatible with tests that require to be `run`, as the stubs are only good for tests that only need to be built (i.e. no `run-{pass,fail}`).
- [x] 5. Add some self-tests to sanity check the behavior.
- [x] 6. Ensure that `tests/auxiliary/minicore.rs` is input stamped, i.e. modifying `tests/auxiliary/minicore.rs` should invalidate test cache and force the test to be rerun.
### Known limitations
- The current `minicore` is very minimal, because this PR is intended to focus on supporting the test infrastructure first. Further stubs could be added in follow-up PRs and/or on a as-needed basis.
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: armhf-gnu
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: test-various
try-job: dist-various-1
The initial `minicore` is intentionally super minimal and contains an
incomplete subset of `core` items, and explicitly not items from `alloc`
or `std`-only items.
Remove region from adjustments
It's not necessary to store this region, because it's only used in THIR and MemCat/ExprUse, both of which already basically only deal with erased regions anyways.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132347 (Remove `ValueAnalysis` and `ValueAnalysisWrapper`.)
- #132365 (pass `RUSTC_HOST_FLAGS` at once without the for loop)
- #132366 (Do not enforce `~const` constness effects in typeck if `rustc_do_not_const_check`)
- #132376 (Annotate `input` reference tests)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not enforce `~const` constness effects in typeck if `rustc_do_not_const_check`
Fixes a slight inconsistency between HIR and MIR enforcement of `~const` :D
r? `@rust-lang/project-const-traits`
Remove `ValueAnalysis` and `ValueAnalysisWrapper`.
They represent a lot of abstraction and indirection, but they're only used for `ConstAnalysis`, and apparently won't be used for any other analyses in the future. This commit inlines and removes them, which makes `ConstAnalysis` easier to read and understand.
r? `@cjgillot`
Try to point out when edition 2024 lifetime capture rules cause borrowck issues
Lifetime capture rules in 2024 are modified to capture more lifetimes, which sometimes lead to some non-local borrowck errors. This PR attempts to link these back together with a useful note pointing out the capture rule changes.
This is not a blocking concern, but I'd appreciate feedback (though, again, I'd like to stress that I don't want to block this PR on this): I'm worried about this note drowning in the sea of other diagnostics that borrowck emits. I was tempted to change the level of the note to `.span_warn` just so it would show up in a different color. Thoughts?
Fixes#130545
Opening as a draft first since it's stacked on #131183.
r? `@ghost`
They represent a lot of abstraction and indirection, but they're only
used for `ConstAnalysis`, and apparently won't be used for any other
analyses in the future. This commit inlines and removes them, which
makes `ConstAnalysis` easier to read and understand.
