Use correct `hir_id` for array const arg infers
Fixes#133771
`self.next_id()` results in the `DefId` for the const argument, created from the hack introduced by #133468, having no `HirId` associated with it. This then results in an ICE in metadata encoding. Fixing this then results in *another* ICE where `encode_defs` was not skipping encoding `type_of` and other queries for `DefId`s when they correspond to a `ConstArgKind::Infer` node.
This only reproduces with a library crate as metadata is not encoded for binaries, and apparently we had 0 tests for `generic_arg_infer` for array lengths in a library crate so this was not caught :<
cc #133589 `@voidc`
r? `@compiler-errors` `@lcnr`
Reduce false positives on some common cases from if-let-rescope lint
r? `@jieyouxu`
We would like to identify a very common case in the ecosystem in which we do not need to apply the lint suggestion for the new Edition 2024 `if let` semantics.
In this patch we excluded linting from `if let`s in statements and block tail expressions. In these simple cases, new Edition 2024 drop orders are identical to those of Edition 2021 and prior.
However, conservatively we should still lint for the other cases, because [this example](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=stable&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=2113df5ce78f161d32a1190faf5c7469) shows that the drop order changes are very pronounced, some of which are even sensitive to runtime data.
Gate async fn trait bound modifier on `async_trait_bounds`
This PR moves `async Fn()` trait bounds into a new feature gate: `feature(async_trait_bounds)`. The general vibe is that we will most likely stabilize the `feature(async_closure)` *without* the `async Fn()` trait bound modifier, so we need to gate that separately.
We're trying to work on the general vision of `async` trait bound modifier general in: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3710, however that RFC still needs more time for consensus to converge, and we've decided that the value that users get from calling the bound `async Fn()` is *not really* worth blocking landing async closures in general.
switch `jemalloc-sys` back to `tikv-jemalloc-sys`, and update to 0.6.0
Some context:
- we used to use jemalloc bindings from https://github.com/gnzlbg/jemallocator, since #55238
- that crate was abandoned, picked up as a fork in https://github.com/tikv/jemallocator, so we switched to that in #83152.
- then they were able to publish to the original `jemalloc-sys` bindings crate, and `jemalloc-sys` and `tikv-jemalloc-sys` became the same thing -- so I switched back to the OG crate in #96790
- they're now having publishing problems again: I've been waiting for https://github.com/tikv/jemallocator/pull/96 for the `jemalloc-sys` 0.6.0 update for a few months, but `tikv-jemalloc-sys` is already updated to 0.6.0.
A perf run showed some improvements, so this PR switches back to `tikv-jemalloc-sys` to update to 0.6.0.
Deeply normalize when computing implied outlives bounds
r? lcnr
Unfortunately resolving regions is still slightly scuffed (though in an unrelated way). Specifically, we should be normalizing our param-env outlives when constructing the `OutlivesEnv`; otherwise, these assumptions (dd2837ec5d/compiler/rustc_infer/src/infer/outlives/env.rs (L78)) are not constructed correctly.
Let me know if you want us to track that somewhere.
Print name of env var in `--print=deployment-target`
The deployment target environment variable is OS-specific, and if you're in a place where you're asking `rustc` for the deployment target, you're likely to also wanna know the name of the environment variable. I myself wanted this for some code I'm working on in bootstrap, for example.
Behaviour before this PR:
```console
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin
deployment_target=11.0
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos
deployment_target=1.0
```
Behaviour after this PR:
```console
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-darwin
MACOSX_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=11.0
$ rustc --print=deployment-target --target=aarch64-apple-visionos
XROS_DEPLOYMENT_TARGET=1.0
```
My _belief_ is that this option is extremely rarely used in general, and a GitHub search for "rustc print deployment-target" seems to confirm this, it revealed only the following actual pieces of code using this:
- b292ef6934/src/build_context.rs (L1199-L1220)
- daab9244b0/src/lib.rs (L3422-L3426)
`maturin` does `.split('=').last()`, so it will continue to work after this change, but `cc v1.0.84` did `.strip_prefix("deployment_target=")` since [this PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/848), so it would break. That's _probably_ fine though, it was broken in a lot of scenarios anyway, and [got](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/901) [reverted](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/943) in `v1.0.85`.
So while this is _technically_ a breaking change, I really doubt that anyone is going to observe it, so it's probably fine.
``@BlackHoleFox`` wdyt?
``@rustbot`` label O-apple
r? compiler
Unify `sysroot_target_{bin,lib}dir` handling
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131405#discussion_r1826558962 where `sysroot_target_bindir` had to do some dancing because the sysroot ensure logic embedded in `sysroot_target_libdir` returned `$sysroot/$relative_lib/rustlib/$target/lib` and not the `rustlib` parent `$sysroot/$relative_lib/rustlib/`.
This PR pulls out the sysroot ensure logic into a helper, and return `$sysroot/$relative_lib/rustlib/` instead so `sysroot_target_bindir` doesn't have to do parent traversal from the path returned from `sysroot_target_libdir`, and also make them easier to follow in that they are now clearly closely related based on the common target sysroot ensure logic.
Get rid of HIR const checker
As far as I can tell, the HIR const checker was implemented in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/66170 because we were not able to issue useful const error messages in the MIR const checker.
This seems to have changed in the last 5 years, probably due to work like #90532. I've tweaked the diagnostics slightly and think the error messages have gotten *better* in fact.
Thus I think the HIR const checker has reached the end of its usefulness, and we can retire it.
cc `@RalfJung`
Change `AttrArgs::Eq` to a struct variant
Cleanups for simplifying https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131808
Basically changes `AttrArgs::Eq` to a struct variant and then avoids several matches on `AttrArgsEq` in favor of methods on it. This will make future refactorings simpler, as they can either keep methods or switch to field accesses without having to restructure code
Reducing `target_feature` check-cfg merge conflicts
It was rightfully pointed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099#discussion_r1862490542 that the expected values for the `target_feature` cfg are regularly updated and unfortunately the check-cfg tests for it are very merge-conflict prone.
This PR aims at drastically reducing the likely-hood of those, by normalizing the "and X more" diagnostic, as well as making the full expected list multi-line instead of being on a single one.
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@jieyouxu`
add "profiler" and "optimized-compiler-builtins" option coverage for ci-rustc
Adds "profiler" and "optimized-compiler-builtins" option coverage in CI-rustc config compatibility check.
Resolves#133675
fix ICE when promoted has layout size overflow
Turns out there is no reason to distinguish `tainted_by_errors` and `can_be_spurious` here, we can just track whether we allow this even in "infallible" constants.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125476
Use c"lit" for CStrings without unwrap
I've reviewed uses of `CString::new("lit")`.
Some could be changed to `c"lit"`. Some could be changed to `c"lit".to_owned()`, avoiding an `unwrap()`.
Many `CString` documentation examples could be simplified. I deliberately haven't changed all the examples to use the exact same expression, so that they can demonstrate many ways of creating `CString`s.
I've left UI tests mostly unchanged, because `c""` requires edition 2021, but most UI tests use 2015, and I didn't want to accidentally change what the tests are testing.
Move `Const::{from_anon_const,try_from_lit}` to hir_ty_lowering
Fixes#128176.
This accomplishes one of the followup items from #131081.
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
r? `@BoxyUwU`
show forbidden_lint_groups in future-compat reports
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/81670. This has been a future-compat lint for a while, time to dial it up to show up in reports.
Stabilize `const_maybe_uninit_write`
Mark the following API const stable:
```rust
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub const fn write(&mut self, val: T) -> &mut T;
}
```
This depends on `const_mut_refs` and [`const_maybe_uninit_assume_init`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86722), both of which have recently been stabilized.
Closes: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63567>
build `rustc` with 1 CGU on `aarch64-apple-darwin`
Distribute `aarch64-apple-darwin` artifacts built with `rust.codegen-units=1`, like we already do on Linux/Windows/macOS Intel.
1. Performance results (only wall-time on mac as usual)
- I only did some `ripgrep` check builds (the revision from rustc-perf), because we had noticeable wins in wall-time there back then on linux. It's a ~2-4% (mostly 3%) improvement on local builds.
```console
Benchmark 1: cargo +caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.800 s ± 0.087 s [User: 16.048 s, System: 2.294 s]
Range (min … max): 5.725 s … 6.028 s 10 runs
Benchmark 2: cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.551 s ± 0.037 s [User: 15.451 s, System: 2.252 s]
Range (min … max): 5.477 s … 5.602 s 10 runs
Summary
'cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q' ran
1.04 ± 0.02 times faster than 'cargo +caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286 check -q'
```
```console
Benchmark 1: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.743 s ± 0.030 s [User: 16.005 s, System: 2.249 s]
Range (min … max): 5.720 s … 5.792 s 5 runs
Benchmark 2: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q
Time (mean ± σ): 5.469 s ± 0.055 s [User: 15.244 s, System: 2.110 s]
Range (min … max): 5.404 s … 5.524 s 5 runs
Summary
'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q' ran
1.05 ± 0.01 times faster than 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286 check -q'
```
```console
Benchmark 1: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286 check -q -j1
Time (mean ± σ): 15.092 s ± 0.049 s [User: 11.969 s, System: 1.665 s]
Range (min … max): 15.052 s … 15.165 s 5 runs
Benchmark 2: CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q -j1
Time (mean ± σ): 14.623 s ± 0.035 s [User: 11.520 s, System: 1.619 s]
Range (min … max): 14.593 s … 14.682 s 5 runs
Summary
'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70 check -q -j1' ran
1.03 ± 0.00 times faster than 'CARGO_INCREMENTAL=0 cargo +caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286 check -q -j1'
```
2. Effects on code size on `aarch64-apple-darwin`: it's a 13.24% reduction on `librustc_driver.dylib`
- [before](https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/caa81728c37f5ccfa9a0979574b9272a67f8a286/rustc-nightly-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.xz): 173452888 (57.3 MB compressed).
- [after](https://ci-artifacts.rust-lang.org/rustc-builds/41f40c97bbff6c8642f5510d0be283551b095b70/rustc-nightly-aarch64-apple-darwin.tar.xz): 150471368 (55.2 MB compressed, -3.7% here).
3. Effects on CI
- the [1st try build](https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/12118946198/job/33784512526) took 1h31
- the [2nd try build](https://github.com/rust-lang-ci/rust/actions/runs/12121452825/job/33792429553) took 1h28
- I don't know how long the builder usually takes
These operations are much more about lowering the HIR than about
`Const`s themselves. They fit better in hir_ty_lowering with
`lower_const_arg` (formerly `Const::from_const_arg`) and the rest.
To accomplish this, `const_evaluatable_predicates_of` had to be changed
to not use `from_anon_const` anymore. Instead of visiting the HIR and
lowering anon consts on the fly, it now visits the `rustc_middle::ty`
data structures instead and directly looks for `UnevaluatedConst`s. This
approach was proposed in:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131081#discussion_r1821189257
Mark the following API const stable:
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub const fn write(&mut self, val: T) -> &mut T;
}
This depends on `const_mut_refs` and `const_maybe_uninit_assume_init`,
both of which have recently been stabilized.
Tracking issue: <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63567>
