Fix `armv7-sony-vita-newlibeabihf` LLVM target triple
It was previously normalized by LLVM to `thumbv7a-vita-unknown-eabihf` (can be seen with `clang -target thumbv7a-vita-eabihf -v`), which seems wrong, as Vita is the OS name.
Motivation: To make it easier to verify that [`cc-rs`' conversion from `rustc` to Clang/LLVM triples](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1431) is correct.
CC target maintainers ``@nikarh,`` ``@pheki`` and ``@ZetaNumbers.``
r? jieyouxu
Set `target_vendor = "openwrt"` on `mips64-openwrt-linux-musl`
OpenWRT is a Linux distribution for embedded network devices. The target name contains `openwrt`, so we should set `cfg(target_vendor = "openwrt")`.
This is similar to what other Linux distributions do (the only one in-tree is `x86_64-unikraft-linux-musl`, but that sets `target_vendor = "unikraft"`).
Motivation: To make correctly [parsing target names](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/pull/1413) simpler.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131165.
CC target maintainer `@Itus-Shield`
Fix `uclibc` LLVM target triples
`uclibc` is not an environment understood by LLVM, it is only a concept in Clang that can be selected with `-muclibc` (it affects which dynamic linker is passed to the static linker's `-dynamic-linker` flag).
In fact, using `uclibcgnueabi`/`uclibc` is actively harmful, as it prevents LLVM from seeing that the target is gnu-like; we should use `gnueabi`/`gnu` directly instead.
Motivation: To make it easier to verify that [`cc-rs`' conversion from `rustc` to Clang/LLVM triples](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1431) is correct.
**There are no target maintainers for these targets.** So I'll CC ``@lancethepants`` and ``@skrap`` who maintain the related `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi` and `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf` (both of which already pass `-gnu` instead of `-uclibc`) in case they have any insights.
r? jieyouxu
add FCW to warn about wasm ABI transition
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/122532 for context: the "C" ABI on wasm32-unk-unk will change. The goal of this lint is to warn about any function definition and calls whose behavior will be affected by the change. My understanding is the following:
- scalar arguments are fine
- including 128 bit types, they get passed as two `i64` arguments in both ABIs
- `repr(C)` structs (recursively) wrapping a single scalar argument are fine (unless they have extra padding due to over-alignment attributes)
- all return values are fine
`@bjorn3` `@alexcrichton` `@Manishearth` is that correct?
I am making this a "show up in future compat reports" lint to maximize the chances people become aware of this. OTOH this likely means warnings for most users of Diplomat so maybe we shouldn't do this?
IIUC, wasm-bindgen should be unaffected by this lint as they only pass scalar types as arguments.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138762
Transition plan blog post: https://github.com/rust-lang/blog.rust-lang.org/pull/1531
try-job: dist-various-2
rustc_target: Add target features for LoongArch v1.1
This patch adds new target features for LoongArch v1.1:
* div32
* lam-bh
* lamcas
* ld-seq-sa
* scq
Sync Fuchsia target spec with clang Fuchsia driver
This updates the Fuchsia target spec with the [Clang Fuchsia driver], which picks up a few changes:
* Adds `-z start-stop-visibility=hidden` and `-z rel` to the pre link arguments.
* Adds `--execute-only` and `--fix-cortex-a53-843419` for `aarch64-unknown-fuchsia`.
* Enables the equivalent cpu features for `x86-64-v2` for `x86_64-unknown-fuchsia`, which is our minimum supported x86_64 platform according to [RFC-0073].
try-job: x86_64-fuchsia
[Clang Fuchsia driver]: 8374d42186/clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Fuchsia.cpp
[RFC-0073]: https://fuchsia.dev/fuchsia-src/contribute/governance/rfcs/0073_x86_64_platform_requirement
Fix RISC-V VxWorks LLVM target triples
The targets `riscv32-wrs-vxworks` and `riscv64-wrs-vxworks` uses the plain `$ARCH` LLVM triple, which LLVM normalizes to `$ARCH-unknown-unknown`, we should use `$ARCH-unknown-linux-gnu$ABI` which is consistent with the the other VxWorks targets.
Motivation: To make it easier to verify that [`cc-rs`' conversion from `rustc` to Clang/LLVM triples](https://github.com/rust-lang/cc-rs/issues/1431) is correct.
Alternative: Pass `$ARCH-unknown-none` in the other VxWorks LLVM triples, I don't know anything about VxWorks, so am unsure which is the most correct option.
CC target maintainer `@biabbas.`
r? jieyouxu
`uclibc` is not an environment understood by LLVM, it is only a concept
in Clang that can be selected with `-muclibc` (it affects which dynamic
linker is passed to the static linker's `-dynamic-linker` flag).
In fact, using `uclibcgnueabi`/`uclibc` is actively harmful, as it
prevents LLVM from seeing that the target is gnu-like; we should use
`gnueabi`/`gnu` directly instead.
The targets used the plain `$ARCH` triple, which LLVM normalizes to
`$ARCH-unknown-unknown`, which is inconsistent with the the other
VxWorks targets which all use `$ARCH-unknown-linux-gnu$ABI`.
Speed up target feature computation
The LLVM backend calls `LLVMRustHasFeature` twice for every feature. In short-running rustc invocations, this accounts for a surprising amount of work.
r? `@bjorn3`
Revert <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138084> to buy time to
consider options that avoids breaking downstream usages of cargo on
distributed `rustc-src` artifacts, where such cargo invocations fail due
to inability to inherit `lints` from workspace root manifest's
`workspace.lints` (this is only valid for the source rust-lang/rust
workspace, but not really the distributed `rustc-src` artifacts).
This breakage was reported in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138304>.
This reverts commit 48caf81484, reversing
changes made to c6662879b2.
Remove i586-pc-windows-msvc
See [MCP 840](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/840).
I left a specialized error message that should help users that hit this in the wild (for example, because they use it in their CI).
```
error: Error loading target specification: the `i586-pc-windows-msvc` target has been removed. Use the `i686-pc-windows-msvc` target instead.
Windows 10 (the minimum required OS version) requires a CPU baseline of at least i686 so you can safely switch. Run `rustc --print target-list` for a list of built-in targets
```
``@workingjubilee`` ``@calebzulawski`` fyi portable-simd uses this target in CI, if you wanna remove it already before this happens
compiler: factor Windows x86-32 ABI impl into its own file
While it shares more than zero code with the SysV x86-32 ABI impl, there is no particular reason to organize wildly different ABIs using if-else in the same function.
By naming them in `[workspace.lints.rust]` in the top-level
`Cargo.toml`, and then making all `compiler/` crates inherit them with
`[lints] workspace = true`. (I omitted `rustc_codegen_{cranelift,gcc}`,
because they're a bit different.)
The advantages of this over the current approach:
- It uses a standard Cargo feature, rather than special handling in
bootstrap. So, easier to understand, and less likely to get
accidentally broken in the future.
- It works for proc macro crates.
It's a shame it doesn't work for rustc-specific lints, as the comments
explain.
While it shares more than zero code with the SysV x86-32 ABI impl,
there is no particular reason to organize wildly different ABIs
using if-else in the same function.
Support raw-dylib link kind on ELF
raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library without having any library files present.
This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they can then be resolved by the linker.
While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning. The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning in the future.
This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a corresponding library at build-time.
I was inspired by Björn's comments in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/bundle-zig-cc-in-rustup-by-default/22096/27
Tracking issue: #135694
r? bjorn3
try-job: aarch64-apple
try-job: x86_64-msvc-1
try-job: x86_64-msvc-2
try-job: test-various
raw-dylib is a link kind that allows rustc to link against a library
without having any library files present.
This currently only exists on Windows. rustc will take all the symbols
from raw-dylib link blocks and put them in an import library, where they
can then be resolved by the linker.
While import libraries don't exist on ELF, it would still be convenient
to have this same functionality. Not having the libraries present at
build-time can be convenient for several reasons, especially
cross-compilation. With raw-dylib, code linking against a library can be
cross-compiled without needing to have these libraries available on the
build machine. If the libc crate makes use of this, it would allow
cross-compilation without having any libc available on the build
machine. This is not yet possible with this implementation, at least
against libc's like glibc that use symbol versioning.
The raw-dylib kind could be extended with support for symbol versioning
in the future.
This implementation is very experimental and I have not tested it very
well. I have tested it for a toy example and the lz4-sys crate, where it
was able to successfully link a binary despite not having a
corresponding library at build-time.
add more `s390x` target features
Closes#88937
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869
The target feature names are, right now, just the llvm target feature names. These mostly line up well with the names of [Facility Indications](https://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf#page=301) names. The linux kernel (and `/proc/cpuinfo`) uses shorter, more cryptic names. (e.g. "vector" is `vx`). We can deviate from the llvm names, but the CPU vendor (IBM) does not appear to use e.g. `vx` for what they call `vector`.
There are a number of implied target features between the vector facilities (based on the [Facility Indications](https://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/a227832d.pdf#page=301) table):
- 129 The vector facility for z/Architecture is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode.
- 134 The vector packed decimal facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 134 is one, bit 129 is also one.
- 135 The vector enhancements facility 1 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 135 is one, bit 129 is also one.
- 148 The vector-enhancements facility 2 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 148 is one, bits 129 and 135 are also one.
- 152 The vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 1 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 152 is one, bits 129 and 134 are also one.
- 165 The neural-network-processing-assist facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 165 is one, bit 129 is also one.
- 192 The vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 2 is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. When bit 192 is one, bits 129, 134, and 152 are also one.
The remaining facilities do not have any implied target features (that we provide):
- 45 The distinct-operands, fast-BCR-serialization, high-word, and population-count facilities, the interlocked-access facility 1, and the load/store-oncondition facility 1 are installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode.
- 73 The transactional-execution facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode. Bit 49 is one when bit 73 is one.
- 133 The guarded-storage facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode.
- 150 The enhanced-sort facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode.
- 151 The DEFLATE-conversion facility is installed in the z/Architecture architectural mode.
The added target features are those that have ISA implications, can be queried at runtime, and have LLVM support. LLVM [defines more target features](d49a2d2bc9/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZFeatures.td), but I'm not sure those are useful. They can always be added later, and can already be set globally using `-Ctarget-feature`.
I'll also update the `is_s390x_feature_supported` macro (added in https://github.com/rust-lang/stdarch/pull/1699, not yet on nightly, that needs an stdarch sync) to include these target features.
``@Amanieu`` you had some reservations about the `"vector"` target feature name. It does appear to be the most "official" name we have. On the one hand the name is very generic, and some of the other names are rather long. For the `neural-network-processing-assist` even LLVM thought that was a bit much and shortened it to `nnp-assist`. Also for `vector-packed-decimal-enhancement facility 1` the llvm naming is inconsistent. On the other hand, the cpuinfo names are very cryptic, and aren't found in the IBM documentation.
r? ``@Amanieu``
cc ``@uweigand`` ``@taiki-e``
