Stabilize intra-doc links
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43466
Thanks to the great work of `@jyn514` in getting the [cross-crate reexport issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983) in intra-rustdoc links fixed, I think we're now in a position to stabilize this feature.
The tracking issue currently has two unresolved issues:
- <s>behavior around doc(hidden): This is fixed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/73365, which is just waiting for CI and should land tomorrow. It's also a pretty niche bug so while I expect it to land soon I don't think we need to block stabilization on it anyway.</s>
- Non-identifier primitive types like slices: This was not a part of the original RFC anyway, and is a pretty niche use case
The feature itself, sans https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983, has been shipped on nightly for three years now, with people using it on docs.rs. https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65983 itself is not an overwhelmingly central bit of functionality; the reason we elected to block stabilization on it was that back in 2017 it was not possible to fix the issue without some major refactorings of resolve, and we did not want to stabilize something that had such a potentially unfixable bug.
Given that we've fixed it, I see no reason to delay stabilization on this long awaited feature. It's possible that the latest patches have problems, however we _have_ done crater runs of some of the crucial parts. Furthermore, that's what the release trains are for, we will have a solid three months to let it ride the trains before it actually hits the stable compiler.
r? `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
revert const_type_id stabilization
This reverts #72488, which is currently on beta and scheduled to stabilize in `1.47.0`, based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75923#issuecomment-696676511
It turns out we might not be quite ready to stabilize `TypeId` in const contexts before having a chance to rework its internals. Since `TypeId` is a bit of an oddity we want to be careful about how those internals are currently being relied on while making changes. That will be easier to do without having to also consider compile-time contexts.
r? `@eddyb`
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #76898 (Record `tcx.def_span` instead of `item.span` in crate metadata)
- #76939 (emit errors during AbstractConst building)
- #76965 (Add cfg(target_has_atomic_equal_alignment) and use it for Atomic::from_mut.)
- #76993 (Changing the alloc() to accept &self instead of &mut self)
- #76994 (fix small typo in docs and comments)
- #77017 (Add missing examples on Vec iter types)
- #77042 (Improve documentation for ToSocketAddrs)
- #77047 (Miri: more informative deallocation error messages)
- #77055 (Add #[track_caller] to more panicking Cell functions)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
MIR pass to remove unneeded drops on types not needing drop
This is heavily dependent on MIR inlining running to actually see the drop statement.
Do we want to special case replacing a call to std::mem::drop with a goto aswell?
Add #[track_caller] to more panicking Cell functions
Continuation of #74526
Adds the #[track_caller] attribute to almost all panicking Cell
functions. The ones that borrow two Cells in their function
body are spared, because the panic location helps pinpoint
which of the two borrows failed. You'd need to have
full debuginfo and backtraces enabled together with column
info in order to be able to discern the cases.
Column info in debuginfo is only available on non-Windows platforms.
Add cfg(target_has_atomic_equal_alignment) and use it for Atomic::from_mut.
Fixes some platform-specific problems with #74532 by using the actual alignment of the types instead of hardcoding a few `target_arch`s.
r? @RalfJung
emit errors during AbstractConst building
There changes are currently still untested, so I don't expect this to pass CI 😆
It seems to me like this is the direction we want to go in, though we didn't have too much of a discussion about this.
r? @oli-obk
Record `tcx.def_span` instead of `item.span` in crate metadata
This was missed in PR #75465. As a result, a few places have been using
the full body span of functions, instead of just the header span.
Don't download/sync llvm-project submodule if download-ci-llvm is set
llvm-project takes > 1GB storage space and a long time to download.
It's better to not download it unless needed.
SimplifyComparisonIntegral: fix miscompilation
Fixes#76432
Only insert StorageDeads if we actually removed one.
Fixes an issue where we added StorageDead to a place with no StorageLive
r? `@oli-obk`
Remove `qualify_min_const_fn`
~~Blocked on #76807 (the first six commits).~~
With this PR, all checks in `qualify_min_const_fn` are replicated in `check_consts`, and the former is no longer invoked. My goal was to have as few changes to test output as possible, since making sweeping changes to the code *while* doing big batches of diagnostics updates turned out to be a headache. To this end, there's a few `HACK`s in `check_consts` to achieve parity with `qualify_min_const_fn`.
The new system that replaces `is_min_const_fn` is referred to as "const-stability" My end goal for the const-stability rules is this:
* Const-stability is only applicable to functions defined in `staged_api` crates.
* All functions not marked `rustc_const_unstable` are considered "const-stable".
- NB. This is currently not implemented. `#[unstable]` functions are also const-unstable. This causes problems when searching for feature gates.
- All "const-unstable" functions have an associated feature gate
* const-stable functions can only call other const-stable functions
- `allow_internal_unstable` can be used to circumvent this.
* All const-stable functions are subject to some additional checks (the ones that were unique to `qualify_min_const_fn`)
The plan is to remove each `HACK` individually in subsequent PRs. That way, changes to error message output can be reviewed in isolation.
Don't dynamically link LLVM tools unless rustc is too
This PR initially tried to support link-shared on all of our target platforms (other than Windows), but ran into a number of difficulties:
* LLVM doesn't really support a shared link on macOS (llvm-config runs into problems with the version suffix)
* LLVM doesn't seem to support a shared link when cross-compiling (the libLLVM.so ends up empty and symbols are not found)
So, this PR has now been revised such that we don't attempt to dynamically link LLVM tools (even if that would, otherwise, be supported) on targets where LLVM is statically linked to rustc. Currently that's basically everything except for x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu (where we dynamically link to avoid rerunning ThinLTO in each stage).
Follow-up to #76708.
Fixes#76698.
