Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133411 (the emscripten OS no longer exists on non-wasm targets)
- #133419 (Added a doc test for std::path::strip_prefix)
- #133430 (Tweak parameter mismatch explanation to not say `{unknown}`)
- #133443 (Remove dead code stemming from the old effects desugaring (II))
- #133450 (remove "onur-ozkan" from users_on_vacation)
- #133454 (Update test expectations to accept LLVM 'initializes' attribute)
- #133462 (Use ReadCache for archive reading in bootstrap)
- #133464 (std:🧵 avoid leading whitespace in some panic messages)
- #133467 (tests: Add recursive associated type bound regression tests)
- #133470 (Cleanup: delete `//@ pretty-expanded` directive)
- #133473 (tests: Add regression test for recursive enum with Cow and Clone)
- #133481 (Disable `avr-rjmp-offset` on Windows for now)
- #133495 (add test for alias-bound shadowing, rename folder)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Disable `avr-rjmp-offset` on Windows for now
The linker has been randomly crashing on `x86_64-mingw` that's causing spurious failures (#133480). Disable this test on Windows for now.
cc `@jfrimmel` (nothing actionable, just FYI because linker gonna linker)
cc `@ehuss` (who noticed this)
r? compiler (or anyone really)
tests: Add regression test for recursive enum with Cow and Clone
I could not find any existing test. `git grep "(Cow<'[^>]\+\["` gave no hits before this tests.
Closes#100347
Cleanup: delete `//@ pretty-expanded` directive
This PR removes the `//@ pretty-expanded` directive support in compiletest and removes its usage inside ui tests because it does not actually do anything, and its existence is itself misleading. This PR is split into two commits:
1. The first commit just drops `pretty-expanded` directive support in compiletest.
2. The second commit is created by `sd '//@ pretty-expanded.*\n' '' tests/ui/**/*.rs`[^1], reblessing, and slightly adjusting some leading whitespace in a few tests.
We can tell this is fully removed because compiletest doesn't complain about unknown directive when running the `ui` test suite.
cc #23616
### History
Originally, there was some effort to introduce more test coverage for `-Z unpretty=expanded` (in 2015 this was called `--pretty=expanded`). In [Make it an error to not declare used features #23598][pr-23598], there was a flip from `//@ no-pretty-expanded` (opt-out of `-Z
unpretty=expanded` test) to `//@ pretty-expanded` (opt-in to `-Z unpretty=expanded` test). This was needed because back then the dedicated `tests/pretty` ("pretty") test suite did not existed, and the pretty tests were grouped together under `run-pass` tests (I believe the `ui` test suite didn't exist back then either). Unfortunately, in this process the replacement `//@ pretty-expanded` directives contained a `FIXME #23616` linking to [There are very few tests for `-Z unpretty` expansion #23616][issue-23616]. But this was arguably backwards and somewhat misleading, as noted in [#23616](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23616#issuecomment-484999901):
The attribute is off by default and things just work if you don't
test it, people have not been adding the `pretty-expanded`
annotation to new tests even if it would work.
Which basically renders this useless.
### Current status
As of Nov 2024, we have a dedicated `pretty` test suite, and some time over the years the split between `run-pass` into `ui` and `pretty` test suites caused all the `//@ pretty-expanded` in `ui` tests to do absolutely nothing: the compiletest logic for `pretty-expanded` only triggers in the *pretty* test suite, but none of the pretty tests use it. Oops.
Nobody remembers this, nobody uses this, it's misleading in ui tests. Let's get rid of this directive altogether.
[pr-23598]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/23598
[issue-23616]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23616
### Follow-ups
- [x] Yeet this directive from rustc-dev-guide docs. https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide/pull/2147
[^1]: https://github.com/chmln/sd
r? compiler
std:🧵 avoid leading whitespace in some panic messages
This:
```
panic!(
"use of std:🧵:current() is not possible after the thread's
local data has been destroyed"
)
```
will print a newline followed by a bunch of spaces, since the entire string literal is interpreted literally.
I think the intention was to print the message without the newline and the spaces, so let's add some `\` to make that happen.
r? ``@joboet``
Use ReadCache for archive reading in bootstrap
Address expensive archive reading in bootstrap. This fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133268
Enable the `std` feature of `object` to use `ReadCache` instead of reading the entire archive file into memory to check for headers. This takes minimal extra time to compile compared to introducing other expensive dependencies to `bootstrap`.
r? jieyouxu
Update test expectations to accept LLVM 'initializes' attribute
The test was checking for two `ptr` arguments by matching commas (or non-commas), however after
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117104 LLVM adds an `initializes((0, 16))` attribute, which includes a comma.
So instead, we make the test check for two LLVM values, i.e. something prefixed by %.
(See also https://crbug.com/380707238)
Tweak parameter mismatch explanation to not say `{unknown}`
* Tweak parameter mismatch explanation not to call parameters with no identifier `{unknown}`
* Say "both" when there are two parameters
* Backtick a type parameter name for consistency
Added a doc test for std::path::strip_prefix
I was about 90% sure `Path::new("/test/haha/foo.txt").strip_prefix("/te")` would return an Err, but I couldn't find an example to confirm this behaviour.
This should be an easy merge :)
the emscripten OS no longer exists on non-wasm targets
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117338 removed our asmjs targets, which AFAIK means that emscripten only exists on wasm targets. However at least one place in the code still checked "is wasm or is emscripten". Let's fix that.
Cc ```@workingjubilee```
Refactor `where` predicates, and reserve for attributes support
Refactor `WherePredicate` to `WherePredicateKind`, and reserve for attributes support in `where` predicates.
This is a part of #115590 and is split from #132388.
r? petrochenkov
`ResultsCursor` currently owns its `Results`. But sometimes the
`Results` is needed again afterwards. So there is
`ResultsCursor::into_results` for extracting the `Results`, which leads
to some awkwardness.
This commit adds `ResultsHandle`, a `Cow`-like type that can either
borrow or own a a `Results`. `ResultsCursor` now uses it. This is good
because some `ResultsCursor`s really want to own their `Results`, while
others just want to borrow it.
We end with with a few more lines of code, but get some nice cleanups.
- `ResultsCursor::into_results` and `Formatter::into_results` are
removed.
- `write_graphviz_results` now just borrows a `Results`, instead of the
awkward "take ownership of a `Results` and then return it unchanged"
pattern.
This reinstates the cursor flexibility that was lost in #118230 -- which
removed the old `ResultsRefCursor` and `ResultsCloneCursor` types -- but
in a much simpler way. Hooray!
In `MaybeRequiresStorage::apply_before_statement_effect`, call
`transfer_function` directly, as is already done in
`MaybeRequiresStorage::apply_before_terminator_effect`. This makes it clear
that the operation doesn't rely on the `MaybeBorrowedLocals` results.
Foreword
========
Let us begin the journey to rediscover what the `//@ pretty-expanded`
directive does, brave traveller --
"My good friend, [..] when I wrote that passage, God and I knew what
it meant. It is possible that God knows it still; but as for me, I
have totally forgotten."
-- Johann Paul Friedrich Richter, 1826
We must retrace the steps of those before us, for history shall guide us
in the present and inform us of the future.
The Past
========
Originally there was some effort to introduce more test coverage for `-Z
unpretty=expanded` (in 2015 this was called `--pretty=expanded`). In
[Make it an error to not declare used features #23598][pr-23598], there
was a flip from `//@ no-pretty-expanded` (opt-out of `-Z
unpretty=expanded` test) to `//@ pretty-expanded` (opt-in to `-Z
unpretty=expanded` test). This was needed because back then the
dedicated `tests/pretty` ("pretty") test suite did not existed, and the
pretty tests were grouped together under `run-pass` tests (I believe
`ui` test suite didn't exist back then either). Unfortunately, in this
process the replacement `//@ pretty-expanded` directives contained a
`FIXME #23616` linking to [There are very few tests for `-Z unpretty`
expansion #23616][issue-23616]. But this was arguably backwards and
somewhat misleading, as noted in
<https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23616#issuecomment-484999901>:
The attribute is off by default and things just work if you don't
test it, people have not been adding the `pretty-expanded`
annotation to new tests even if it would work.
Which basically renders this useless.
The Present
===========
As of Nov 2024, we have a dedicated `pretty` test suite, and some time
over the years the split between `run-pass` into `ui` and `pretty` test
suites caused all of the `//@ pretty-expanded` in `ui` tests to do
absolutely nothing -- the compiletest logic for `pretty-expanded` only
triggered in the *pretty* test suite, but none of the pretty tests use
it. Oops.
The Future
==========
Nobody remembers this, nobody uses this, it's misleading in ui tests.
Let's get rid of this directive altogether.
[pr-23598]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/23598
[issue-23616]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/23616
