Handle error body in generator layout
Fixes#111468
I feel like making this query return `Option<GeneratorLayout>` might be better but had some issues with that approach
Suppress "erroneous constant used" for constants tainted by errors
When constant evaluation fails because its MIR is tainted by errors,
suppress note indicating that erroneous constant was used, since those
errors have to be fixed regardless of the constant being used or not.
Fixes#110891.
When constant evaluation fails because its MIR is tainted by errors,
suppress note indicating that erroneous constant was used, since those
errors have to be fixed regardless of the constant being used or not.
Shrink `SelectionError` a lot
`SelectionError` used to be 80 bytes (on 64 bit). That's quite big. Especially because the selection cache contained `Result<_, SelectionError>. The Ok type is only 32 bytes, so the 80 bytes significantly inflate the size of the cache.
Most variants of the `SelectionError` seem to be hard errors, only `Unimplemented` shows up in practice (for cranelift-codegen, it occupies 23.4% of all cache entries). We can just box away the biggest variant, `OutputTypeParameterMismatch`, to get the size down to 16 bytes, well within the size of the Ok type inside the cache.
This trait ref is derived from the self type and then equated to the
trait ref from the obligation.
For example, for `fn(): Fn(u32)`, `self_ty_trait_ref` is `Fn()`, which
is then equated to `Fn(u32)` (which will fail, causing the obligation to
fail).
`SelectionError` used to be 80 bytes (on 64 bit). That's quite big.
Especially because the selection cache contained `Result<_,
SelectionError>. The Ok type is only 32 bytes, so the 80 bytes
significantly inflate the size of the cache.
Most variants of the `SelectionError` seem to be hard errors, only
`Unimplemented` shows up in practice (for cranelift-codegen, it occupies
23.4% of all cache entries). We can just box away the biggest variant,
`OutputTypeParameterMismatch`, to get the size down to 16 bytes, well
within the size of the Ok type inside the cache.
Min specialization improvements
- Don't allow specialization impls with no items, such implementations are probably not correct and only occur as mistakes in the compiler and standard library
- Fix a missing normalization call
- Adds spans for lifetime errors from overly general specializations
Closes#79457Closes#109815
Introduce `AliasKind::Inherent` for inherent associated types
Allows us to check (possibly generic) inherent associated types for well-formedness.
Type inference now also works properly.
Follow-up to #105961. Supersedes #108430.
Fixes#106722.
Fixes#108957.
Fixes#109768.
Fixes#109789.
Fixes#109790.
~Not to be merged before #108860 (`AliasKind::Weak`).~
CC `@jackh726`
r? `@compiler-errors`
`@rustbot` label T-types F-inherent_associated_types
Support return-type bounds on associated methods from supertraits
Support `T: Trait<method(): Bound>` when `method` comes from a supertrait, aligning it with the behavior of associated type bounds (both equality and trait bounds).
The only wrinkle is that I have to extend `super_predicates_that_define_assoc_type` to look for *all* items, not just `AssocKind::Ty`. This will also be needed to support `feature(associated_const_equality)` as well, which is subtly broken when it comes to supertraits, though this PR does not fix those yet. There's a slight chance there's a perf regression here, in which case I guess I could split it out into a separate query.
Use fulfillment to check `Drop` impl compatibility
Use an `ObligationCtxt` to ensure that a `Drop` impl does not have stricter requirements than the ADT that it's implemented for, rather than using a `SimpleEqRelation` to (more or less) syntactically equate predicates on an ADT with predicates on an impl.
r? types
### Some background
The old code reads:
```rust
// An earlier version of this code attempted to do this checking
// via the traits::fulfill machinery. However, it ran into trouble
// since the fulfill machinery merely turns outlives-predicates
// 'a:'b and T:'b into region inference constraints. It is simpler
// just to look for all the predicates directly.
```
I'm not sure what this means, but perhaps in the 8 years since that this comment was written (cc #23638) it's gotten easier to process region constraints after doing fulfillment? I don't know how this logic differs from anything we do in the `compare_impl_item` module. Ironically, later on it says:
```rust
// However, it may be more efficient in the future to batch
// the analysis together via the fulfill (see comment above regarding
// the usage of the fulfill machinery), rather than the
// repeated `.iter().any(..)` calls.
```
Also:
* Removes `SimpleEqRelation` which was far too syntactical in its relation.
* Fixes#110557
Implement negative bounds for internal testing purposes
Implements partial support the `!` negative polarity on trait bounds. This is incomplete, but should allow us to at least be able to play with the feature.
Not even gonna consider them as a public-facing feature, but I'm implementing them because would've been nice to have in UI tests, for example in #110671.
Currently a `{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` can be created from any type that
impls `Into<String>`. That includes `&str`, `String`, and `Cow<'static,
str>`, which are reasonable. It also includes `&String`, which is pretty
weird, and results in many places making unnecessary allocations for
patterns like this:
```
self.fatal(&format!(...))
```
This creates a string with `format!`, takes a reference, passes the
reference to `fatal`, which does an `into()`, which clones the
reference, doing a second allocation. Two allocations for a single
string, bleh.
This commit changes the `From` impls so that you can only create a
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage` from `&str`, `String`, or `Cow<'static,
str>`. This requires changing all the places that currently create one
from a `&String`. Most of these are of the `&format!(...)` form
described above; each one removes an unnecessary static `&`, plus an
allocation when executed. There are also a few places where the existing
use of `&String` was more reasonable; these now just use `clone()` at
the call site.
As well as making the code nicer and more efficient, this is a step
towards possibly using `Cow<'static, str>` in
`{D,Subd}iagnosticMessage::{Str,Eager}`. That would require changing
the `From<&'a str>` impls to `From<&'static str>`, which is doable, but
I'm not yet sure if it's worthwhile.
Add `ConstParamTy` trait
This is a bit sketch, but idk.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
Yet to be done:
- [x] ~~Figure out if it's okay to implement `StructuralEq` for primitives / possibly remove their special casing~~ (it should be okay, but maybe not in this PR...)
- [ ] Maybe refactor the code a little bit
- [x] Use a macro to make impls a bit nicer
Future work:
- [ ] Actually™ use the trait when checking if a `const` generic type is allowed
- [ ] _Really_ refactor the surrounding code
- [ ] Refactor `marker.rs` into multiple modules for each "theme" of markers
Tweak await span to not contain dot
Fixes a discrepancy between method calls and await expressions where the latter are desugared to have a span that *contains* the dot (i.e. `.await`) but method call identifiers don't contain the dot. This leads to weird suggestions suggestions in borrowck -- see linked issue.
Fixes#110761
This mostly touches a bunch of tests to tighten their `await` span.
Clear response values for overflow in new solver
When we have an overflow, return a trivial query response. This fixes an ICE with the code described in #110544:
```rust
trait Trait {}
struct W<T>(T);
impl<T, U> Trait for W<(W<T>, W<U>)>
where
W<T>: Trait,
W<U>: Trait,
{}
fn impls<T: Trait>() {}
fn main() {
impls::<W<_>>()
}
```
Where, while proving `W<?0>: Trait`, we overflow but still apply the query response of `?0 = (W<?1>, W<?2>)`. Then while re-processing the query to validate that our evaluation result was stable, we get a different query response that looks like `?1 = (W<?3>, W<?4>), ?2 = (W<?5>, W<?6>)`, and so we trigger the ICE.
Also, by returning a trivial query response we also avoid the infinite-loop/OOM behavior of the old solver.
r? ``@lcnr``
Consider polarity in new solver
It's kinda ugly to have a polarity check in all of the builtin impls -- I guess I could consider the polarity at the top of assemble-builtin but that would require adding a polarity fn to `GoalKind`...
🤷 putting this up just so i dont forget, since it's needed to bootstrap core during coherence (this alone does not allow core to bootstrap though, additional work is needed!)
r? ``@lcnr``
Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `explicit_item_bounds`
Part of the work to finish https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105779.
This PR adds `EarlyBinder` to the return type of the `explicit_item_bounds` query and removes `bound_explicit_item_bounds`.
r? `@compiler-errors` (hope it's okay to request you, since you reviewed #110299 and #110498😃)
