Add GUI test to check URLs
The first commit merges both file doing kinda the same thing. Didn't make much sense to keep them separated.
The second commit add checks to ensure the URL has the expected value depending if the search is displayed or not.
r? `@notriddle`
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94810 (debuginfo: Fix bug in type name generation for dyn types with associated types but no other generic arguments.)
- #94947 (fix typos)
- #94956 (Fix small typo in FIXME)
- #94958 (Support other types of pluralization in pluralize macro)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fix typos
Rework of #94603 which got closed as I was trying to unmerge and repush. This is a subset of changes from the original pr as I sed'd whatever typos I remembered from the original PR
thanks to `@cuishuang` for the original PR
debuginfo: Fix bug in type name generation for dyn types with associated types but no other generic arguments.
For types like `&dyn Future<Output=bool>` the compiler currently emits invalid types names in debuginfo. This PR fixes this.
Before:
```txt
// DWARF
&dyn core::future::future::Future, Output=bool>
// CodeView
ref$<dyn$<core::future::future::Future,assoc$<Output,bool> > > >
```
After:
```txt
// DWARF
&dyn core::future::future::Future<Output=bool>
// CodeView
ref$<dyn$<core::future::future::Future<assoc$<Output,bool> > > >
```
These syntactically incorrect type names can cause downstream tools (e.g. debugger extensions) crash when trying to parse them.
r? `@wesleywiser`
debuginfo: Refactor debuginfo generation for types
This PR implements the refactoring of the `rustc_codegen_llvm::debuginfo::metadata` module as described in MCP https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/482.
In particular it
- changes names to use `di_node` instead of `metadata`
- uniformly names all functions that build new debuginfo nodes `build_xyz_di_node`
- renames `CrateDebugContext` to `CodegenUnitDebugContext` (which is more accurate)
- removes outdated parts from `compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/debuginfo/doc.md`
- moves `TypeMap` and functions that work directly work with it to a new `type_map` module
- moves enum related builder functions to a new `enums` module
- splits enum debuginfo building for the native and cpp-like cases, since they are mostly separate
- uses `SmallVec` instead of `Vec` in many places
- removes the old infrastructure for dealing with recursion cycles (`create_and_register_recursive_type_forward_declaration()`, `RecursiveTypeDescription`, `set_members_of_composite_type()`, `MemberDescription`, `MemberDescriptionFactory`, `prepare_xyz_metadata()`, etc)
- adds `type_map::build_type_with_children()` as a replacement for dealing with recursion cycles
- adds many (doc-)comments explaining what's going on
- changes cpp-like naming for C-Style enums so they don't get a `enum$<...>` name (because the NatVis visualizer does not apply to them)
- fixes detection of what is a C-style enum because some enums where classified as C-style even though they have fields
- changes cpp-like naming for generator enums so that NatVis works for them
- changes the position of discriminant debuginfo node so it is consistently nested inside the top-level union instead of, sometimes, next to it
The following could be done in subsequent PRs:
- add caching for `closure_saved_names_of_captured_variables`
- add caching for `generator_layout_and_saved_local_names`
- fix inconsistent handling of what is considered a C-style enum wrt to debuginfo
- rename `metadata` module to `types`
- move common generator fields to front instead of appending them
This PR is based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93644 which is not merged yet.
Right now, the changes are all done in one big commit. They could be split into smaller commits but hopefully the list of changes above makes it tractable to review them as a single commit too.
For now: r? `@ghost` (let's see if this affects compile times)
More robust fallback for `use` suggestion
Our old way to suggest where to add `use`s would first look for pre-existing `use`s in the relevant crate/module, and if there are *no* uses, it would fallback on trying to use another item as the basis for the suggestion.
But this was fragile, as illustrated in issue #87613
This PR instead identifies span of the first token after any inner attributes, and uses *that* as the fallback for the `use` suggestion.
Fix#87613
check ~Projection~ all supertrait bounds when confirming dyn candidate
I'm pretty sure Projection is the only other PredicateKind that we care about enforcing here.
Fixes#80800
Improve `expect` impl and handle `#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` (RFC 2383)
This PR updates unstable `ExpectationIds` in stashed diagnostics and adds some asserts to ensure that the stored expectations are really empty in the end. Additionally, it handles the `#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` case.
According to the [Errors and lints docs](https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/diagnostics.html#diagnostic-levels) the `error` level should only be used _"when the compiler detects a problem that makes it unable to compile the program"_. As this isn't the case with `#[expect(unfulfilled_lint_expectations)]` I decided to only create a warning. To avoid adding a new lint only for this case, I simply emit a `unfulfilled_lint_expectations` diagnostic with an additional note.
---
r? `@wesleywiser` I'm requesting a review from you since you reviewed the previous PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87835. You are welcome to reassign it if you're busy 🙃
rfc: [RFC-2383](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2383-lint-reasons.html)
tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85549
cc: `@flip1995` In case you're also interested in this :)
Type params and assoc types have unit metadata if they are sized
Extend the logic in `Pointee` projection to ensure that we can satisfy `<T as Pointee>::Metadata = ()` if `T: Sized`.
cc: `@SimonSapin` and #93959
This commit
- changes names to use di_node instead of metadata
- uniformly names all functions that build new debuginfo nodes build_xyz_di_node
- renames CrateDebugContext to CodegenUnitDebugContext (which is more accurate)
- moves TypeMap and functions that work directly work with it to a new type_map module
- moves and reimplements enum related builder functions to a new enums module
- splits enum debuginfo building for the native and cpp-like cases, since they are mostly separate
- uses SmallVec instead of Vec in many places
- removes the old infrastructure for dealing with recursion cycles (create_and_register_recursive_type_forward_declaration(), RecursiveTypeDescription, set_members_of_composite_type(), MemberDescription, MemberDescriptionFactory, prepare_xyz_metadata(), etc)
- adds type_map::build_type_with_children() as a replacement for dealing with recursion cycles
- adds many (doc-)comments explaining what's going on
- changes cpp-like naming for C-Style enums so they don't get a enum$<...> name (because the NatVis visualizer does not apply to them)
- fixes detection of what is a C-style enum because some enums where classified as C-style even though they have fields
- changes the position of discriminant debuginfo node so it is consistently nested inside the top-level union instead of, sometimes, next to it
Add riscv32im-unknown-none-elf built-in target triple.
* Add built-in target `riscv32im-unknown-none-elf`.
* Update `platform-support.md` to list it as a Tier 3 target.
Below are details on how this target meets the requirements for tier 3:
> A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
I would be willing to be a target maintainer, though I would appreciate if others with more experience around RISC-V volunteered to help with that as well.
> Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.
Uses the same naming as the LLVM target, and the same convention as many other bare-metal targets.
> Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.
I don't believe there is any ambiguity here.
> Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.
I don't see any legal issues here.
> The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
> The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.
> If the target supports building host tools (such as rustc or cargo), those host tools must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries, other than ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other binaries built for the target. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> Targets should not require proprietary (non-FOSS) components to link a functional binary or library.
> "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.
I see no issues with any of the above.
> Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.
> This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Only relevant to those making approval decisions.
> Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.
`core` and `alloc` can be used. `std` cannot be used as this is a bare-metal target.
> The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
Use `--target=x86_64-unknown-none-elf` option to cross compile, just like any target. The target does not support running tests.
> Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.
> Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.
I don't foresee this being a problem.
> Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.
> In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
No other targets should be affected by the pull request.
Fix definition of Box in ssa-analysis-regression-50041.rs
The Box in liballoc always has a field for the allocator. It is quite
hard to support both the old and new definition of Box in cg_clif so
this change uses the new definition in this test too.
