Commit Graph

162425 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eric Holk
97b24f3236 Drop tracking: track borrows of projections
Previous efforts to ignore partially consumed values meant we were also
not considering borrows of a projection. This led to cases where we'd
miss borrowed types which MIR expected to be there, leading to ICEs.
2022-02-07 16:01:27 -08:00
Tomasz Miąsko
29185844c4 Add a flag enabling drop range tracking in generators 2022-02-07 12:27:09 -08:00
bors
f52c31840d Auto merge of #93738 - m-ou-se:rollup-zjyd2et, r=m-ou-se
Rollup of 13 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #88313 (Make the pre-commit script pre-push instead)
 - #91530 (Suggest 1-tuple parentheses on exprs without existing parens)
 - #92724 (Cleanup c_str.rs)
 - #93208 (Impl {Add,Sub,Mul,Div,Rem,BitXor,BitOr,BitAnd}Assign<$t> for Wrapping<$t> for rust 1.60.0)
 - #93394 (Don't allow {} to refer to implicit captures in format_args.)
 - #93416 (remove `allow_fail` test flag)
 - #93487 (Fix linking stage1 toolchain in `./x.py setup`)
 - #93673 (Linkify sidebar headings for sibling items)
 - #93680 (Drop json::from_reader)
 - #93682 (Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`)
 - #93722 (Use shallow clones for submodules managed by rustbuild, not just bootstrap.py)
 - #93723 (Rerun bootstrap's build script when RUSTC changes)
 - #93737 (bootstrap: prefer using '--config' over 'RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG')

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-02-07 15:32:19 +00:00
Mara Bos
a6c48108ad
Rollup merge of #93737 - mfrw:mfrw/bootstrap-config, r=Mark-Simulacrum
bootstrap: prefer using '--config' over 'RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG'

Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>

Closes: #93725
Rleated: #92260
2022-02-07 14:08:40 +00:00
Mara Bos
0f9d3b4c21
Rollup merge of #93723 - jyn514:rerun-if-changed, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Rerun bootstrap's build script when RUSTC changes

Previously, rustbuild would give strange errors if you tried to reuse the same build directory under two names:

```
$ mkdir tmp && cd tmp
$ ../x.py check
Building rustbuild
    Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 35.27s
Checking stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
^C
$ cd ..
$ mv tmp/build build
$ ./x.py check
Building rustbuild
   Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0 (/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap)
    Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 11.18s

failed to execute command: "/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/tmp/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--print" "target-libdir"
error: No such file or directory (os error 2)
```

This fixes the error. Reusing the same build directory is useful if you want to test path-related things in
bootstrap itself, without having to recompile it each time.

For good measure, this also reruns the build script when PATH changes.
2022-02-07 14:08:39 +00:00
Mara Bos
82fe6ed425
Rollup merge of #93722 - jyn514:less-submodule-cloning, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Use shallow clones for submodules managed by rustbuild, not just bootstrap.py

I missed this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89757; it made
`x.py test src/bootstrap` very slow.
2022-02-07 14:08:37 +00:00
Mara Bos
f4377a8932
Rollup merge of #93682 - PatchMixolydic:where-in-the-world-is-const_fn_trait_bound, r=oli-obk
Update tracking issue for `const_fn_trait_bound`

It previously pointed to #57563, the conglomerate issue for `const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`). This tracking issue doesn't mention anything about `const_fn_trait_bound`(the only occurrence of "trait bound" is for the now-removed `?const Trait` syntax), which can be confusing to people who want to find out more about trait bounds on `const fn`s. This pull request changes the tracking issue to one meant specifically for `const_fn_trait_bound`, #93706, which can help collect information on this feature's stabilization and point users towards `const_trait_impl` if they're looking for const-in-const-contexts trait bounds.

Fixes #93679.

`````@rustbot````` modify labels +A-const-fn +F-const_trait_impl
2022-02-07 14:08:37 +00:00
Mara Bos
bd245facd4
Rollup merge of #93680 - Mark-Simulacrum:drop-json-reader, r=bjorn3
Drop json::from_reader

Just a small cleanup -- this was essentially unused; the one use site is better suited to reading from &str regardless.
2022-02-07 14:08:36 +00:00
Mara Bos
0b6c7fbbba
Rollup merge of #93673 - jsha:linkify-sidebar-headings, r=GuillaumeGomez
Linkify sidebar headings for sibling items

Also adjust CSS so this doesn't produce excess padding/margin.

Note: I tried and failed to write a test with browser-UI-test. First I tried to `assert-property: (".block.mod h3 a", {"href": "index.html#macros"})`. But the `href` that gets read out is the fully-quallified URL, starting with `file:///`. That URL will differ depending on what path the test is run from, so that doesn't work.

Next I tried clicking on the appropriate sidebar link, and verifying that the appropriate heading on the next page is highlighted with the right background color. However, that also didn't work: according to browser-UI-test, the targeted heading was plain white. However, running with no-headless, I could see that it actually was yellow. I suspect this is a bug in the older version of Chromium used with browser-UI-test's bundled puppeteer, since it doesn't reproduce on latest Chrome.

Fixes #92957

Demo: https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/linkify-sidebar-headings/std/string/trait.ToString.html

r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
2022-02-07 14:08:35 +00:00
Mara Bos
f611de074a
Rollup merge of #93487 - yerke:yerke/fix-link-toolchain-in-setup, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Fix linking stage1 toolchain in `./x.py setup`

Closes [92319](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92319)

Fix linking stage1 toolchain in `./x.py setup`. I guess this can be considered a follow up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89212 by `````@Sl1mb0.`````

We create 2 directories and 1 file that are required by rustup to [link a custom toolchain from path](5225e87a5d/src/toolchain.rs (L479-L497)).

cc `````@jyn514````` and `````@Mark-Simulacrum````` as they were active in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89206
2022-02-07 14:08:34 +00:00
Mara Bos
252ff5ead0
Rollup merge of #93416 - name1e5s:chore/remove_allow_fail, r=m-ou-se
remove `allow_fail` test flag

close #93345
2022-02-07 14:08:34 +00:00
Mara Bos
4445a8ff84
Rollup merge of #93394 - m-ou-se:fix-93378, r=estebank
Don't allow {} to refer to implicit captures in format_args.

Fixes #93378
2022-02-07 14:08:33 +00:00
Mara Bos
e3c972e252
Rollup merge of #93208 - kellerkindt:wrapping_int_assign_impl, r=m-ou-se
Impl {Add,Sub,Mul,Div,Rem,BitXor,BitOr,BitAnd}Assign<$t> for Wrapping<$t> for rust 1.60.0

Tracking issue #93204

This is about adding basic integer operations to the `Wrapping` type:

```rust
let mut value = Wrapping(2u8);
value += 3u8;
value -= 1u8;
value *= 2u8;
value /= 2u8;
value %= 2u8;
value ^= 255u8;
value |= 123u8;
value &= 2u8;
```

Because this adds stable impls on a stable type, it runs into the following issue if an `#[unstable(...)]` attribute is used:

```
an `#[unstable]` annotation here has no effect
note: see issue #55436 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55436> for more information
```

This means - if I understood this correctly - the new impls have to be stabilized instantly.
Which in turn means, this PR has to kick of an FCP on the tracking issue as well?

This impl is analog to 1c0dc1810d #92356 for the `Saturating` type ``@dtolnay``  ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
2022-02-07 14:08:32 +00:00
Mara Bos
8219ad4fac
Rollup merge of #92724 - inteon:cleanup, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Cleanup c_str.rs

Some code cleanups in `c_str.rs`.
No functional changes.

ref: https://github.com/bytecodealliance/rustix/pull/163
2022-02-07 14:08:32 +00:00
Mara Bos
557d300e1b
Rollup merge of #91530 - bobrippling:suggest-1-tuple-parens, r=camelid
Suggest 1-tuple parentheses on exprs without existing parens

A follow-on from #86116, split out from #90677.

This alters the suggestion to add a trailing comma to create a 1-tuple - previously we would only apply this if the relevant expression was parenthesised. We now make the suggestion regardless of parentheses, which reduces the fragility of the check (w.r.t formatting).

e.g.
```rust
let a: Option<(i32,)> = Some(3);
```

gets the below suggestion:

```rust
let a: Option<(i32,)> = Some((3,));
//                           ^ ^^
```

This change also improves the suggestion in other ways, such as by only making the suggestion if the types would match after the suggestion is applied and making the suggestion a multipart suggestion.
2022-02-07 14:08:31 +00:00
Mara Bos
aee13fb7c5
Rollup merge of #88313 - jyn514:pre-push, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Make the pre-commit script pre-push instead

This should make it substantially less annoying, and hopefully more
people will find it useful. In particular, it will no longer run tidy
each time you run `git commit --amend` or rebase a branch.

This also warns if you have the old script in pre-commit; see the HACK
comment for details.

r? ````@Mark-Simulacrum```` cc ````@caass````
2022-02-07 14:08:29 +00:00
Muhammad Falak R Wani
95054de501
bootstrap: prefer using '--config' over 'RUST_BOOTSTRAP_CONFIG'
Signed-off-by: Muhammad Falak R Wani <falakreyaz@gmail.com>
2022-02-07 18:26:25 +05:30
bors
c5e414843e Auto merge of #93719 - scottmcm:core-as-2021-everywhere, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Build libcore as 2021 in a few more places

The `Cargo.toml` has `edition = "2021"` (as of #92068), so that's what these command lines should use too.
2022-02-07 12:38:21 +00:00
Mara Bos
14ff58cd86 Stabilize wrapping_int_assign_impl in 1.60.0. 2022-02-07 11:45:12 +01:00
bors
926e7843ea Auto merge of #93643 - lcnr:fold-substs-perf, r=michaelwoerister
use `fold_list` in `try_super_fold_with` for `SubstsRef`

split out from #93505 as this by itself is responsible for most of the perf improvements there

r? `@michaelwoerister`
2022-02-07 03:47:47 +00:00
Joshua Nelson
b5b21507c1 Rerun bootstrap's build script when RUSTC changes
Previously, rustbuild would give strange errors if you tried to reuse the same build directory under two names:

```
$ mkdir tmp && cd tmp
$ ../x.py check
Building rustbuild
    Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 35.27s
Checking stage0 std artifacts (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
^C
$ cd ..
$ mv tmp/build build
$ ./x.py check
Building rustbuild
   Compiling bootstrap v0.0.0 (/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/src/bootstrap)
    Finished dev [unoptimized] target(s) in 11.18s

failed to execute command: "/home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/tmp/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/bin/rustc" "--target" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" "--print" "target-libdir"
error: No such file or directory (os error 2)
```

This fixes the error. Reusing the same build directory is useful if you want to test path-things in
bootstrap itself, without having to recompile it each time.

For good measure, this also reruns the build script when PATH changes.
2022-02-06 19:54:35 -06:00
Joshua Nelson
1870db6e41 Use shallow clones for submodules managed by rustbuild, not just bootstrap.py
I missed this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89757; it made
`x.py test src/bootstrap` very slow.
2022-02-06 19:37:50 -06:00
bors
25b21a1d16 Auto merge of #93179 - Urgau:unreachable-2021, r=m-ou-se,oli-obk
Fix invalid special casing of the unreachable! macro

This pull-request fix an invalid special casing of the `unreachable!` macro in the same way the `panic!` macro was solved, by adding two new internal only macros `unreachable_2015` and `unreachable_2021` edition dependent and turn `unreachable!` into a built-in macro that do dispatching. This logic is stolen from the `panic!` macro.

~~This pull-request also adds an internal feature `format_args_capture_non_literal` that allows capturing arguments from formatted string that expanded from macros. The original RFC #2795 mentioned this as a future possibility. This feature is [required](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92137#issuecomment-1018630522) because of concatenation that needs to be done inside the macro:~~
```rust
$crate::concat!("internal error: entered unreachable code: ", $fmt)
```

**In summary** the new behavior for the `unreachable!` macro with this pr is:

Edition 2021:
```rust
let x = 5;
unreachable!("x is {x}");
```
```
internal error: entered unreachable code: x is 5
```

Edition <= 2018:
```rust
let x = 5;
unreachable!("x is {x}");
```
```
internal error: entered unreachable code: x is {x}
```

Also note that the change in this PR are **insta-stable** and **breaking changes** but this a considered as being a [bug](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92137#issuecomment-998441613).
If someone could start a perf run and then a crater run this would be appreciated.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/92137
2022-02-07 00:26:52 +00:00
Scott McMurray
d91e7a3663 Build libcore as 2021 in a few more places
The `Cargo.toml` has `edition = "2021"`, so that's what these command lines should use too.
2022-02-06 15:41:01 -08:00
bors
7b43cfc9b2 Auto merge of #93695 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-zslgooo, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 2 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #90998 (Require const stability attribute on all stable functions that are `const`)
 - #93489 (Mark the panic_no_unwind lang item as nounwind)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-02-06 21:41:00 +00:00
Rob Pilling
82a012299d Merge duplicate suggestion string 2022-02-06 20:58:24 +00:00
Rob Pilling
344ea6e0e5 Factor out emit_tuple_wrap_err, improve Applicability 2022-02-06 20:58:24 +00:00
Inteon
afb7a502f6
rewrite from_bytes_with_nul to match code style in from_vec_with_nul
Signed-off-by: Inteon <42113979+inteon@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-02-06 20:07:03 +01:00
Ruby Lazuli
57b102ff73
Fix tracking issue for const_fn_trait_bound
It previously pointed to #57563, the conglomerate issue for
`const fn` (presumably under the feature gate `const_fn`).
`const_fn_trait_bounds` weren't mentioned here, so this commit changes
its tracking issue to a new one.
2022-02-06 10:43:26 -06:00
Matthias Krüger
4695c2157c
Rollup merge of #93489 - Amanieu:panic_no_unwind, r=nagisa
Mark the panic_no_unwind lang item as nounwind

This has 2 effects:
- It helps LLVM when inlining since it doesn't need to generate landing pads for `panic_no_unwind`.
- It makes it sound for a panic handler to unwind even if `PanicInfo::can_unwind` returns true. This will simply cause another panic once the unwind tries to go past the `panic_no_unwind` lang item. Eventually this will cause a stack overflow, which is safe.
2022-02-06 10:43:51 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
9f4559c345
Rollup merge of #90998 - jhpratt:require-const-stability, r=oli-obk
Require const stability attribute on all stable functions that are `const`

This PR requires all stable functions (of all kinds) that are `const fn` to have a `#[rustc_const_stable]` or `#[rustc_const_unstable]` attribute. Stability was previously implied if omitted; a follow-up PR is planned to change the fallback to be unstable.
2022-02-06 10:43:50 +01:00
bors
f624427f87 Auto merge of #90414 - thomcc:count-chars-faster, r=nagisa
Optimize `core::str::Chars::count`

I wrote this a while ago after seeing this function as a bottleneck in a profile, but never got around to contributing it. I saw it again, and so here it is. The implementation is fairly complex, but I tried to explain what's happening at both a high level (in the header comment for the file), and in line comments in the impl. Hopefully it's clear enough.

This implementation (`case00_cur_libcore` in the benchmarks below) is somewhat consistently around 4x to 5x faster than the old implementation (`case01_old_libcore` in the benchmarks below), for a wide variety of workloads, without regressing performance on any of the workload sizes I've tried.

I also improved the benchmarks for this code, so that they explicitly check text in different languages and of different sizes (err, the cross product of language x size). The results of the benchmarks are here:

<details>
<summary>Benchmark results</summary>
<pre>
test str::char_count::emoji_huge::case00_cur_libcore       ... bench:      20,216 ns/iter (+/- 3,673) = 17931 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_huge::case01_old_libcore       ... bench:     108,851 ns/iter (+/- 12,777) = 3330 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_huge::case02_iter_increment    ... bench:     329,502 ns/iter (+/- 4,163) = 1100 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_huge::case03_manual_char_len   ... bench:     223,333 ns/iter (+/- 14,167) = 1623 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_large::case00_cur_libcore      ... bench:         293 ns/iter (+/- 6) = 19331 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_large::case01_old_libcore      ... bench:       1,681 ns/iter (+/- 28) = 3369 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_large::case02_iter_increment   ... bench:       5,166 ns/iter (+/- 85) = 1096 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_large::case03_manual_char_len  ... bench:       3,476 ns/iter (+/- 62) = 1629 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_medium::case00_cur_libcore     ... bench:          48 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 14750 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_medium::case01_old_libcore     ... bench:         217 ns/iter (+/- 4) = 3262 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_medium::case02_iter_increment  ... bench:         642 ns/iter (+/- 7) = 1102 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_medium::case03_manual_char_len ... bench:         445 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 1591 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_small::case00_cur_libcore      ... bench:          18 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 3777 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_small::case01_old_libcore      ... bench:          23 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 2956 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_small::case02_iter_increment   ... bench:          66 ns/iter (+/- 2) = 1030 MB/s
test str::char_count::emoji_small::case03_manual_char_len  ... bench:          29 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 2344 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_huge::case00_cur_libcore          ... bench:      25,909 ns/iter (+/- 39,260) = 13299 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_huge::case01_old_libcore          ... bench:     102,887 ns/iter (+/- 3,257) = 3349 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_huge::case02_iter_increment       ... bench:     166,370 ns/iter (+/- 12,439) = 2071 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_huge::case03_manual_char_len      ... bench:     166,332 ns/iter (+/- 4,262) = 2071 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_large::case00_cur_libcore         ... bench:         281 ns/iter (+/- 6) = 19160 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_large::case01_old_libcore         ... bench:       1,598 ns/iter (+/- 19) = 3369 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_large::case02_iter_increment      ... bench:       2,598 ns/iter (+/- 167) = 2072 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_large::case03_manual_char_len     ... bench:       2,578 ns/iter (+/- 55) = 2088 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_medium::case00_cur_libcore        ... bench:          44 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 15295 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_medium::case01_old_libcore        ... bench:         201 ns/iter (+/- 51) = 3348 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_medium::case02_iter_increment     ... bench:         322 ns/iter (+/- 40) = 2090 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_medium::case03_manual_char_len    ... bench:         319 ns/iter (+/- 5) = 2109 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_small::case00_cur_libcore         ... bench:          15 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 2333 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_small::case01_old_libcore         ... bench:          14 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 2500 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_small::case02_iter_increment      ... bench:          30 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 1166 MB/s
test str::char_count::en_small::case03_manual_char_len     ... bench:          30 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 1166 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_huge::case00_cur_libcore          ... bench:      16,439 ns/iter (+/- 3,105) = 19777 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_huge::case01_old_libcore          ... bench:      89,480 ns/iter (+/- 2,555) = 3633 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_huge::case02_iter_increment       ... bench:     217,703 ns/iter (+/- 22,185) = 1493 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_huge::case03_manual_char_len      ... bench:     157,330 ns/iter (+/- 19,188) = 2066 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_large::case00_cur_libcore         ... bench:         243 ns/iter (+/- 6) = 20905 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_large::case01_old_libcore         ... bench:       1,384 ns/iter (+/- 51) = 3670 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_large::case02_iter_increment      ... bench:       3,381 ns/iter (+/- 543) = 1502 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_large::case03_manual_char_len     ... bench:       2,423 ns/iter (+/- 429) = 2096 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_medium::case00_cur_libcore        ... bench:          42 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 15119 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_medium::case01_old_libcore        ... bench:         180 ns/iter (+/- 4) = 3527 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_medium::case02_iter_increment     ... bench:         402 ns/iter (+/- 45) = 1579 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_medium::case03_manual_char_len    ... bench:         280 ns/iter (+/- 29) = 2267 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_small::case00_cur_libcore         ... bench:          12 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 2666 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_small::case01_old_libcore         ... bench:          12 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 2666 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_small::case02_iter_increment      ... bench:          19 ns/iter (+/- 0) = 1684 MB/s
test str::char_count::ru_small::case03_manual_char_len     ... bench:          14 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 2285 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_huge::case00_cur_libcore          ... bench:      15,053 ns/iter (+/- 2,640) = 20067 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_huge::case01_old_libcore          ... bench:      82,622 ns/iter (+/- 3,602) = 3656 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_huge::case02_iter_increment       ... bench:     230,456 ns/iter (+/- 7,246) = 1310 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_huge::case03_manual_char_len      ... bench:     220,595 ns/iter (+/- 11,624) = 1369 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_large::case00_cur_libcore         ... bench:         227 ns/iter (+/- 65) = 20792 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_large::case01_old_libcore         ... bench:       1,136 ns/iter (+/- 144) = 4154 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_large::case02_iter_increment      ... bench:       3,147 ns/iter (+/- 253) = 1499 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_large::case03_manual_char_len     ... bench:       2,993 ns/iter (+/- 400) = 1577 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_medium::case00_cur_libcore        ... bench:          36 ns/iter (+/- 5) = 16388 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_medium::case01_old_libcore        ... bench:         142 ns/iter (+/- 18) = 4154 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_medium::case02_iter_increment     ... bench:         379 ns/iter (+/- 37) = 1556 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_medium::case03_manual_char_len    ... bench:         364 ns/iter (+/- 51) = 1620 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_small::case00_cur_libcore         ... bench:          11 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 3000 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_small::case01_old_libcore         ... bench:          11 ns/iter (+/- 1) = 3000 MB/s
test str::char_count::zh_small::case02_iter_increment      ... bench:          20 ns/iter (+/- 3) = 1650 MB/s
</pre>
</details>

I also added fairly thorough tests for different sizes and alignments. This completes on my machine in 0.02s, which is surprising given how thorough they are, but it seems to detect bugs in the implementation. (I haven't run the tests on a 32 bit machine yet since before I reworked the code a little though, so... hopefully I'm not about to embarrass myself).

This uses similar SWAR-style techniques to the `is_ascii` impl I contributed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74066, so I'm going to request review from the same person who reviewed that one. That said am not particularly picky, and might not have the correct syntax for requesting a review from someone (so it goes).

r? `@nagisa`
2022-02-06 08:34:48 +00:00
Jacob Hoffman-Andrews
e27ebb5dff Linkify sidebar headings for sibling items
Also adjust CSS so this doesn't produce excess padding/margin.
2022-02-05 22:11:27 -08:00
bors
e069a71108 Auto merge of #93689 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-3pd1ept, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #91939 (Clarify error on casting larger integers to char)
 - #92300 (mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: Add Tier 3 target)
 - #92383 (Add new target armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi (softfloat))
 - #92651 (Remove "up here" arrow on item-infos)
 - #93556 (Change struct expr pretty printing to match rustfmt style)
 - #93649 (Add regression tests for issue 80309)
 - #93657 (Update CPU idle tracking for apple hosts)
 - #93659 (Refactor conditional)
 - #93669 (Resolve lifetimes for const generic defaults)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-02-06 05:54:07 +00:00
Yerkebulan Tulibergenov
a4112dc7b5 fix linking stage1 toolchain in setup 2022-02-05 19:57:02 -08:00
Matthias Krüger
cbf4b46640
Rollup merge of #93669 - compiler-errors:const-generic-args, r=lcnr
Resolve lifetimes for const generic defaults

We weren't visiting the const generic default argument in `rustc_resolve::late::lifetimes`. This seems to fix the issue, and we deny any non-`'static` lifetimes anyways.

Fixes #93647
2022-02-06 04:13:36 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
b7287e9e4f
Rollup merge of #93659 - UltiRequiem:refactor_conditional_static_rustdoc, r=GuillaumeGomez
Refactor conditional

Merge two `if` in just one.
2022-02-06 04:13:35 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
9a5e937d74
Rollup merge of #93657 - Mark-Simulacrum:apple-measurement, r=pietroalbini
Update CPU idle tracking for apple hosts

The previous setup did not properly consider hyperthreads (at least in local
testing), which likely skews CI results as well. The new code is both simpler
and hopefully will produce more accurate results; locally it matches behavior
of the Linux version of this script.
2022-02-06 04:13:34 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
520bd359a3
Rollup merge of #93649 - WaffleLapkin:regression_test_80309, r=oli-obk
Add regression tests for issue 80309

Closes #80309 😝

I'm not sure where to put the tests, is `ui/issues` the right place for this kind of tests?
2022-02-06 04:13:33 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
59baf4db0f
Rollup merge of #93556 - dtolnay:trailingcomma, r=cjgillot
Change struct expr pretty printing to match rustfmt style

This PR backports trailing comma support from https://github.com/dtolnay/prettyplease into rustc_ast_pretty and uses it to improve the formatting of struct expressions.

Example:

```rust
macro_rules! stringify_expr {
    ($expr:expr) => {
        stringify!($expr)
    };
}

fn main() {
    println!("{}", stringify_expr!(Struct {
        a: Struct { b, c },
    }));
    println!("{}", stringify_expr!(Struct {
        aaaaaaaaaa: AAAAAAAAAA,
        bbbbbbbbbb: Struct {
            cccccccccc: CCCCCCCCCC,
            dddddddddd: DDDDDDDDDD,
            eeeeeeeeee: EEEEEEEEEE,
        },
    }));
}
```

🤮 Before:

```console
Struct{a: Struct{b, c,},}
Struct{aaaaaaaaaa: AAAAAAAAAA,
    bbbbbbbbbb:
        Struct{cccccccccc: CCCCCCCCCC,
            dddddddddd: DDDDDDDDDD,
            eeeeeeeeee: EEEEEEEEEE,},}
```

After:

```console
Struct { a: Struct { b, c } }
Struct {
    aaaaaaaaaa: AAAAAAAAAA,
    bbbbbbbbbb: Struct {
        cccccccccc: CCCCCCCCCC,
        dddddddddd: DDDDDDDDDD,
        eeeeeeeeee: EEEEEEEEEE,
    },
}
```
2022-02-06 04:13:32 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
05bb32dde2
Rollup merge of #92651 - jsha:impl-spacing, r=GuillaumeGomez
Remove "up here" arrow on item-infos

Use spacing to distinguish what is related to a given heading.

This was originally introduced in #53043, in response to #51387. The arrow is a little distracting, and leads the item-info to not be aligned properly with the text below it.

Demo: https://rustdoc.crud.net/jsha/impl-spacing/std/string/struct.String.html

r? ``@GuillaumeGomez``
2022-02-06 04:13:31 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
4a3be6e6e2
Rollup merge of #92383 - lancethepants:armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi, r=nagisa
Add new target armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi (softfloat)

This adds the new target `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi (softfloat)`. It is of course similar to `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf (hardfloat)` which was just recently added to rust except that it is `softfloat`.

My interest lies in the Broadcom BCM4707/4708/BCM4709 family, notably found in some Netgear and Asus consumer routers. The armv7 Cortex-A9 cpus found in these devices do not have an fpu or NEON support.

With this patch I've been able to bootstrap rustc, std and host tools `(extended = true)` to run on the target device for native compilation, allowing the target to be used as a development platform.

With the recent addition of `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabihf (hardfloat)` it looks like many of the edge cases of using the uclibc c-library are getting worked out nicely. I've been able to compile some complex projects. Some patching still needed in some crates, but getting there for sure.  I think `armv7-unknown-linux-uclibceabi` is ready to be a tier 3 target.

I use a cross-toolchain from my project to bootstrap rust.
https://github.com/lancethepants/tomatoware
The goal of this project is to create a native development environment with support for various languages.
2022-02-06 04:13:30 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
0eda3fa761
Rollup merge of #92300 - Itus-Shield:mips64-openwrt, r=nagisa
mips64-openwrt-linux-musl: Add Tier 3 target

Tier 3 tuple for Mips64 OpenWrt toolchain.

This add first-time support for OpenWrt.  Future Tier3 targets will be added as I test them.

Signed-off-by: Donald Hoskins <grommish@gmail.com>
2022-02-06 04:13:29 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
58bfe72f52
Rollup merge of #91939 - GKFX:feature-91866, r=cjgillot
Clarify error on casting larger integers to char

Closes #91836 with changes to E0604.md and a `span_help`.
2022-02-06 04:13:29 +01:00
bors
719b04ca99 Auto merge of #92535 - Amanieu:oom_hook_unwind, r=m-ou-se
Allow unwinding from OOM hooks

This is split off from #88098 and contains just the bare minimum to allow specifying a custom OOM hook with `set_alloc_error_hook` which unwinds instead of aborting.

See #88098 for an actual command-line flag which switches the default OOM behavior to unwind instead of aborting.

Previous perf results show a negligible impact on performance.
2022-02-06 03:12:45 +00:00
Amanieu d'Antras
2082842340 Update llvm-project submodule 2022-02-05 21:00:23 +00:00
Amanieu d'Antras
915a16035d Mark __rgl_oom and __rd_oom as "C-unwind" 2022-02-05 20:58:04 +00:00
Amanieu d'Antras
b1b8810952 Allow handle_alloc_error to unwind 2022-02-05 20:58:04 +00:00
Mark Rousskov
0fb2b7a2da Drop json::from_reader
Performing UTF-8 decode outside the JSON module makes more sense in almost all cases.
2022-02-05 15:07:10 -05:00
Thom Chiovoloni
41f821461f
Fix comment grammar for do_count_chars 2022-02-05 11:17:10 -08:00