Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138167 (Small code improvement in rustdoc hidden stripper)
- #138605 (Clean up librustdoc::html::render to be better encapsulated)
- #139423 (Suppress missing field error when autoderef bottoms out in infer)
- #139449 (match ergonomics: replace `peel_off_references` with a recursive call)
- #139507 (compiletest: Trim whitespace from environment variable names)
- #139530 (Remove some dead or leftover code related to rustc-intrinsic abi removal)
- #139560 (fix title of offset_of_enum feature)
- #139563 (emit a better error message for using the macro incorrectly)
- #139568 (Don't use empty trait names)
- #139580 (Temporarily leave the review rotation)
- #139589 (saethlin is back from vacation)
- #139592 (rustdoc: Enable Markdown extensions when looking for doctests)
- #139599 (Tracking issue template: fine-grained information on style update status)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Tracking issue template: fine-grained information on style update status
Inspired by some of the communication issues around the stabilization of
`let`-chains, give more fine-grained information about the status of
updating style for any new syntax.
This does not change the process or blockers in any way; it only
*documents* the current state in the tracking issue. For instance, in
the case of `let`-chains, we would have checked the boxes for "Style
team decision" and "(non-blocking) Formatting has been implemented", and
not checked the box for the style guide. That would have then provided
better supporting information for any decisions.
rustdoc: Enable Markdown extensions when looking for doctests
Fixes#139064.
We should enable these to avoid misinterpreting uses of the extended
syntax as code blocks. This happens in practice with multi-paragraph
footnotes, as discovered in #139064.
emit a better error message for using the macro incorrectly
fixing: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rust/issues/185
I feel like it's not a perfect message either, so I'm open to suggestions.
But at the end of the day users will need to read the docs anyway, and emitting
multi-line errors each time this gets triggered can probably become annoying?
r? ``@jieyouxu`` since you've reviewed my frontend work back in the days.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
compiletest: Trim whitespace from environment variable names
When a test contains a directive like `//@ exec-env: FOO=bar`, compiletest currently includes that leading space in the name of the environment variable, so it is defined as ` FOO` instead of `FOO`.
This is an annoying footgun that is pretty much never intended, especially since most other directives *do* trim whitespace. So let's get rid of it by trimming the environment variable name.
Values remain untrimmed, since there could conceivably be a use-case for values with leading space, but perhaps we'll end up trimming values too in the future.
Recently observed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/138603#issuecomment-2783709359.
Fixes#132990.
Supersedes #133148.
---
try-job: test-various
match ergonomics: replace `peel_off_references` with a recursive call
This makes it imo quite a bit easier to follow how the binding mode gets calculated.
cc ```@dianne```
Suppress missing field error when autoderef bottoms out in infer
I see this error repeatedly when doing refactorings, and it's pretty misleading b/c it's not the source of the error.
Small code improvement in rustdoc hidden stripper
This is a very minor code improvement following https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/137534. It doesn't change anything about the performance issue.
r? ```@notriddle```
Rigidly project missing item due to guaranteed impossible sized predicate
This is a somewhat involved change, but it amounts to treating missing impl items due to guaranteed impossible where clauses (dyn/str/slice sized, cc #135480) as *rigid projections* rather than projecting to an error term, since that was preventing either reporting a proper error (in an empty param env) *or* successfully type checking the code (in the presence of trivially false where clauses).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138970
r? `@lcnr` `@oli-obk`
Inspired by some of the communication issues around the stabilization of
`let`-chains, give more fine-grained information about the status of
updating style for any new syntax.
This does not change the process or blockers in any way; it only
*documents* the current state in the tracking issue. For instance, in
the case of `let`-chains, we would have checked the boxes for "Style
team decision" and "(non-blocking) Formatting has been implemented", and
not checked the box for the style guide. That would have then provided
better supporting information for any decisions.
report call site of inlined scopes for large assignment lints
Addressed issue: #121672
Tracking issue: #83518
r? `@oli-obk`
I tried to follow your comment about what to do [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121672#issuecomment-1972783675). However, I'm totally unfamiliar with the code so far (this is my first contribution touching compiler code), so I apologize in advance if I did something stupid 😅
In particular, I'm not sure I use the _correct_ source scope to look for inline data, as there is a whole `IndexVec` of them. My changes definitely did something, as can be seen by the added ui test. However, the result is not as anticipated in the issue:
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ value moved from here
```
instead of
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^ value moved from here
```
raising my suspicion that maybe I got the wrong source scope.
Update `u8`-to-and-from-`i8` suggestions.
`u8::cast_signed` and `i8::cast_unsigned` have been stabilised, but `i8::from_ne_bytes` et al. still suggest using `as i8` or `as u8`.
Report higher-ranked trait error when higher-ranked projection goal fails in new solver
~~See HACK comment inline. Not actually sure if it should be marked as a *HACK*, b/c~~ it's kinda a legitimate case we want to care about unless we're going to make the proof tree visitor *smarter* about the leak check than the actual trait solver itself.
Encountered this while battling with `NiceRegionError`s in the old solver b/c I wondered what this code ended up giving us in the *new* solver as a comparison:
```rust
trait Foo {}
impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
fn main() {
baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
}
```
On master it's pretty bad:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<fn(&()) as FnOnce<(&(),)>>::Output == ()`
--> <source>:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ types differ
|
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> <source>:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
After this PR it's much better:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `fn(&'static ()): Foo` is not satisfied
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `for<'a> FnOnce(&'a ())` is not implemented for `fn(&'static ())`
|
= note: expected a closure with arguments `(&'static (),)`
found a closure with arguments `(&(),)`
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
note: required by a bound in `baz`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:5:11
|
5 | fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
| ^^^ required by this bound in `baz`
```
r? lcnr
compiletest: Add directive `dont-require-annotations`
for making matching on specific diagnostic kinds non-exhaustive.
E.g. `//@ dont-require-annotations:ERROR`, like in the examples in this PR.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/139427#issuecomment-2782827583Closes#132647 FYI `@BoxyUwU` since you've wanted this.
r? `@jieyouxu`
speed up `String::push` and `String::insert`
Addresses the concerns described in #116235.
The performance gain comes mainly from avoiding temporary buffers.
Complex pattern matching in `encode_utf8` (introduced in #67569) has been simplified to a comparison and an exhaustive `match` in the `encode_utf8_raw_unchecked` helper function. It takes a slice of `MaybeUninit<u8>` because otherwise we'd have to construct a normal slice to uninitialized data, which is not desirable, I guess.
Several functions still have that [unneeded zeroing](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/5oKfMPo7j), but a single instruction is not that important, I guess.
`@rustbot` label T-libs C-optimization A-str
We should enable these to avoid misinterpreting uses of the extended
syntax as code blocks. This happens in practice with multi-paragraph
footnotes, as discovered in #139064.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138869 (Try not to use verbatim paths in `Command::current_dir`)
- #138993 (Make `cfg_match!` a semitransparent macro)
- #139099 (Promise `array::from_fn` is generated in order of increasing indices)
- #139364 (Make the compiler suggest actual paths instead of visible paths if the visible paths are through any doc hidden path.)
- #139468 (Don't call `Span::with_parent` on the good path in `has_stashed_diagnostic`)
- #139481 (Add job summary links to post-merge report)
- #139573 (Miri subtree update)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add job summary links to post-merge report
This should make it much easier to investigate the individual job test/duration changes.
The GitHub API handling is a bit crude, but I didn't want to include octocrab, because it more than doubles the current number of dependencies of `citool`...
Can be tested with:
```bash
$ cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml post-merge-report bad13a970a1e008dd5d8
```
r? ```@marcoieni```
Don't call `Span::with_parent` on the good path in `has_stashed_diagnostic`
More unnecessary incurred span tracking avoided by not calling `span.with_parent(None)`. This is useless on its own but makes it much easier to fix other "span tracking on the good path" issues in the future.
r? oli-obk
Make the compiler suggest actual paths instead of visible paths if the visible paths are through any doc hidden path.
close#127011
Currently, when emitting a diagnostic about a valid trait, the compiler suggestes using visible paths of the trait even if they are through a doc hidden path. This PR updates the compiler to suggest actual paths in these cases.
Promise `array::from_fn` is generated in order of increasing indices
Fixes#139061
I agree this needs to be documented because of the `FnMut`, either with a guarantee or to explicitly disclaim one.
I'm pretty sure this will be non-controversial (like the other "well sure you *could* do it in a different order, but why?" things were), but I couldn't find any previous libs-api decision on it so it's seemingly a new promise that will need FCP.
Basically, yes, it would be plausible to fill in the reverse order, but there's no obvious way we could ever know that that might even be a good idea, so forward seems like an easy thing to promise. We could always add a `from_fn_rev` or something later if there's ever a strong enough need, but it seems unlikely.
Let's just do the obvious thing so it matches what `[gen(0), gen(1), …, gen(N-1)]` does.
Make `cfg_match!` a semitransparent macro
IIUC this is preferred when (potentially) stabilizing `macro` items, to avoid potentially utilizing def-site hygiene instead of mixed-site.
Tracking issue: #115585
Try not to use verbatim paths in `Command::current_dir`
If possible, we should try not to use verbatim paths in `Command::current_dir`. It might work but it might also break code in the subprocess that assume the current directory isn't verbatim (including Windows APIs). cc ``@ehuss``
Side note: we now have a lot of ad-hoc fixes like this spread about the place. It'd be good to make a proper `WindowsPath` type that handles all this in one place. But that's a bigger job for another PR.
