fix: build on haiku
## What does this PR do
The std is broken on haiku, this PR fixes it.
## To reproduce the issue
```sh
$ cargo +nightly --version
cargo 1.81.0-nightly (b1feb75d0 2024-06-07)
$ cargo new hello
$ cd hello
$ cargo +nightly check -Zbuild-std --target x86_64-unknown-haiku -q
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared crate or module `std`
--> ~/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/os.rs:468:13
|
468 | std::ptr::null_mut(),
| ^^^ use of undeclared crate or module `std`
|
help: consider importing one of these items
|
8 + use core::ptr;
|
8 + use crate::ptr;
|
help: if you import `ptr`, refer to it directly
|
468 - std::ptr::null_mut(),
468 + ptr::null_mut(),
|
error[E0433]: failed to resolve: use of undeclared crate or module `std`
--> ~/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/sys/pal/unix/os.rs:470:13
|
470 | std::ptr::null_mut(),
| ^^^ use of undeclared crate or module `std`
|
help: consider importing one of these items
|
8 + use core::ptr;
```
Fix `NonZero` doctest inconsistencies
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
`NonZero`'s doctests contain both `?` and `.unwrap()` with no obvious reason for the difference, so this changes all of them to `?`. Also removes an explicit `std::num::NonZero`.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #126172 (Weekly `cargo update`)
- #126176 (rustdoc-search: use lowercase, non-normalized name for type search)
- #126190 (Autolabel run-make tests, remind to update tracking issue)
- #126194 (Migrate more things to `WinError`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add `FRAC_1_SQRT_2PI` constant to f16/f32/f64/f128
This adds the `FRAC_1_SQRT_2PI` to the `f16`, `f32`, `f64` and `f128` as [`1/√(2π)`](https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=1%2Fsqrt%282*pi%29). The rationale is that while `FRAC_1_SQRT_PI` already exists, [Gaussian calculations](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gaussian_function) for random normal distributions require a `1/(σ√(2π))` term, which could then be directly expressed e.g. as `f32::FRAC_1_SQRT_2PI / sigma`.
The actual value is approximately `1/√(2π) = 0.3989422804014326779399460599343818684758586311649346576659258296…`. Truncated/rounded forms were used for the individual types.
---
~~I did not any of the `#[unstable]` attributes since I am not aware of their implications.~~
**Edit:** I applied the stability attributes from the surrounding types according to what seemed most likely correct. I believe the `more_float_constants` feature marker is incorrectly applied, but I wasn't sure how to proceed.
std::unix::os current_exe implementation simplification for haiku.
_get_net_image_info is a bit overkill as it allows to get broader informations about the process.
std::unix::fs::get_mode implementation for illumos/solaris.
they both support the F_GETFL fctnl flag/O_ACCMODE mask to get the file descriptor access modes.
Size optimize int formatting
Let's use the new feature flag!
This uses a simpler algorithm to format integers.
It is slower, but also smaller.
It also saves having to import the 200 byte rodata lookup table.
In a test of mine this saves ~300 bytes total of a cortex-m binary that does integer formatting.
For a 16KB device, that's almost 2%.
Note though that for opt-level 3 the text size actually grows by 116 bytes.
Still a win in total. I'm not sure why the generated code is bigger than the more fancy algo. Maybe the smaller algo lends itself more to inlining and duplicating?
Prevent copy-paste errors from producing new starved-for-resources
threaded platforms by raising `DEFAULT_MIN_STACK_SIZE` from 4096 bytes
to at least 64KiB.
Two platforms "affected" by this have no actual threads:
- UEFI
- "unsupported"
Platforms that this actually affects:
- wasm32-wasi with "atomics" enabled
- wasm32-wasi-p1-threads
Two exceptions:
- SGX: a "secure code execution" platform, stays at 4096B
- TEEOS: also a "secure code execution" platform, stays at 8192B
I believe either of these may have sufficiently "interesting" semantics
around threads, or significant external library support. Either would
mean making any choices here for them is suspect.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #124840 (resolve: mark it undetermined if single import is not has any bindings)
- #125622 (Winnow private method candidates instead of assuming any candidate of the right name will apply)
- #125648 (Remove unused(?) `~/rustsrc` folder from docker script)
- #125672 (Add more ABI test cases to miri (RFC 3391))
- #125800 (Fix `mut` static task queue in SGX target)
- #125871 (Orphanck[old solver]: Consider opaque types to never cover type parameters)
- #125893 (Handle all GVN binops in a single place.)
- #126008 (Port `tests/run-make-fulldeps/issue-19371` to ui-fulldeps)
- #126032 (Update description of the `IsTerminal` example)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Fix `mut` static task queue in SGX target
[PR 125046](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/125046) prevents mutable references to statics with `#[linkage]`. Such a construct was used with the tests for the `x86_64-fortanix-unknown-sgx` target. This PR fixes this and cleans up code a bit in 5 steps. Each step passes CI:
- The `mut` static is removed, and `Task` explicitly implements `Send`
- Renaming of the `task_queue::lock` function
- Pass function for `Thread` as `Send` to `Thread::imp` and update when `Packet<'scope, T>` implements `Sync`
- Storing `Task::p` as a type that implements `Send`
- Letting the compiler auto implement `Send` for `Task`
cc: ``@jethrogb``
std::unix::fs::get_path: using fcntl codepath for netbsd instead.
on netbsd, procfs is not as central as on linux/solaris thus can be perfectly not mounted.
Thus using fcntl with F_GETPATH, the kernel deals with MAXPATHLEN internally too.
Use inline const blocks to create arrays of `MaybeUninit`.
This PR contains 2 changes enabled by the fact that [`inline_const` is now stable](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104087), and was split out of #125082.
1. Use inline const instead of `unsafe` to construct arrays in `MaybeUninit` examples.
Rationale: Demonstrate good practice of avoiding `unsafe` code where it is not strictly necessary.
4. Use inline const instead of `unsafe` to implement `MaybeUninit::uninit_array()`.
This is arguably giving the compiler more work to do, in exchange for eliminating just one single internal unsafe block, so it's less certain that this is good on net.
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Add `size_of` and `size_of_val` and `align_of` and `align_of_val` to the prelude
(Note: need to update the PR to add `align_of` and `align_of_val`, and remove the second commit with the myriad changes to appease the lint.)
Many, many projects use `size_of` to get the size of a type. However,
it's also often equally easy to hardcode a size (e.g. `8` instead of
`size_of::<u64>()`). Minimizing friction in the use of `size_of` helps
ensure that people use it and make code more self-documenting.
The name `size_of` is unambiguous: the name alone, without any prefix or
path, is self-explanatory and unmistakeable for any other functionality.
Adding it to the prelude cannot produce any name conflicts, as any local
definition will silently shadow the one from the prelude. Thus, we don't
need to wait for a new edition prelude to add it.
Fix typo in the docs of `HashMap::raw_entry_mut`
<!--
If this PR is related to an unstable feature or an otherwise tracked effort,
please link to the relevant tracking issue here. If you don't know of a related
tracking issue or there are none, feel free to ignore this.
This PR will get automatically assigned to a reviewer. In case you would like
a specific user to review your work, you can assign it to them by using
r? <reviewer name>
-->
Ignore `vec_deque_alloc_error::test_shrink_to_unwind` test on non-unwind targets
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123803 added this test which requires unwinding to succeed. This conditionally ignores the test on non-unwind targets (as is the case with other tests using `catch_unwind`).
Explain differences between `{Once,Lazy}{Cell,Lock}` types
The question of "which once-ish cell-ish type should I use?" has been raised multiple times, and is especially important now that we have stabilized the `LazyCell` and `LazyLock` types. The answer for the `Lazy*` types is that you would be better off using them if you want to use what is by far the most common pattern: initialize it with a single nullary function that you would call at every `get_or_init` site. For everything else there's the `Once*` types.
"For everything else" is a somewhat weak motivation, as it only describes by negation. While contrasting them is inevitable, I feel positive motivations are more understandable. For this, I now offer a distinct example that helps explain why `OnceLock` can be useful, despite `LazyLock` existing: you can do some cool stuff with it that `LazyLock` simply can't support due to its mere definition.
The pair of `std::sync::*Lock`s are usable inside a `static`, and can serve roles in async or multithreaded (or asynchronously multithreaded) programs that `*Cell`s cannot. Because of this, they received most of my attention.
Fixes#124696Fixes#125615
Add function `core::iter::chain`
The addition of `core::iter::zip` (#82917) set a precedent for adding plain functions for iterator adaptors. Adding `chain` makes it a little easier to `chain` two iterators.
```rust
for (x, y) in chain(xs, ys) {}
// vs.
for (x, y) in xs.into_iter().chain(ys) {}
```
There is prior art for the utility of this in [`itertools::chain`](https://docs.rs/itertools/latest/itertools/fn.chain.html).
Approved ACP https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/154
The addition of `core::iter::zip` (#82917) set a precedent for adding
plain functions for iterator adaptors. Adding `chain` makes it a little
easier to `chain` two iterators.
```
for (x, y) in chain(xs, ys) {}
// vs.
for (x, y) in xs.into_iter().chain(ys) {}
```
