Add lint for `panic!(123)` which is not accepted in Rust 2021.
This extends the `panic_fmt` lint to warn for all cases where the first argument cannot be interpreted as a format string, as will happen in Rust 2021.
It suggests to add `"{}",` to format the message as a string. In the case of `std::panic!()`, it also suggests the recently stabilized
`std::panic::panic_any()` function as an alternative.
It renames the lint to `non_fmt_panic` to match the lint naming guidelines.
This is part of #80162.
r? ```@estebank```
introduce future-compatibility warning for forbidden lint groups
We used to ignore `forbid(group)` scenarios completely. This changed in #78864, but that led to a number of regressions (#80988, #81218).
This PR introduces a future compatibility warning for the case where a group is forbidden but then an individual lint within that group is allowed. We now issue a FCW when we see the "allow", but permit it to take effect.
r? ``@Mark-Simulacrum``
Rename Iterator::fold_first to reduce and stabilize it
This stabilizes `#![feature(iterator_fold_self)]`.
The name for this function (originally `fold_first`) was still an open question, but the discussion on [the tracking issue](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68125) seems to have converged to `reduce`.
Stabilize the Wake trait
This PR proposes stabilizing the `wake_trait` feature, tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69912.
## Motivation
The surface area this trait introduces is small, and it has been on nightly for 4 months without any reported issues. Given the surface area of this trait is small and only serves to provide a safe interface around the already stable [`std::task::RawWakerVTable`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/task/struct.RawWaker.html) it seems unlikely this trait will require any further changes. So I'm proposing we stabilize this.
Personally I would love to have this available on stable, since it would enable cleaning up some runtime internals by removing the tedious pointer required to construct a [`RawWakerVTable`](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/task/struct.RawWakerVTable.html). I believe the intent was always to introduce a `Wake` counterpart to `RawWaker` in order to safely construct `Waker` instances. And the `Wake` trait feels like it does that job as intended.
## Implementation notes
This PR itself fixes a link in the docs, and introduces an example of how to use the trait: a minimal `block_on` example that runs a future to completion on the current thread. It doesn't include fancier features such as support for nesting, but is intended to serve as a teaching device for both `task::Wake` and futures alike.
This extends the `panic_fmt` lint to warn for all cases where the first
argument cannot be interpreted as a format string, as will happen in
Rust 2021.
It suggests to add `"{}", ` to format the message as a string. In the
case of `std::panic!()`, it also suggests the recently stabilized
`std::panic::panic_any()` function as an alternative.
It renames the lint to `non_fmt_panic` to match the lint naming
guidelines.
Fix panic when emitting diagnostic for closure mutable binding error
Fixes#81700
The upvar borrow kind may be `ty::BorrowKind::UniqueImmBorrow`, which is
still a mutable borrow for the purposes of this diagnostic code.
Fix non-existent-field ICE for generic fields.
I mentioned this ICE in a chat and it took about 3 milliseconds before `@eddyb` found the problem and said this change would fix it. :)
This also changes one the field types in the related test to one that triggered the ICE.
Fixes#81627.
Fixes#81672.
Fixes#81709.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/81480 `@b-naber` `@estebank.`
Reduce tab formatting assertions to debug only
The tab replacement for diagnostics added in #79757 included a few assertions to ensure all tab characters are handled appropriately. We've started getting reports of these assertions firing (#81614). Since it's only a cosmetic issue, this downgrades the assertions to debug only, so we at least continue compiling even if the diagnostics might be a tad wonky.
Minimizes the impact of #81614
Remove incorrect `delay_span_bug`
The following code is supposed to compile
```rust
use std::ops::BitOr;
pub trait IntWrapper {
type InternalStorage;
}
impl<T> BitOr for dyn IntWrapper<InternalStorage = T>
where
Self: Sized,
T: BitOr + BitOr<Output = T>,
{
type Output = Self;
fn bitor(self, _other: Self) -> Self {
todo!()
}
}
```
Before this change it would ICE. In #70998 the removed logic was added
to provide better suggestions, and the `delay_span_bug` guard was added
to protect against a potential logic error when returning traits. As it
happens, there are cases, like the one above, where traits can indeed be
returned, so valid code was being rejected.
Fix (but not close) #80207.
make const_err a future incompat lint
This is the first step for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/71800: make const_err a future-incompat lint. I also rewrote the const_err lint description as the old one seemed wrong.
This has the unfortunate side-effect of making const-eval error even more verbose by making the const_err message longer without fixing the redundancy caused by additionally emitting an error on each use site of the constant. We cannot fix that redundancy until const_err is a *hard* error (at that point the error-on-use-site can be turned into a `delay_span_bug!` for uses of monomorphic consts, and into a nicely rendered error for [lazily / post-monomorhization evaluated] associated consts).
~~The one annoying effect of this PR is that `let _x = &(1/(1-1));` now also shows the future-incompat warning, even though of course we will *not* make this a hard error. We'll instead (hopefully) stop promoting it -- see https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3027. The only way I see to avoid the future-incompat warning is to use a different lint for "failure to evaluate promoted".~~
Cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
The tab replacement for diagnostics added in #79757 included a few assertions to
ensure all tab characters are handled appropriately. We've started getting
reports of these assertions firing (#81614). Since it's only a cosmetic issue,
this downgrades the assertions to debug only, so we at least continue compiling
even if the diagnostics might be a tad wonky.
Fixes#81614
The following code is supposed to compile
```rust
use std::ops::BitOr;
pub trait IntWrapper {
type InternalStorage;
}
impl<T> BitOr for dyn IntWrapper<InternalStorage = T>
where
Self: Sized,
T: BitOr + BitOr<Output = T>,
{
type Output = Self;
fn bitor(self, _other: Self) -> Self {
todo!()
}
}
```
Before this change it would ICE. In #70998 the removed logic was added
to provide better suggestions, and the `delay_span_bug` guard was added
to protect against a potential logic error when returning traits. As it
happens, there are cases, like the one above, where traits can indeed be
returned, so valid code was being rejected.
Fix#80207.
Add some links to the cell docs.
This adds a few links to the cell module docs to make it a little easier to navigate to the types and functions it references.
Add a new ABI to support cmse_nonsecure_call
This adds support for the `cmse_nonsecure_call` feature to be able to perform non-secure function call.
See the discussion on Zulip [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/Support.20for.20callsite.20attributes/near/223054928).
This is a followup to #75810 which added `cmse_nonsecure_entry`. As for that PR, I assume that the changes are small enough to not have to go through a RFC but I don't mind doing one if needed 😃
I did not yet create a tracking issue, but if most of it is fine, I can create one and update the various files accordingly (they refer to the other tracking issue now).
On the Zulip chat, I believe `@jonas-schievink` volunteered to be a reviewer 💯
Update test-various to Ubuntu 20.04
The test command-setgroups.rs is adjusted to skip on musl, where `sysconf(_SC_NGROUPS_MAX)` always returns a dummy value of 32, even though the actual value is 65536. I'm not sure why this only became a problem now, as the information I found indicates that this value changed in kernel version 2.6.4, which is ages ago.
I'm a bit unsure whether this one will go through, because I locally also saw a failure in std-backtrace.rs which went away on subsequent runs, and also had port assignment failures, but I think those might be on my side. I'm kind of curious how the code in b122908617/library/std/src/net/test.rs (L43-L56) is supposed to work, as the directory names it checks don't seem to appear anywhere else.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
We used to ignore `forbid(group)` scenarios completely. This changed
in #78864, but that led to a number of regressions (#80988, #81218).
This PR introduces a future compatibility warning for the case where
a group is forbidden but then an individual lint within that group
is allowed. We now issue a FCW when we see the "allow", but permit
it to take effect.
