Update windows-gnu targets to set `DebuginfoKind::DWARF`
These targets have always used DWARF debuginfo and not CodeView/PDB debuginfo like the MSVC Windows targets. However, their target definitions claim to use `DebuginfoKind::PDB` probably to ensure that we do not try to allow the use of split-DWARF debuginfo.
This does not appear to be necessary since the targets set their supported split debug info to `Off`. I've looked at all of the uses of these properties and this patch does not appear to cause any functional changes in compiler behavior. I also added UI tests to attempt to validate there is no change in the behavior of these options on stable compilers.
cc ````@mati865```` since you mentioned this in #135739
cc ````@davidtwco```` for split-dwarf
AIX: use align 8 for byval parameter
On AIX, byval pointer arguments are aligned to 8 bytes based on the 64bit register size. For example, the C callee https://godbolt.org/z/5f4vnG6bh will expect the following argument.
```
ptr nocapture noundef readonly byval(%struct.TwoU64s) align 8 %0
```
This case is captured by `run-make/extern-fn-explicit-align`
These targets have always generated DWARF debuginfo and not CodeView/PDB debuginfo
like the MSVC Windows targets. Correct their target definitions to reflect this.
The newly added tests for the various combinations of `*-windows-gnu*` targets and
`-Csplit-debuginfo` show that this does not change any stable behavior.
Add gpu-kernel calling convention
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit f6b21e90d1 (#120495 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/16463) due to inactivity in the amdgpu target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to `ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust compiles for.
Tracking issue: #135467
amdgpu target tracking issue: #135024
Some targets have many different CPUs and no generic CPU that can be
used as a default. For these targets, the user needs to explicitly
specify a CPU through `-C target-cpu=`.
Add an option for targets and an error message if no CPU is set.
This affects the proposed amdgpu and avr targets.
The amdgpu-kernel calling convention was reverted in commit
f6b21e90d1 due to inactivity in the amdgpu
target.
Introduce a `gpu-kernel` calling convention that translates to
`ptx_kernel` or `amdgpu_kernel`, depending on the target that rust
compiles for.
Add new `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-gnu` targets
These are in symmetry with `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc`.
> ## Tier 3 target policy
>
> At this tier, the Rust project provides no official support for a target, so we
> place minimal requirements on the introduction of targets.
>
> A proposed new tier 3 target must be reviewed and approved by a member of the
> compiler team based on these requirements. The reviewer may choose to gauge
> broader compiler team consensus via a [Major Change Proposal (MCP)][https://forge.rust-lang.org/compiler/mcp.html].
>
> A proposed target or target-specific patch that substantially changes code
> shared with other targets (not just target-specific code) must be reviewed and
> approved by the appropriate team for that shared code before acceptance.
>
> - A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target
> maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target.
> (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)
This is me, `@tbu-` on github.
> - Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a
> target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same
> name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and
> naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust
> (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to
> diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially
> once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important
> even for a tier 3 target.
> - Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless
> absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if
> the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect
> beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to
> disambiguate it.
> - If possible, use only letters, numbers, dashes and underscores for the name.
> Periods (`.`) are known to cause issues in Cargo.
Consistent with `{x86_64,i686}-win7-windows-msvc`, see also #118150.
> - Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not
> create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for
> Rust developers or users.
> - The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.
> - Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust
> license (`MIT OR Apache-2.0`).
> - The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other
> host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend
> on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This
> applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding
> new license exceptions (as specified by the `tidy` tool in the
> rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library
> or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a
> user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be
> subject to any new license requirements.
> - Compiling, linking, and emitting functional binaries, libraries, or other
> code for the target (whether hosted on the target itself or cross-compiling
> from another target) must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries.
> Host tools built for the target itself may depend on the ordinary runtime
> libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other applications
> built for the target, but those libraries must not be required for code
> generation for the target; cross-compilation to the target must not require
> such libraries at all. For instance, `rustc` built for the target may
> depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library,
> but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code
> optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the
> Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the
> scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.
> - "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous"
> legal/licensing terms include but are *not* limited to: non-disclosure
> requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements
> (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms,
> requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular
> Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability
> for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that
> adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its
> developers or users.
AFAICT, it's the same legal situation as the tier 1 `{x86_64,i686}-pc-windows-gnu`.
> - Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any
> binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving
> Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or
> employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their
> decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval
> decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise
> participate in discussions.
> - This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being
> cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or
> maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a
> developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not
> face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely
> exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves
> subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.
Understood.
> - Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries
> as possible and appropriate (`core` for most targets, `alloc` for targets
> that can support dynamic memory allocation, `std` for targets with an
> operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but
> may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as
> appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or
> challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to
> avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3
> target not implementing those portions.
This target supports the whole libstd surface, since it's essentially reusing all of the x86_64-pc-windows-gnu target. Understood.
> - The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how
> to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target
> supports running binaries, or running tests (even if they do not pass), the
> documentation must explain how to run such binaries or tests for the target,
> using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.
I tried to write some documentation on that.
> - Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or
> other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular,
> do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a
> block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or
> notifications (via any medium, including via ``@`)` to a PR author or others
> involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into
> such messages.
> - Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to
> an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within
> reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not
> generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested
> such notifications.
Understood.
> - Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2
> or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without
> approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3
> target.
> - In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets,
> such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid
> introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the
> target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as
> appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.
> - Tier 3 targets must be able to produce assembly using at least one of
> rustc's supported backends from any host target. (Having support in a fork
> of the backend is not sufficient, it must be upstream.)
Understood.
> If a tier 3 target stops meeting these requirements, or the target maintainers
> no longer have interest or time, or the target shows no signs of activity and
> has not built for some time, or removing the target would improve the quality
> of the Rust codebase, we may post a PR to remove it; any such PR will be CCed
> to the target maintainers (and potentially other people who have previously
> worked on the target), to check potential interest in improving the situation.
>
Understood.
r? compiler-team
arm: add unstable soft-float target feature
This has an actual usecase as mentioned [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344#issuecomment-2575324988), and with my recent ARM float ABI changes there shouldn't be any soundness concerns any more. We will reject enabling this feature on `hf` targets, but disabling it on non-`hf` targets is entirely fine -- the target feature refers to whether softfloat emulation is used for float instructions, and is independent of the ABI which we set separately via `llvm_floatabi`.
Cc ``@workingjubilee``
add m68k-unknown-none-elf target
r? `@workingjubilee`
The existing `m68k-unknown-linux-gnu` target builds `std` by default, requires atomics, and has a base cpu with an fpu. A smaller/more embedded target is desirable both to have a baseline target for the ISA, as well to make debugging easier for working on the llvm backend. Currently this target is using the `M68010` as the minimum CPU due, but as missing features are merged into the `M68k` llvm backend I am hoping to lower this further.
I have been able to build very small crates using a toolchain built against this target (together with a later version of `object`) using the configuration described in the target platform-support documentation, although getting anything of substantial complexity to build quickly hits errors in the llvm backend
Add a notion of "some ABIs require certain target features"
I think I finally found the right shape for the data and checks that I recently added in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133417, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134337: we have a notion of "this ABI requires the following list of target features, and it is incompatible with the following list of target features". Both `-Ctarget-feature` and `#[target_feature]` are updated to ensure we follow the rules of the ABI. This removes all the "toggleability" stuff introduced before, though we do keep the notion of a fully "forbidden" target feature -- this is needed to deal with target features that are actual ABI switches, and hence are needed to even compute the list of required target features.
We always explicitly (un)set all required and in-conflict features, just to avoid potential trouble caused by the default features of whatever the base CPU is. We do this *before* applying `-Ctarget-feature` to maintain backward compatibility; this poses a slight risk of missing some implicit feature dependencies in LLVM but has the advantage of not breaking users that deliberately toggle ABI-relevant target features. They get a warning but the feature does get toggled the way they requested.
For now, our logic supports x86, ARM, and RISC-V (just like the previous logic did). Unsurprisingly, RISC-V is the nicest. ;)
As a side-effect this also (unstably) allows *enabling* `x87` when that is harmless. I used the opportunity to mark SSE2 as required on x86-64, to better match the actual logic in LLVM and because all x86-64 chips do have SSE2. This infrastructure also prepares us for requiring SSE on x86-32 when we want to use that for our ABI (and for float semantics sanity), see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133611, but no such change is happening in this PR.
r? `@workingjubilee`
Target: Add mips mti baremetal support
Do the same thing as gcc, which use the vendor `mti` to mark the toolchain as MIPS32r2 default.
We support both big endian and little endian flavor:
mips-mti-none-elf
mipsel-mti-none-elf
Do the same thing as gcc, which use the vendor `mti` to mark
the toolchain as MIPS32r2 default.
We support both big endian and little endian flavor:
mips-mti-none-elf
mipsel-mti-none-elf
Improve default target options for x86_64-unknown-linux-none
Without a standard library, we cannot unwind, so it should be panic=abort by default.
Additionally, it does not have std because while it is Linux, it cannot use libc, which std uses today for Linux.
Using PIE by default may be surprising to users, as shown in #134763, so I've documented it explicitly. I'm not sure if we want to count that as fixing the issue or not.
cc `@morr0ne,` as you added the target (and are the maintainer), and `@Noratrieb,` who reviewed that PR (:D).
Without a standard library, we cannot unwind, so it should be
panic=abort by default.
Additionally, it does not have std because while it is
Linux, it cannot use libc, which std uses today for Linux.
Re-export more `rustc_span::symbol` things from `rustc_span`.
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from `rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`, and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers to `rustc_span::`. This is a 300+ net line of code reduction, mostly because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to one.
r? `@jieyouxu`
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
Promote powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl to tier 2 with host tools
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/803
I'm using crosstool-ng for building a toolchain because GCC 9 from `musl-toolchain.sh` has float ABI issues (?) and can't compile LLVM, and writing a crosstool-ng config for a target feels less hacky than yet another target specific shell script. I also defined a kernel version, since there wasn't one specified before. If a lower version is desired, just let me know. I also tried to match the rust configure args with the loongarch64 musl tier 2 target.
The resulting compiler works fine, built with `DEPLOY=1 ./src/ci/docker/run.sh dist-powerpc64le-linux` and tested on Alpine Linux in a VM and on a bare metal POWER8 machine:
```
qemu-ppc64le:/tmp/rust-nightly-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl$ ash install.sh
install: creating uninstall script at /usr/local/lib/rustlib/uninstall.sh
install: installing component 'rustc'
install: installing component 'rust-std-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl'
install: installing component 'cargo'
install: installing component 'rustfmt-preview'
install: installing component 'rls-preview'
install: installing component 'rust-analyzer-preview'
install: installing component 'llvm-tools-preview'
install: installing component 'clippy-preview'
install: installing component 'miri-preview'
install: installing component 'rust-analysis-powerpc64le-unknown-linux-musl'
install: installing component 'llvm-bitcode-linker-preview'
install: WARNING: failed to run ldconfig. this may happen when not installing as root. run with --verbose to see the error
rust installed.
qemu-ppc64le:~$ echo 'fn main() { println!("hello world"); }' > test.rs
qemu-ppc64le:~$ rustc test.rs
qemu-ppc64le:~$ ./test
hello world
qemu-ppc64le:~$ file test
test: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, 64-bit PowerPC or cisco 7500, OpenPOWER ELF V2 ABI, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked, BuildID[sha1]=596ee6abf9add487ebc54fb71c2076fb6faea013, with debug_info, not stripped
```
try-job: dist-powerpc64le-linux
reject unsound toggling of RISCV target features
~~Stacked on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133417, only the last commit is new.~~
Works towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132618 (but more [remains to be done](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134337#issuecomment-2544228958))
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344
Cc ``@beetrees`` I hope I got everything. I didn't do anything about "The f and zfinx features are incompatible" and that's not an ABI thing (right?) and I am not sure how to handle it with these ABI checks.
r? ``@workingjubilee``
Ideally we'd also reject target specs that disable the `f` feature but set an ABI that requires `f`... but I don't want to duplicate this logic. I have some ideas for how maybe the entire float ABI check logic should be different, now that we have some examples of what these ABI checks look like, but that will be a future PR.
This allows compile-time configuration based on this.
In the near future we should do this across all RISCV targets, probably,
but this cfg is essential for building software usable on these targets.
reject aarch64 target feature toggling that would change the float ABI
~~Stacked on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133099. Only the last two commits are new.~~
The first new commit lays the groundwork for separately controlling whether a feature may be enabled or disabled. The second commit uses that to make it illegal to *disable* the `neon` feature (which is only possible via `-Ctarget-feature`, and so the new check just adds a warning). Enabling the `neon` feature remains allowed on targets that don't disable `neon` or `fp-armv8`, which is all our built-in targets. This way, the entire PR is not a breaking change.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131058 for hardfloat targets (together with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/133102 which fixed it for softfloat targets).
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #133221 (Add external macros specific diagnostics for check-cfg)
- #133386 (Update linux_musl base to dynamically link the crt by default)
- #134191 (Make some types and methods related to Polonius + Miri public)
- #134227 (Update wasi-sdk used to build WASI targets)
- #134279 ((Re-)return adjustment target if adjust kind is never-to-any)
- #134295 (Encode coroutine-closures in SMIR)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update linux_musl base to dynamically link the crt by default
However, don't change the behavior of any existing targets at this time. For targets that used the old default, explicitly set `crt_static_default = true`.
This makes it easier for new targets to use the correct defaults while leaving the changing of individual targets to future PRs.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/422
forbid toggling x87 and fpregs on hard-float targets
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344, follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129884:
The `x87` target feature on x86 and the `fpregs` target feature on ARM must not be disabled on a hardfloat target, as that would change the float ABI. However, *enabling* `fpregs` on ARM is [explicitly requested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130988) as it seems to be useful. Therefore, we need to refine the distinction of "forbidden" target features and "allowed" target features: all (un)stable target features can determine on a per-target basis whether they should be allowed to be toggled or not. `fpregs` then checks whether the current target has the `soft-float` feature, and if yes, `fpregs` is permitted -- otherwise, it is not. (Same for `x87` on x86).
Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132351. Since `fpregs` and `x87` can be enabled on some builds and disabled on others, it would make sense that one can query it via `cfg`. Therefore, I made them behave in `cfg` like any other unstable target feature.
The first commit prepares the infrastructure, but does not change behavior. The second commit then wires up `fpregs` and `x87` with that new infrastructure.
r? `@workingjubilee`
ABI checks: add support for loongarch
LoongArch psABI[^1] specifies that LSX vector types are passed via general-purpose registers, while LASX vector types are passed indirectly through the stack.
This patch addresses the following warnings:
```
warning: this function call uses a SIMD vector type that is not currently supported with the chosen ABI
--> .../library/core/src/../../stdarch/crates/core_arch/src/loongarch64/lsx/generated.rs:3695:5
|
3695 | __lsx_vreplgr2vr_b(a)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ function called here
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #116558 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558>
= note: `#[warn(abi_unsupported_vector_types)]` on by default
```
[^1]: https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/lapcs.adoc
r? `@workingjubilee`
LoongArch psABI[^1] specifies that LSX vector types are passed via general-purpose
registers, while LASX vector types are passed indirectly through the stack.
This patch addresses the following warnings:
```
warning: this function call uses a SIMD vector type that is not currently supported with the chosen ABI
--> .../library/core/src/../../stdarch/crates/core_arch/src/loongarch64/lsx/generated.rs:3695:5
|
3695 | __lsx_vreplgr2vr_b(a)
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ function called here
|
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #116558 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116558>
= note: `#[warn(abi_unsupported_vector_types)]` on by default
```
[^1]: https://github.com/loongson/la-abi-specs/blob/release/lapcs.adoc
rustc_target: ppc64 target string fixes for LLVM 20
LLVM continues to clean these up, and we continue to make this consistent. This is similar to 9caced7bad, e985396145, and
a10e744faf.
```@rustbot``` label: +llvm-main
LLVM continues to clean these up, and we continue to make this
consistent. This is similar to 9caced7bad,
e985396145, and
a10e744faf.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
rust_for_linux: -Zreg-struct-return commandline flag for X86 (#116973)
Command line flag `-Zreg-struct-return` for X86 (32-bit) for rust-for-linux.
This flag enables the same behavior as the `abi_return_struct_as_int` target spec key.
- Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116973
Mark visionOS as supporting `std`
Cargo's -Zbuild-std has recently started checking this field, which causes it to fail to compile even though we have full support for the standard library on these targets.
[Example of failed build](https://github.com/rust-random/getrandom/actions/runs/12069033154/job/33655430622).
Affected targets: `aarch64-apple-visionos` and `aarch64-apple-visionos-sim`.
r? Noratrieb (because you've worked with `rustc` target metadata IIRC)
``@rustbot`` label O-visionos
Support input/output in vector registers of PowerPC inline assembly
This extends currently clobber-only vector registers (`vreg`) support to allow passing `#[repr(simd)]` types as input/output.
| Architecture | Register class | Target feature | Allowed types |
| ------------ | -------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| PowerPC | `vreg` | `altivec` | `i8x16`, `i16x8`, `i32x4`, `f32x4` |
| PowerPC | `vreg` | `vsx` | `f32`, `f64`, `i64x2`, `f64x2` |
In addition to floats and `core::simd` types listed above, `core::arch` types and custom `#[repr(simd)]` types of the same size and type are also allowed. All allowed types and relevant target features are currently unstable.
r? `@Amanieu`
`@rustbot` label +O-PowerPC +A-inline-assembly
Add `+forced-atomics` feature to esp32s2 no_std target
Similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114499 but for the Xtensa backend. The ESP32-S2 doesn't have native atomic support, but can have atomic load/stores as part of the ISA with this LLVM codegen feature.
Note: The current rev of LLVM that rustc is using doesn't contain the `+forced-atomics` feature for Xtensa, but I'm pushing this now to remove the patch from our fork in `esp-rs/rust`.
r? ``@Amanieu`` because you reviewed the related RISC-V PR
Fix target_feature handling in freg of LoongArch inline assembly
In LoongArch inline assembly, freg currently always accepts f32/f64 as input/output.
9b4d7c6a40/compiler/rustc_target/src/asm/loongarch.rs (L41)
However, these types actually require f/d target features as in RISC-V.
Otherwise, an (ugly) compile error will occur: https://godbolt.org/z/K61Gq1E9E
f32/f64 without f:
```
error: couldn't allocate output register for constraint '{$f1}'
--> <source>:12:11
|
12 | asm!("", in("$f1") x, lateout("$f1") y);
| ^
```
f64 with f but without d:
```
error: scalar-to-vector conversion failed, possible invalid constraint for vector type
--> <source>:19:11
|
19 | asm!("", in("$f1") x, lateout("$f1") y);
| ^
```
cc ``@heiher``
r? ``@Amanieu``
``@rustbot`` label +O-LoongArch +A-inline-assembly
Support `clobber_abi` in AVR inline assembly
This PR implements the `clobber_abi` part necessary to eventually stabilize the inline assembly for AVR. This is tracked in #93335.
This is heavily inspired by the sibling-PR #131310 for the MSP430. I've explained my reasoning in the first commit message in detail, which is reproduced below for easier reviewing:
This follows the [ABI documentation] of AVR-GCC:
> The [...] call-clobbered general purpose registers (GPRs) are registers that might be destroyed (clobbered) by a function call.
>
> - **R18–R27, R30, R31**
>
> These GPRs are call clobbered. An ordinary function may use them without restoring the contents. [...]
>
> - **R0, T-Flag**
>
> The temporary register and the T-flag in SREG are also call-clobbered, but this knowledge is not exposed explicitly to the compiler (R0 is a fixed register).
Therefore this commit lists the aforementioned registers `r18–r27`, `r30` and `r31` as clobbered registers. Since the `r0` register (listed above as well) is not available in inline assembly at all (potentially because the AVR-GCC considers it a fixed register causing the register to never be used in register allocation and LLVM adopting this), there is no need to list it in the clobber list (the `r0`-variant is not even available). A comment was added to ensure, that the `r0` gets added to the clobber-list once the register gets usable in inline ASM.
Since the SREG is normally considered clobbered anyways (unless the user supplies the `preserve_flags`-option), there is no need to explicitly list a bit in this register (which is not possible to list anyways).
Note, that this commit completely ignores the case of interrupts (that are described in the ABI-specification), since every register touched in an ISR need to be saved anyways.
[ABI documentation]: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/avr-gcc#Call-Used_Registers
r? ``@Amanieu``
``@rustbot`` label +O-AVR
ensure JSON-defined targets are consistent
We have a `check_consistency` check that ensures some invariants which (presumably) the rest of the compiler relies on. However, JSON targets can easily be written in a way that violates those invariants. So this PR applies the same consistency check to JSON targets that we already enforce for built-in targets.
I have converted many of the assertions in that function to new macros that show a nice error instead of a panic; if people are okay with the general approach here, I can do that for the rest of the checks as well.
This commit adds the relevant registers to the list of clobbered regis-
ters (part of #93335). This follows the [ABI documentation] of AVR-GCC:
> The [...] call-clobbered general purpose registers (GPRs) are
> registers that might be destroyed (clobbered) by a function call.
>
> - **R18–R27, R30, R31**
>
> These GPRs are call clobbered. An ordinary function may use them
> without restoring the contents. [...]
>
> - **R0, T-Flag**
>
> The temporary register and the T-flag in SREG are also call-
> clobbered, but this knowledge is not exposed explicitly to the
> compiler (R0 is a fixed register).
Therefore this commit lists the aforementioned registers `r18–r27`,
`r30` and `r31` as clobbered registers. Since the `r0` register (listed
above as well) is not available in inline assembly at all (potentially
because the AVR-GCC considers it a fixed register causing the register
to never be used in register allocation and LLVM adopting this), there
is no need to list it in the clobber list (the `r0`-variant is not even
available). A comment was added to ensure, that the `r0` gets added to
the clobber-list once the register gets usable in inline ASM.
Since the SREG is normally considered clobbered anyways (unless the user
supplies the `preserve_flags`-option), there is no need to explicitly
list a bit in this register (which is not possible to list anyways).
Note, that this commit completely ignores the case of interrupts (that
are described in the ABI-specification), since every register touched in
an ISR need to be saved anyways.
[ABI documentation]: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/avr-gcc#Call-Used_Registers
Cargo's -Zbuild-std has recently started checking this field, which
causes it to fail to compile even though we have full support for the
standard library on these targets.
Fix clobber_abi in RV32E and RV64E inline assembly
Currently clobber_abi in RV32E and RV64E inline assembly is implemented using InlineAsmClobberAbi::RiscV, but broken since x16-x31 cannot be used in RV32E and RV64E.
```
error: cannot use register `x16`: register can't be used with the `e` target feature
--> <source>:42:14
|
42 | asm!("", clobber_abi("C"), options(nostack, nomem, preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: cannot use register `x17`: register can't be used with the `e` target feature
--> <source>:42:14
|
42 | asm!("", clobber_abi("C"), options(nostack, nomem, preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: cannot use register `x28`: register can't be used with the `e` target feature
--> <source>:42:14
|
42 | asm!("", clobber_abi("C"), options(nostack, nomem, preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: cannot use register `x29`: register can't be used with the `e` target feature
--> <source>:42:14
|
42 | asm!("", clobber_abi("C"), options(nostack, nomem, preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: cannot use register `x30`: register can't be used with the `e` target feature
--> <source>:42:14
|
42 | asm!("", clobber_abi("C"), options(nostack, nomem, preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
error: cannot use register `x31`: register can't be used with the `e` target feature
--> <source>:42:14
|
42 | asm!("", clobber_abi("C"), options(nostack, nomem, preserves_flags));
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
r? `@Amanieu`
`@rustbot` label O-riscv +A-inline-assembly
the emscripten OS no longer exists on non-wasm targets
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117338 removed our asmjs targets, which AFAIK means that emscripten only exists on wasm targets. However at least one place in the code still checked "is wasm or is emscripten". Let's fix that.
Cc ```@workingjubilee```
Support input/output in vector registers of s390x inline assembly (under asm_experimental_reg feature)
This extends currently clobber-only vector registers (`vreg`) support to allow passing `#[repr(simd)]` types, floats (f32/f64/f128), and integers (i32/i64/i128) as input/output.
This is unstable and gated under new `#![feature(asm_experimental_reg)]` (tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/133416). If the feature is not enabled, only clober is supported as before.
| Architecture | Register class | Target feature | Allowed types |
| ------------ | -------------- | -------------- | -------------- |
| s390x | `vreg` | `vector` | `i32`, `f32`, `i64`, `f64`, `i128`, `f128`, `i8x16`, `i16x8`, `i32x4`, `i64x2`, `f32x4`, `f64x2` |
This matches the list of types that are supported by the vector registers in LLVM:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/SystemZ/SystemZRegisterInfo.td#L301-L313
In addition to `core::simd` types and floats listed above, custom `#[repr(simd)]` types of the same size and type are also allowed. All allowed types other than i32/f32/i64/f64/i128, and relevant target features are currently unstable.
Currently there is no SIMD type for s390x in `core::arch`, but this is tracked in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130869 about vector facility support in s390x
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/125398 & https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116909 about f128 support in asm
`@rustbot` label +O-SystemZ +A-inline-assembly
However, don't change the behavior of any existing targets at this time.
For targets that used the old default, explicitly set `crt_static_default = true`.
This makes it easier for new targets to use the correct defaults while
leaving the changing of individual targets to future PRs.
Related to https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/422
aarch64 softfloat target: always pass floats in int registers
This is a part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131058: on softfloat aarch64 targets, the float registers may be unavailable. And yet, LLVM will happily use them to pass float types if the corresponding target features are enabled. That's a problem as it means enabling/disabling `neon` instructions can change the ABI.
Other targets have a `soft-float` target feature that forces the use of the soft-float ABI no matter whether float registers are enabled or not; aarch64 has nothing like that.
So we follow the aarch64 [softfloat ABI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131058#issuecomment-2385027423) and treat floats like integers for `extern "C"` functions. For the "Rust" ABI, we do the same for scalars, and then just do something reasonable for ScalarPair that avoids the pointer indirection.
Cc ```@workingjubilee```
Emscripten: link with -sWASM_BIGINT
When linking an executable without dynamic linking, this is a pure improvement. It significantly reduces code size and avoids a lot of buggy behaviors. It is supported in all browsers for many years and in all maintained versions of Node.
It does change the ABI, so people who are dynamically linking with a library or executable that uses the old ABI may need to turn it off. It can be disabled if needed by passing `-Clink-arg -sWASM_BIGINT=0` to `rustc`. But few people will want to turn it off.
Note this includes a libc bump to 0.2.162!
When linking an executable without dynamic linking, this is a pure improvement.
It significantly reduces code size and avoids a lot of buggy behaviors. It is
supported in all browsers for many years and in all maintained versions of
Node.
It does change the ABI, so people who are dynamically linking with a library
or executable that uses the old ABI may need to turn it off. It can be disabled
if needed by passing `-Clink-arg -sWASM_BIGINT=0` to `rustc`. But few people
will want to turn it off.
For the `multivalue` and `reference-types` features this commit is
similar to #117457 in that it's stabilizing target features specific to
WebAssembly targets. The previous PR left out these two features because
they weren't expected to change much about compiled code so it was
unclear what the rationale was. It has [since been discovered][blog]
that `reference-types` can be useful as it changes the binary format of
the `call_indirect` instruction. Additionally [on Zulip][zulip] there's
a use case of detecting these features at compile time and generating a
compile error to better warn users about features not supported on
engines.
This PR then additionally adds the `tail-call` feature which corresponds
to the [tail-call] proposal to WebAssembly. This feature advanced to
"phase 4" in the WebAssembly CG awhile back and has been supported in
LLVM for quite some time now. Engines are finishing up implementations
or have already shipped implementations, so while this is a bit of a
late addition to Rust itself it reflects the current status of
WebAssembly's state of the feature.
A test has been added here not only for these features but other
WebAssembly features as well to showcase that they're usable without
feature gates in stable Rust.
[blog]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/09/24/webassembly-targets-change-in-default-target-features.html
[zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/wasm32.20reference-types.20.2F.20multivalue.20in.201.2E82-beta.20not.20enabled/near/473893987
[tail-call]: https://github.com/webassembly/tail-call
Emit warning when calling/declaring functions with unavailable vectors.
On some architectures, vector types may have a different ABI depending on whether the relevant target features are enabled. (The ABI when the feature is disabled is often not specified, but LLVM implements some de-facto ABI.)
As discussed in rust-lang/lang-team#235, this turns out to very easily lead to unsound code.
This commit makes it a post-monomorphization future-incompat warning to declare or call functions using those vector types in a context in which the corresponding target features are disabled, if using an ABI for which the difference is relevant. This ensures that these functions are always called with a consistent ABI.
See the [nomination comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731#issuecomment-2288558187) for more discussion.
Part of #116558
r? RalfJung
rustc_target: more target string fixes for LLVM 20
LLVM continues to clean these up, and we continue to make this consistent. This is similar to 9caced7bad and e985396145.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
pointee_info_at: fix logic for recursing into enums
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131834
The logic in `pointee_info_at` was likely written at a time when the null pointer optimization was the *only* enum layout optimization -- and as `Variant::Multiple` kept getting expanded, nobody noticed that the logic is now unsound.
The job of this function is to figure out whether there is a dereferenceable-or-null and aligned pointer at a given offset inside a type. So when we recurse into a multi-variant enum, we better make sure that all the other enum variants must be null! This is the part that was forgotten, and this PR adds it.
The reason this didn't explode in many ways so far is that our references only have 1 niche value (null), so it's not possible on stable to have a multi-variant enum with a dereferenceable pointer and other enum variants that are not null. But with `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range` attributes one can force such a layout, and if `@the8472's` work on alignment niches ever lands, that will make this possible on stable.
Basic inline assembly support for SPARC and SPARC64
This implements asm_experimental_arch (tracking issue https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93335) for SPARC and SPARC64.
This PR includes:
- General-purpose registers `r[0-31]` (`reg` register class, LLVM/GCC constraint `r`)
Supported types: i8, i16, i32, i64 (SPARC64-only)
Aliases: `g[0-7]` (`r[0-7]`), `o[0-7]` (`r[8-15]`), `l[0-7]` (`r[16-23]`), `i[0-7]` (`r[24-31]`)
- `y` register (clobber-only, needed for clobber_abi)
- preserves_flags: Integer condition codes (`icc`, `xcc`) and floating-point condition codes (`fcc*`)
The following are *not* included:
- 64-bit integer support on SPARC-V8+'s global or out registers (`g[0-7]`, `o[0-7]`): GCC's `h` constraint (it seems that there is no corresponding constraint in LLVM?)
- Floating-point registers (LLVM/GCC constraint `e`/`f`):
I initially tried to implement this, but postponed it for now because there seemed to be several parts in LLVM that behaved differently than in the LangRef's description.
- clobber_abi: Support for floating-point registers is needed.
Refs:
- LLVM
- Reserved registers https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/SparcRegisterInfo.cpp#L52
- Register definitions https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/llvmorg-19.1.0/llvm/lib/Target/Sparc/SparcRegisterInfo.td
- Supported constraints https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#supported-constraint-code-list
- GCC
- Reserved registers 63b6967b06/gcc/config/sparc/sparc.h (L633-L658)
- Supported constraints https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Machine-Constraints.html
- SPARC ISA/ABI
- (64-bit ISA) The SPARC Architecture Manual, Version 9
(32-bit ISA) The SPARC Architecture Manual, Version 8
(64-bit ABI) System V Application Binary Interface SPARC Version 9 Processor Supplement, Rev 1.35
(32-bit ABI) System V Application Binary Interface SPARC Processor Supplement, Third Edition
The above docs can be downloaded from https://sparc.org/technical-documents
- (32-bit V8+ ABI) The V8+ Technical Specification
https://temlib.org/pub/SparcStation/Standards/V8plus.pdf
cc `@thejpster` (sparc-unknown-none-elf target maintainer)
(AFAIK, other sparc/sprac64 targets don't have target maintainers)
r? `@Amanieu`
`@rustbot` label +O-SPARC +A-inline-assembly
Remove unused intercrate dependencies
Checked by enabling `-Wunused-crate-dependencies`
`driver_impl` still depends on `index` to forward the `rustc_randomized_layouts` feature, and `rustc_main` depends on several unused crates for sysroot reasons
r? compiler
Remove the `wasm32-wasi` target from rustc
This commit is the final step in the journey of renaming the historical `wasm32-wasi` target in the Rust compiler to `wasm32-wasip1`. Various steps in this journey so far have been:
* 2023-04-03: rust-lang/compiler-team#607 - initial proposal for this rename
* 2024-11-27: rust-lang/compiler-team#695 - amended schedule/procedure for rename
* 2024-01-29: rust-lang/rust#120468 - initial introduction of `wasm32-wasip1`
* 2024-06-18: rust-lang/rust#126662 - warn on usage of `wasm32-wasi`
* 2024-11-08: this PR - remove the `wasm32-wasi` target
The full transition schedule is in [this comment][comment] and is summarized with:
* 2024-05-02: Rust 1.78 released with `wasm32-wasip1` target
* 2024-09-05: Rust 1.81 released warning on usage of `wasm32-wasi`
* 2025-01-09: Rust 1.84 to be released without the `wasm32-wasi` target
This means that support on stable for the replacement target of `wasm32-wasip1` has currently been available for 6 months. Users have already seen warnings on stable for 2 months about usage of `wasm32-wasi` and stable users have another 2 months of warnings before the target is removed from stable.
This commit is intended to be the final step in this transition so the source tree should no longer mention `wasm32-wasi` except in historical reference to the older name of the `wasm32-wasip1` target.
[comment]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120468#issuecomment-1977878747
Add a new `wide-arithmetic` feature for WebAssembly
This commit adds a new rustc target feature named `wide-arithmetic` for WebAssembly targets. This corresponds to the [wide-arithmetic] proposal for WebAssembly which adds new instructions catered towards accelerating integer arithmetic larger than 64-bits. This proposal to WebAssembly is not standard yet so this new feature is flagged as an unstable target feature. Additionally Rust's LLVM version doesn't support this new feature yet since support will first be added in LLVM 20, so the feature filtering logic for LLVM is updated to handle this.
I'll also note that I'm not currently planning to add wasm-specific intrinsics to `std::arch::wasm32` at this time. The currently proposed instructions are all accessible through `i128` or `u128`-based operations which Rust already supports, so intrinsic shouldn't be necessary to get access to these new instructions.
[wide-arithmetic]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wide-arithmetic
mark some target features as 'forbidden' so they cannot be (un)set with -Ctarget-feature
The context for this is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116344: some target features change the way floats are passed between functions. Changing those target features is unsound as code compiled for the same target may now use different ABIs.
So this introduces a new concept of "forbidden" target features (on top of the existing "stable " and "unstable" categories), and makes it a hard error to (un)set such a target feature. For now, the x86 and ARM feature `soft-float` is on that list. We'll have to make some effort to collect more relevant features, and similar features from other targets, but that can happen after the basic infrastructure for this landed. (These features are being collected in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/131799.)
I've made this a warning for now to give people some time to speak up if this would break something.
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/780
