Fix `non-constant value` ICE (#90878)
This also fixes the same suggestion, which was kind of broken, because it just searched for the last occurence of `const` to replace with a `let`. This works great in some cases, but when there is no const and a leading space to the file, it doesn't work and panic with overflow because it thought that it had found a const.
I also changed the suggestion to only trigger if the `const` and the non-constant value are on the same line, because if they aren't, the suggestion is very likely to be wrong.
Also don't trigger the suggestion if the found `const` is on line 0, because that triggers the ICE.
Asking Esteban to review since he was the last one to change the relevant code.
r? ``@estebank``
Fixes#90878
Clarify error messages caused by re-exporting `pub(crate)` visibility to outside
This PR clarifies error messages and suggestions caused by re-exporting pub(crate) visibility outside the crate.
Here is a small example ([Rust Playground](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2018&gist=e2cd0bd4422d4f20e6522dcbad167d3b)):
```rust
mod m {
pub(crate) enum E {}
}
pub use m::E;
fn main() {}
```
This code is compiled to:
```
error[E0365]: `E` is private, and cannot be re-exported
--> prog.rs:4:9
|
4 | pub use m::E;
| ^^^^ re-export of private `E`
|
= note: consider declaring type or module `E` with `pub`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0365`.
```
However, enum `E` is actually public to the crate, not private totally—nevertheless, rustc treats `pub(crate)` and private visibility as the same on the error messages. They are not clear and should be segmented distinctly.
By applying changes in this PR, the error message below will be the following message that would be clearer:
```
error[E0365]: `E` is only public to inside of the crate, and cannot be re-exported outside
--> prog.rs:4:9
|
4 | pub use m::E;
| ^^^^ re-export of crate public `E`
|
= note: consider declaring type or module `E` with `pub`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0365`.
```
Implement `clone_from` for `State`
Data flow engine uses `clone_from` for domain values. Providing an
implementation of `clone_from` will avoid some intermediate memory
allocations.
Extracted from #90413.
r? `@oli-obk`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #88361 (Makes docs for references a little less confusing)
- #90089 (Improve display of enum variants)
- #90956 (Add a regression test for #87573)
- #90999 (fix CTFE/Miri simd_insert/extract on array-style repr(simd) types)
- #91026 (rustdoc doctest: detect `fn main` after an unexpected semicolon)
- #91035 (Put back removed empty line)
- #91044 (Turn all 0x1b_u8 into '\x1b' or b'\x1b')
- #91054 (rustdoc: Fix some unescaped HTML tags in docs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
rustdoc doctest: detect `fn main` after an unexpected semicolon
Fixes#91014
The basic problem with this is that rustdoc, when hunting for `fn main`, will stop parsing after it reaches a fatal error. This unexpected semicolon was a fatal error, so in `src/test/rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-extra-semicolon-on-item.rs`, it would wrap the doctest in an implied main function, turning it into this:
fn main() {
struct S {};
fn main() {
assert_eq!(0, 1);
}
}
This, as it turns out, is totally valid, and it executes no assertions, so *it passes,* even though the user wanted it to execute the assertion.
The Rust parser already has the ability to recover from these unexpected semicolons, but to do so, it needs to use the `parse_mod` function, so this PR changes it to do that.
fix CTFE/Miri simd_insert/extract on array-style repr(simd) types
The changed test would previously fail since `place_index` would just return the only field of `f32x4`, i.e., the array -- rather than *indexing into* the array which is what we have to do.
The new helper methods will also be needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1912.
r? ``````@oli-obk``````
Makes docs for references a little less confusing
- Make clear that the `Pointer` trait is related to formatting
- Make clear that the `Pointer` trait is implemented for references (previously it was confusing to first see that it's implemented and then see it in "expect")
- Make clear that `&T` (shared reference) implements `Send` (if `T: Send + Sync`)
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89258 (Make char conversion functions unstably const)
- #90578 (add const generics test)
- #90633 (Refactor single variant `Candidate` enum into a struct)
- #90800 (bootstap: create .cargo/config only if not present)
- #90942 (windows: Return the "Not Found" error when a path is empty)
- #90947 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories - 9.5)
- #90961 (Suggest removal of arguments for unit variant, not replacement)
- #90990 (Arenas cleanup)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bootstap: create .cargo/config only if not present
In some situations we should want on influence into the .cargo/config
when we use vendored source. One example is #90764, when we want to
workaround some references to crates forked and living in git, that are
missing in the vendor/ directory.
This commit will create the .cargo/config file only when the .cargo/
directory needs to be created.
Refactor single variant `Candidate` enum into a struct
`Candidate` enum has only a single `Ref` variant. Refactor it into a
struct and reduce overall indentation of the code by two levels.
No functional changes.
Make char conversion functions unstably const
The char conversion functions like `char::from_u32` do trivial computations and can easily be converted into const fns. Only smaller tricks are needed to avoid non-const standard library functions like `Result::ok` or `bool::then_some`.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/89259
Try all stable method candidates first before trying unstable ones
Currently we try methods in this order in each step:
* Stable by value
* Unstable by value
* Stable autoref
* Unstable autoref
* ...
This PR changes it to first try pick methods without any unstable candidates, and if none is found, try again to pick unstable ones.
Fix#90320
CC #88971, hopefully would allow us to rename the "unstable_*" methods for integer impls back.
`@rustbot` label T-compiler T-libs-api
std: Tweak expansion of thread-local const
This commit tweaks the expansion of `thread_local!` when combined with a
`const { ... }` value to help ensure that the rules which apply to
`const { ... }` blocks will be the same as when they're stabilized.
Previously with this invocation:
thread_local!(static NAME: Type = const { init_expr });
this would generate (on supporting platforms):
#[thread_local]
static NAME: Type = init_expr;
instead the macro now expands to:
const INIT_EXPR: Type = init_expr;
#[thread_local]
static NAME: Type = INIT_EXPR;
with the hope that because `init_expr` is defined as a `const` item then
it's not accidentally allowing more behavior than if it were put into a
`static`. For example on the stabilization issue [this example][ex] now
gives the same error both ways.
[ex]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84223#issuecomment-953384298
The basic problem with this is that rustdoc, when hunting for `fn main`, will stop
parsing after it reaches a fatal error. This unexpected semicolon was a fatal error,
so in `src/test/rustdoc-ui/failed-doctest-extra-semicolon-on-item.rs`, it would wrap
the doctest in an implied main function, turning it into this:
fn main() {
struct S {};
fn main() {
assert_eq!(0, 1);
}
}
This, as it turns out, is totally valid, and it executes no assertions, so *it passes,*
even though the user wanted it to execute the assertion.
The Rust parser already has the ability to recover from these unexpected semicolons,
but to do so, it needs to use the `parse_mod` function, so this commit changes it to do that.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #90386 (Add `-Zassert-incr-state` to assert state of incremental cache)
- #90438 (Clean up mess for --show-coverage documentation)
- #90480 (Mention `Vec::remove` in `Vec::swap_remove`'s docs)
- #90607 (Make slice->str conversion and related functions `const`)
- #90750 (rustdoc: Replace where-bounded Clean impl with simple function)
- #90895 (require full validity when determining the discriminant of a value)
- #90989 (Avoid suggesting literal formatting that turns into member access)
- #91002 (rustc: Remove `#[rustc_synthetic]`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
require full validity when determining the discriminant of a value
This resolves (for now) the semantic question that came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89764: arguably, reading the discriminant of a value is 'using' that value, so we are in our right to demand full validity. Reading a discriminant is somewhat special in that it works for values of *arbitrary* type; all the other primitive MIR operations work on specific types (e.g. `bool` or an integer) and basically implicitly require validity as part of just "doing their job".
The alternative would be to just require that the discriminant itself is valid, if any -- but then what do we do for types that do not have a discriminant, which kind of validity do we check? [This code](81117ff930/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/mir/place.rs (L206-L215)) means we have to at least reject uninhabited types, but I would rather not special case that.
I don't think this can be tested in CTFE (since validity is not enforced there), I will add a compile-fail test to Miri:
```rust
#[allow(enum_intrinsics_non_enums)]
fn main() {
let i = 2u8;
std::mem::discriminant(unsafe { &*(&i as *const _ as *const bool) }); // UB
}
```
(I tried running the check even on the CTFE machines, but then it runs during ConstProp and that causes all sorts of problems. We could run it for ConstEval but not ConstProp, but that simply does not seem worth the effort currently.)
r? ``@oli-obk``
rustdoc: Replace where-bounded Clean impl with simple function
This is the first step in removing the Clean impls for tuples. Either way, this
significantly simplifies the code since it reduces the amount of "trait magic".
(To clarify, I'm referring to impls like `impl Clean for (A, B)`, not Clean impls
that work on tuples in the user's program.)
cc ``@jyn514``
Clean up mess for --show-coverage documentation
It was somewhat duplicated for some reasons... Anyway, this remove this duplication and clean up a bit.
r? ```@camelid```
std: Get the standard library compiling for wasm64
This commit goes through and updates various `#[cfg]` as appropriate to
get the wasm64-unknown-unknown target behaving similarly to the
wasm32-unknown-unknown target. Most of this is just updating various
conditions for `target_arch = "wasm32"` to also account for `target_arch
= "wasm64"` where appropriate. This commit also lists `wasm64` as an
allow-listed architecture to not have the `restricted_std` feature
enabled, enabling experimentation with `-Z build-std` externally.
The main goal of this commit is to enable playing around with
`wasm64-unknown-unknown` externally via `-Z build-std` in a way that's
similar to the `wasm32-unknown-unknown` target. These targets are
effectively the same and only differ in their pointer size, but wasm64
is much newer and has much less ecosystem/library support so it'll still
take time to get wasm64 fully-fledged.
