This change is somewhat extensive, since it affects MIR -- since this is called to determine Copy vs Move -- so any test that's `no_core` needs to actually have the normal `impl`s it uses.
Treat constant values as mir::ConstantKind::Val
Another step that is necessary for the introduction of Valtrees: we don't want to treat `ty::Const` instances of kind `ty::ConstKind::Value` as `mir::ConstantKind::Ty` anymore.
r? `@oli-obk`
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #91804 (Make some `Clone` impls `const`)
- #92541 (Mention intent of `From` trait in its docs)
- #93057 (Add Iterator::collect_into)
- #94739 (Suggest `if let`/`let_else` for refutable pat in `let`)
- #94754 (Warn users about `||` in let chain expressions)
- #94763 (Add documentation about lifetimes to thread::scope.)
- #94768 (Ignore `close_read_wakes_up` test on SGX platform)
- #94772 (Add miri to the well known conditional compilation names and values)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
add `#[rustc_pass_by_value]` to more types
the only interesting changes here should be to `TransitiveRelation`, but I believe to be highly unlikely that we will ever use a non `Copy` type with this type.
Ignore `close_read_wakes_up` test on SGX platform
PR #94714 enabled the `close_read_wakes_up` test for all platforms. This is incorrect. This test should be ignored at least for the SGX platform.
cc: ``@mzohreva`` ``@jethrogb``
Warn users about `||` in let chain expressions
Or more specifically, warn that `||` operators are forbidden.
This PR is simple so I guess anyone can review 🤷
cc #53667
cc ``@matthewjasper``
Add Iterator::collect_into
This PR adds `Iterator::collect_into` as proposed by ``@cormacrelf`` in #48597 (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/48597#issuecomment-842083688).
Followup of #92982.
This adds the following method to the Iterator trait:
```rust
fn collect_into<E: Extend<Self::Item>>(self, collection: &mut E) -> &mut E
```
Mention intent of `From` trait in its docs
This pr is a docs modification to add to the documentation of the `From` trait a note about its intent as a perfect conversion. This is already stated in the `TryFrom` docs so this is simply adding that information in a more visible way.
Edit `rustc_trait_selection::infer::lattice` docs
Closes#94311.
Removes mentions of outdated/missing type and filename (`infer.rs` and `LatticeValue`).
unix: reduce the size of DirEntry
On platforms where we call `readdir` instead of `readdir_r`, we store
the name as an allocated `CString` for variable length. There's no point
carrying around a full `dirent64` with its fixed-length `d_name` too.
Reverted atomic_mut_ptr feature removal causing compilation break
Fixes a regression introduced as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94546
Std no longer compiles on nightly while using the following commnd:
export RUSTFLAGS='-C target-feature=+atomics,+bulk-memory'
cargo build --target wasm32-unknown-unknown -Z build-std=panic_abort,std
I can help add tests to avoid future breaks but i couldn't understand the test framework
unix: Avoid name conversions in `remove_dir_all_recursive`
Each recursive call was creating an `OsString` for a `&Path`, only for
it to be turned into a `CString` right away. Instead we can directly
pass `.name_cstr()`, saving two allocations each time.
Add core::hint::must_use
The example code in this documentation is minimized from a real-world situation in the `anyhow` crate where this function would have been valuable.
Having this provided by the standard library is especially useful for proc macros, even more than for macro_rules. That's because proc macro crates aren't allowed to export anything other than macros, so they couldn't make their own `must_use` function for their macro-generated code to call.
<br>
## Rendered documentation
> An identity function that causes an `unused_must_use` warning to be triggered if the given value is not used (returned, stored in a variable, etc) by the caller.
>
> This is primarily intended for use in macro-generated code, in which a [`#[must_use]` attribute][must_use] either on a type or a function would not be convenient.
>
> [must_use]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/attributes/diagnostics.html#the-must_use-attribute
>
> ### Example
>
> ```rust
> #![feature(hint_must_use)]
>
> use core::fmt;
>
> pub struct Error(/* ... */);
>
> #[macro_export]
> macro_rules! make_error {
> ($($args:expr),*) => {
> core::hint::must_use({
> let error = $crate::make_error(core::format_args!($($args),*));
> error
> })
> };
> }
>
> // Implementation detail of make_error! macro.
> #[doc(hidden)]
> pub fn make_error(args: fmt::Arguments<'_>) -> Error {
> Error(/* ... */)
> }
>
> fn demo() -> Option<Error> {
> if true {
> // Oops, meant to write `return Some(make_error!("..."));`
> Some(make_error!("..."));
> }
> None
> }
> ```
>
> In the above example, we'd like an `unused_must_use` lint to apply to the value created by `make_error!`. However, neither `#[must_use]` on a struct nor `#[must_use]` on a function is appropriate here, so the macro expands using `core::hint::must_use` instead.
>
> - We wouldn't want `#[must_use]` on the `struct Error` because that would make the following unproblematic code trigger a warning:
>
> ```rust
> fn f(arg: &str) -> Result<(), Error>
>
> #[test]
> fn t() {
> // Assert that `f` returns error if passed an empty string.
> // A value of type `Error` is unused here but that's not a problem.
> f("").unwrap_err();
> }
> ```
>
> - Using `#[must_use]` on `fn make_error` can't help because the return value *is* used, as the right-hand side of a `let` statement. The `let` statement looks useless but is in fact necessary for ensuring that temporaries within the `format_args` expansion are not kept alive past the creation of the `Error`, as keeping them alive past that point can cause autotrait issues in async code:
>
> ```rust
> async fn f() {
> // Using `let` inside the make_error expansion causes temporaries like
> // `unsync()` to drop at the semicolon of that `let` statement, which
> // is prior to the await point. They would otherwise stay around until
> // the semicolon on *this* statement, which is after the await point,
> // and the enclosing Future would not implement Send.
> log(make_error!("look: {:p}", unsync())).await;
> }
>
> async fn log(error: Error) {/* ... */}
>
> // Returns something without a Sync impl.
> fn unsync() -> *const () {
> 0 as *const ()
> }
> ```
Enable `close_read_wakes_up` test on Windows
I wonder if we could/should try enabling this again? It was closed by #38867 due to #31657. I've tried running this test (along with other tests) on my machine a number of times and haven't seen this fail yet,
Caveat: the worst that can happen is this succeeds initially but then causes random hangs in CI. This is not a great failure mode and would be a reason not to do this.
If this does work out, closes#39006
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Use impl substs in `#[rustc_on_unimplemented]`
We were using the trait-ref substs instead of impl substs in `rustc_on_unimplemented`, even when computing the `rustc_on_unimplemented` attached to an impl block. Let's not do that.
This PR also untangles impl and trait def-ids in the logic in `on_unimplemented` a bit.
Fixes#94675
On platforms where we call `readdir` instead of `readdir_r`, we store
the name as an allocated `CString` for variable length. There's no point
carrying around a full `dirent64` with its fixed-length `d_name` too.
Move some more bootstrap logic from python to rust
Same rationale as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76544; it would be nice to make python entirely optional at some point.
This also removes $ROOT as an option for the build directory; I haven't been using it, and like Alex
said in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/76544#discussion_r488248930 it seems like a misfeature.
This allows running `cargo run` from src/bootstrap, although that still gives
lots of compile errors if you don't use the beta toolchain. It's not exactly the same as using `x.py`, since it won't have `BOOTSTRAP_DOWNLOAD_RUSTC` set, but it's pretty close. Doing this from the top-level directory requires https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/7290 to be fixed, or using `cargo run -p bootstrap`.
The next steps for making python optional are to move download-ci-llvm and download-rustc support into rustbuild, likely be shelling out as the python scripts do today.
It would also be nice (although not required) to move submodule support there, but that would require taking bootstrap out of the workspace to avoid errors from crates that haven't been cloned yet.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
