Move lint level source explanation to the bottom
So, uhhhhh
r? `@estebank`
## User-facing change
"note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic:
```diff
- = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>
+ = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
```
Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO.
## Developer-facing change
`struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature.
Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)`
After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>`
The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion.
Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere.
## Subtle problem
By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings...
I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate.
## P.S.
I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
Migrate sidebar links color to CSS variables and unify themes with ayu
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98460.
This PR does two things:
1. Migrate more theme CSS rules toward CSS variables.
2. Remove `a.current` specific colors depending on the kind of the item behind the link. The `ayu` theme was already doing it this way and I think it makes much more sense like this.
You can test it [here](https://rustdoc.crud.net/imperio/sidebar-links-color/lib2/struct.Foo.html) by hovering other module's items in the sidebar (or check the selector `a.current`).
cc `@jsha`
r? `@notriddle`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102361 (Fix ICE in const_trait check code)
- #102373 (Flush delayed bugs before codegen)
- #102483 (create def ids for impl traits during ast lowering)
- #102490 (Generate synthetic region from `impl` even in closure body within an associated fn)
- #102492 (Don't lower assoc bindings just to deny them)
- #102493 (Group together more size assertions.)
- #102521 (rustdoc: add missing margin to no-docblock methods)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Group together more size assertions.
Also add a few more assertions for some relevant token-related types.
And fix an erroneous comment in `rustc_errors`.
r? `@lqd`
Flush delayed bugs before codegen
Sometimes it can happen that invalid code like a TyKind::Error makes its way through the compiler without triggering any errors (this is always a bug in rustc but bugs do happen sometimes :)). These ICEs will manifest in the backend like as cg_llvm not being able to get the layout of `[type error]`, which makes it hard to debug. By flushing before codegen, we display all the delayed bugs, making it easier to trace it to the root of the problem.
I tried this on #102366 and it showed tons of of delayed bugs and no error in cg_llvm, so it seems to be working.
rustdoc: remove no-op CSS `h3.variant, .sub-variant h4 { border-bottom: none }`
This rule, added in 69df43b041 to override the default `h4` style, has been obsoleted when a65c98fefb changed it so that only the top docblock put `border-bottom` on `h4.`
Reinstate `hir-stats.rs` test for stage 1.
It was disabled in #94075 for stage 1 because that PR changed type layouts such that the results for this test were different for stage 1 and stage 2. But now that #94075 is in beta, the results for this test are now the same for stage 1 and stage 2.
r? ```@lqd```
remove the unused :: between trait and type to give user correct diag…
…nostic information
modified: compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/error_reporting/mod.rs
new file: src/test/ui/type/issue-101866.rs
new file: src/test/ui/type/issue-101866.stderr
Manually order `DefId` on 64-bit big-endian
`DefId` uses different field orders on 64-bit big-endian vs. others, in
order to optimize its `Hash` implementation. However, that also made it
derive different lexical ordering for `PartialOrd` and `Ord`. That
caused spurious differences wherever `DefId`s are sorted, like the
candidate sources list in `report_method_error`.
Now we manually implement `PartialOrd` and `Ord` on 64-bit big-endian to
match the same lexical ordering as other targets, fixing at least one
test, `src/test/ui/methods/method-ambig-two-traits-cross-crate.rs`.
Added more const_closure functionality
Enables ConstFnMutClosure to use a tuple of mutable references instead of just a mutable reference to a tuple.
Removes the new function, since it would barely be usable with this new code.
r? `@fee1-dead`
Fix integer overflow in `format!("{:.0?}", Duration::MAX)`
Currently `format!("{:.0?}", Duration::MAX)` causes an integer overflow in the `Duration` `Debug` impl ([playground link](https://play.rust-lang.org/?version=nightly&mode=debug&edition=2021&gist=67675c6895bdb2e37ee727f0ed7622b2)). This is because the carry from the rounding of the fractional_part into the integer_part will cause the integer_part to overflow as it is already `u64::MAX`. This PR uses a larger integer type to avoid that issue, and adds a test for the correct behaviour.
