Commit Graph

6089 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Josh Triplett
67ab53daee
Update library/core/tests/future.rs
Co-authored-by: Daniel Henry-Mantilla <daniel.henry.mantilla@gmail.com>
2021-12-10 05:07:52 -08:00
Daniel Henry-Mantilla
f8dc13db43 Add tests asserting the function-like semantics of join!() 2021-12-09 22:57:30 +01:00
Daniel Henry-Mantilla
e277a98758
Fix missing mut typo
Co-authored-by: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
2021-12-09 21:21:37 +01:00
Daniel Henry-Mantilla
07bcf4aad3 Bring back the colon separators for the macro munching.
Co-Authored-By: Ibraheem Ahmed <ibrah1440@gmail.com>
2021-12-09 21:05:34 +01:00
Daniel Henry-Mantilla
846cb9c583 Fix two false positive lints 2021-12-09 21:05:34 +01:00
Daniel Henry-Mantilla
e936071fbf Minor improvements to future::join!'s implementation
This is a follow-up from #91645, regarding [some remarks I made](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/187312-wg-async-foundations/topic/join!/near/264293660).

Mainly:
  - it hides the recursive munching through a private `macro`, to avoid leaking such details (a corollary is getting rid of the need to use `@` to disambiguate);
  - it uses a `match` binding, _outside_ the `async move` block, to better match the semantics from function-like syntax;
  - it pre-pins the future before calling into `poll_fn`, since `poll_fn`, alone, cannot guarantee that its capture does not move;
  - it uses `.ready()?` since it's such a neat pattern;
  - it renames `Took` to `Taken` for consistency with `Done`.
2021-12-09 21:05:29 +01:00
bors
0b42deaccc Auto merge of #85157 - the8472:drain-drop-in-place, r=Mark-Simulacrum
replace vec::Drain drop loops with drop_in_place

The `Drain::drop` implementation came up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82185#issuecomment-789584796 as potentially interfering with other optimization work due its widespread use somewhere in `println!`

`@rustbot` label T-libs-impl
2021-12-09 15:01:42 +00:00
bors
3b263ceb5c Auto merge of #81156 - DrMeepster:read_buf, r=joshtriplett
Implement most of RFC 2930, providing the ReadBuf abstraction

This replaces the `Initializer` abstraction for permitting reading into uninitialized buffers, closing #42788.

This leaves several APIs described in the RFC out of scope for the initial implementation:

* read_buf_vectored
* `ReadBufs`

Closes #42788, by removing the relevant APIs.
2021-12-09 10:11:55 +00:00
bors
600820da45 Auto merge of #91692 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-u7dvh0n, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #87599 (Implement concat_bytes!)
 - #89999 (Update std::env::temp_dir to use GetTempPath2 on Windows when available.)
 - #90796 (Remove the reg_thumb register class for asm! on ARM)
 - #91042 (Use Vec extend instead of repeated pushes on several places)
 - #91634 (Do not attempt to suggest help for overly malformed struct/function call)
 - #91685 (Install llvm tools to sysroot when assembling local toolchain)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-12-09 07:08:32 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
856eefece9
Rollup merge of #89999 - talagrand:GetTempPath2, r=m-ou-se
Update std::env::temp_dir to use GetTempPath2 on Windows when available.

As a security measure, Windows 11 introduces a new temporary directory API, GetTempPath2.
When the calling process is running as SYSTEM, a separate temporary directory
will be returned inaccessible to non-SYSTEM processes. For non-SYSTEM processes
the behavior will be the same as before.

This can help mitigate against attacks such as this one:
https://medium.com/csis-techblog/cve-2020-1088-yet-another-arbitrary-delete-eop-a00b97d8c3e2

Compatibility risk: Software which relies on temporary files to communicate between SYSTEM and non-SYSTEM
processes may be affected by this change. In many cases, such patterns may be vulnerable to the very
attacks the new API was introduced to harden against.
I'm unclear on the Rust project's tolerance for such change-of-behavior in the standard library. If anything,
this PR is meant to raise awareness of the issue and hopefully start the conversation.

How tested: Taking the example code from the documentation and running it through psexec (from SysInternals) on
Win10 and Win11.
On Win10:
C:\test>psexec -s C:\test\main.exe
<...>
Temporary directory: C:\WINDOWS\TEMP\

On Win11:
C:\test>psexec -s C:\test\main.exe
<...>
Temporary directory: C:\Windows\SystemTemp\
2021-12-09 05:08:31 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
3fc5bd7abc
Rollup merge of #87599 - Smittyvb:concat_bytes, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Implement concat_bytes!

This implements the unstable `concat_bytes!` macro, which has tracking issue #87555. It can be used like:
```rust
#![feature(concat_bytes)]

fn main() {
    assert_eq!(concat_bytes!(), &[]);
    assert_eq!(concat_bytes!(b'A', b"BC", [68, b'E', 70]), b"ABCDEF");
}
```
If strings or characters are used where byte strings or byte characters are required, it suggests adding a `b` prefix. If a number is used outside of an array it suggests arrayifying it. If a boolean is used it suggests replacing it with the numeric value of that number. Doubly nested arrays of bytes are disallowed.
2021-12-09 05:08:30 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
90c3e9a2c2
Rollup merge of #91645 - ibraheemdev:future-join, r=joshtriplett
Implement `core::future::join!`

`join!` polls multiple futures concurrently and returns their outputs.

```rust
async fn run() {
    let (a, b) = join!(async { 0 }, async { 1 });
}
```

cc `@rust-lang/wg-async-foundations`
2021-12-09 05:02:22 +01:00
The 8472
2d8a11bdbb Use *mut [T] instead of [MaybeUninit<T>] 2021-12-09 00:20:13 +01:00
Ibraheem Ahmed
5478f439e1 trim down expansion of core::future::join 2021-12-08 17:21:32 -05:00
Ibraheem Ahmed
a8c9314100 remove implicit .await from core::future::join 2021-12-08 16:44:48 -05:00
bors
4459e720be Auto merge of #91656 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-lk96y6d, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #83744 (Deprecate crate_type and crate_name nested inside #![cfg_attr])
 - #90550 (Update certificates in some Ubuntu 16 images.)
 - #91272 (Print a suggestion when comparing references to primitive types in `const fn`)
 - #91467 (Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string)
 - #91531 (Do not add `;` to expected tokens list when it's wrong)
 - #91577 (Address some FIXMEs left over from #91475)
 - #91638 (Remove `in_band_lifetimes` from `rustc_mir_transform`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-12-08 11:22:02 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
bb8a4ab6ae
Rollup merge of #91467 - ChrisDenton:confusing-os-string, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Emphasise that an OsStr[ing] is not necessarily a platform string

Fixes #53261

Since that issue was filed, #56141 added a further clarification to the `OsString` docs. However the ffi docs may still leave the impression that an `OsStr` is in the platform native form. This PR aims to further emphasise that an `OsStr` is not necessarily a platform string.
2021-12-08 11:08:58 +01:00
bors
ce0f7baf56 Auto merge of #91512 - scottmcm:array-intoiter-advance, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Override `Iterator::advance(_back)_by` for `array::IntoIter`

Because I happened to notice that `nth` is currently getting codegen'd as a loop even for `Copy` types: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/fPqv7Gvs7>

<details>
<summary>LLVM before and after</summary>

Rust:

```rust
#[no_mangle]
pub fn array_intoiter_nth(it: &mut std::array::IntoIter<i32, 100>, n: usize) -> Option<i32> {
    it.nth(n)
}
```

Current nightly:
```llvmir
define { i32, i32 } `@array_intoiter_nth(%"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32,` 100_usize>"* noalias nocapture align 8 dereferenceable(416) %it, i64 %n) unnamed_addr #0 personality i32 (i32, i32, i64, %"unwind::libunwind::_Unwind_Exception"*, %"unwind::libunwind::_Unwind_Context"*)* `@rust_eh_personality` !dbg !6 {
start:
  %_3.i.i.i4.i.i = getelementptr inbounds %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>", %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>"* %it, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
  %_4.i.i.i5.i.i = getelementptr inbounds %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>", %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>"* %it, i64 0, i32 0, i32 1
  %_4.i.i.i.i.i.i = load i64, i64* %_4.i.i.i5.i.i, align 8, !alias.scope !10
  %.not.i.i = icmp eq i64 %n, 0, !dbg !15
  %_3.i.i.i.i.pre.i = load i64, i64* %_3.i.i.i4.i.i, align 8, !dbg !40, !alias.scope !41
  br i1 %.not.i.i, label %bb4.i, label %bb4.preheader.i.i, !dbg !42

bb4.preheader.i.i:                                ; preds = %start
  %umax.i = tail call i64 `@llvm.umax.i64(i64` %_3.i.i.i.i.pre.i, i64 %_4.i.i.i.i.i.i) #3, !dbg !43
  %0 = sub i64 %umax.i, %_3.i.i.i.i.pre.i, !dbg !43
  br label %bb4.i.i, !dbg !43

bb4.i.i:                                          ; preds = %bb3.i.i.i.i, %bb4.preheader.i.i
  %_3.i.i.i.i.i.i = phi i64 [ %2, %bb3.i.i.i.i ], [ %_3.i.i.i.i.pre.i, %bb4.preheader.i.i ], !dbg !52
  %iter.sroa.0.016.i.i = phi i64 [ %1, %bb3.i.i.i.i ], [ 0, %bb4.preheader.i.i ]
  %1 = add nuw i64 %iter.sroa.0.016.i.i, 1, !dbg !54
  %exitcond.not.i = icmp eq i64 %iter.sroa.0.016.i.i, %0, !dbg !52
  br i1 %exitcond.not.i, label %core::iter::traits::iterator::Iterator::nth.exit, label %bb3.i.i.i.i, !dbg !43

bb3.i.i.i.i:                                      ; preds = %bb4.i.i
  %2 = add nuw i64 %_3.i.i.i.i.i.i, 1, !dbg !63
  store i64 %2, i64* %_3.i.i.i4.i.i, align 8, !dbg !66, !alias.scope !75
  %exitcond.not.i.i = icmp eq i64 %1, %n, !dbg !15
  br i1 %exitcond.not.i.i, label %bb4.i, label %bb4.i.i, !dbg !42

bb4.i:                                            ; preds = %bb3.i.i.i.i, %start
  %_3.i.i.i.i.i = phi i64 [ %_3.i.i.i.i.pre.i, %start ], [ %2, %bb3.i.i.i.i ], !dbg !84
  %3 = icmp ult i64 %_3.i.i.i.i.i, %_4.i.i.i.i.i.i, !dbg !84
  br i1 %3, label %bb3.i.i.i, label %core::iter::traits::iterator::Iterator::nth.exit, !dbg !89

bb3.i.i.i:                                        ; preds = %bb4.i
  %4 = add nuw i64 %_3.i.i.i.i.i, 1, !dbg !90
  store i64 %4, i64* %_3.i.i.i4.i.i, align 8, !dbg !93, !alias.scope !96
  %5 = getelementptr inbounds %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>", %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>"* %it, i64 0, i32 1, i64 %_3.i.i.i.i.i, !dbg !105
  %6 = load i32, i32* %5, align 4, !dbg !131, !alias.scope !141, !noalias !144
  br label %core::iter::traits::iterator::Iterator::nth.exit, !dbg !149

core::iter::traits::iterator::Iterator::nth.exit: ; preds = %bb4.i.i, %bb4.i, %bb3.i.i.i
  %.sroa.3.0.i = phi i32 [ %6, %bb3.i.i.i ], [ undef, %bb4.i ], [ undef, %bb4.i.i ], !dbg !40
  %.sroa.0.0.i = phi i32 [ 1, %bb3.i.i.i ], [ 0, %bb4.i ], [ 0, %bb4.i.i ], !dbg !40
  %7 = insertvalue { i32, i32 } undef, i32 %.sroa.0.0.i, 0, !dbg !150
  %8 = insertvalue { i32, i32 } %7, i32 %.sroa.3.0.i, 1, !dbg !150
  ret { i32, i32 } %8, !dbg !151
}
```

With this PR:
```llvmir
define { i32, i32 } `@array_intoiter_nth(%"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32,` 100_usize>"* noalias nocapture align 8 dereferenceable(416) %it, i64 %n) unnamed_addr #0 personality i32 (...)* `@__CxxFrameHandler3` {
start:
  %0 = getelementptr inbounds %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>", %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>"* %it, i64 0, i32 0, i32 1
  %_2.i.i.i.i = load i64, i64* %0, align 8, !alias.scope !6, !noalias !13
  %1 = getelementptr inbounds %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>", %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>"* %it, i64 0, i32 0, i32 0
  %_3.i.i.i.i = load i64, i64* %1, align 8, !alias.scope !16
  %2 = sub i64 %_2.i.i.i.i, %_3.i.i.i.i
  %3 = icmp ult i64 %2, %n
  %.0.sroa.speculated.i.i.i.i.i = select i1 %3, i64 %2, i64 %n
  %_10.i.i = add i64 %.0.sroa.speculated.i.i.i.i.i, %_3.i.i.i.i
  store i64 %_10.i.i, i64* %1, align 8, !alias.scope !16
  %.not.i = xor i1 %3, true
  %4 = icmp ult i64 %_10.i.i, %_2.i.i.i.i
  %or.cond.i = select i1 %.not.i, i1 %4, i1 false
  br i1 %or.cond.i, label %bb3.i.i.i, label %_ZN4core4iter6traits8iterator8Iterator3nth17hcbc727011e9e2a3bE.exit

bb3.i.i.i:                                        ; preds = %start
  %5 = add nuw i64 %_10.i.i, 1
  store i64 %5, i64* %1, align 8, !alias.scope !17
  %6 = getelementptr inbounds %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>", %"core::array::iter::IntoIter<i32, 100_usize>"* %it, i64 0, i32 1, i64 %_10.i.i
  %7 = load i32, i32* %6, align 4, !alias.scope !26, !noalias !29
  br label %_ZN4core4iter6traits8iterator8Iterator3nth17hcbc727011e9e2a3bE.exit

_ZN4core4iter6traits8iterator8Iterator3nth17hcbc727011e9e2a3bE.exit: ; preds = %start, %bb3.i.i.i
  %.sroa.3.0.i = phi i32 [ undef, %start ], [ %7, %bb3.i.i.i ]
  %.sroa.0.0.i = phi i32 [ 0, %start ], [ 1, %bb3.i.i.i ]
  %8 = insertvalue { i32, i32 } undef, i32 %.sroa.0.0.i, 0
  %9 = insertvalue { i32, i32 } %8, i32 %.sroa.3.0.i, 1
  ret { i32, i32 } %9
}
```
</details>
2021-12-08 07:54:30 +00:00
DrMeepster
cd23799ba5
correct typo
Co-authored-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
2021-12-07 22:09:14 -08:00
Ibraheem Ahmed
d07cef22b0 add tests for core::future::join 2021-12-07 21:20:58 -05:00
Ibraheem Ahmed
08dca1933b generate MaybeDone futures inline join 2021-12-07 21:07:47 -05:00
Ibraheem Ahmed
d761e84968 implement core::future::join 2021-12-07 21:07:47 -05:00
bors
11fb21fd0e Auto merge of #91484 - workingjubilee:simd-remove-autosplats, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Sync portable-simd to remove autosplats

This PR syncs portable-simd in up to a8385522ad in order to address the type inference breakages documented on nightly in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90904 by removing the vector + scalar binary operations (called "autosplats", "broadcasting", or "rank promotion", depending on who you ask) that allow `{scalar} + &'_ {scalar}` to fail in some cases, because it becomes possible the programmer may have meant `{scalar} + &'_ {vector}`.

A few quality-of-life improvements make their way in as well:
- Lane counts can now go to 64, as LLVM seems to have fixed their miscompilation for those.
- `{i,u}8x64` to `__m512i` is now available.
- a bunch of `#[must_use]` notes appear throughout the module.
- Some implementations, mostly instances of `impl core::ops::{Op}<Simd> for Simd` that aren't `{vector} + {vector}` (e.g. `{vector} + &'_ {vector}`), leverage some generics and `where` bounds now to make them easier to understand by reducing a dozen implementations into one (and make it possible for people to open the docs on less burly devices).
- And some internal-only improvements.

None of these changes should affect a beta backport, only actual users of `core::simd` (and most aren't even visible in the programmatic sense), though I can extract an even more minimal changeset for beta if necessary. It seemed simpler to just keep moving forward.
2021-12-08 01:37:59 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
1c2fba6540
Rollup merge of #91547 - TennyZhuang:suggest_try_reserve, r=scottmcm
Suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact

During developing #91529 , I found that `try_reserve_exact` suggests `reserve` for further insertions. I think it's a mistake by copy&paste, `try_reserve` is better here.
2021-12-07 11:05:04 +01:00
Scott McMurray
9b86c5998c s/from_raw_parts/new_unchecked/ 2021-12-06 22:59:04 -08:00
Smitty
eb56693a37 Implement concat_bytes!
The tracking issue for this is #87555.
2021-12-06 21:05:13 -05:00
Scott McMurray
0b90204bc8 Add tracking issue; make empty const too (unstably) 2021-12-06 01:12:59 -08:00
Scott McMurray
ef7c833c20 Move the doc test to edition2021 2021-12-06 00:58:40 -08:00
Scott McMurray
a30f96311a Add array::IntoIter::{empty, from_raw_parts}
`array::IntoIter` has a bunch of really handy logic for dealing with partial arrays, but it's currently hamstrung by only being creatable from a fully-initialized array.

This PR adds two new constructors:
- a safe & const `empty`, since `[].into_iter()` gives `<T, 0>`, not `<T, N>`.
- an unsafe `from_raw_parts`, to allow experimentation with new uses.

(Slice & vec iterators don't need `from_raw_parts` because you `from_raw_parts` the slice or vec instead, but there's no useful way to made a `<[T; N]>::from_raw_parts`, so I think this is a reasonable place to have one.)
2021-12-06 00:58:40 -08:00
bors
87dce6e8df Auto merge of #91284 - t6:freebsd-riscv64, r=Amanieu
Add support for riscv64gc-unknown-freebsd

For https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/rustc/target-tier-policy.html#tier-3-target-policy:

* A tier 3 target must have a designated developer or developers (the "target maintainers") on record to be CCed when issues arise regarding the target. (The mechanism to track and CC such developers may evolve over time.)

For all Rust targets on FreeBSD, it's [rust@FreeBSD.org](mailto:rust@FreeBSD.org).

* Targets must use naming consistent with any existing targets; for instance, a target for the same CPU or OS as an existing Rust target should use the same name for that CPU or OS. Targets should normally use the same names and naming conventions as used elsewhere in the broader ecosystem beyond Rust (such as in other toolchains), unless they have a very good reason to diverge. Changing the name of a target can be highly disruptive, especially once the target reaches a higher tier, so getting the name right is important even for a tier 3 target.

Done.

* Target names should not introduce undue confusion or ambiguity unless absolutely necessary to maintain ecosystem compatibility. For example, if the name of the target makes people extremely likely to form incorrect beliefs about what it targets, the name should be changed or augmented to disambiguate it.

Done

* Tier 3 targets may have unusual requirements to build or use, but must not create legal issues or impose onerous legal terms for the Rust project or for Rust developers or users.

Done.

* The target must not introduce license incompatibilities.

Done.

* Anything added to the Rust repository must be under the standard Rust license (MIT OR Apache-2.0).

Fine with me.

* The target must not cause the Rust tools or libraries built for any other host (even when supporting cross-compilation to the target) to depend on any new dependency less permissive than the Rust licensing policy. This applies whether the dependency is a Rust crate that would require adding new license exceptions (as specified by the tidy tool in the rust-lang/rust repository), or whether the dependency is a native library or binary. In other words, the introduction of the target must not cause a user installing or running a version of Rust or the Rust tools to be subject to any new license requirements.

Done.

* If the target supports building host tools (such as rustc or cargo), those host tools must not depend on proprietary (non-FOSS) libraries, other than ordinary runtime libraries supplied by the platform and commonly used by other binaries built for the target. For instance, rustc built for the target may depend on a common proprietary C runtime library or console output library, but must not depend on a proprietary code generation library or code optimization library. Rust's license permits such combinations, but the Rust project has no interest in maintaining such combinations within the scope of Rust itself, even at tier 3.

Done.

* Targets should not require proprietary (non-FOSS) components to link a functional binary or library.

Done.

* "onerous" here is an intentionally subjective term. At a minimum, "onerous" legal/licensing terms include but are not limited to: non-disclosure requirements, non-compete requirements, contributor license agreements (CLAs) or equivalent, "non-commercial"/"research-only"/etc terms, requirements conditional on the employer or employment of any particular Rust developers, revocable terms, any requirements that create liability for the Rust project or its developers or users, or any requirements that adversely affect the livelihood or prospects of the Rust project or its developers or users.

Fine with me.

* Neither this policy nor any decisions made regarding targets shall create any binding agreement or estoppel by any party. If any member of an approving Rust team serves as one of the maintainers of a target, or has any legal or employment requirement (explicit or implicit) that might affect their decisions regarding a target, they must recuse themselves from any approval decisions regarding the target's tier status, though they may otherwise participate in discussions.

Ok.

* This requirement does not prevent part or all of this policy from being cited in an explicit contract or work agreement (e.g. to implement or maintain support for a target). This requirement exists to ensure that a developer or team responsible for reviewing and approving a target does not face any legal threats or obligations that would prevent them from freely exercising their judgment in such approval, even if such judgment involves subjective matters or goes beyond the letter of these requirements.

Ok.

* Tier 3 targets should attempt to implement as much of the standard libraries as possible and appropriate (core for most targets, alloc for targets that can support dynamic memory allocation, std for targets with an operating system or equivalent layer of system-provided functionality), but may leave some code unimplemented (either unavailable or stubbed out as appropriate), whether because the target makes it impossible to implement or challenging to implement. The authors of pull requests are not obligated to avoid calling any portions of the standard library on the basis of a tier 3 target not implementing those portions.

std is implemented.

* The target must provide documentation for the Rust community explaining how to build for the target, using cross-compilation if possible. If the target supports running tests (even if they do not pass), the documentation must explain how to run tests for the target, using emulation if possible or dedicated hardware if necessary.

Building is possible the same way as other Rust on FreeBSD targets.

* Tier 3 targets must not impose burden on the authors of pull requests, or other developers in the community, to maintain the target. In particular, do not post comments (automated or manual) on a PR that derail or suggest a block on the PR based on a tier 3 target. Do not send automated messages or notifications (via any medium, including via `@)` to a PR author or others involved with a PR regarding a tier 3 target, unless they have opted into such messages.

Ok.

* Backlinks such as those generated by the issue/PR tracker when linking to an issue or PR are not considered a violation of this policy, within reason. However, such messages (even on a separate repository) must not generate notifications to anyone involved with a PR who has not requested such notifications.

Ok.

* Patches adding or updating tier 3 targets must not break any existing tier 2 or tier 1 target, and must not knowingly break another tier 3 target without approval of either the compiler team or the maintainers of the other tier 3 target.

Ok.

* In particular, this may come up when working on closely related targets, such as variations of the same architecture with different features. Avoid introducing unconditional uses of features that another variation of the target may not have; use conditional compilation or runtime detection, as appropriate, to let each target run code supported by that target.

Ok.
2021-12-06 03:51:05 +00:00
bors
1597728ef5 Auto merge of #88611 - m-ou-se:array-into-iter-new-deprecate, r=joshtriplett
Deprecate array::IntoIter::new.
2021-12-05 12:53:01 +00:00
TennyZhuang
aa3370c92b doc: suggest try_reserve in try_reserve_exact
Signed-off-by: TennyZhuang <zty0826@gmail.com>
2021-12-05 14:38:59 +08:00
Matthias Krüger
23012b5200
Rollup merge of #91355 - alexcrichton:stabilize-thread-local-const, r=m-ou-se
std: Stabilize the `thread_local_const_init` feature

This commit is intended to follow the stabilization disposition of the
FCP that has now finished in #84223. This stabilizes the ability to flag
thread local initializers as `const` expressions which enables the macro
to generate more efficient code for accessing it, notably removing
runtime checks for initialization.

More information can also be found in #84223 as well as the tests where
the feature usage was removed in this PR.

Closes #84223
2021-12-05 00:38:00 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
4af985ac00
Rollup merge of #91215 - GuillaumeGomez:vec-deque-retain-mut, r=m-ou-se
Implement VecDeque::retain_mut

Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90829.

In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90772, someone suggested that `retain_mut` should also be implemented on `VecDeque`. I think that it follows the same logic (coherency). So first: is it ok? Second: should I create a new feature for it or can we put it into the same one?

r? `@joshtriplett`
2021-12-05 00:37:59 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
b97f375ea2
Rollup merge of #89642 - devnexen:macos_getenv_chng, r=m-ou-se
environ on macos uses directly libc which has the correct signature.
2021-12-05 00:37:55 +01:00
Mara Bos
27d39357b7 Update array::IntoIter::new deprecation version. 2021-12-04 19:42:37 +01:00
Mara Bos
eb3fc45c87 Update docs. 2021-12-04 19:40:33 +01:00
Mara Bos
1acb44f03c Use IntoIterator for array impl everywhere. 2021-12-04 19:40:33 +01:00
Mara Bos
b34cf1a9e1 Swap body of array::IntoIter::new and IntoIterator::new. 2021-12-04 19:15:47 +01:00
Mara Bos
911ee9403e Deprecate array::IntoIter::new. 2021-12-04 19:15:44 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
c223a1c109
Rollup merge of #87054 - kit-981:master, r=scottmcm
Add a `try_reduce` method to the Iterator trait

Tracking issue: #87053
2021-12-04 10:42:19 +01:00
Scott McMurray
eb846dbaca Override Iterator::advance(_back)_by for array::IntoIter
Because I happened to notice that `nth` is currently getting codegen'd as a loop even for `Copy` types: <https://rust.godbolt.org/z/fPqv7Gvs7>
2021-12-03 21:36:51 -08:00
kit
aef59e4fb8 Add a try_reduce method to the Iterator trait 2021-12-04 15:17:14 +11:00
Matthias Krüger
0bd4ee79e0
Rollup merge of #90851 - ibraheemdev:downcast-unchecked, r=scottmcm
Add unchecked downcast methods

```rust
impl dyn Any (+ Send + Sync) {
    pub unsafe fn downcast_ref_unchecked<T: Any>(&self) -> &T;
    pub unsafe fn downcast_mut_unchecked<T: Any>(&mut self) -> &mut T;
}

impl<A: Allocator> Box<dyn Any (+ Send + Sync), A> {
    pub unsafe fn downcast_unchecked<T: Any>(&self) -> Box<T, A>;
}
```
2021-12-04 02:26:21 +01:00
Ibraheem Ahmed
4ec5cdc94b fix stability annotations for Box::downcast 2021-12-03 16:06:13 -05:00
bors
532d2b14c0 Auto merge of #90737 - eholk:intofuture, r=tmandry
Reintroduce `into_future` in `.await` desugaring

This is a reintroduction of the remaining parts from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65244 that have not been relanded yet.

This isn't quite ready to merge yet. The last attempt was reverting due to performance regressions, so we need to make sure this does not introduce those issues again.

Issues #67644, #67982

/cc `@yoshuawuyts`
2021-12-03 19:29:21 +00:00
bors
d47a6cc3f2 Auto merge of #91286 - scottmcm:residual-trait, r=joshtriplett
Make `array::{try_from_fn, try_map}` and `Iterator::try_find` generic over `Try`

Fixes #85115

This only updates unstable functions.

`array::try_map` didn't actually exist before; this adds it under the still-open tracking issue #79711 from the old PR #79713.

Tracking issue for the new trait: #91285

This would also solve the return type question in for the proposed `Iterator::try_reduce` in #87054
2021-12-03 10:15:11 +00:00
bors
3e21768a0a Auto merge of #91486 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-699fo18, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 10 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #88906 (Implement write() method for Box<MaybeUninit<T>>)
 - #90269 (Make `Option::expect` unstably const)
 - #90854 (Type can be unsized and uninhabited)
 - #91170 (rustdoc: preload fonts)
 - #91273 (Fix ICE #91268 by checking that the snippet ends with a `)`)
 - #91381 (Android: -ldl must appear after -lgcc when linking)
 - #91453 (Document Windows TLS drop behaviour)
 - #91462 (Use try_normalize_erasing_regions in needs_drop)
 - #91474 (suppress warning about set_errno being unused on DragonFly)
 - #91483 (Sync rustfmt subtree)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2021-12-03 07:12:36 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
aa6f2d9a79
Rollup merge of #91474 - rtzoeller:dfly_set_errno, r=cuviper
suppress warning about set_errno being unused on DragonFly

Other targets allow this function to be unused, DragonFly just misses out due to providing a specialization.

This fixes a build error for DragonFly.
2021-12-03 06:24:18 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
25474ed731
Rollup merge of #91453 - ChrisDenton:doc-win-tls-dtors, r=dtolnay
Document Windows TLS drop behaviour

The way Windows TLS destructors are run has some "interesting" properties. They should be documented.

Fixes #74875
2021-12-03 06:24:16 +01:00