Stabilize unsigned and float variants of `num_midpoint` feature
This PR proposes that we stabilize the unsigned variants of the [`num_midpoint`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110840#issue-1684506201) feature as well as the floats variants, since they are not subject to any unresolved questions, which is equivalent to doing `(a + b) / 2` (and `(a + b) >> 1`) in a sufficiently large number.
The stabilized API surface would be:
```rust
/// Calculates the middle point of `self` and `rhs`.
///
/// `midpoint(a, b)` is `(a + b) / 2` as if it were performed in a sufficiently-large unsigned integral type.
/// This implies that the result is always rounded towards negative infinity and that no overflow will ever occur.
impl u{8,16,32,64,128,size} {
pub const fn midpoint(self, rhs: Self) -> Self;
}
impl NonZeroU{8,16,32,64,size} {
pub const fn midpoint(self, rhs: Self) -> Self;
}
impl f{32,64} {
pub const fn midpoint(self, rhs: Self) -> Self;
}
```
The signed variants `u{8,16,32,64,128,size}` would remain gated, until a decision is made about the rounding mode, in other words that the [unresolved questions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/110840#issue-1684506201) are resolved.
cc `@rust-lang/libs-api`
cc `@scottmcm`
r? libs-api
Mark `slice::copy_from_slice` unstably const
Tracking issue #131415
I used `const_eval_select` for runtime and const panic functions because const formatting isn't available yet.
Stop cloning `Context` so much
This is a first step for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82381.
It's already big enough so I'll continue in a follow-up once this PR is merged. Next step will be to get rid of `SharedContext` by inlining it directly into `Context`.
cc `@camelid`
r? `@notriddle`
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132974 (Properly pass linker arguments that contain commas)
- #133403 (Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`)
- #133482 (Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+)
- #133595 (Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items)
- #133669 (Move some functions out of const_swap feature gate)
- #133674 (Fix chaining `carrying_add`s)
- #133691 (Check let source before suggesting annotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not emit `missing_doc_code_examples` rustdoc lint on module and a few other items
It doesn't make sense to expect modules to have code examples. Same goes for:
* Trait aliases
* Foreign items
* Associated types and constants
Should make the use of this lint a bit nicer.
r? ``@notriddle``
Only error raw lifetime followed by `\'` in edition 2021+
Fixes#133479
cc #132341
I think this fixes a purely theoretical regression since it only affects edition 2015 (who is using that?) and only in the very rare case of a raw lifetime followed immediately by a lifetime like `'r#a'r`.
Make `adjust_fulfillment_errors` work with `HostEffectPredicate` and `const_conditions`
Greatly improves the spans for reporting unsatisfied `~const` bounds :)
r? project-const-traits or maybe ``@lcnr`` (if you want to deal with a diagnostics PR lmao)
Properly pass linker arguments that contain commas
When linking with the system C compiler, we sometimes want to forward certain arguments unchanged to the linker. This can be done with `-Wl,arg1,arg2` or `-Xlinker arg1 -Xlinker arg2`. `-Wl` is used when possible, since it is more compact, but it does not support commas in the argument itself - in those cases, we need to use `-Xlinker`, and that is what this PR implements.
This also fixes using sanitizers on macOS with `-Clinker-flavor=ld`, as those were previously manually using `-Wl`/`-Xlinker` (probably since the support wasn't present in the `link_args` function).
Note that there has been [a previous PR for this](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/38798), but it only implemented this in certain cases when passing `-rpath`.
r? compiler
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #128184 (std: refactor `pthread`-based synchronization)
- #132047 (Robustify and genericize return-type-notation resolution in `resolve_bound_vars`)
- #133515 (fix: hurd build, stat64.st_fsid was renamed to st_dev)
- #133602 (fix: fix codeblocks in `PathBuf` example)
- #133622 (update link to "C++ Exceptions under the hood" blog)
- #133660 (Do not create trait object type if missing associated types)
- #133686 (Add diagnostic item for `std::ops::ControlFlow`)
- #133689 (Fixed typos by changing `happend` to `happened`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add diagnostic item for `std::ops::ControlFlow`
This will be used in Clippy to detect useless conversions done through `ControlFlow::map_break()` and `ControlFlow::map_continue()`.
fix: hurd build, stat64.st_fsid was renamed to st_dev
On hurd, `stat64.st_fsid` was renamed to `st_dev` in https://github.com/rust-lang/libc/pull/3785, so if you have a new libc with this patch included, and you build std from source, you get this error:
```sh
error[E0609]: no field `st_fsid` on type `&stat64`
--> /home/runner/.rustup/toolchains/nightly-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/rustlib/src/rust/library/std/src/os/hurd/fs.rs:301:36
|
301 | self.as_inner().as_inner().st_fsid as u64
| ^^^^^^^ unknown field
|
help: a field with a similar name exists
|
301 | self.as_inner().as_inner().st_uid as u64
| ~~~~~~
```
Full CI log: https://github.com/nix-rust/nix/actions/runs/12033180710/job/33546728266?pr=2544
Robustify and genericize return-type-notation resolution in `resolve_bound_vars`
#129629 implemented return-type-notation (RTN) in its path form, like `where T::method(..): Bound`. As part of lowering, we must record the late-bound vars for the where clause introduced by the method (namely, its early- and late-bound lifetime arguments, since `where T::method(..)` turns into a higher-ranked where clause over all of the lifetimes according to [RFC 3654](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3654-return-type-notation.html#converting-to-higher-ranked-trait-bounds)).
However, this logic was only looking at the where clauses of the parent item that the `T::method(..)` bound was written on, and not any parent items. This PR generalizes that logic to look at the parent item (i.e. the outer impl or trait) instead and fixes a (debug only) assertion as an effect.
This logic is also more general and likely easier to adapt to more interesting (though likely very far off) cases like non-lifetime binder `for<T: Trait> T::method(..): Send` bounds.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/109417
std: refactor `pthread`-based synchronization
The non-trivial code for `pthread_condvar` is duplicated across the thread parking and the `Mutex`/`Condvar` implementations. This PR moves that code into `sys::pal`, which now exposes an `unsafe` wrapper type for `pthread_mutex_t` and `pthread_condvar_t`.
Respect verify-llvm-ir option in the backend
We are currently unconditionally verifying the LLVM IR in the backend (twice), ignoring the value of the verify-llvm-ir option. This has substantial compile-time impact for debug builds.
Make `compare_impl_item` into a query
Turns `compare_impl_item` into a query (generalizing the existing query for `compare_impl_const`), and uses that in `Instance::resolve` to fail resolution when an implementation is incompatible with the trait it comes from.
Fixes#119701Fixes#121127Fixes#121411Fixes#129075Fixes#129127Fixes#129214Fixes#131294
Eliminate print_expr_maybe_paren function from pretty printers
This PR is part of backporting Syn's expression precedence design into rustc. (See #133603 for other work on this.)
In Syn, our version of `print_expr_cond_paren` is called `print_subexpression` and it is called from 19 places. Of those calls, 12 of them need a "custom" behavior for the `needs_paren` argument, whereas only 7 use a "standard" behavior resembling `print_subexpression($e, $e.precedence() < Precedence::$Variant, ...)`. In other words the behavior that rustc_ast_pretty's `print_expr_maybe_paren` implements is actually not what you want most of the time. The current usage you see in rustc is overuse.
<details>
<summary>Aside: am I confident about the correctness of Syn's parenthesization? Yes. Click for details.</summary>
---
The behavior is constrained by the following pair of tests which both run over every Rust source file of rustc and the standard library and tools and test suites:
- To rule out **false positives**: for every expression in every source file, print the expression, parse it back, and verify that not a single new parenthesis got added. Since these are expressions parsed from source code, not macro-generated syntax trees, we know they must never need automatic parenthesis insertion. Rustc's pretty printer does not pass this.
Pseudocode: `assert(expr == parse(print(expr)))`
- To rule out **false negatives**: for every expression in every source file, replace every Expr::Paren node in the syntax tree with just its contents, i.e. stripping the parentheses but otherwise preserving the syntax tree structure. Then print the stripped expression performing parenthesis insertion wherever needed, and reparse it. Verify that the reparsed expression has identical structure to the original, despite there being no parentheses in the original prior to printing, i.e. all the right parentheses got re-inserted by the printer to preserve the expression's structure. Rustc's pretty printer does not pass this. See https://github.com/dtolnay/syn/pull/1788 which reveals multiple rustc_ast_pretty bugs.
Pseudocode: `assert(unparenthesize(expr) == unparenthesize(parse(print(unparenthesize(expr)))))`
---
</details>
If `print_expr_maybe_paren` is usually not correct, is there harm in keeping it for the minority of cases where it is correct? I think the answer is yes and Syn doesn't use any equivalent of this helper function. The problems with it are:
- Having both `print_expr_maybe_paren` and `print_expr_cond_paren` applies counterproductive inertia against moving from the first to the second. When looking at a call site like `print_expr_maybe_paren(e, Precedence::$Variant, ...)` with parentheses not being inserted where they should be, anyone's first inclination would be to solve the bug by tweaking $Variant because that is the only knob that visibly appears in the function call. For example to pass "prec + 1", like tweaking the code to conditionally pass `Precedence::Prefix` instead of `Precedence::Cast`.
Experience in Syn shows this is (almost?) never what you want the person to do. In a call `print_expr_cond_paren(e, e.precedence() < ExprPrecedence::$Variant, ...)` almost always the best fix involves one of:
- Changing `e.precedence()`, e.g. to `fixup.leading_precedence(e)` and `fixup.trailing_precedence(e)` in cases of asymmetrical precedence (`(return 1) + 1` vs `1 + return 1`).
- Changing `<` to `<=`, to handle associativity and other grammar restrictions like chained comparisons (which rustc gets wrong today).
- Adding `||` and/or `&&` clauses to the condition.
By using these 3 better knobs instead of $Variant, it upholds the property that any time we talk about precedence, it is always the precedence of some actual expression that our code is actively manipulating, instead of a value standing in for some imaginary precedence level that would exist between two consecutive [real levels](https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.83.0/reference/expressions.html#expression-precedence). For example consider that "`Cast` + 1" might be `Prefix` today, but only until some new Rust syntax ends up adding a level between those.
- The `print_expr_maybe_paren` call sites look shorter, but they are not clearer. For myself, a function argument that says "does this subexpression need parenthesization" is a concrete thing that is easy to think about, while a function argument that is "what is the effective precedence level associated with this subexpression's placement inside its parent expression" is abstract and tricky to even state a precise meaning for. I expect that for someone less familiar with the pretty printer working on adding a new expression kind (like postfix match, recently), having every subexpression consistently printed using `print_expr_cond_paren` will be more beneficial, for the same reason, than having `print_expr_maybe_paren` available.
r? ``@lcnr``
Mark visionOS as supporting `std`
Cargo's -Zbuild-std has recently started checking this field, which causes it to fail to compile even though we have full support for the standard library on these targets.
[Example of failed build](https://github.com/rust-random/getrandom/actions/runs/12069033154/job/33655430622).
Affected targets: `aarch64-apple-visionos` and `aarch64-apple-visionos-sim`.
r? Noratrieb (because you've worked with `rustc` target metadata IIRC)
``@rustbot`` label O-visionos
