Do not erase late bound regions when selecting inherent associated types
In the fix for #97156 we would want the following code:
```rust
#![feature(inherent_associated_types)]
#![allow(incomplete_features)]
struct Foo<T>(T);
impl Foo<fn(&'static ())> {
type Assoc = u32;
}
trait Other {}
impl Other for u32 {}
// FIXME(inherent_associated_types): Avoid emitting two diagnostics (they only differ in span).
// FIXME(inherent_associated_types): Enhancement: Spruce up the diagnostic by saying something like
// "implementation is not general enough" as is done for traits via
// `try_report_trait_placeholder_mismatch`.
fn bar(_: Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>::Assoc) {}
//~^ ERROR mismatched types
//~| ERROR mismatched types
fn main() {}
```
to fail with ...
```
error[E0220]: associated type `Assoc` not found for `Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>` in the current scope
--> tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/issue-109789.rs:18:36
|
4 | struct Foo<T>(T);
| ------------- associated item `Assoc` not found for this struct
...
18 | fn bar(_: Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>::Assoc) {}
| ^^^^^ associated item not found in `Foo<for<'a> fn(&'a ())>`
|
= note: the associated type was found for
- `Foo<fn(&'static ())>`
error: aborting due to previous error
For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0220`.
```
This PR fixes the ICE we are currently getting "was a subtype of Foo<Binder(fn(&ReStatic ()), [])> during selection but now it is not"
Also fixes#112631
r? `@lcnr`
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #118095 (Enable the Arm Cortex-A53 errata mitigation on aarch64-unknown-none)
- #118340 (Use helper functions in `pretty.rs` instead of accessing the `Cell`s manually)
- #118358 (make const tests independent of std debug assertions)
- #118359 (Suggest swapping the order of `ref` and `box`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Suggest swapping the order of `ref` and `box`
It is not valid grammar to write `ref box <ident>` in patterns, but `box ref <ident>` is.
This patch adds a diagnostic to suggest swapping them, analogous to what we do for `mut let`.
make const tests independent of std debug assertions
Fixes some fallout from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110303: `ignore-debug` is bad since it makes it very annoying to develop rustc with debug assertions enabled.
These tests do not really provide any interesting test coverage, we already got plenty of other tests that check that we detect invalid enums. So we can just remove them.
Enable the Arm Cortex-A53 errata mitigation on aarch64-unknown-none
Arm Cortex-A53 CPUs have an errata related to a specific sequence of instructions - errata number 843419 (https://documentation-service.arm.com/static/5fa29fddb209f547eebd361d). There is a mitigation that can be applied at link-time which detects the when sequence of instructions exists at a specific alignment. When detected, the linker re-writes those instructions and either changes an ADRP to an ADR, or bounces to a veneer to break the sequence.
The linker argument to enable the mitigation is "--fix-cortex-a53-843419", and this is supported by GNU ld and LLVM lld. The gcc argument to enable the flag is "-mfix-cortex-a53-843419".
Because the aarch64-unknown-none target uses rust-lld directly, this patch causes rustc to emit the "--fix-cortex-a53-843419" argument when calling the linker, just like aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc on Ubuntu 22.04 does.
Failure to enable this mitigation in the linker can cause the production of instruction sequences that do not execute correctly on Arm Cortex-A53.
bootstrap: Memoize the LLVM rebuild hash to avoid very slow `x check`
Recently I've encountered a massive regression in the performance of re-running `x check` after making no changes.
It used to take around 2 seconds, and now it takes 20-30 seconds. That's quite a hassle when r-a runs it every time I save.
After some poking around, what I've found is that each individual call to `generate_smart_stamp_hash` doesn't take a particularly long time (around 0.5 sec), but it gets called dozens of times during `x check`, and that seems to be what's adding up to 20-30 seconds.
---
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/326414-t-infra.2Fbootstrap/topic/Massive.20regression.20in.20no-op.20.60x.20check.60
cc `@onur-ozkan`
skip {tidy,compiletest,rustdoc-gui} based tests for `DocTests::Only`
As use of `--doc` with `x test` is intended for running doc-tests only, executing compiletest, tidy or rustdoc-gui based tests considered as an incorrect behavior from bootstrap. This change fixes that.
rustdoc: Remove space from fake-variadic fn ptr impls
before: `for fn (T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ) -> Ret`
after: `for fn(T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ) -> Ret`
I don't think we usually have spaces there, so it looks weird.
cc `@notriddle` since you added the space in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98180 (or rather, added the feature with a space included).
Eagerly compute output_filenames
It can be computed before creating TyCtxt. Previously the query would also write the dep info file, which meant that the output filenames couldn't be accessed before macro expansion is done. The dep info file writing is now done as a separate non-query function. The old query was always executed again anyways due to depending on the HIR.
Also encode the output_filenames in rlink files to ensure `#![crate_name]` affects the linking stage when doing separate compiling and linking using `-Zno-link`/`-Zlink-only`.
Non null convenience ops
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/251.
I went through all of the methods on `*mut` and added every method, which does not require additional safety conditions, to `NonNull`. (exceptions: `guaranteed_eq`, `guaranteed_ne`, `with_metadata_of`, it's unclear if they are useful here...)
I'm also not sure what types should the "second pointer parameter" be. `*mut`/`*const` might be more permissible, but given that `NonNull` doesn't coerce to them, it might also be annoying. For now I chose the "use `NonNull` everywhere" path, but I'm not sure it's the correct one...
<sub>I'm eepy, so I probably messed up somewhere while copying...</sub>
cc `@scottmcm`
r? libs-api
As use of `--doc` with `x test` is intended for running doc-tests only, executing
compiletest, tidy or rustdoc-gui based tests considered as an incorrect behavior
from bootstrap. This change fixes that.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Remove myself from users on vacation
I think I have some capacity for reviews now and recently there were a few PRs with explicit `r? `@WaffleLapkin`` which I'm actually capable to review, so
