Rename some `name` variables as `ident`.
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called `ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of `Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
r? `@fee1-dead`
fix "still mutable" ice while metrics are enabled
Resolves "still mutable" ICE discovered by `@matthiaskrgr` here: [#t-docs-rs > metrics intitiative @ 💬](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/356853-t-docs-rs/topic/metrics.20intitiative/near/510490790)
This was caused by invoking `crate_hash` before the `definitions` struct was frozen here: e643f59f6d/compiler/rustc_interface/src/passes.rs (L951)
resolved by moving metrics dumping to occur after `analysis` freezes the definitions
I'm guessing we didn't discover this in CI because the problem only occurs when you try to calculate the crash hash with incremental compilation enabled when it tries to freeze the definitions here: e643f59f6d/compiler/rustc_middle/src/hir/map.rs (L1172)
my understanding is that this causes us to freeze the definitions too early in compilation, then we subsequently try to mutate them, likely during `analysis`, and this causes the ICE.
r? `@bjorn3`
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138167 (Small code improvement in rustdoc hidden stripper)
- #138605 (Clean up librustdoc::html::render to be better encapsulated)
- #139423 (Suppress missing field error when autoderef bottoms out in infer)
- #139449 (match ergonomics: replace `peel_off_references` with a recursive call)
- #139507 (compiletest: Trim whitespace from environment variable names)
- #139530 (Remove some dead or leftover code related to rustc-intrinsic abi removal)
- #139560 (fix title of offset_of_enum feature)
- #139563 (emit a better error message for using the macro incorrectly)
- #139568 (Don't use empty trait names)
- #139580 (Temporarily leave the review rotation)
- #139589 (saethlin is back from vacation)
- #139592 (rustdoc: Enable Markdown extensions when looking for doctests)
- #139599 (Tracking issue template: fine-grained information on style update status)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
emit a better error message for using the macro incorrectly
fixing: https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rust/issues/185
I feel like it's not a perfect message either, so I'm open to suggestions.
But at the end of the day users will need to read the docs anyway, and emitting
multi-line errors each time this gets triggered can probably become annoying?
r? ``@jieyouxu`` since you've reviewed my frontend work back in the days.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
match ergonomics: replace `peel_off_references` with a recursive call
This makes it imo quite a bit easier to follow how the binding mode gets calculated.
cc ```@dianne```
Suppress missing field error when autoderef bottoms out in infer
I see this error repeatedly when doing refactorings, and it's pretty misleading b/c it's not the source of the error.
Rigidly project missing item due to guaranteed impossible sized predicate
This is a somewhat involved change, but it amounts to treating missing impl items due to guaranteed impossible where clauses (dyn/str/slice sized, cc #135480) as *rigid projections* rather than projecting to an error term, since that was preventing either reporting a proper error (in an empty param env) *or* successfully type checking the code (in the presence of trivially false where clauses).
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138970
r? `@lcnr` `@oli-obk`
It bugs me when variables of type `Ident` are called `name`. It leads to
silly things like `name.name`. `Ident` variables should be called
`ident`, and `name` should be used for variables of type `Symbol`.
This commit improves things by by doing `s/name/ident/` on a bunch of
`Ident` variables. Not all of them, but a decent chunk.
report call site of inlined scopes for large assignment lints
Addressed issue: #121672
Tracking issue: #83518
r? `@oli-obk`
I tried to follow your comment about what to do [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/121672#issuecomment-1972783675). However, I'm totally unfamiliar with the code so far (this is my first contribution touching compiler code), so I apologize in advance if I did something stupid 😅
In particular, I'm not sure I use the _correct_ source scope to look for inline data, as there is a whole `IndexVec` of them. My changes definitely did something, as can be seen by the added ui test. However, the result is not as anticipated in the issue:
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ value moved from here
```
instead of
```
LL | let cell = std::cell::UnsafeCell::new(data);
| ^^^^ value moved from here
```
raising my suspicion that maybe I got the wrong source scope.
Report higher-ranked trait error when higher-ranked projection goal fails in new solver
~~See HACK comment inline. Not actually sure if it should be marked as a *HACK*, b/c~~ it's kinda a legitimate case we want to care about unless we're going to make the proof tree visitor *smarter* about the leak check than the actual trait solver itself.
Encountered this while battling with `NiceRegionError`s in the old solver b/c I wondered what this code ended up giving us in the *new* solver as a comparison:
```rust
trait Foo {}
impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
fn main() {
baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
}
```
On master it's pretty bad:
```
error[E0271]: type mismatch resolving `<fn(&()) as FnOnce<(&(),)>>::Output == ()`
--> <source>:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ types differ
|
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> <source>:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
```
After this PR it's much better:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `fn(&'static ()): Foo` is not satisfied
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:8:11
|
8 | baz::<fn(&'static ())>();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `for<'a> FnOnce(&'a ())` is not implemented for `fn(&'static ())`
|
= note: expected a closure with arguments `(&'static (),)`
found a closure with arguments `(&(),)`
note: required for `fn(&'static ())` to implement `Foo`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:3:22
|
3 | impl<T: FnOnce(&())> Foo for T {}
| ----------- ^^^ ^
| |
| unsatisfied trait bound introduced here
note: required by a bound in `baz`
--> /home/mgx/test.rs:5:11
|
5 | fn baz<T: Foo>() {}
| ^^^ required by this bound in `baz`
```
r? lcnr
Don't call `Span::with_parent` on the good path in `has_stashed_diagnostic`
More unnecessary incurred span tracking avoided by not calling `span.with_parent(None)`. This is useless on its own but makes it much easier to fix other "span tracking on the good path" issues in the future.
r? oli-obk
Make the compiler suggest actual paths instead of visible paths if the visible paths are through any doc hidden path.
close#127011
Currently, when emitting a diagnostic about a valid trait, the compiler suggestes using visible paths of the trait even if they are through a doc hidden path. This PR updates the compiler to suggest actual paths in these cases.
There's an existing fast path for the `type_op_prove_predicate`
predicate, checking for trivially `Sized` types, which can be re-used
when evaluating obligations within queries. This should improve
performance, particularly in anticipation of new sizedness traits being
added which can take advantage of this.
Allow GVN to produce places and not just locals.
That may be too big of a hammer, as we may introduce new deref projections (possible UB footgun + probably not good for perf).
The second commit opts out of introducing projections that don't have a stable offset, which is probably what we want. Hence no new Deref and no new Index projections.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138936
cc `@scottmcm` `@dianqk`
Currently in case of a Trait object in closure parameter, the compiler
suggests either to use a reference, which is correct or to use an
`impl Trait` which is not. Do not emit this suggestion when the parameter
is part of a closure.
`resolve_ident_in_lexical_scope` checks for an empty name. Why is this
necessary? Because `parse_item_impl` can produce an `impl` block with an
empty trait name in some cases. This is pretty gross and very
non-obvious.
This commit avoids the use of the empty trait name. In one case the
trait name is instead pulled from `TyKind::ImplTrait`, which prevents
the output for `tests/ui/impl-trait/extra-impl-in-trait-impl.rs` from
changing. In the other case we just fail the parse and don't try to
recover. I think losing error recovery in this obscure case is worth
the code cleanup.
This change affects `tests/ui/parser/impl-parsing.rs`, which is split in
two, and the obsolete `..` syntax cases are removed (they are tested
elsewhere).
Instantiate higher-ranked transmute goal w/ placeholders before emitting sub-obligations
This avoids an ICE where we weren't keeping track of bound variables correctly in the `Freeze` obligations we emit for transmute goals. We could use `rebind` instead on that goal, but I think it's better just to instantiate the binder.
Fixes#139538
r? `@lcnr` or reassign
Improve presentation of closure signature mismatch from `Fn` trait goal
Flip the order of "expected" and "found" since that wasn't correct.
Don't present the arguments as a tuple, since it leaves a trailing comma. Instead, just use `fn(arg, arg)`.
Finally, be better with binders since we were just skipping binders.
r? oli-obk or reassign
Invert the order that we pass the arguments to the
`contract_check_ensures` function to avoid the warning when the tail
of the function is unreachable.
Note that the call itself is also unreachable, but we have already
handled that case by ignoring unreachable call for contract calls.
Fix stack overflow in exhaustiveness due to recursive HIR opaque hidden types
This fixes several spicy non-trivial recursive opaque definitions inferred from HIR typeck, ensuring that they don't cause stack overflows in exhaustiveness code, which currently reveals opaques manually in a way that is not overflow aware (as opposed to something like the normalizer folders).
These should eventually be outright rejected, but today (some) non-trivial recursive opaque definitions are accepted, and changing that requires an FCP, so for now just make sure we don't stack overflow :^)
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139402
r? lcnr
borrowck typeck children together with their root
This introduces new cycle errors, even with `feature(inline_const_pat)` removed, see the `non-structural-match-types-cycle-err.rs` test.
The new cycle error happens as the layout of `async`-blocks relies on their `optimized_mir`. As that now depends on `mir_borrowck` of its typeck parent, computing the layout of an `async`-block during MIR building, e.g. when evaluating a named `const` pattern. I think there's currently no way to have a named const pattern whose type references an async block while being allowed? cc `@oli-obk` `@RalfJung`
I cannot think of other cases where we currently rely on the MIR of a typeck children while borrowchecking their parent. The crater run came back without any breakage. My work here will prevent any future features which rely on this as we'll get locked into borrowchecking them together as I continue to work on https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/129, cc `@rust-lang/types.`
r? compiler-errors
Fix trait upcasting to dyn type with no principal when there are projections
#126660 (which I had originally authored, lol) had a subtle bug that is the moral equivalent of #114036, which is that when upcasting from `dyn Principal<Projection = Ty> + AutoTrait` to `dyn AutoTrait`, we were dropping the trait ref for `Principal` but not its projections (if there were any).
With debug assertions enabled, this triggers the assertion I luckily added in a2a0cfe825, but even without debug assertions this is a logical bug since we had a dyn type with just a projection bound but no principal, so it caused a type mismatch.
This does not need an FCP because this should've been covered by the FCP in #126660, but we just weren't testing a case when casting from a `dyn` type with projections 😸Fixes#139418
r? ````@oli-obk```` (or anyone)
compiler: report error when trait object type param reference self
Fixes#139082.
Emits an error when `Self` is found in the projection bounds of a trait
object. In type aliases, `Self` has no meaning, so `type A = &'static
dyn B` where `trait B = Fn() -> Self` will expands to `type A = &'static
Fn() -> Self` which is illegal, causing the region solver to bail out
when hitting the uninferred Self.
r? ````@compiler-errors```` ````@fee1-dead````
Tell LLVM about impossible niche tags
I was trying to find a better way of emitting discriminant calculations, but sadly had no luck.
So here's a fairly small PR with the bits that did seem worth bothering:
1. As the [`TagEncoding::Niche` docs](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_abi/enum.TagEncoding.html#variant.Niche) describe, it's possible to end up with a dead value in the input that's not already communicated via the range parameter attribute nor the range load metadata attribute. So this adds an `llvm.assume` in non-debug mode to tell LLVM about that. (That way it can tell that the sides of the `select` have disjoint possible values.)
2. I'd written a bunch more tests, or at least made them parameterized, in the process of trying things out, so this checks in those tests to hopefully help future people not trip on the same weird edge cases, like when the tag type is `i8` but yet there's still a variant index and discriminant of `258` which doesn't fit in that tag type because the enum is really weird.
Make error message for missing fields with `..` and without `..` more consistent
When `..` is not present, we say "missing field `bar` in initializer", but when it is present we say "missing mandatory field `bar`". I don't see why the primary error message should change, b/c the root cause is the same.
Let's harmonize these error messages and instead use a label to explain that `..` is required b/c it's not defaulted.
r? estebank
Fixes#139445.
The additional errors aren't great but the first one is still good and
it's the most important, and imperfect errors are better than ICEing.
This can happen when invalid syntax is passed to a declarative macro. We
shouldn't be too strict about the token stream position once the parser
has rejected the invalid syntax.
Fixes#139248.
Do not visit whole crate to compute `lints_that_dont_need_to_run`.
This allows to reuse the computed lint levels instead of re-visiting the whole crate.
Use `const_eval_select!()` macro to enable contract checking only at
runtime. The existing contract logic relies on closures,
which are not supported in constant functions.
This commit also removes one level of indirection for ensures clauses,
however, it currently has a spurious warning message when the bottom
of the function is unreachable.
Trivial tweaks to stop tracking source span directly
Firstly, remove some unnecessary work from `sccs_info`. This included debug printing which ends up giving all mir borrowck queries a dependency edge from the query to `source_span` (I think?).
Secondly, turn some calls from `hir_span` (which does some span adjustment, and thus incurs span tracking, which causes a dependency edge from the query to `source_span`) to `def_span`, which should cache better.
r? oli-obk
add sret handling for scalar autodiff
r? `@oli-obk`
Fixing one of the todo's which I left in my previous batching PR.
This one handles sret for scalar autodiff. `sret` mostly shows up when we try to return a lot of scalar floats.
People often start testing autodiff which toy functions which just use a few scalars as inputs and outputs, and those were the most likely to be affected by this issue. So this fix should make learning/teaching hopefully a bit easier.
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
Stop calling `source_span` query in significant drop order code
`source_span` is only meant for incremental tracking. I don't really think we need to highlight the whole drop impl span anyways; it can be quite large.
r? oli-obk
Remove support for `extern "rust-intrinsic"` blocks
Part of rust-lang/rust#132735
Looked manageable and there didn't appear to have been progress in the last two weeks,
so decided to give it a try.
coverage: Build the CGU's global file table as late as possible
Embedding coverage metadata in the output binary is a delicate dance, because per-function records need to embed references to the per-CGU filename table, but we only want to include files in that table if they are successfully used by at least one function.
The way that we build the file tables has changed a few times over the last few years. This particular change is motivated by experimental work on properly supporting macro-expansion regions, which adds some additional constraints that our previous implementation wasn't equipped to deal with.
LLVM is very strict about not allowing unused entries in local file tables. Currently that's not much of an issue, because we assume one source file per function, but to support expansion regions we need the flexibility to avoid committing to the use of a file until we're completely sure that we are able and willing to produce at least one coverage mapping region for it. In particular, when preparing a function's covfun record, we need the flexibility to decide at a late stage that a particular file isn't needed/usable after all.
(It's OK for the *global* file table to contain unused entries, but we would still prefer to avoid that if possible, and this implementation also achieves that.)
Default auto traits: fix perf
Skip computing `requires_default_supertraits` if `experimental-default-bounds` option is not enabled. Possible perf fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120706
r? lcnr
Implement `super let`
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139076
This implements `super let` as proposed in #139080, based on the following two equivalence rules.
1. For all expressions `$expr` in any context, these are equivalent:
- `& $expr`
- `{ super let a = & $expr; a }`
2. And, additionally, these are equivalent in any context when `$expr` is a temporary (aka rvalue):
- `& $expr`
- `{ super let a = $expr; & a }`
So far, this experiment has a few interesting results:
## Interesting result 1
In this snippet:
```rust
super let a = f(&temp());
```
I originally expected temporary `temp()` would be dropped at the end of the statement (`;`), just like in a regular `let`, because `temp()` is not subject to temporary lifetime extension.
However, it turns out that that would break the fundamental equivalence rules.
For example, in
```rust
g(&f(&temp()));
```
the temporary `temp()` will be dropped at the `;`.
The first equivalence rule tells us this must be equivalent:
```rust
g({ super let a = &f(&temp()); a });
```
But that means that `temp()` must live until the last `;` (after `g()`), not just the first `;` (after `f()`).
While this was somewhat surprising to me at first, it does match the exact behavior we need for `pin!()`: The following _should work_. (See also https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/138718)
```rust
g(pin!(f(&mut temp())));
```
Here, `temp()` lives until the end of the statement. This makes sense from the perspective of the user, as no other `;` or `{}` are visible. Whether `pin!()` uses a `{}` block internally or not should be irrelevant.
This means that _nothing_ in a `super let` statement will be dropped at the end of that super let statement. It does not even need its own scope.
This raises questions that are useful for later on:
- Will this make temporaries live _too long_ in cases where `super let` is used not in a hidden block in a macro, but as a visible statement in code like the following?
```rust
let writer = {
super let file = File::create(&format!("/home/{user}/test"));
Writer::new(&file)
};
```
- Is a `let` statement in a block still the right syntax for this? Considering it has _no_ scope of its own, maybe neither a block nor a statement should be involved
This leads me to think that instead of `{ super let $pat = $init; $expr }`, we might want to consider something like `let $pat = $init in $expr` or `$expr where $pat = $init`. Although there are also issues with these, as it isn't obvious anymore if `$init` should be subject to temporary lifetime extension. (Do we want both `let _ = _ in ..` and `super let _ = _ in ..`?)
## Interesting result 2
What about `super let x;` without initializer?
```rust
let a = {
super let x;
x = temp();
&x
};
```
This works fine with the implementation in this PR: `x` is extended to live as long as `a`.
While it matches my expectations, a somewhat interesting thing to realize is that these are _not_ equivalent:
- `super let x = $expr;`
- `super let x; x = $expr;`
In the first case, all temporaries in $expr will live at least as long as (the result of) the surrounding block.
In the second case, temporaries will be dropped at the end of the assignment statement. (Because the assignment statement itself "is not `super`".)
This difference in behavior might be confusing, but it _might_ be useful.
One might want to extend the lifetime of a variable without extending all the temporaries in the initializer expression.
On the other hand, that can also be expressed as:
- `let x = $expr; super let x = x;` (w/o temporary lifetime extension), or
- `super let x = { $expr };` (w/ temporary lifetime extension)
So, this raises these questions:
- Do we want to accept `super let x;` without initializer at all?
- Does it make sense for statements other than let statements to be "super"? An expression statement also drops temporaries at its `;`, so now that we discovered that `super let` basically disables that `;` (see interesting result 1), is there a use to having other statements without their own scope? (I don't think that's ever useful?)
## Interesting result 3
This works now:
```rust
super let Some(x) = a.get(i) else { return };
```
I didn't put in any special cases for `super let else`. This is just the behavior that 'naturally' falls out when implementing `super let` without thinking of the `let else` case.
- Should `super let else` work?
## Interesting result 4
This 'works':
```rust
fn main() {
super let a = 123;
}
```
I didn't put in any special cases for `super let` at function scope. I had expected the code to cause an ICE or other weird failure when used at function body scope, because there's no way to let the variable live as long as the result of the function.
This raises the question:
- Does this mean that this behavior is the natural/expected behavior when `super let` is used at function scope? Or is this just a quirk and should we explicitly disallow `super let` in a function body? (Probably the latter.)
---
The questions above do not need an answer to land this PR. These questions should be considered when redesigning/rfc'ing/stabilizing the feature.
Simplify `thir::PatKind::ExpandedConstant`
I made it a bit less ad-hoc. In particular, I removed `is_inline: bool` that was just caching the output of `tcx.def_kind(def_id)`. This makes inline consts a tiny bit less special in patterns.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@Zalathar`
Add new `PatKind::Missing` variants
To avoid some ugly uses of `kw::Empty` when handling "missing" patterns, e.g. in bare fn tys. Helps with #137978. Details in the individual commits.
r? ``@oli-obk``
More trivial tweaks
Found some really tiny nits when trying to find places that span tracking caused queries to be recomputed in incremental; these probably don't need a perf run b/c they're so simple.
r? oli-obk
Make the UnifyKey and UnifyValue imports non-nightly
Explicitly depend on ena in rustc_type_ir and import types from there.
This is required for rust-analyzer to use the new solver.
r? types
fix usage of `autodiff` macro with inner functions
This PR adds additional handling into the expansion step of the `std::autodiff` macro (in `compiler/rustc_builtin_macros/src/autodiff.rs`), which allows the macro to be applied to inner functions.
```rust
#![feature(autodiff)]
use std::autodiff::autodiff;
fn main() {
#[autodiff(d_inner, Forward, Dual, DualOnly)]
fn inner(x: f32) -> f32 {
x * x
}
}
```
Previously, the compiler didn't allow this due to only handling `Annotatable::Item` and `Annotatable::AssocItem` and missing the handling of `Annotatable::Stmt`. This resulted in the rather generic error
```
error: autodiff must be applied to function
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | / fn inner(x: f32) -> f32 {
7 | | x * x
8 | | }
| |_____^
error: could not compile `enzyme-test` (bin "enzyme-test") due to 1 previous error
```
This issue was originally reported [here](https://github.com/EnzymeAD/rust/issues/184).
Quick question: would it make sense to add a ui test to ensure there is no regression on this?
This is my first contribution, so I'm extra grateful for any piece of feedback!! :D
r? `@oli-obk`
Tracking issue for autodiff: #124509
coverage: Deal with unused functions and their names in one place
When coverage codegen creates dummy instances and covfun records for unused functions, we already know that they are unused, so we might as well set up the special array of unused function names at the same time.
---
The first commit only moves code around; all significant changes are in the second commit.
There should be no change in compiler output.
- fix errors caused by the move of `ast::Item::ident` (see #138740)
- move the logic of getting `sig`, `vis`, and `ident` from two seperate
`match` statements into one (less repetition especially with the
nested `match`)
Add `*_value` methods to proc_macro lib
This is the (re-)implementation of https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/459.
It allows to get the actual value (unescaped) of the different string literals.
It was originally done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136355 but it broke the artifacts build so we decided to move the crate to crates.io to go around this limitation.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/136652.
Considering this is a copy-paste of the originally approved PR, no need to go through the whole process again. \o/
r? `@Urgau`
Refactor Apple version handling in the compiler
Move various Apple version handling code in the compiler out `rustc_codegen_ssa` and into a place where it can be accessed by `rustc_attr_parsing`, which I found to be necessary when doing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/136867. Thought I'd split it out to make it easier to land, and to make further changes like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131477 have fewer conflicts / PR dependencies.
There should be no functional changes in this PR.
`@rustbot` label O-apple
r? rust-lang/compiler
In `simplify_repeated_aggregate`, don't test first element against itself
r? `@saethlin`
Noticed that in `InstSimplifyContext::simplify_repeated_aggregate`, we're accidentally evaluating the first element's value twice, and then comparing it with itself, instead of just checking whether the rest of the elements are equal to the first one.
This will probably save very few cycles, but since `InstSimplify` is always enabled, this might improve perf by a bit.
Update the minimum external LLVM to 19
With this change, we'll have stable support for LLVM 19 and 20.
For reference, the previous increase to LLVM 18 was #130487.
cc `@rust-lang/wg-llvm`
r? nikic
StableMIR: Prepare for refactoring
Temporarily make `stable_mir` "parasitic" on the `rustc_smir` crate.
It aims to resolve the circular dependency that would arise if we directly invert the dependency order between `rustc_smir` and `stable_mir`.
Once the refactoring is complete (`rustc_smir` does not depend on `stable_mir`), we will migrate it back to the `stable_mir` crate. See more details: [here](https://hackmd.io/jBRkZLqAQL2EVgwIIeNMHg).
Folder experiment: Micro-optimize RegionEraserVisitor
**NOTE:** This is one of a series of perf experiments that I've come up with while sick in bed. I'm assigning them to lqd b/c you're a good reviewer and you'll hopefully be awake when these experiments finish, lol.
r? lqd
The region eraser is very hot, so let's see if we can avoid erasing types (and visiting consts and preds that don't have region-ful types) unnecessarily.
hygiene: Avoid recursion in syntax context decoding
#139241 has two components
- Avoiding recursion during syntax context decoding
- Encoding/decoding only the non-redundant data, and recalculating the redundant data again during decoding
Both of these parts may influence compilation times, possibly in opposite directions.
So this PR contains only the first part to evaluate its effect in isolation.
Apply `Recovery::Forbidden` when reparsing pasted macro fragments.
Fixes#137874.
The changes to the output of `tests/ui/associated-consts/issue-93835.rs`
partly undo the changes seen when `NtTy` was removed in #133436, which
is good.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
replace extra_filename with strict version hash in metrics file names
Should resolve the potential issue of overwriting metrics from the same crate when compiled with different features or flags.
r? `````@estebank`````
try-job: test-various
Autodiff batching
Enzyme supports batching, which is especially known from the ML side when training neural networks.
There we would normally have a training loop, where in each iteration we would pass in some data (e.g. an image), and a target vector. Based on how close we are with our prediction we compute our loss, and then use backpropagation to compute the gradients and update our weights.
That's quite inefficient, so what you normally do is passing in a batch of 8/16/.. images and targets, and compute the gradients for those all at once, allowing better optimizations.
Enzyme supports batching in two ways, the first one (which I implemented here) just accepts a Batch size,
and then each Dual/Duplicated argument has not one, but N shadow arguments. So instead of
```rs
for i in 0..100 {
df(x[i], y[i], 1234);
}
```
You can now do
```rs
for i in 0..100.step_by(4) {
df(x[i+0],x[i+1],x[i+2],x[i+3], y[i+0], y[i+1], y[i+2], y[i+3], 1234);
}
```
which will give the same results, but allows better compiler optimizations. See the testcase for details.
There is a second variant, where we can mark certain arguments and instead of having to pass in N shadow arguments, Enzyme assumes that the argument is N times longer. I.e. instead of accepting 4 slices with 12 floats each, we would accept one slice with 48 floats. I'll implement this over the next days.
I will also add more tests for both modes.
For any one preferring some more interactive explanation, here's a video of Tim's llvm dev talk, where he presents his work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=edvaLAL5RqU
I'll also add some other docs to the dev guide and user docs in another PR.
r? ghost
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/124509
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/135283
Use the span of the whole bound when the diagnostic talks about a bound
While it makes sense that the host predicate only points to the `~const` part, as whether the actual trait bound is satisfied is checked separately, the user facing diagnostic is talking about the entire trait bound, at which point it makes more sense to just highlight the entire bound
r? `@compiler-errors` or `@fee1-dead`
ToSocketAddrs: fix typo
It's "a function", never "an function".
I noticed the same typo somewhere in the compiler sources so figured I'd fix it there as well.
Fix `Debug` impl for `LateParamRegionKind`.
It uses `Br` prefixes which are inappropriate and appear to have been incorrectly copy/pasted from the `Debug` impl for `BoundRegionKind`.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
AsyncDestructor: replace fields with impl_did
The future and ctor fields aren't actually used, and the way they are extracted is obviously wrong – swapping the order of the items in the source code will give wrong results.
Instead, store just the LocalDefId of the impl, which is enough for the only use of this data.
Remove `rustc_middle::ty::util::ExplicitSelf`.
It's an old (2017 or earlier) type that describes a `self` receiver. It's only used in `rustc_hir_analysis` for two error messages, and much of the complexity isn't used. I suspect it used to be used for more things.
This commit removes it, and moves a greatly simplified version of the `determine` method into `rustc_hir_analysis`, renamed as `get_self_string`. The big comment on the method is removed because it no longer seems relevant.
r? `@BoxyUwU`
add `TypingMode::Borrowck`
Shares the first commit with #138499, doesn't really matter which PR to land first 😊😁
Introduces `TypingMode::Borrowck` which unlike `TypingMode::Analysis`, uses the hidden type computed by HIR typeck as the initial value of opaques instead of an unconstrained infer var. This is a part of https://github.com/rust-lang/types-team/issues/129.
Using this new `TypingMode` is unfortunately a breaking change for now, see tests/ui/impl-trait/non-defining-uses/as-projection-term.rs. Using an inference variable as the initial value results in non-defining uses in the defining scope. We therefore only enable it if with `-Znext-solver=globally` or `-Ztyping-mode-borrowck`
To do that the PR contains the following changes:
- `TypeckResults::concrete_opaque_type` are already mapped to the definition of the opaque type
- writeback now checks that the non-lifetime parameters of the opaque are universal
- for this, `fn check_opaque_type_parameter_valid` is moved from `rustc_borrowck` to `rustc_trait_selection`
- we add a new `query type_of_opaque_hir_typeck` which, using the same visitors as MIR typeck, attempts to merge the hidden types from HIR typeck from all defining scopes
- done by adding a `DefiningScopeKind` flag to toggle between using borrowck and HIR typeck
- the visitors stop checking that the MIR type matches the HIR type. This is trivial as the HIR type are now used as the initial hidden types of the opaque. This check is useful as a safeguard when not using `TypingMode::Borrowck`, but adding it to the new structure is annoying and it's not soundness critical, so I intend to not add it back.
- add a `TypingMode::Borrowck` which behaves just like `TypingMode::Analysis` except when normalizing opaque types
- it uses `type_of_opaque_hir_typeck(opaque)` as the initial value after replacing its regions with new inference vars
- it uses structural lookup in the new solver
fixes#112201, fixes#132335, fixes#137751
r? `@compiler-errors` `@oli-obk`
Demote i686-pc-windows-gnu to Tier 2
In accordance with [RFC 3771](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3771). FCP has been completed.
tracking issue #138422
I also added a stub doc page for the target and renamed the windows-gnullvm page for consistency.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #138949 (Rename `is_like_osx` to `is_like_darwin`)
- #139295 (Remove creation of duplicate `AnonPipe`)
- #139313 (Deduplicate some `rustc_middle` function bodies by calling the `rustc_type_ir` equivalent)
- #139317 (compiletest: Encapsulate all of the code that touches libtest)
- #139322 (Add helper function for checking LLD usage to `run-make-support`)
- #139335 (Pass correct param-env to `error_implies`)
- #139342 (Add a mailmap entry for myself)
- #139349 (adt_destructor: sanity-check returned item)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Pass correct param-env to `error_implies`
Duplicated comment from the test:
In the error reporting code, when reporting fulfillment errors for goals A and B, we try to see if elaborating A will result in another goal that can equate with B. That would signal that B is "implied by" A, allowing us to skip reporting it, which is beneficial for cutting down on the number of diagnostics we report.
In the new trait solver especially, but even in the old trait solver through things like defining opaque type usages, this `can_equate` call was not properly taking the param-env of the goals, resulting in nested obligations that had empty param-envs. If one of these nested obligations was a `ConstParamHasTy` goal, then we would ICE, since those goals are particularly strict about the param-env they're evaluated in.
This is morally a fix for <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139314>, but that repro uses details about how defining usages in the `check_opaque_well_formed` code can spring out of type equality, and will likely stop failing soon coincidentally once we start using `PostBorrowck` mode in that check. Instead, we use lazy normalization to end up generating an alias-eq goal whose nested goals woul trigger the ICE instead, since this is a lot more stable.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/139314
r? ``@oli-obk`` or reassign
Deduplicate some `rustc_middle` function bodies by calling the `rustc_type_ir` equivalent
Maybe in the future we can use method delegation, but I'd rather avoid that for now (I don't even know if it can do that already)
