Helps with #90929
This changes the search results, specifically, when there's more than
one impl with an associated item with the same name. For example,
the search queries `simd<i8> -> simd<i8>` and `simd<i64> -> simd<i64>`
don't link to the same function, but most of the functions have the
same names.
This change should probably be FCP-ed, especially since it adds a new
anchor link format for `main.js` to handle, so that URLs like
`struct.Vec.html#impl-AsMut<[T]>-for-Vec<T,+A>/method.as_mut` redirect
to `struct.Vec.html#method.as_mut-2`. It's a strange design, but there
are a few reasons for it:
* I'd like to avoid making the HTML bigger. Obviously, fixing this bug
is going to add at least a little more data to the search index, but
adding more HTML penalises viewers for the benefit of searchers.
* Breaking `struct.Vec.html#method.len` would also be a disappointment.
On the other hand:
* The path-style anchors might be less prone to link rot than the numbered
anchors. It's definitely less likely to have URLs that appear to "work",
but silently point at the wrong thing.
* This commit arranges the path-style anchor to redirect to the numbered
anchor. Nothing stops rustdoc from doing the opposite, making path-style
anchors the default and redirecting the "legacy" numbered ones.
coverage: Don't bother renumbering expressions on the Rust side
The LLVM API that we use to encode coverage mappings already has its own code for removing unused coverage expressions and renumbering the rest.
This lets us get rid of our own complex renumbering code, making it easier to change our coverage code in other ways.
---
Now that we have tests for coverage mappings (#114843), I've been able to verify that this PR doesn't make the coverage mappings worse, thanks to an explicit simplification step.
interpret: more consistently use ImmTy in operators and casts
The diff in src/tools/miri/src/shims/x86/sse2.rs should hopefully suffice to explain why this is nicer. :)
Delete obsolete `--disable-per-crate-search` rustdoc flag
This unstable flag is unused by rustdoc since ef96d573bf.
We should avoid landing this until after https://github.com/rust-lang/docs.rs/pull/2225 is deployed to docs.rs.
Call panic_display directly in const_panic_fmt.
`panic_str` just directly calls `panic_display`. The only reason `panic_str` exists, is for a lint to detect an expansion of `panic_2015!(expr)` (which expands to `panic_str`).
It is `panic_display` that is hooked by const-eval, which is the reason we call it here.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116005
r? ``@oli-obk``
rename mir::Constant -> mir::ConstOperand, mir::ConstKind -> mir::Const
Also, be more consistent with the `to/eval_bits` methods... we had some that take a type and some that take a size, and then sometimes the one that takes a type is called `bits_for_ty`.
Turns out that `ty::Const`/`mir::ConstKind` carry their type with them, so we don't need to even pass the type to those `eval_bits` functions at all.
However this is not properly consistent yet: in `ty` we have most of the methods on `ty::Const`, but in `mir` we have them on `mir::ConstKind`. And indeed those two types are the ones that correspond to each other. So `mir::ConstantKind` should actually be renamed to `mir::Const`. But what to do with `mir::Constant`? It carries around a span, that's really more like a constant operand that appears as a MIR operand... it's more suited for `syntax.rs` than `consts.rs`, but the bigger question is, which name should it get if we want to align the `mir` and `ty` types? `ConstOperand`? `ConstOp`? `Literal`? It's not a literal but it has a field called `literal` so it would at least be consistently wrong-ish...
``@oli-obk`` any ideas?
Prevent promotion of const fn calls in inline consts
We don't wanna make that mistake we did for statics and consts worse by letting more code use it.
r? ``@RalfJung``
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76001
Improve invalid UTF-8 lint by finding the expression initializer
This PR introduce a small mechanism to walk up the HIR through bindings, if/else, consts, ... when trying lint on invalid UTF-8.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115208
The LLVM API that we use to encode coverage mappings already has its own code
for removing unused coverage expressions and renumbering the rest.
This lets us get rid of our own complex renumbering code, making it easier to
change our coverage code in other ways.
After coverage instrumentation and MIR transformations, we can sometimes end up
with coverage expressions that always have a value of zero. Any expression
operand that refers to an always-zero expression can be replaced with a literal
`Operand::Zero`, making the emitted coverage mapping data smaller and simpler.
This simplification step is mostly redundant with the simplifications performed
inline in `expressions_with_regions`, except that it does a slightly more
thorough job in some cases (because it checks for always-zero expressions
*after* other simplifications).
However, adding this simplification step will then let us greatly simplify that
code, without affecting the quality of the emitted coverage maps.
implement `intercrate_ambiguity_causes` in the new solver
I added some comments but this is still somewhat of a mess. I think we should for the most part be able to treat all of this as a black box, so I can accept that this code isn't too great.
I also believe that some of the weirdness here is unavoidable, as proof trees - and their visitor - hide semantically relevant information, so they cannot perfectly represent the actual solver behavior.
There are some known bugs here when testing with `./x.py test tests/ui --bless -- --target-rustcflags -Ztrait-solver=next-coherence`. While I haven't diagnosed them all in detail I believe we are able to handle them all separately
- `structurally_normalize` currently does not normalize opaque types, resulting in divergence between the solver internal `trait_ref_is_knowable` and the one when computing intercrate ambiguity causes.
- we don't add an `intercrate_ambiguity_cause` for reserved impls
- we should `deeply_normalize` the trait ref before printing it, that requires a "best effort" version of `deeply_normalize`
r? `@compiler-errors`
Fix `ui-fulldeps --stage=1` with `-Zignore-directory-in-diagnostics-source-blocks`
Fixes#115977
Also makes sure this doesn't happen again by running `ui-fulldeps --stage=1` in CI
Fall back to the unoptimized implementation in read_binary_file if File::metadata lies
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115458
r? `@jackh726` because you approved the previous PR
Rename BoxMeUp to PanicPayload.
"BoxMeUp" is not very clear. Let's rename that to a description of what it actually represents: a panic payload.
This PR also renames the structs that implement this trait to have more descriptive names.
Part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/116005
r? `@oli-obk`
style-guide: Document formatting of `as` casts (mostly like a binary operator)
`as` casts currently get formatted like a binary operator, except that
the second line can stack several `as` casts rather than breaking them
each onto their own line. Document this.
As far as I can tell (cc `@calebcartwright` for verification), this is not a 2024 edition change, it just documents current behavior.
Simplify/Optimize FileEncoder
FileEncoder is basically a BufWriter except that it exposes access to the not-written-to-yet region of the buffer so that some users can write directly to the buffer. This strategy is awesome because it lets us avoid calling memcpy for small copies, but the previous strategy was based on the writer accessing a `&mut [MaybeUninit<u8>; N]` and returning a `&[u8]` which is an API which currently mandates the use of unsafe code, making that interface in general not that appealing.
So this PR cleans up the FileEncoder implementation and builds on that general idea of direct buffer access in order to prevent `memcpy` calls in a few key places when encoding the dep graph and rmeta tables. The interface used here is now 100% safe, but with the caveat that internally we need to avoid trusting the number of bytes that the provided function claims to have written.
The original primary objective of this PR was to clean up the FileEncoder implementation so that the fix for the following issues would be easy to implement. The fix for these issues is to correctly update self.buffered even when writes fail, which I think it's easy to verify manually is now done, because all the FileEncoder methods are small.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115298
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114671
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114045
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108100
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/106787
rustc_target/loongarch: Fix passing of transparent unions with only one non-ZST member
This ensures that `MaybeUninit<T>` has the same ABI as `T` when passed through an `extern "C"` function.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115509
r? `@bjorn3`
adjust ConstValue::Slice to work for arbitrary slice types
valtrees have already been assuming that this works; this PR makes it a reality. Also further restrict `ConstValue::Slice` to what it is actually used for; this even shrinks `ConstValue` from 32 to 24 bytes which is a nice win. :)
The alternative to this approach is to make `ConstValue::Slice` work really only for `&str`/`&[u8]` literals, and never return it in `op_to_const`. That would make `op_to_const` very clean. We could then even remove the `meta` field; the length would always be `data.inner().len()`. We could *almost* just use a `Symbol` instead of a `ConstAllocation`, but we have to support byte strings and there doesn't seem to be an interned representation of them (or rather, `ConstAllocation` *is* their interned representation). In this world, valtrees of slice reference types would then become noticeably more expensive to turn into a `ConstValue` -- but does that matter? Specifically for `&str`/`&[u8]` we could still use the optimized representation if we wanted.
If byte strings were already interned somewhere I'd gravitate towards the alternative, but the way things stand, we need a `ConstAllocation` case anyway to support byte strings, and then we might as well support arbitrary slices. (Or we say that byte strings don't get an optimized representation at all. Such a performance cliff between `str` and byte strings is probably unexpected, though due to the lack of interning for byte strings I think there might already be a performance cliff there.)
