Add a default implementation for CodegenBackend::link
As a side effect this should add raw-dylib support to cg_gcc as the default ArchiveBuilderBuilder that is used implements create_dll_import_lib. I haven't tested if the raw-dylib support actually works however.
Document some `check_expr` methods, and other misc `hir_typeck` tweaks
Most importantly, make sure that all of the expression checking functions that are called from `check_expr_kind` start with `check_expr_*`. This is super useful to me personally, since I grep these functions all the time, and the ones that *aren't* named consistently are incredibly hard to find.
Also document more of the `check_expr_*` functions, and squash two args for passing data about a call expr into one `Option`.
Arbitrary self types v2: (unused) Receiver trait
This commit contains a new `Receiver` trait, which is the basis for the Arbitrary Self Types v2 RFC. This allows smart pointers to be method receivers even if they're not Deref.
This is currently unused by the compiler - a subsequent PR will start to use this for method resolution if the `arbitrary_self_types` feature gate is enabled. This is being landed first simply to make review simpler: if people feel this should all be in an atomic PR let me know.
This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project, https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874
r? `@wesleywiser`
Only copy, rename and link `llvm-objcopy` if llvm tools are enabled
Fixes#132719.
cc `@bjorn3` who reported the bootstrapping problem for cg_clif.
cc `@davidtwco` in case this might be problematic for linux -> macOS cross-compile builds, but seems very unlikely.
cc `@albertlarsan68` (co-reviewed #131405)
r? bootstrap
query/plumbing: adjust comment to reality
The limit for the query key size got changed recently in f51ec110a7 but the comment was not updated.
Though maybe it is time to intern `CanonicalTypeOpAscribeUserTypeGoal` rather than copying it everywhere?
r? `@lcnr`
triagebot: Assign rustdoc tests to T-rustdoc.
Should avoid situations like #132871, which got assigned to mark (via fallback) despite being a rustdoc change.
For now, I've assigned all our testsuites to the rustdoc group (whoever from T-Rustdoc is on review rotation), except the json one which is assigned to me.
CC `@rust-lang/rustdoc`
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Stabilize WebAssembly `multivalue`, `reference-types`, and `tail-call` target features
For the `multivalue` and `reference-types` features this commit is
similar to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/117457 in that it's stabilizing target features specific to
WebAssembly targets. The previous PR left out these two features because
they weren't expected to change much about compiled code so it was
unclear what the rationale was. It has [since been discovered][blog]
that `reference-types` can be useful as it changes the binary format of
the `call_indirect` instruction. Additionally [on Zulip][zulip] there's
a use case of detecting these features at compile time and generating a
compile error to better warn users about features not supported on
engines.
This PR then additionally adds the `tail-call` feature which corresponds
to the [tail-call] proposal to WebAssembly. This feature advanced to
"phase 4" in the WebAssembly CG awhile back and has been supported in
LLVM for quite some time now. Engines are finishing up implementations
or have already shipped implementations, so while this is a bit of a
late addition to Rust itself it reflects the current status of
WebAssembly's state of the feature.
A test has been added here not only for these features but other
WebAssembly features as well to showcase that they're usable without
feature gates in stable Rust.
[blog]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/09/24/webassembly-targets-change-in-default-target-features.html
[zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/wasm32.20reference-types.20.2F.20multivalue.20in.201.2E82-beta.20not.20enabled/near/473893987
[tail-call]: https://github.com/webassembly/tail-call
Break from review rotation
Spending ~a week to focus on:
- Digesting remaining `Makefile`s (so close yet so far).
- 2024 Q3 T-compiler P-high issues review pre-triage.
- Some docs for rustc-dev-guide.
r? `@ghost`
Prefer `pub(super)` in `unreachable_pub` lint suggestion
This PR updates the `unreachable_pub` lint suggestion to prefer `pub(super)` instead of `pub(crate)` when possible.
cc `@petrochenkov`
r? `@nnethercote`
Stabilize Arm64EC inline assembly
This stabilizes inline assembly for Arm64EC ("Emulation Compatible").
Corresponding reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1653
---
From the requirements of stabilization mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93335
> Each architecture needs to be reviewed before stabilization:
> - It must have clobber_abi.
Done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131332.
> - It must be possible to clobber every register that is normally clobbered by a function call.
This is possible from the time of the initial implementation.
> - Generally review that the exposed register classes make sense.
The registers available in this target are a subset of those available in the AArch64 inline assembly which is already stable.
The following registers cannot be used in Arm64EC compared to AArch64:
- `x13`, `x14`, `x23`, `x24`, `x28` (register class: `reg`)
- `v[16-31]` (register class: `vreg`)
- `p[0-15]`, `ffr` (clobber-only register class `preg`)
These are disallowed by the ABI (see also [abi docs](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/arm64ec-windows-abi-conventions?view=msvc-170#register-mapping) for `reg`/`vreg` and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131332#issuecomment-2401189142 for `preg`).
Although not listed in the above requirements, preserves_flags is also implemented and the same as AArch64.
---
cc `@dpaoliello`
r? `@Amanieu`
`@rustbot` label O-windows O-AArch64 +A-inline-assembly +T-lang -T-compiler +needs-fcp
Update minifer version to `0.3.2`
This version fixes a few lints but the main change is that it makes `clap` dependency optional since it's only used for the binary.
r? `@notriddle`
coverage: Restrict empty-span expansion to only cover `{` and `}`
Coverage instrumentation has some tricky code for converting a coverage-relevant `Span` into a set of start/end line/byte-column coordinates that will be embedded in the CGU's coverage metadata.
A big part of this complexity is special code for handling empty spans, which are expanded into non-empty spans (if possible) because LLVM's coverage reporter does not handle empty spans well.
This PR simplifies that code by restricting it to only apply in two specific situations: when the character after the empty span is `{`, or the character before the empty span is `}`.
(As an added benefit, this means that the expanded spans no longer extend awkwardly beyond the end of a physical line, which was common under the previous implementation.)
Along the way, this PR also removes some unhelpful code for dealing with function source code spread across multiple files. Functions currently can't have coverage spans in multiple files, and if that ever changes (e.g. to properly support expansion regions) then this code will need to be completely overhauled anyway.
For the `multivalue` and `reference-types` features this commit is
similar to #117457 in that it's stabilizing target features specific to
WebAssembly targets. The previous PR left out these two features because
they weren't expected to change much about compiled code so it was
unclear what the rationale was. It has [since been discovered][blog]
that `reference-types` can be useful as it changes the binary format of
the `call_indirect` instruction. Additionally [on Zulip][zulip] there's
a use case of detecting these features at compile time and generating a
compile error to better warn users about features not supported on
engines.
This PR then additionally adds the `tail-call` feature which corresponds
to the [tail-call] proposal to WebAssembly. This feature advanced to
"phase 4" in the WebAssembly CG awhile back and has been supported in
LLVM for quite some time now. Engines are finishing up implementations
or have already shipped implementations, so while this is a bit of a
late addition to Rust itself it reflects the current status of
WebAssembly's state of the feature.
A test has been added here not only for these features but other
WebAssembly features as well to showcase that they're usable without
feature gates in stable Rust.
[blog]: https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/09/24/webassembly-targets-change-in-default-target-features.html
[zulip]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/122651-general/topic/wasm32.20reference-types.20.2F.20multivalue.20in.201.2E82-beta.20not.20enabled/near/473893987
[tail-call]: https://github.com/webassembly/tail-call
Revert #132772 to fix unknown git commit hash
Reverts #132772 to address #132845, we seem to have unintentionally omitted commit hash.
r? `@onur-ozkan`
Dont suggest `use<impl Trait>` when we have an edition-2024-related borrowck issue
#131186 implements some machinery to detect in borrowck when we may have RPIT overcaptures due to edition 2024, and suggests adding `+ use<'a, T>` to go back to the edition 2021 capture rules. However, we weren't filtering out cases when there are APITs in scope.
This PR implements a more sophisticated diagnostic where we will suggest turning any APITs in scope into type parameters, and applies this to both the borrowck error note, and to the `impl_trait_overcaptures` migration lint.
cc #132809
ABI compatibility: remove section on target features
Once https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127731 lands, we will properly diagnose ABI issues caused by target feature mismatch (at least on tier 1 targets). So I'd say we can remove the corresponding part of the docs here -- this is now something the compiler can take care of, so programmers don't need to be concerned. For now this is just a lint, but that's just a transition period, like in prior cases where we fix I-unsound bugs by adding a new check that goes through the "future incompatibility" stages. We have decided that it's actually a bug that we have ABI risks around target features, and we shouldn't document that bug as-if it was intended behavior.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@chorman0773` `@veluca93`
Additional tests to ensure let is rejected during parsing
In the original stabilization PR, @ `compiler-errors` has [pointed out](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94927#issuecomment-1165156328) that #97295 wasn't enough to address the concerns about having `let` in expressions being rejected at parsing time, instead of later.
Thankfully, since then the situation has been greatly improved by #115677. This PR adds some additional tests to `disallowed-positions.rs`, and adds two additional revisions to the "normal" case which is now given the `feature` name:
* `no_feature`: Added to incorporate `disallowed-positions-without-feature-gate.rs` into the file, reducing duplication.
* `nothing`: like feature, but all functions are cfg'd out. Ensures that the errors are really emitted during parsing.
cc tracking issue #53667
