This will temporarily prevent warnings generated from expanding to code that the
test harness itself uses. This solution will require tweaking around the beta
cycle, but it will prevent spurious warnings for now.
Closes#20823
This will temporarily prevent warnings generated from expanding to code that the
test harness itself uses. This solution will require tweaking around the beta
cycle, but it will prevent spurious warnings for now.
Closes#20823
Because we are warning about unstable APIs and there are many
of these yet, this creates a high likelyhood doc tests will
fail.
This doesn't seem right as a blanket policy to me anyway, though
certainly we want it in std. Probably more appropriate to add
a rustdoc option.
Because we are warning about unstable APIs and there are many
of these yet, this creates a high likelyhood doc tests will
fail.
This doesn't seem right as a blanket policy to me anyway, though
certainly we want it in std. Probably more appropriate to add
a rustdoc option.
On DragonFly pthread_{mutex,rwlock,condvar}_destroy() returns EINVAL
when called on a pthread_{mutex,rwlock,condvar}_t that was just
initialized via PTHREAD_{MUTEX,RWLOCK,CONDVAR}_INITIALIZER and not used
in the meantime or initialized via pthread_{mutex,rwlock,condvar}_init().
Change the code to treat a return value of EINVAL on DragonFly as success.
This gets rid of the 'experimental' level, removes the non-staged_api
case (i.e. stability levels for out-of-tree crates), and lets the
staged_api attributes use 'unstable' and 'deprecated' lints.
This makes the transition period to the full feature staging design
a bit nicer.
An updated version of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/19461
This version vendors aturon/rust-book@731f7bf and builds it when building the docs. This is almost great, except my `make`-foo is poor, so I have my own personal paths in `mk/docs.mk`. How should I best get around that?
/cc @brson
This pulls all of our long-form documentation into a single document,
nicknamed "the book" and formally titled "The Rust Programming
Language."
A few things motivated this change:
* People knew of The Guide, but not the individual Guides. This merges
them together, helping discoverability.
* You can get all of Rust's longform documentation in one place, which
is nice.
* We now have rustbook in-tree, which can generate this kind of
documentation. While its style is basic, the general idea is much
better: a table of contents on the left-hand side.
* Rather than a almost 10,000-line guide.md, there are now smaller files
per section.
