Implement write() method for Box<MaybeUninit<T>>
This adds method similar to `MaybeUninit::write` main difference being
it returns owned `Box`. This can be used to elide copy from stack
safely, however it's not currently tested that the optimization actually
occurs.
Analogous methods are not provided for `Rc` and `Arc` as those need to
handle the possibility of sharing. Some version of them may be added in
the future.
This was discussed in #63291 which this change extends.
Rollup of 12 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #89954 (Fix legacy_const_generic doc arguments display)
- #91321 (Handle placeholder regions in NLL type outlive constraints)
- #91329 (Fix incorrect usage of `EvaluatedToOk` when evaluating `TypeOutlives`)
- #91364 (Improve error message for incorrect field accesses through raw pointers)
- #91387 (Clarify and tidy up explanation of E0038)
- #91410 (Move `#![feature(const_precise_live_drops)]` checks earlier in the pipeline)
- #91435 (Improve diagnostic for missing half of binary operator in `if` condition)
- #91444 (disable tests in Miri that take too long)
- #91457 (Add additional test from rust issue number 91068)
- #91460 (Document how `last_os_error` should be used)
- #91464 (Document file path case sensitivity)
- #91466 (Improve the comments in `Symbol::interner`.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Document how `last_os_error` should be used
It should be made clear that the state of the last OS error could change if another function call is made before the call to `Error::last_os_error()`.
Fixes: #53155
disable tests in Miri that take too long
Comparing slices of length `usize::MAX` diverges in Miri. In fact these tests even diverge in rustc unless `-O` is passed. I tried this code to check that:
```rust
#![feature(slice_take)]
const EMPTY_MAX: &'static [()] = &[(); usize::MAX];
fn main() {
let mut slice: &[_] = &[(); usize::MAX];
println!("1");
assert_eq!(Some(&[] as _), slice.take(usize::MAX..));
println!("2");
let remaining: &[_] = EMPTY_MAX;
println!("3");
assert_eq!(remaining, slice);
println!("4");
}
```
So, disable these tests in Miri for now.
Improve diagnostic for missing half of binary operator in `if` condition
Fixes#91421. I've also changed it so that it doesn't consume the `else` token in the error case, because it will try to consume it again afterwards, leading to this incorrect error message (where the `else` reported as missing is actually there):
```
error: expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator, found `{`
--> src/main.rs:4:12
|
4 | } else { 4 };
| ^ expected one of `.`, `;`, `?`, `else`, or an operator
```
r? `@lcnr`
Move `#![feature(const_precise_live_drops)]` checks earlier in the pipeline
Should mitigate the issues found during MCP on #73255.
Once this is done, we should clean up the queries a bit, since I think `mir_drops_elaborated_and_const_checked` can be merged back into `mir_promoted`.
Fixes#90770.
cc ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval``
r? ``@nikomatsakis`` (since they reviewed #71824)
Clarify and tidy up explanation of E0038
I ran into E0038 (specifically the `Self:Sized` constraint on object-safety) the other day and it seemed to me that the explanations I found floating around the internet were a bit .. wrong. Like they didn't make sense. And then I went and checked the official explanation here and it didn't make sense either.
As far as I can tell (reading through the history of the RFCs), two totally different aspects of object-safety have got tangled up in much of the writing on the subject:
- Object-safety related to "not even theoretically possible" issues. This includes things like "methods that take or return Self by value", which obviously will never work for an unsized type in a world with fixed-size stack frames (and it'd be an opaque type anyways, which, ugh). This sort of thing was originally decided method-by-method, with non-object-safe methods stripped from objects; but in [RFC 0255](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0255-object-safety.html) this sort of per-impossible-method reasoning was made into a per-trait safety property (with the escape hatch left in where users could mark methods `where Self:Sized` to have them stripped before the trait's object safety is considered).
- Object-safety related to "totally possible but ergonomically a little awkward" issues. Specifically in a trait with `Trait:Sized`, there's no a priori reason why this constraint makes the trait impossible to make into an object -- imagine it had nothing but harmless `&self`-taking methods. No problem! Who cares if the Trait requires its implementing types to be sized? As far as I can tell reading the history here, in both RFC 0255 and then later in [RFC 0546](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0546-Self-not-sized-by-default.html) it seems that the motivation for making `Trait:Sized` be non-object-safe has _nothing to do_ with the impossibility of making objects out of such types, and everything to do with enabling "[a trait object SomeTrait to implement the trait SomeTrait](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0546-Self-not-sized-by-default.html#motivation)". That is, since `dyn Trait` is unsized, if `Trait:Sized` then you can never have the automatic (and reasonable) ergonomic implicit `impl Trait for dyn Trait`. And the authors of that RFC really wanted that automatic implicit implementation of `Trait` for `dyn Trait`. So they just defined `Trait:Sized` as non-object safe -- no `dyn Trait` can ever exist that the compiler can't synthesize such an impl for. Well enough!
However, I noticed in my reading-and-reconstruction that lots of documentation on the internet, including forum and Q&A site answers and (most worrying) the compiler explanation all kinda grasp at something like the first ("not theoretically possible") explanation, and fail to mention the second ("just an ergonomic constraint") explanation. So I figured I'd clean up the docs to clarify, maybe confuse the next person less (unless of course I'm misreading the history here and misunderstanding motives -- please let me know if so!)
While here I also did some cleanups:
- Rewrote the preamble, trying to help the user get a little better oriented (I found the existing preamble a bit scattered).
- Modernized notation (using `dyn Trait`)
- Changed the section headings to all be written with the same logical sense: to all be written as "conditions that violate object safety" rather than a mix of that and the negated form "conditions that must not happen in order to ensure object safety".
I think there's a fair bit more to clean up in this doc -- the later sections get a bit rambly and I suspect there should be a completely separated-out section covering the `where Self:Sized` escape hatch for instructing the compiler to "do the old thing" and strip methods off traits when turning them into objects (it's a bit buried as a digression in the individual sub-error sections). But I did what I had time for now.
Fix incorrect usage of `EvaluatedToOk` when evaluating `TypeOutlives`
A global predicate is not guarnatenteed to outlive all regions.
If the predicate involves late-bound regions, then it may fail
to outlive other regions (e.g. `for<'b> &'b bool: 'static` does not
hold)
We now only produce `EvaluatedToOk` when a global predicate has no
late-bound regions - in that case, the ony region that can be present
in the type is 'static
This adds method similar to `MaybeUninit::write` main difference being
it returns owned `Box`. This can be used to elide copy from stack
safely, however it's not currently tested that the optimization actually
occurs.
Analogous methods are not provided for `Rc` and `Arc` as those need to
handle the possibility of sharing. Some version of them may be added in
the future.
This was discussed in #63291 which this change extends.
Enable svh tests on msvc
These tests were ignored for msvc in #30778 because of additional notes that were being added for some reason. I'm fairly confident this has been fixed in the intervening years so lets try re-enabling these tests.
Fixes#31306
Issue 90702 fix: Stop treating some crate loading failures as fatal errors
Surface mulitple `extern crate` resolution errors at a time.
This is achieved by creating a dummy crate, instead of aborting directly after the resolution error. The `ExternCrateError` has been added to allow propagating the resolution error from `rustc_metadata` crate to the `rustc_resolve` with a minimal public surface. The `import_extern_crate` function is a block that was factored out from `build_reduced_graph_for_item` for better organization. The only added functionality made to it where the added error handling in the `process_extern_crate` call. The remaining bits in this function are the same as before.
Resolves#90702
r? `@petrochenkov`
Disallow non-c-like but "fieldless" ADTs from being casted to integer if they use arbitrary enum discriminant
Code like
```rust
#[repr(u8)]
enum Enum {
Foo /* = 0 */,
Bar(),
Baz{}
}
let x = Enum::Bar() as u8;
```
seems to be unintentionally allowed so we couldn't disallow them now ~~, but we could disallow them if arbitrary enum discriminant is used before 1.56 hits stable~~ (stabilization was reverted).
Related: #88621
`@rustbot` label +T-lang
Cleanup: Eliminate ConstnessAnd
This is almost a behaviour-free change and purely a refactoring. "almost" because we appear to be using the wrong ParamEnv somewhere already, and this is now exposed by failing a test using the unstable `~const` feature.
We most definitely need to review all `without_const` and at some point should probably get rid of many of them by using `TraitPredicate` instead of `TraitRef`.
This is a continuation of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90274.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@spastorino` `@ecstatic-morse`
... if they use arbitrary enum discriminant. Code like
```rust
enum Enum {
Foo = 1,
Bar(),
Baz{}
}
```
seems to be unintentionally allowed so we couldn't disallow them now,
but we could disallow them if arbitrary enum discriminant is used before
1.56 hits stable.
Add tests for `normalize-docs` overflow errors
`@b-naber` do you understand why using `try_normalize_erasing_regions` doesn't silence these cycle errors? Rustdoc isn't emitting them, rustc is aborting before returning an error, even though the function has `try_` in the name.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/82692, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/91255
Include lint errors in error count for `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`
This was a regression from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/87337;
the `panic_if_treat_err_as_bug` function only checked the number of hard
errors, not the number of lint errors.
r? `@oli-obk`
Update LLVM with patches for better llvm-cov diagnostics
Cherry-picks
ee88b8d63e
and
126e7611c7
These patches to LLVM were added to help debug occasional errors that
cause coverage reporting to fail. Prior to this patch, the only messaging
was that the coverage data was malformed. Hopefully the improved
messaging will help identify the root cause of these errors, when they
arise, so we can make corrections to coverage output from Rust.
r? `@tmandry`
expand: Turn `ast::Crate` into a first class expansion target
And stop creating a fake `mod` item for the crate root when expanding a crate, thus addressing FIXMEs left in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82238, and making a step towards a proper support for crate-level macro attributes (cc #54726).
I haven't added token collection support for the whole crate in this PR, maybe later.
r? `@Aaron1011`
