Rename `adjustment::PointerCast` and variants using it to `PointerCoercion`
It makes it sounds like the `ExprKind` and `Rvalue` are supposed to represent all pointer related casts, when in reality their just used to share a little enum variants. Make it clear there these are only coercions and that people who see this and think "why are so many pointer related casts not in these variants" aren't insane.
This enum was added in #59987. I'm not sure whether the variant sharing is actually worth it, but this at least makes it less confusing.
r? oli-obk
It makes it sound like the `ExprKind` and `Rvalue` are supposed to represent all pointer related
casts, when in reality their just used to share a some enum variants. Make it clear there these
are only coercion to make it clear why only some pointer related "casts" are in the enum.
Move `TyCtxt::mk_x` to `Ty::new_x` where applicable
Part of rust-lang/compiler-team#616
turns out there's a lot of places we construct `Ty` this is a ridiculously huge PR :S
r? `@oli-obk`
Specialize `try_destructure_mir_constant` for its sole user (pretty printing)
We can't remove the query, as we need to invoke it from rustc_middle, but can only implement it in mir interpretation/const eval.
r? `@RalfJung` for a first round.
While we could move all the logic into pretty printing, that would end up duplicating a bit of code with const eval, which doesn't seem great either.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #113010 (rust-installer & rls: remove exclusion from rustfmt & tidy )
- #113317 ( -Ztrait-solver=next: stop depending on old solver)
- #113319 (`TypeParameterDefinition` always require a `DefId`)
- #113320 (Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors)
- #113321 (Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`)
- #113337 (Winnow specialized impls during selection in new solver)
- #113355 (Move most coverage code out of `rustc_codegen_ssa`)
- #113356 (Add support for NetBSD/riscv64 aka. riscv64gc-unknown-netbsd.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Winnow specialized impls during selection in new solver
We need to be able to winnow impls that are specialized by more specific impls in order for codegen to be able to proceed.
r? ``@lcnr``
Move `ty::ConstKind` to `rustc_type_ir`
Needed this in another PR for custom debug impls, and this will also be required to move the new solver into a separate crate that does not use `TyCtxt` so that r-a and friends can depend on the trait solver.
Rebased on top of #113325, only the second and third commits needs reviewing
Add some extra information to opaque type cycle errors
Plus a bunch of cleanups.
This should help users debug query cycles due to auto trait checking. We'll probably want to fix cycle errors in most (or all?) cases by looking at the current item's hidden types (new solver does this), and by delaying the auto trait checks to after typeck.
Effects/keyword generics MVP
This adds `feature(effects)`, which adds `const host: bool` to the generics of const functions, const traits and const impls. This will be used to replace the current logic around const traits.
r? `@oli-obk`
Make simd_shuffle_indices use valtrees
This removes the second-to-last user of the `destructure_mir_constant` query. So in a follow-up we can remove the query and just move the query provider function directly into pretty printing (which is the last user).
cc `@rust-lang/clippy` there's a small functional change, but I think it is correct?
Make `UnwindAction::Continue` explicit in MIR dump
Makes it easier to spot unwinding related issues in MIR by making `UnwindAction::Continue` explicit, just like all other `UnwindAction`s.
Migrate `TyCtxt::predicates_of` and `ParamEnv::caller_bounds` to `Clause`
The last big change in the series.
I will follow-up with additional filed issues once this PR lands:
- [ ] Investigate making `TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ty::Clause<'tcx>` implementation less weird: 2efe091705/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/structural_impls.rs (L672)
- [ ] Clean up the elaborator since it should only be emitting child clauses, not predicates
- [ ] Rename identifiers like `pred` and `predicates` to `clause` if they're actually clauses around the codebase
- [ ] Validate that all of the `ToPredicate` impls are acutally still needed, or prune them if they're not
r? `@ghost` until the other branch lands
Various impl trait in assoc tys cleanups
r? `@compiler-errors`
All commits except for the last are pure refactorings. 274dab5bd658c97886a8987340bf50ae57900c39 allows struct fields to participate in deciding whether a function has an opaque in its signature.
best reviewed commit by commit
Migrate `item_bounds` to `ty::Clause`
Should be simpler than the next PR that's coming up. Last three commits are the relevant ones.
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@lcnr``
Don't ICE on unnormalized struct tail in layout computation
1. We try to compute a `SizeSkeleton` even if a layout error occurs, but we really only need to do this if we get `LayoutError::Unknown`, since that means our type is too polymorphic to actually compute the full layout. If we have other errors, like `LayoutError::NormalizationError` or `LayoutError::Cycle`, then we can't really make any progress, since this represents an actual error.
2. Avoid using `normalize_erasing_regions` and `struct_tail_erasing_lifetimes` since those ICE on normalization errors, and since we may call `layout_of` in HIR typeck, we don't know for certain that we're on the happy path.
Fixes#112736
Inline before merging cgus
Because CGU merging relies on CGU sizes, but the CGU sizes before inlining aren't accurate.
This change doesn't have much effect on compile perf, but it makes follow-on changes that involve more sophisticated reasoning about CGU sizes much easier.
r? `@wesleywiser`
- Rename `create_size_estimate` as `compute_size_estimate`, because that
makes more sense for the second and subsequent calls for each CGU.
- Change `CodegenUnit::size_estimate` from `Option<usize>` to `usize`.
We can still assert that `compute_size_estimate` is called first.
- Move the size estimation for `place_mono_items` inside the function,
for consistency with `merge_codegen_units`.
Because CGU merging relies on CGU sizes, but the CGU sizes before
inlining aren't accurate.
This requires tweaking how the sizes are updated during merging: if CGU
A and B both have an inlined function F, then `size(A + B)` will be a
little less than `size(A) + size(B)`, because `A + B` will only have one
copy of F. Also, the minimum CGU size is increased because it now has to
account for inlined functions.
This change doesn't have much effect on compile perf, but it makes
follow-on changes that involve more sophisticated reasoning about CGU
sizes much easier.
Add a fully fledged `Clause` type, rename old `Clause` to `ClauseKind`
Does two basic things before I put up a more delicate set of PRs (along the lines of #112714, but hopefully much cleaner) that migrate existing usages of `ty::Predicate` to `ty::Clause` (`predicates_of`/`item_bounds`/`ParamEnv::caller_bounds`).
1. Rename `Clause` to `ClauseKind`, so it's parallel with `PredicateKind`.
2. Add a new `Clause` type which is parallel to `Predicate`.
* This type exposes `Clause::kind(self) -> Binder<'tcx, ClauseKind<'tcx>>` which is parallel to `Predicate::kind` 😸
The new `Clause` type essentially acts as a newtype wrapper around `Predicate` that asserts that it is specifically a `PredicateKind::Clause`. Turns out from experimentation[^1] that this is not negative performance-wise, which is wonderful, since this a much simpler design than something that requires encoding the discriminant into the alignment bits of a predicate kind, or something else like that...
r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@oli-obk``
[^1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112714#issuecomment-1595653910
Merge `BorrowKind::Unique` into `BorrowKind::Mut`
Fixes#112072
Might have conflict with #112070
r? `@lcnr`
I'm not sure what's the suitable change in a couple places.
Add `implement_via_object` to `rustc_deny_explicit_impl` to control object candidate assembly
Some built-in traits are special, since they are used to prove facts about the program that are important for later phases of compilation such as codegen and CTFE. For example, the `Unsize` trait is used to assert to the compiler that we are able to unsize a type into another type. It doesn't have any methods because it doesn't actually *instruct* the compiler how to do this unsizing, but this is later used (alongside an exhaustive match of combinations of unsizeable types) during codegen to generate unsize coercion code.
Due to this, these built-in traits are incompatible with the type erasure provided by object types. For example, the existence of `dyn Unsize<T>` does not mean that the compiler is able to unsize `Box<dyn Unsize<T>>` into `Box<T>`, since `Unsize` is a *witness* to the fact that a type can be unsized, and it doesn't actually encode that unsizing operation in its vtable as mentioned above.
The old trait solver gets around this fact by having complex control flow that never considers object bounds for certain built-in traits:
2f896da247/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/candidate_assembly.rs (L61-L132)
However, candidate assembly in the new solver is much more lovely, and I'd hate to add this list of opt-out cases into the new solver. Instead of maintaining this complex and hard-coded control flow, instead we can make this a property of the trait via a built-in attribute. We already have such a build attribute that's applied to every single trait that we care about: `rustc_deny_explicit_impl`. This PR adds `implement_via_object` as a meta-item to that attribute that allows us to opt a trait out of object-bound candidate assembly as well.
r? `@lcnr`
