mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2025-04-28 02:57:37 +00:00
Auto merge of #112835 - lcnr:proof-tree-nits, r=BoxyUwU
proof tree nits r? `@BoxyUwU`
This commit is contained in:
commit
46514218f6
@ -991,9 +991,3 @@ pub enum DefiningAnchor {
|
||||
/// Used to catch type mismatch errors when handling opaque types.
|
||||
Error,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub enum IsNormalizesToHack {
|
||||
Yes,
|
||||
No,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -228,3 +228,9 @@ impl<'tcx> TypeVisitable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for PredefinedOpaques<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.opaque_types.visit_with(visitor)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Debug, Copy, Clone, PartialEq, Eq, Hash, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub enum IsNormalizesToHack {
|
||||
Yes,
|
||||
No,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
use super::{CanonicalInput, Certainty, Goal, NoSolution, QueryInput, QueryResult};
|
||||
use crate::{traits::IsNormalizesToHack, ty};
|
||||
use super::{
|
||||
CanonicalInput, Certainty, Goal, IsNormalizesToHack, NoSolution, QueryInput, QueryResult,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use crate::ty;
|
||||
use format::ProofTreeFormatter;
|
||||
use std::fmt::{Debug, Write};
|
||||
|
||||
@ -22,6 +24,7 @@ pub struct GoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
pub result: QueryResult<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Hash, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub enum GoalEvaluationKind<'tcx> {
|
||||
CacheHit(CacheHit),
|
||||
@ -65,6 +68,7 @@ pub struct GoalCandidate<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub candidates: Vec<GoalCandidate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: CandidateKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[derive(Eq, PartialEq, Debug, Hash, HashStable)]
|
||||
pub enum CandidateKind<'tcx> {
|
||||
/// Probe entered when normalizing the self ty during candidate assembly
|
||||
|
@ -110,12 +110,11 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
direction: ty::AliasRelationDirection,
|
||||
invert: Invert,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.probe(
|
||||
self.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "normalizes-to".into(), result: *r }).enter(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.normalizes_to_inner(param_env, alias, other, direction, invert)?;
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "normalizes-to".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -157,7 +156,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
alias_rhs: ty::AliasTy<'tcx>,
|
||||
direction: ty::AliasRelationDirection,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.probe(
|
||||
self.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "substs relate".into(), result: *r }).enter(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
match direction {
|
||||
ty::AliasRelationDirection::Equate => {
|
||||
@ -170,7 +169,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "substs relate".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -181,8 +179,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
rhs: ty::Term<'tcx>,
|
||||
direction: ty::AliasRelationDirection,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
self.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "bidir normalizes-to".into(), result: *r })
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.normalizes_to_inner(
|
||||
param_env,
|
||||
lhs.to_alias_ty(ecx.tcx()).unwrap(),
|
||||
@ -198,8 +196,6 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Invert::Yes,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "bidir normalizes-to".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -337,8 +337,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
return
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let normalized_self_candidates: Result<_, NoSolution> = self.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
let normalized_self_candidates: Result<_, NoSolution> =
|
||||
self.probe(|_| CandidateKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly).enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.with_incremented_depth(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
let result = ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(
|
||||
@ -368,9 +368,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
Ok(ecx.assemble_and_evaluate_candidates(goal))
|
||||
},
|
||||
)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|_| CandidateKind::NormalizedSelfTyAssembly,
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
if let Ok(normalized_self_candidates) = normalized_self_candidates {
|
||||
candidates.extend(normalized_self_candidates);
|
||||
|
@ -11,10 +11,10 @@ use rustc_infer::traits::ObligationCause;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::infer::unify_key::{ConstVariableOrigin, ConstVariableOriginKind};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::inspect::{self, CandidateKind};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{
|
||||
CanonicalInput, CanonicalResponse, Certainty, MaybeCause, PredefinedOpaques,
|
||||
PredefinedOpaquesData, QueryResult,
|
||||
CanonicalInput, CanonicalResponse, Certainty, IsNormalizesToHack, MaybeCause,
|
||||
PredefinedOpaques, PredefinedOpaquesData, QueryResult,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::{DefiningAnchor, IsNormalizesToHack};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::DefiningAnchor;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty::{
|
||||
self, OpaqueTypeKey, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeSuperVisitable, TypeVisitable,
|
||||
TypeVisitableExt, TypeVisitor,
|
||||
@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ use super::SolverMode;
|
||||
use super::{search_graph::SearchGraph, Goal};
|
||||
|
||||
mod canonical;
|
||||
mod probe;
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// The inference context that backs (mostly) inference and placeholder terms
|
||||
@ -529,32 +530,6 @@ impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// `probe_kind` is only called when proof tree building is enabled so it can be
|
||||
/// as expensive as necessary to output the desired information.
|
||||
pub(super) fn probe<T>(
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
f: impl FnOnce(&mut EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx>) -> T,
|
||||
probe_kind: impl FnOnce(&T) -> CandidateKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
) -> T {
|
||||
let mut ecx = EvalCtxt {
|
||||
infcx: self.infcx,
|
||||
var_values: self.var_values,
|
||||
predefined_opaques_in_body: self.predefined_opaques_in_body,
|
||||
max_input_universe: self.max_input_universe,
|
||||
search_graph: self.search_graph,
|
||||
nested_goals: self.nested_goals.clone(),
|
||||
tainted: self.tainted,
|
||||
inspect: self.inspect.new_goal_candidate(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let r = self.infcx.probe(|_| f(&mut ecx));
|
||||
if !self.inspect.is_noop() {
|
||||
let cand_kind = probe_kind(&r);
|
||||
ecx.inspect.candidate_kind(cand_kind);
|
||||
self.inspect.goal_candidate(ecx.inspect);
|
||||
}
|
||||
r
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub(super) fn tcx(&self) -> TyCtxt<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.infcx.tcx
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -868,8 +843,12 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
if candidate_key.def_id != key.def_id {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
values.extend(self.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
values.extend(
|
||||
self.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate {
|
||||
name: "opaque type storage".into(),
|
||||
result: *r,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
for (a, b) in std::iter::zip(candidate_key.substs, key.substs) {
|
||||
ecx.eq(param_env, a, b)?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -881,9 +860,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
candidate_ty,
|
||||
);
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "opaque type storage".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
));
|
||||
}),
|
||||
);
|
||||
}
|
||||
values
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
47
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/probe.rs
Normal file
47
compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/eval_ctxt/probe.rs
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
|
||||
use super::EvalCtxt;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::inspect;
|
||||
use std::marker::PhantomData;
|
||||
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) struct ProbeCtxt<'me, 'a, 'tcx, F, T> {
|
||||
ecx: &'me mut EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx>,
|
||||
probe_kind: F,
|
||||
_result: PhantomData<T>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx, F, T> ProbeCtxt<'_, '_, 'tcx, F, T>
|
||||
where
|
||||
F: FnOnce(&T) -> inspect::CandidateKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) fn enter(self, f: impl FnOnce(&mut EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx>) -> T) -> T {
|
||||
let ProbeCtxt { ecx: outer_ecx, probe_kind, _result } = self;
|
||||
|
||||
let mut nested_ecx = EvalCtxt {
|
||||
infcx: outer_ecx.infcx,
|
||||
var_values: outer_ecx.var_values,
|
||||
predefined_opaques_in_body: outer_ecx.predefined_opaques_in_body,
|
||||
max_input_universe: outer_ecx.max_input_universe,
|
||||
search_graph: outer_ecx.search_graph,
|
||||
nested_goals: outer_ecx.nested_goals.clone(),
|
||||
tainted: outer_ecx.tainted,
|
||||
inspect: outer_ecx.inspect.new_goal_candidate(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
let r = nested_ecx.infcx.probe(|_| f(&mut nested_ecx));
|
||||
if !outer_ecx.inspect.is_noop() {
|
||||
let cand_kind = probe_kind(&r);
|
||||
nested_ecx.inspect.candidate_kind(cand_kind);
|
||||
outer_ecx.inspect.goal_candidate(nested_ecx.inspect);
|
||||
}
|
||||
r
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'a, 'tcx> EvalCtxt<'a, 'tcx> {
|
||||
/// `probe_kind` is only called when proof tree building is enabled so it can be
|
||||
/// as expensive as necessary to output the desired information.
|
||||
pub(in crate::solve) fn probe<F, T>(&mut self, probe_kind: F) -> ProbeCtxt<'_, 'a, 'tcx, F, T>
|
||||
where
|
||||
F: FnOnce(&T) -> inspect::CandidateKind<'tcx>,
|
||||
{
|
||||
ProbeCtxt { ecx: self, probe_kind, _result: PhantomData }
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
@ -1,14 +1,9 @@
|
||||
use rustc_middle::{
|
||||
traits::{
|
||||
query::NoSolution,
|
||||
solve::{
|
||||
inspect::{self, CacheHit, CandidateKind},
|
||||
CanonicalInput, Certainty, Goal, QueryInput, QueryResult,
|
||||
},
|
||||
IsNormalizesToHack,
|
||||
},
|
||||
ty,
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::query::NoSolution;
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::inspect::{self, CacheHit, CandidateKind};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::traits::solve::{
|
||||
CanonicalInput, Certainty, Goal, IsNormalizesToHack, QueryInput, QueryResult,
|
||||
};
|
||||
use rustc_middle::ty;
|
||||
|
||||
pub mod dump;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -25,6 +20,7 @@ pub struct WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
pub result: Option<QueryResult<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluation {
|
||||
@ -52,6 +48,7 @@ pub struct WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub evaluations: Vec<Vec<WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
pub result: Option<Result<Certainty, NoSolution>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::AddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::AddedGoalsEvaluation {
|
||||
@ -76,6 +73,7 @@ pub struct WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
pub result: Option<QueryResult<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::GoalEvaluationStep<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::GoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
@ -97,6 +95,7 @@ pub struct WipGoalCandidate<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub candidates: Vec<WipGoalCandidate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
pub kind: Option<CandidateKind<'tcx>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> WipGoalCandidate<'tcx> {
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> inspect::GoalCandidate<'tcx> {
|
||||
inspect::GoalCandidate {
|
||||
@ -120,10 +119,45 @@ pub enum DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate<'tcx>),
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>(Option<Box<DebugSolver<'tcx>>>);
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipGoalEvaluation<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipAddedGoalsEvaluation<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipGoalEvaluationStep<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> From<WipGoalCandidate<'tcx>> for DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn from(g: WipGoalCandidate<'tcx>) -> DebugSolver<'tcx> {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(g)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub struct ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
state: Option<Box<DebugSolver<'tcx>>>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
fn new(state: impl Into<DebugSolver<'tcx>>) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder { state: Some(Box::new(state.into())) }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn as_mut(&mut self) -> Option<&mut DebugSolver<'tcx>> {
|
||||
self.state.as_mut().map(|boxed| &mut **boxed)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn finalize(self) -> Option<inspect::GoalEvaluation<'tcx>> {
|
||||
match *(self.0?) {
|
||||
match *(self.state?) {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(wip_goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
Some(wip_goal_evaluation.finalize())
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -132,15 +166,15 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_root() -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
Self(Some(Box::new(DebugSolver::Root)))
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new(DebugSolver::Root)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_noop() -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
Self(None)
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder { state: None }
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn is_noop(&self) -> bool {
|
||||
self.0.is_none()
|
||||
self.state.is_none()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_goal_evaluation(
|
||||
@ -148,11 +182,11 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
is_normalizes_to_hack: IsNormalizesToHack,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
if self.0.is_none() {
|
||||
return ProofTreeBuilder(None);
|
||||
if self.state.is_none() {
|
||||
return ProofTreeBuilder { state: None };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Self(Some(Box::new(DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(WipGoalEvaluation {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new(WipGoalEvaluation {
|
||||
uncanonicalized_goal: goal,
|
||||
canonicalized_goal: None,
|
||||
evaluation_steps: vec![],
|
||||
@ -160,62 +194,54 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
cache_hit: None,
|
||||
returned_goals: vec![],
|
||||
result: None,
|
||||
}))))
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn canonicalized_goal(&mut self, canonical_goal: CanonicalInput<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert!(goal_evaluation.canonicalized_goal.is_none());
|
||||
goal_evaluation.canonicalized_goal = Some(canonical_goal)
|
||||
pub fn canonicalized_goal(&mut self, canonical_goal: CanonicalInput<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(goal_evaluation.canonicalized_goal.replace(canonical_goal), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn cache_hit(&mut self, cache_hit: CacheHit) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
goal_evaluation.cache_hit = Some(cache_hit)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(goal_evaluation.cache_hit.replace(cache_hit), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
};
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn returned_goals(&mut self, goals: &[Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>]) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert!(evaluation.returned_goals.is_empty());
|
||||
evaluation.returned_goals.extend(goals);
|
||||
pub fn returned_goals(&mut self, goals: &[Goal<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>]) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert!(evaluation.returned_goals.is_empty());
|
||||
evaluation.returned_goals.extend(goals);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation(&mut self, goal_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match (this, *goal_evaluation.0.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation { evaluations, .. }),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
) => evaluations.last_mut().unwrap().push(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
(this @ DebugSolver::Root, goal_evaluation) => *this = goal_evaluation,
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, *goal_evaluation.state.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation {
|
||||
evaluations, ..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
) => evaluations.last_mut().unwrap().push(goal_evaluation),
|
||||
(this @ DebugSolver::Root, goal_evaluation) => *this = goal_evaluation,
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -223,144 +249,124 @@ impl<'tcx> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
&mut self,
|
||||
instantiated_goal: QueryInput<'tcx, ty::Predicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
if self.0.is_none() {
|
||||
return Self(None);
|
||||
if self.state.is_none() {
|
||||
return ProofTreeBuilder { state: None };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Self(Some(Box::new(DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
instantiated_goal,
|
||||
nested_goal_evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
candidates: vec![],
|
||||
result: None,
|
||||
}))))
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_evaluation_step(&mut self, goal_eval_step: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match (this, *goal_eval_step.0.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_eval), DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(step)) => {
|
||||
goal_eval.evaluation_steps.push(step);
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, *goal_eval_step.state.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_eval), DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(step)) => {
|
||||
goal_eval.evaluation_steps.push(step);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_goal_candidate(&mut self) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
if self.0.is_none() {
|
||||
return Self(None);
|
||||
if self.state.is_none() {
|
||||
return ProofTreeBuilder { state: None };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Self(Some(Box::new(DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate {
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new(WipGoalCandidate {
|
||||
nested_goal_evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
candidates: vec![],
|
||||
kind: None,
|
||||
}))))
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn candidate_kind(&mut self, kind: CandidateKind<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate { kind: old_kind @ None, .. }) => {
|
||||
*old_kind = Some(kind)
|
||||
pub fn candidate_kind(&mut self, candidate_kind: CandidateKind<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(this) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(this.kind.replace(candidate_kind), None)
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn goal_candidate(&mut self, candidate: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match (this, *candidate.0.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate { candidates, .. })
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep { candidates, .. }),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(candidate),
|
||||
) => candidates.push(candidate),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
pub fn goal_candidate(&mut self, candidate: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, *candidate.state.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate { candidates, .. })
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep { candidates, .. }),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(candidate),
|
||||
) => candidates.push(candidate),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn new_evaluate_added_goals(&mut self) -> ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx> {
|
||||
if self.0.is_none() {
|
||||
return Self(None);
|
||||
if self.state.is_none() {
|
||||
return ProofTreeBuilder { state: None };
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Self(Some(Box::new(DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation {
|
||||
evaluations: vec![],
|
||||
result: None,
|
||||
}))))
|
||||
ProofTreeBuilder::new(WipAddedGoalsEvaluation { evaluations: vec![], result: None })
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn evaluate_added_goals_loop_start(&mut self) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(this) => {
|
||||
this.evaluations.push(vec![]);
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(this) => {
|
||||
this.evaluations.push(vec![]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn eval_added_goals_result(&mut self, result: Result<Certainty, NoSolution>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(this) => {
|
||||
assert!(this.result.is_none());
|
||||
this.result = Some(result);
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(this) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(this.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
pub fn added_goals_evaluation(&mut self, goals_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match (this, *goals_evaluation.0.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
nested_goal_evaluations,
|
||||
..
|
||||
})
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate { nested_goal_evaluations, .. }),
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
) => nested_goal_evaluations.push(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
pub fn added_goals_evaluation(&mut self, goals_evaluation: ProofTreeBuilder<'tcx>) {
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match (this, *goals_evaluation.state.unwrap()) {
|
||||
(
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(WipGoalEvaluationStep {
|
||||
nested_goal_evaluations,
|
||||
..
|
||||
})
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(WipGoalCandidate {
|
||||
nested_goal_evaluations, ..
|
||||
}),
|
||||
DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
) => nested_goal_evaluations.push(added_goals_evaluation),
|
||||
_ => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn query_result(&mut self, result: QueryResult<'tcx>) {
|
||||
let this = match self.0.as_mut() {
|
||||
None => return,
|
||||
Some(this) => &mut **this,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert!(goal_evaluation.result.is_none());
|
||||
goal_evaluation.result = Some(result);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DebugSolver::Root
|
||||
| DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(_)
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(_) => unreachable!(),
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(evaluation_step) => {
|
||||
assert!(evaluation_step.result.is_none());
|
||||
evaluation_step.result = Some(result);
|
||||
if let Some(this) = self.as_mut() {
|
||||
match this {
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluation(goal_evaluation) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(goal_evaluation.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DebugSolver::GoalEvaluationStep(evaluation_step) => {
|
||||
assert_eq!(evaluation_step.result.replace(result), None);
|
||||
}
|
||||
DebugSolver::Root
|
||||
| DebugSolver::AddedGoalsEvaluation(_)
|
||||
| DebugSolver::GoalCandidate(_) => unreachable!(),
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -112,8 +112,8 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
if let Some(projection_pred) = assumption.as_projection_clause() {
|
||||
if projection_pred.projection_def_id() == goal.predicate.def_id() {
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "assumption".into(), result: *r })
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
let assumption_projection_pred =
|
||||
ecx.instantiate_binder_with_infer(projection_pred);
|
||||
ecx.eq(
|
||||
@ -128,9 +128,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
)
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
then(ecx)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "assumption".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(NoSolution)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -154,6 +152,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "impl".into(), result: *r }).enter(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
let impl_substs = ecx.fresh_substs_for_item(impl_def_id);
|
||||
let impl_trait_ref = impl_trait_ref.subst(tcx, impl_substs);
|
||||
@ -235,7 +234,6 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "impl".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -331,8 +329,8 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, Self>,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
let tcx = ecx.tcx();
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "builtin pointee".into(), result: *r })
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
let metadata_ty = match goal.predicate.self_ty().kind() {
|
||||
ty::Bool
|
||||
| ty::Char
|
||||
@ -415,9 +413,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, metadata_ty.into())
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "builtin pointee".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn consider_builtin_future_candidate(
|
||||
@ -552,14 +548,15 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for ProjectionPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
),
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, discriminant_ty.into())
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "builtin discriminant kind".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate {
|
||||
name: "builtin discriminant kind".into(),
|
||||
result: *r,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.term, discriminant_ty.into())
|
||||
.expect("expected goal term to be fully unconstrained");
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn consider_builtin_destruct_candidate(
|
||||
|
@ -62,24 +62,21 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
let impl_substs = ecx.fresh_substs_for_item(impl_def_id);
|
||||
let impl_trait_ref = impl_trait_ref.subst(tcx, impl_substs);
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "impl".into(), result: *r }).enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
let impl_substs = ecx.fresh_substs_for_item(impl_def_id);
|
||||
let impl_trait_ref = impl_trait_ref.subst(tcx, impl_substs);
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)?;
|
||||
let where_clause_bounds = tcx
|
||||
.predicates_of(impl_def_id)
|
||||
.instantiate(tcx, impl_substs)
|
||||
.predicates
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred));
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(where_clause_bounds);
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, goal.predicate.trait_ref, impl_trait_ref)?;
|
||||
let where_clause_bounds = tcx
|
||||
.predicates_of(impl_def_id)
|
||||
.instantiate(tcx, impl_substs)
|
||||
.predicates
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|pred| goal.with(tcx, pred));
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(where_clause_bounds);
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(maximal_certainty)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "impl".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(maximal_certainty)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn probe_and_match_goal_against_assumption(
|
||||
@ -93,8 +90,8 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
&& trait_clause.polarity() == goal.predicate.polarity
|
||||
{
|
||||
// FIXME: Constness
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "assumption".into(), result: *r })
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
let assumption_trait_pred = ecx.instantiate_binder_with_infer(trait_clause);
|
||||
ecx.eq(
|
||||
goal.param_env,
|
||||
@ -102,9 +99,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
assumption_trait_pred.trait_ref,
|
||||
)?;
|
||||
then(ecx)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "assumption".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
Err(NoSolution)
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -141,7 +136,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
|
||||
let tcx = ecx.tcx();
|
||||
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "trait alias".into(), result: *r }).enter(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
let nested_obligations = tcx
|
||||
.predicates_of(goal.predicate.def_id())
|
||||
@ -149,7 +144,6 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(nested_obligations.predicates.into_iter().map(|p| goal.with(tcx, p)));
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "trait alias".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -356,7 +350,7 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
if b_ty.is_ty_var() {
|
||||
return ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::AMBIGUOUS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "builtin unsize".into(), result: *r }).enter(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
match (a_ty.kind(), b_ty.kind()) {
|
||||
// Trait upcasting, or `dyn Trait + Auto + 'a` -> `dyn Trait + 'b`
|
||||
@ -464,7 +458,6 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
_ => Err(NoSolution),
|
||||
}
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "builtin unsize".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -495,38 +488,36 @@ impl<'tcx> assembly::GoalKind<'tcx> for TraitPredicate<'tcx> {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let mut unsize_dyn_to_principal = |principal: Option<ty::PolyExistentialTraitRef<'tcx>>| {
|
||||
ecx.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| -> Result<_, NoSolution> {
|
||||
// Require that all of the trait predicates from A match B, except for
|
||||
// the auto traits. We do this by constructing a new A type with B's
|
||||
// auto traits, and equating these types.
|
||||
let new_a_data = principal
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|trait_ref| trait_ref.map_bound(ty::ExistentialPredicate::Trait))
|
||||
.chain(a_data.iter().filter(|a| {
|
||||
matches!(a.skip_binder(), ty::ExistentialPredicate::Projection(_))
|
||||
}))
|
||||
.chain(
|
||||
b_data
|
||||
.auto_traits()
|
||||
.map(ty::ExistentialPredicate::AutoTrait)
|
||||
.map(ty::Binder::dummy),
|
||||
);
|
||||
let new_a_data = tcx.mk_poly_existential_predicates_from_iter(new_a_data);
|
||||
let new_a_ty = tcx.mk_dynamic(new_a_data, b_region, ty::Dyn);
|
||||
|
||||
// We also require that A's lifetime outlives B's lifetime.
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, new_a_ty, b_ty)?;
|
||||
ecx.add_goal(
|
||||
goal.with(
|
||||
tcx,
|
||||
ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(a_region, b_region)),
|
||||
),
|
||||
ecx.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate {
|
||||
name: "upcast dyn to principle".into(),
|
||||
result: *r,
|
||||
})
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| -> Result<_, NoSolution> {
|
||||
// Require that all of the trait predicates from A match B, except for
|
||||
// the auto traits. We do this by constructing a new A type with B's
|
||||
// auto traits, and equating these types.
|
||||
let new_a_data = principal
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
.map(|trait_ref| trait_ref.map_bound(ty::ExistentialPredicate::Trait))
|
||||
.chain(a_data.iter().filter(|a| {
|
||||
matches!(a.skip_binder(), ty::ExistentialPredicate::Projection(_))
|
||||
}))
|
||||
.chain(
|
||||
b_data
|
||||
.auto_traits()
|
||||
.map(ty::ExistentialPredicate::AutoTrait)
|
||||
.map(ty::Binder::dummy),
|
||||
);
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "upcast dyn to principle".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
let new_a_data = tcx.mk_poly_existential_predicates_from_iter(new_a_data);
|
||||
let new_a_ty = tcx.mk_dynamic(new_a_data, b_region, ty::Dyn);
|
||||
|
||||
// We also require that A's lifetime outlives B's lifetime.
|
||||
ecx.eq(goal.param_env, new_a_ty, b_ty)?;
|
||||
ecx.add_goal(
|
||||
goal.with(tcx, ty::Binder::dummy(ty::OutlivesPredicate(a_region, b_region))),
|
||||
);
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
})
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
let mut responses = vec![];
|
||||
@ -723,8 +714,8 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
goal: Goal<'tcx, TraitPredicate<'tcx>>,
|
||||
constituent_tys: impl Fn(&EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>) -> Result<Vec<Ty<'tcx>>, NoSolution>,
|
||||
) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
|
||||
self.probe(
|
||||
|ecx| {
|
||||
self.probe(|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "constituent tys".into(), result: *r })
|
||||
.enter(|ecx| {
|
||||
ecx.add_goals(
|
||||
constituent_tys(ecx, goal.predicate.self_ty())?
|
||||
.into_iter()
|
||||
@ -737,9 +728,7 @@ impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
|
||||
.collect::<Vec<_>>(),
|
||||
);
|
||||
ecx.evaluate_added_goals_and_make_canonical_response(Certainty::Yes)
|
||||
},
|
||||
|r| CandidateKind::Candidate { name: "constituent tys".into(), result: *r },
|
||||
)
|
||||
})
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[instrument(level = "debug", skip(self))]
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user