Gate `repr(Rust)` correctly on non-ADT items
#114201 added `repr(Rust)` but didn't add any attribute validation to it like `repr(C)` has, to only allow it on ADT items.
I consider this code to be nonsense, for example:
```
#[repr(Rust)]
fn foo() {}
```
Reminder that it's different from `extern "Rust"`, which *is* valid on function items. But also this now disallows `repr(Rust)` on modules, impls, traits, etc.
I'll crater it, if it looks bad then I'll add an FCW.
---
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/labels/relnotes: Compatibility (minor breaking change).
Do not ICE with incorrect empty suggestion
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.
The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
Fix#108748.
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130457 (Cleanup codegen traits)
- #130471 (Add zlib to musl dist image so rust-lld will support zlib compression for debug info there.)
- #130507 (Improve handling of raw-idents in check-cfg)
- #130509 (llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes, second try)
- #130510 (doc: the source of `LetStmt` can also be `AssignDesugar`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
When we have two types with the same name, one without type parameters and the other with type parameters and a derive macro, we were before incorrectly suggesting to remove type parameters from the former, which ICEd because we were suggesting to remove nothing. We now gate against this.
The output is still not perfect. E0107 should explicitly detect this case and provide better context, but for now let's avoid the ICE.
doc: the source of `LetStmt` can also be `AssignDesugar`
For example, the two following statements are desugared into a block whose `LetStmt` source is `AssignDesugar`:
```rust
_ = ignoring_some_result();
(a, b) = (b, a);
```
llvm-wrapper: adapt for LLVM API changes, second try
This is a re-work of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129749 after LLVM brought back the APIs used by rust.
No functional changes intended.
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@nikic`
cc: `@tmandry`
Improve handling of raw-idents in check-cfg
This PR improves the handling of raw-idents in the check-cfg diagnostics.
In particular the list of expected names and the suggestion now correctly take into account the "keyword-ness" of the ident, and correctly prefix the ident with `r#` when necessary.
`@rustbot` labels +F-check-cfg
For example, the two following statements are desugared into a block
whose `LetStmt` source is `AssignDesugar`:
```rust
_ = ignoring_some_result();
(a, b) = (b, a);
```
Pass `fmt::Arguments` by reference to `PanicInfo` and `PanicMessage`
Resolves#129330
For some reason after #115974 and #126732 optimizations applied to panic handler became worse and compiler stopped removing panic locations if they are not used in the panic message. This PR fixes that and maybe we can merge it into beta before rust 1.81 is released.
Note: optimization only works with `lto = "fat"`.
r? libs-api
Rollup of 3 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #130466 (tests: add repr/transparent test for aarch64)
- #130468 (Make sure that def id <=> lang item map is bidirectional)
- #130499 (Add myself to the libs review rotation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Take more advantage of the `isize::MAX` limit in `Layout`
Things like `padding_needed_for` are current implemented being super careful to handle things like `Layout::size` potentially being `usize::MAX`.
But now that #95295 has happened, that's no longer a concern. It's possible to add two `Layout::size`s together without risking overflow now.
So take advantage of that to remove a bunch of checked math that's not actually needed. For example, the round-up-and-add-next-size in `extend` doesn't need any overflow checks at all, just the final check for compatibility with the alignment.
(And while I was doing that I made it all unstably const, because there's nothing in `Layout` that's fundamentally runtime-only.)
Make sure that def id <=> lang item map is bidirectional
Self-explanatory from assertion. Just makes sure of an invariant that I forgot to enforce when I added `LanguageItems::from_def_id`.
tests: add repr/transparent test for aarch64
Fixes#74396.
Moves `transparent-struct-ptr.rs` to `transparent-byval-struct-ptr.rs` and then adds a new `transparent-opaque-ptr.rs` for aarch64.
Things like `padding_needed_for` are current implemented being super careful to handle things like `Layout::size` potentially being `usize::MAX`.
But now that 95295 has happened, that's no longer a concern. It's possible to add two `Layout::size`s together without risking overflow now.
So take advantage of that to remove a bunch of checked math that's not actually needed. For example, the round-up-and-add-next-size in `extend` doesn't need any overflow checks at all, just the final check for compatibility with the alignment.
(And while I was doing that I made it all unstably const, because there's nothing in `Layout` that's fundamentally runtime-only.)
Fix circular fn_sig queries to correct number of args for methods
Fixes#130400. This was a [debug assert](28e8f01c2a/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/checks.rs (L2557)) added to some argument error reporting code in #129320 which verified that the number of params (from the HIR) matched the `matched_inputs` which ultimately come from ty::FnSig. In the reduced test case:
```
fn foo(&mut self) -> _ {
foo()
}
```
There is a circular dependency computing the ty::FnSig -- when trying to compute it, we try to figure out the return value, which again depends on this ty::FnSig. In #105162, this was supported by short-circuiting the cycle by synthesizing a FnSig with error types for parameters. The [code in question](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/105162/files#diff-a65feec6bfffb19fbdc60a80becd1030c82a56c16b177182cd277478fdb04592R44) computes the number of parameters by taking the number of parameters from the hir::FnDecl and adding 1 if there is an implicit self parameter.
I might be missing a subtlety here, but AFAICT the adjustment for implicit self args is unnecessary and results in one too many args. For example, for this non-errorful code:
```
trait Foo {
fn bar(&self) {}
}
```
The resulting hir::FnDecl and ty::FnSig both have the same number of inputs -- 1. So, this PR removes that adjustment and adds a test for the debug ICE.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Implement a Method to Seal `DiagInner`'s Suggestions
This PR adds a method on `DiagInner` called `.seal_suggestions()` to prevent new suggestions from being added while preserving existing suggestions.
This is useful because currently there is no way to prevent new suggestions from being added to a diagnostic. `.disable_suggestions()` is the closest but it gets rid of all suggestions before and after the call.
Therefore, `.seal_suggestions()` can be used when, for example, misspelled keyword is detected and reported. In such cases, we may want to prevent other suggestions from being added to the diagnostic, as they would likely be meaningless once the misspelled keyword is identified. For context: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/129899#discussion_r1741307132
To store an additional state, the type of the `suggestions` field in `DiagInner` was changed into a three variant enum. While this change affects files across different crates, care was taken to preserve the existing code's semantics. This is validated by the fact that all UI tests pass without any modifications.
r? chenyukang
tests: allow trunc/select instructions to be missing
On LLVM 20, these instructions already get eliminated, which at least partially satisfies a TODO. I'm not talented enough at using FileCheck to try and constrain this further, but if we really want to we could copy an LLVM 20 specific version of this test that would restore it to being CHECK-NEXT: insertvalue ...
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@DianQK`
Remove redundant test typeid equality by subtyping
This known-bug label was a left over on #118247
r? `@jackh726`
This doesn't address #110395, I didn't investigate about it yet.
Remove uneeded PartialOrd bound in cmp::Ord::clamp
There is a `Self: PartialOrd` bound in `Ord::clamp`, but it is already required by the trait itself. Likely a left-over from the const trait deletion in 76dbe29104.
Reported-by: `@noeensarguet`
There is a Self: PartialOrd bound in Ord::clamp, but it is already
required by the trait itself. Likely a left-over from the const trait
deletion in 76dbe29104.
Reported-by: @noeensarguet
Update Trusty target maintainers
Remove Stephen Crane from the list of Trusty target maintainers and add Andrei Homescu (`@ahomescu)` and Chris Wailes.
Add new_cyclic_in for Rc and Arc
Currently, new_cyclic_in does not exist for Rc and Arc. This is an oversight according to https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/132.
This PR adds new_cyclic_in for Rc and Arc. The implementation is almost the exact same as new_cyclic with some small differences to make it allocator-specific. new_cyclic's implementation has been replaced with a call to `new_cyclic_in(data_fn, Global)`.
Remaining questions:
* ~~Is requiring Allocator to be Clone OK? According to https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/88, Allocators should be cheap to clone. I'm just hesitant to add unnecessary constraints, though I don't see an obvious workaround for this function since many called functions in new_cyclic_in expect an owned Allocator. I see Allocator.by_ref() as an option, but that doesn't work on when creating Weak { ptr: init_ptr, alloc: alloc.clone() }, because the type of Weak then becomes Weak<T, &A> which is incompatible.~~ Fixed, thank you `@zakarumych!` This PR no longer requires the allocator to be Clone.
* Currently, new_cyclic_in's documentation is almost entirely copy-pasted from new_cyclic, with minor tweaks to make it more accurate (e.g. Rc<T> -> Rc<T, A>). The example section is removed to mitigate redundancy and instead redirects to cyclic_in. Is this appropriate?
* ~~The comments in new_cyclic_in (and much of the implementation) are also copy-pasted from new_cyclic. Would it be better to make a helper method new_cyclic_in_internal that both functions call, with either Global or the custom allocator? I'm not sure if that's even possible, since the internal method would have to return Arc<T, Global> and I don't know if it's possible to "downcast" that to an Arc<T>. Maybe transmute would work here?~~ Done, thanks `@zakarumych`
* Arc::new_cyclic is #[inline], but Rc::new_cyclic is not. Which is preferred?
* nit: does it matter where in the impl block new_cyclic_in is defined?
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #128535 (Format `std::env::consts` docstrings with markdown backticks)
- #128961 (Fix#128930: Print documentation of CLI options missing their arg)
- #129988 (Use `Vec` in `rustc_interface::Config::locale_resources`)
- #130201 (Encode `coroutine_by_move_body_def_id` in crate metadata)
- #130275 (Don't call `extern_crate` when local crate name is the same as a dependency and we have a trait error)
- #130314 (Use the same precedence for all macro-like exprs)
- #130440 (Don't ICE in `opaque_hidden_inferred_bound` lint for RPITIT in trait with no default method body)
- #130458 (`rustc_codegen_ssa` cleanups)
- #130469 (Mark `where_clauses_object_safety` as removed)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
