lldb: avoid mixing "Hit breakpoint" message with other output.
This is to get `src/test/debuginfo/lexical-scopes-in-block-expression.rs` working.
It used to work like a week ago, and the main change that happened was I switched from Python 2 to Python 3 (I don't remember why, but I did get rid of the build dir entirely, and it fixed something else).
The error was:
```
error: line not found in debugger output: [...]$27 = 10
```
Relevant part of the output:
```
print val
(long) $26 = 15
print ten
(long) $27 = 10 Hit breakpoint 15.1: where = a`lexical_scopes_in_block_expression::main::hcdd5c3caa9166e73 + 1223 at lexical-scopes-in-block-expression.rs:504:4, address = 0x00005555555556e7, resolved, hit count = 1
Hit breakpoint 16.1: where = a`lexical_scopes_in_block_expression::main::hcdd5c3caa9166e73 + 631 at lexical-scopes-in-block-expression.rs:510:8, address = 0x0000555555555497, resolved, hit count = 1
```
There are most `print` commands and their outputs before, and more `Hit breakpoint` messages afterwards, so I assume what happens is the `Hit breakpoint` messages should be interleaved but somehow they ended up being buffered after all of the other output.
As a stopgap measure I'm adding a newline before each `Hit breakpoint` so they don't end up on the same line as the last `print` output (which breaks our pattern-matching).
r? @michaelwoerister
test/c-variadic: Fix patterns on powerpc64
On architectures such as powerpc64 that use extend_integer_width_to in
their C ABI processing, integer parameters shorter than the native
register width will be annotated with the ArgAttribute::SExt or
ArgAttribute::ZExt attribute, and that attribute will be included in the
generated LLVM IR.
In this test, all relevant parameters are `i32`, which will get the
`signext` annotation on the relevant 64-bit architectures. Match both
the annotated and non-annotated case, but enforce that the annotation is
applied consistently.
Make `abs`, `wrapping_abs`, `overflowing_abs` const functions
This makes `abs`, `wrapping_abs` and `overflowing_abs` const functions like #58044 makes `wrapping_neg` and `overflowing_neg` const functions.
`abs` is made const by returning `(self ^ -1) - -1` = `!self + 1` = `-self` for negative numbers and `(self ^ 0) - 0` = `self` for non-negative numbers. The subexpression `self >> ($BITS - 1)` evaluates to `-1` for negative numbers and `0` otherwise. The subtraction overflows when `self` is `min_value()`, as we would be subtracting `max_value() - -1`; this is when `abs` should overflow.
`wrapping_abs` and `overflowing_abs` make use of `wrapping_sub` and `overflowing_sub` instead of the subtraction operator.
This commit changes the HIR lowering around `await` so that temporary
lifetimes are extended. Previously, await was lowered as:
```rust
{
let mut pinned = future;
loop {
match ::std::future::poll_with_tls_context(unsafe {
<::std::pin::Pin>::new_unchecked(&mut pinned)
}) {
::std::task::Poll::Ready(result) => break result,
::std::task::Poll::Pending => {}
}
yield ();
}
}
```
With this commit, await is lowered as:
```rust
match future {
mut pinned => loop {
match ::std::future::poll_with_tls_context(unsafe {
<::std::pin::Pin>::new_unchecked(&mut pinned)
}) {
::std::task::Poll::Ready(result) => break result,
::std::task::Poll::Pending => {}
}
yield ();
}
}
```
However, this change has the following side-effects:
- All temporaries in future will be considered to live across a
yield for the purpose of auto-traits.
- Borrowed temporaries in future are likely to be considered to be live
across the yield for the purpose of the generator transform.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
On architectures such as powerpc64 that use extend_integer_width_to in
their C ABI processing, integer parameters shorter than the native
register width will be annotated with the ArgAttribute::SExt or
ArgAttribute::ZExt attribute, and that attribute will be included in the
generated LLVM IR.
In this test, all relevant parameters are `i32`, which will get the
`signext` annotation on the relevant 64-bit architectures. Match both
the annotated and non-annotated case, but enforce that the annotation is
applied consistently.
Update version of `rustc-std-workspace-*` crates
This commit updates the version of the `rustc-std-workspace-*` crates
in-tree which are used in `[patch]`. This will guarantee that Cargo will
select these versions even if minor updates are published to crates.io
because otherwise a newer version on crates.io would be preferred which
misses the point of `[patch]`!
This commit updates the version of the `rustc-std-workspace-*` crates
in-tree which are used in `[patch]`. This will guarantee that Cargo will
select these versions even if minor updates are published to crates.io
because otherwise a newer version on crates.io would be preferred which
misses the point of `[patch]`!
Unify escape usage
Fixes#63443.
I chose to keep the search text when pressing escape so when we focus on the search bar, we got the results again without needing to load them again. I also unified a bit a few things (maybe I should have done it in another commit, sorry...).
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
Override `StepBy::{try_fold, try_rfold}`
Previous PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51435
The previous PR was closed in favor of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51601, which was later reverted. I don't think these implementations will make it harder to specialize `StepBy<Range<_>>` later, so we should be able to land this without any consequences.
This should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/57517 – in my benchmarks `iter` and `iter.step_by(1)` now perform equally well, provided internal iteration is used.
Resolve attributes in several places
Resolve attributes for Arm, Field, FieldPat, GenericParam, Param, StructField and Variant.
This PR is based on @petrochenkov work located at 83fdb8d598.
Stabilize `bind_by_move_pattern_guards` in Rust 1.39.0
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15287.
After stabilizing `#![feature(bind_by_move_pattern_guards)]`, you can now use bind-by-move bindings in patterns and take references to those bindings in `if` guards of `match` expressions. For example, the following now becomes legal:
```rust
fn main() {
let array: Box<[u8; 4]> = Box::new([1, 2, 3, 4]);
match array {
nums
// ---- `nums` is bound by move.
if nums.iter().sum::<u8>() == 10
// ^------ `.iter()` implicitly takes a reference to `nums`.
=> {
drop(nums);
// --------- Legal as `nums` was bound by move and so we have ownership.
}
_ => unreachable!(),
}
}
```
r? @matthewjasper
