Don't ICE when no bound vars found while doing closure hir type check
The problem was that we were not visiting the const generic default argument in a bound where predicate when the HIR gets traversed in hir_analysis -> collect -> resolve_bound_vars.
Fixes [112574](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/112574)
Update crates for better MIPS R6 support
Update crates to remove dependency on old versions of rustix and linux-raw-sys. Update libc, rustix, and linux-raw-sys to enhance support for MIPS R6 introduced by #112374
Commands that do the update:
```shell
cargo +nightly update tempfile clap
cargo +nightly update linux-raw-sys rustix
```
Move `llvm.x86.*` shims into `shims::x86` and implement `_addcarry_u32` and `_subborrow_u{32,64}`
This PR moves all `llvm.x86.*` shims into `shims::x86` and adds `llvm.x86.addcarry.32`, `llvm.x86.subborrow.32` and `llvm.x86.subborrow.64`.
Additionally, it fixes the input carry semantics of `llvm.x86.addcarry.32`. The input carry is an 8-bit value that is interpreted as 1 when it is non-zero.
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/docs/cpp-compiler/developer-guide-reference/2021-8/addcarry-u32-addcarry-u64.html
Add assembly test to make sure that inlining works as expected when closures inherit target features
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/108338 (the added test proves that it is working correctly)
Clarify example in `Pin::new_unchecked` docs
This example in the docs of `Pin::new_unchecked` puzzled me for a relatively long time. Now I understand that it comes down to the difference between dropping the `Pin` vs dropping the pinned value.
I have extended the explanation to highlight this difference. In my opinion it is clearer now, and I hope it helps others understand `Pin` better.
fix OS-specific I/O safety docs since the io_safety feature is stable
Looks like this text was forgotten to be updated when `io_safety` got stabilized: it still says "once the io_safety feature is stable".
Also adjust the wording a bit for how these docs relate to the general concept of I/O safety.
Add OwnedTargetMachine to manage llvm:TargetMachine
LLVMRustDisposeTargetMachine taking a &mut could be undefined behaviour.
Wrapping it with a struct and using pointers instead avoids this problem.
In addition the TargetMachine is now automatically freed via the Wrappers drop impl. This should fix some memory leaks when
create_informational_target_machine was used, e.g. 327e6cf55c/compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/llvm_util.rs (L291-L314)
r? `@Nilstrieb`
Rename the legacy feature gating macro
It had a really confusing name by shadowing the previous name, which has
caused issues in the past where people added their new syntax in the
legacy location.
This makes it clear.
Also adds a comment about the return type notation gating, which confused me why it was here at first before `@compiler-errors` told me why.
Fix debug printing of tuple
Self-explanatory. Didn't create a UI test, but I guess I could -- not sure where debug output shows up in rustc_attrs to make a sufficient test, tho.
Add Zba, Zbb, and Zbs as target features for riscv64-linux-android
This pull request adds the Zba, Zbb, and Zbs target features to the `riscv64-linux-android` target specification. These features have been enabled and tested internally in Android infrastructure.
Add Minimal Std implementation for UEFI
# Implemented modules:
1. alloc
2. os_str
3. env
4. math
# Related Links
Tracking Issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100499
API Change Proposal: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/87
# Additional Information
This was originally part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100316. Since that PR was becoming too unwieldy and cluttered, and with suggestion from `@dvdhrm,` I have extracted a minimal std implementation to this PR.
The example in `src/doc/rustc/src/platform-support/unknown-uefi.md` has been tested for `x86_64-unknown-uefi` and `i686-unknown-uefi` in OVMF. It would be great if someone more familiar with AARCH64 can help with testing for that target.
Signed-off-by: Ayush Singh <ayushsingh1325@gmail.com>
It had a really confusing name by shadowing the previous name, which has
caused issues in the past where people added their new syntax in the
legacy location.
This makes it clear.
Document panics on unsigned wrapping_div/rem calls (#116063)
Add missing `# Panics` sections to the `uint_impl!` macro, documenting that the `wrapping_rem/div` calls will panic if passed zero.
Add the `cfg_match!` macro
# Movitation
Adds a match-like version of the `cfg_if` crate without a RFC [for the same reasons that caused `matches!` to be included in the standard library](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/65479).
* General-purpose (not domain-specific)
* Simple (the implementation is short) and useful (things can become difficult with several `cfg`s)
* Very popular [on crates.io ](https://crates.io/crates/cfg-if) (currently 3th in all-time downloads)
* The two previous points combined make it number three in [left-pad index](https://twitter.com/bascule/status/1184523027888988160) score
```rust
match_cfg! {
cfg(unix) => {
fn foo() { /* unix specific functionality */ }
}
cfg(target_pointer_width = "32") => {
fn foo() { /* non-unix, 32-bit functionality */ }
}
_ => {
fn foo() { /* fallback implementation */ }
}
}
```
# Considerations
A match-like syntax feels more natural in the sense that each macro fragment resembles an arm but I personally don't mind switching to any other desired syntax.
The lack of `#[ ... ]` is intended to reduce typing, nevertheless, the same reasoning described above can also be applied to this aspect.
Since blocks are intended to only contain items, anything but `cfg` is not expected to be supported at the current or future time.
~~Credits goes to `@gnzlbg` because most of the code was shamelessly copied from https://github.com/gnzlbg/match_cfg.~~
Credits goes to `@alexcrichton` because most of the code was shamelessly copied from https://github.com/rust-lang/cfg-if.
Raise minimum supported Apple OS versions
This implements the proposal to raise the minimum supported Apple OS versions as laid out in the now-completed MCP (https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/556).
As of this PR, rustc and the stdlib now support these versions as the baseline:
- macOS: 10.12 Sierra
- iOS: 10
- tvOS: 10
- watchOS: 5 (Unchanged)
In addition to everything this breaks indirectly, these changes also erase the `armv7-apple-ios` target (currently tier 3) because the oldest supported iOS device now uses ARMv7s. Not sure what the policy around tier3 target removal is but shimming it is not an option due to the linker refusing.
[Per comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/556#issuecomment-1297175073), this requires a FCP to merge. cc `@wesleywiser.`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #116073 (Allow higher-ranked fn sigs in `ValuePairs`)
- #116082 (Tweak expected message to explain what it's actually signifying)
- #116086 (More accurate suggestion for `self.` and `Self::`)
- #116104 (Reuse calculate_debuginfo_offset for fragments.)
- #116106 (Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Migrate GUI colors test to original CSS color format
Follow-up of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/111459.
And with this one I'm finally done with this migration.
r? ``@notriddle``
More accurate suggestion for `self.` and `Self::`
Detect that we can't suggest `self.` in an associated function without `&self` receiver.
Partially address #115992.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
