```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `{gen block@$DIR/gen_block_is_coro.rs:7:5: 7:8}: Coroutine` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/gen_block_is_coro.rs:6:13
|
LL | fn foo() -> impl Coroutine<Yield = u32, Return = ()> {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Coroutine` is not implemented for `{gen block@$DIR/gen_block_is_coro.rs:7:5: 7:8}`
LL | gen { yield 42 }
| ---------------- return type was inferred to be `{gen block@$DIR/gen_block_is_coro.rs:7:5: 7:8}` here
```
The secondary span label is new.
When a trait is not implemented for a type, but there *is* an `impl`
for another type or different trait params, we format the output to
use highlighting in the same way that E0308 does for types.
The logic accounts for 3 cases:
- When both the type and trait in the expected predicate and the candidate are different
- When only the types are different
- When only the trait generic params are different
For each case, we use slightly different formatting and wording.
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #131829 (Remove support for `-Zprofile` (gcov-style coverage instrumentation))
- #132369 (style-guide: Only use the new binop heuristic for assignments)
- #132383 (Implement suggestion for never type fallback lints)
- #132413 (update offset_of! docs to reflect the stabilization of nesting)
- #132438 (Remove unncessary option for default rust-analyzer setting)
- #132439 (Add `f16` and `f128` to `invalid_nan_comparison`)
- #132444 (rustdoc: Directly use rustc_abi instead of reexports)
- #132445 (Cleanup attributes around unchecked shifts and unchecked negation in const)
- #132448 (Add missing backtick)
- #132450 (Show actual MIR when MIR building forgot to terminate block)
- #132451 (remove some unnecessary rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable)
- #132455 (make const_alloc_layout feature gate only about functions that are already stable)
- #132456 (Move remaining inline assembly test files into asm directory)
- #132459 (feat(byte_sub_ptr): unstably add ptr::byte_sub_ptr)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
feat(byte_sub_ptr): unstably add ptr::byte_sub_ptr
This is an API that naturally should exist as a combination of byte_offset_from and sub_ptr
both existing (they showed up at similar times so this union was never made). Adding these
is a logical (and perhaps final) precondition of stabilizing ptr_sub_ptr (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95892).
Original PR by ``@Gankra`` (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121919), I am just reviving it. The 2nd commit (with a small docs tweak) is by me.
Move remaining inline assembly test files into asm directory
Before:
```
tests/assembly/asm/*
tests/assembly/asm-comments.rs
tests/codegen/asm-target-clobbers.rs
tests/codegen/asm-goto.rs
tests/codegen/asm-maybe-uninit.rs
tests/codegen/asm-msp430-clobbers.rs
tests/codegen/asm-options.rs
tests/codegen/asm-clobbers.rs
tests/codegen/asm-may_unwind.rs
tests/codegen/asm-arm64ec-clobbers.rs
tests/codegen/asm-powerpc-clobbers.rs
tests/codegen/asm-sanitize-llvm.rs
tests/codegen/asm-s390x-clobbers.rs
tests/codegen/asm-clobber_abi.rs
tests/codegen/asm-multiple-options.rs
tests/codegen/global_asm.rs
tests/codegen/global_asm_include.rs
tests/codegen/global_asm_x2.rs
tests/ui/asm/*
```
After:
```
tests/assembly/asm/*
tests/codegen/asm/*
tests/ui/asm/*
```
I moved the remaining standalone test files into the asm directory, and then either removed the "asm-" suffix or for x86-specific registers tests replaced the "asm-" suffix with the "x86-" suffix.
(Then I noticed that there is no test for clobber_abi for already stabilized aarch64, arm, riscv, and loongarch64 asm... I don't believe there is a problem like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/131332, but I plan to add tests for them later.)
r? ``@Amanieu``
``@rustbot`` label +A-inline-assembly
make const_alloc_layout feature gate only about functions that are already stable
The const_alloc_layout feature gate has two kinds of functions: those that are stable, but not yet const-stable, and those that are fully unstable.
I think we should split that up. So this PR makes const_alloc_layout just about functions that are already stable but waiting for const-stability; all the other functions now have their constness guarded by the gate that also guards their regular stability.
Cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67521
remove some unnecessary rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable
These are either unstable functions that don't need the attribute, or the attribute refers to a feature that is already stable.
Cleanup attributes around unchecked shifts and unchecked negation in const
The underlying intrinsic is marked as "safe to expose on stable", so we shouldn't need any `rustc_allow_const_fn_unstable(unchecked_shifts)` anywhere. However, bootstrap rustc doesn't yet have the new const stability checks, so these changes only apply under `cfg(not(bootstrap))`.
rustdoc: Directly use rustc_abi instead of reexports
rustc_target reexports a lot of things that are in rustc_abi, but that will be over soon and now is probably a good time to switch. Uses of rustc_target remain where they inquire about the target tuple.
Add `f16` and `f128` to `invalid_nan_comparison`
Currently `f32_nan` and `f64_nan` are used to provide the `invalid_nan_comparison` lint. Since we have `f16_nan` and `f128_nan`, hook these up so the new float types get the same lints.
Implement suggestion for never type fallback lints
r? ```@WaffleLapkin```
Just opening this up for vibes; it's not done yet. I'd still like to make this suggestable in a few more cases before merge:
- [x] Try to annotate `_` -> `()`
- [x] Try to annotate local variables if they're un-annotated: `let x = ...` -> `let x: () = ...`
- [x] Try to annotate the self type of a `Trait::method()` -> `<() as Trait>::method()`.
The only other case we may want to suggest is a missing turbofish, like `f()` -> `f::<()>()`. That may be possible, but seems overly annoying.
This partly addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/132358; the other half of fixing that would be to make the error message a bit better, perhaps just special casing the `?` operator 🤔 I don't think I'll do that part.
Remove support for `-Zprofile` (gcov-style coverage instrumentation)
Tracking issue: #42524
MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/798
---
This PR removes the unstable `-Zprofile` flag, which enables ”gcov-style” coverage instrumentation, along with its associated `-Zprofile-emit` configuration flag.
(The profile flag predates and is almost entirely separate from the stable `-Cinstrument-coverage` flag.)
Notably, the `-Zprofile` flag:
- Is largely untested in-tree, having only one run-make test that does not check whether its output is correct or useful.
- Has no known maintainer.
- Has seen no push towards stabilization.
- Has at least one severe regression reported in 2022 that apparently remains unaddressed.
- #100125
- Is confusingly named, since it appears to be more about coverage than performance profiling, and has nothing to do with PGO.
- Is fundamentally limited by relying on counters auto-inserted by LLVM, with no knowledge of Rust beyond debuginfo.
Double-check conditional constness in MIR
To prevent any unchecked `~const` bounds from leaking through during MIR lowering.
If this check fails, it will eventually just delay a bug, but for now it reports errors. That error reporting may be redundant if we're calling it from code that already doesn't allow `~const` (i.e. when the `effects` and `const_trait_impl` gates are disabled), but I don't think it's that big of a deal.
edit: This also makes sure that we issue a const stability error if we encounter *any* function with const conditions when `const_trait_impl` is not enabled. This ensures that that feature remains airtight.
rustc_target reexports a lot of things that are in rustc_abi, but
that will be over soon and now is probably a good time to switch.
Uses of rustc_target remain where they inquire about the target tuple.
Some where clause lowering simplifications
Rename `PredicateFilter::SelfThatDefines` to `PredicateFilter::SelfTraitThatDefines` to make it clear that it's only concerned with converting *traits*, and make it do a bit less work when converting bounds.
Also, make the predicate filter matching in `probe_ty_param_bounds_in_generics` explicit, and simply the args it receives a bit.
This is an API that naturally should exist as a combination of byte_offset_from and sub_ptr
both existing (they showed up at similar times so this union was never made). Adding these
is a logical (and perhaps final) precondition of stabilizing ptr_sub_ptr (#95892).
Remove support for decompressing dylib metadata
We haven't been compressing dylib metadata for a while now. Removing decompression support will regress error messages about an incompatible rustc version being used, but dylibs are pretty rare anyway.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/18451
Use protected visibility when building rustc with LLD
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/782
I wasn't sure about having two commits in a PR, but I figured, at least initially it might make sense to discuss these commits together. Happy to squash, or move the second commit to a separate PR.
I contemplated trying to enable protected visibility for more cases when LLD will be used other than just `-Zlinker-features=+lld`, but that would be more a complex change that probably still wouldn't cover all cases when LLD is used, so went with the simplest option of just checking if the linker-feature is enabled.
r? lqd
Currently `f32_nan` and `f64_nan` are used to provide the
`invalid_nan_comparison` lint. Since we have `f16_nan` and `f128_nan`,
hook these up so the new float types get the same lints.
llvm: Match new LLVM 128-bit integer alignment on sparc
LLVM continues to align more 128-bit integers to 128-bits in the data layout rather than relying on the high level language to do it. Update SPARC target files to match and add a backcompat replacement for current LLVMs.
See llvm/llvm-project#106951 for details
`@rustbot` label: +llvm-main
r? `@durin42`
(Please wait for the LLVM CI to come back before approving), creating this PR to get it tested there.
Remove `""` case from RISC-V `llvm_abiname` match statement
For RISC-V, `""` isn't the always the same ABI as `"ilp32"`/`"lp64"` (`""` means LLVM will infer the ABI based on the enabled target features), but `create_object_file` currently assumes that it is. Since all RISC-V targets explicitly specify their ABI since #131807, this PR removes `""` from the match arm's pattern (meaning an empty string will now fall through to the `_ => bug!` arm).
r? `@workingjubilee`
macOS: Document the difference between Clang's `-darwin` and `-macosx` targets
`rustc`'s `*-apple-darwin` targets are badly named (they should've been called `*-apple-macos`), and this causes confusion wrt. the similarly named but somewhat incompatible Clang targets.
So let's document the difference to at least make things a _little_ easier on our users.
``@rustbot`` label O-macos A-docs
continue `TypingMode` refactor
There are still quite a few places which (indirectly) rely on the `Reveal` of a `ParamEnv`, but we're slowly getting there
r? `@compiler-errors`
compiler: Move `rustc_target::spec::abi::Abi` to `rustc_abi::ExternAbi`
Lift `enum Abi` from its rather odd place in the middle of rustc_target, and make it available again from rustc_abi. You know, the crate where you would expect the enum that describes all the ABIs to be? The platform-neutral ones, at least. This will help further refactoring of how we handle ABIs in the near future[^0].
Rename `Abi` to `ExternAbi` because quite a lot of the compiler overloads the concept of "ABI" enough that the existing name is imprecise and it is often renamed _anyway_. Often this was to avoid conflicts with the *other* type formerly known as `Abi` (now named BackendRepr[^1]), but sometimes it is just for clarity, and this name seems more self-explanatory. It does get reexported, though, using its old name, to reduce the odds of merge-conflicting over the entire tree.
All of `ExternAbi`'s friends come along for the ride, which costs adding some optional dependencies to the rustc_abi crate. However, all of this also allows simply moving three crates entirely off rustc_target:
- rustc_hir_pretty
- rustc_lint_defs
- rustc_mir_build
This odd selection is mostly to demonstrate a secondary motivation: The majority of the front-end of the compiler should be as target-agnostic as possible, and it is easier to assure this if they simply don't depend on the crate that describes targets. Note that I didn't migrate crates that don't benefit from it in this way yet, and I didn't survey every last crate.
[^0]: This is being undertaken as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119183
[^1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132246
