Triagebot: Consolidate the T-compiler ad hoc assignment groups
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/757
1. Inline compiler-team and compiler-team-contributors into compiler
2. Sort members alphabetically
Proper support for cross-crate recursive const stability checks
~~Stacked on top of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132492; only the last three commits are new.~~
In a crate without `staged_api` but with `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked`, we now subject all functions marked with `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` to recursive const stability checks. We require an opt-in so that by default, a crate can be built with `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked` and use nightly features as usual. This property is recorded in the crate metadata so when a `staged_api` crate calls such a function, it sees the `#[rustc_const_stable_indirect]` and allows it to be exposed on stable. This, finally, will let us expose `const fn` from hashbrown on stable.
The second commit makes const stability more like regular stability: via `check_missing_const_stability`, we ensure that all publicly reachable functions have a const stability attribute -- both in `staged_api` crates and `-Zforce-unstable-if-unmarked` crates. To achieve this, we move around the stability computation so that const stability is computed after regular stability is done. This lets us access the final result of the regular stability computation, which we use so that `const fn` can inherit the regular stability (but only if that is "unstable"). Fortunately, this lets us get rid of an `Option` in `ConstStability`.
This is the last PR that I have planned in this series.
r? `@compiler-errors`
move all mono-time checks into their own folder, and their own query
The mono item collector currently also drives two mono-time checks: the lint for "large moves", and the check whether function calls are done with all the required target features.
Instead of doing this "inside" the collector, this PR refactors things so that we have a new `rustc_monomorphize::mono_checks` module providing a per-instance query that does these checks. We already have a per-instance query for the ABI checks, so this should be "free" for incremental builds. Non-incremental builds might do a bit more work now since we now have two separate MIR visits (in the collector and the mono-time checks) -- but one of them is cached in case the MIR doesn't change, which is nice.
This slightly changes behavior of the large-move check since the "move_size_spans" deduplication logic now only works per-instance, not globally across the entire collector.
Cc `@saethlin` since you're also doing some work related to queries and caching and monomorphization, though I don't know if there's any interaction here.
Make sure to ignore elided lifetimes when pointing at args for fulfillment errors
See the comment I left in the code.
---
If we have something like:
```
fn foo<'a, T: 'a + BoundThatIsNotSatisfied>() {}
```
And the user turbofishes just the type args:
```
foo::<()>();
```
Then if we try pointing at `()` (i.e. the type argument for `T`), we don't actually consider the possibility that the lifetimes may have been left out of the turbofish. We try indexing incorrectly into the HIR args, and bail on the suggestion.
Consolidate type system const evaluation under `traits::evaluate_const`
Part of #130704Fixes#128232Fixes#118545
Removes `ty::Const::{normalize_internal, eval_valtree}` and `InferCtxt::(try_)const_eval_resolve`, consolidating the associated logic into `evaluate_const` in `rustc_trait_selection`. This results in an API for `ty::Const` that is free of any normalization/evaluation functions that would be incorrect to use under `min_generic_const_args`/`associated_const_equality`/`generic_const_exprs` or, more generally, that would be incorrect to use in the presence of generic type system constants.
Moving this logic to `rustc_trait_selection` and out of `rustc_middle` is also a pre-requisite for ensuring that we do not evaluate constants whose where clauses do not hold.
From this point it should be relatively simple (hah) to implement more complex normalization of type system constants such as: checking wf'ness before invoking CTFE machinery, or being able to normalize const aliases that still refer to generic parameters.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Update grammar in std::cell docs.
Using "having" in both the leading sentence and the bullets is unnecessary.
It makes it read as "it is only possible to have having several immutable...".
test(configure): cover `parse_args` in `src/bootstrap/configure.py`
I was reading `src/bootstrap/configure.py` and `parse_args` function there seems complex. So I added some tests to cover it and prevent regressions.
Feature gate yield expressions not in 2024
This changes it so that yield expressions are no longer allowed in the 2024 edition without a feature gate. We are currently only reserving the `gen` keyword in the 2024 edition, and not allowing anything else to be implicitly enabled by the edition.
In practice this doesn't have a significant difference since yield expressions can't really be used outside of coroutines or gen blocks, which have their own feature gates. However, it does affect what is accepted pre-expansion, and I would feel more comfortable not allowing yield expressions.
I believe the stabilization process for gen blocks or coroutines will not need to check the edition here, so this shouldn't ever be needed.
Remove attributes from generics in built-in derive macros
Related issue #132561
Removes all attributes from generics in the expanded implementations of built-in derive macros.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #132487 (Provide placeholder generics for traits in "no method found for type parameter" suggestions)
- #132627 (cleanup: Remove outdated comment of `thir_body`)
- #132653 (Don't use `maybe_unwrap_block` when checking for macro calls in a block expr)
- #132793 (Update mdbook to 0.4.42)
- #132847 (elem_offset / subslice_range: use addr() instead of 'as usize')
- #132869 (split up the first paragraph of doc comments for better summaries)
- #132929 (Check for null in the `alloc_zeroed` example)
- #132933 (Make sure that we suggest turbofishing the right type arg for never suggestion)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Make sure that we suggest turbofishing the right type arg for never suggestion
I had a bug where rust would suggest the wrong arg to turbofish `()` if there were any early-bound lifetimes...
r? WaffleLapkin
split up the first paragraph of doc comments for better summaries
used `./x clippy -Aclippy::all '-Wclippy::too_long_first_doc_paragraph' library/core library/alloc` to find these issues.
Update mdbook to 0.4.42
This updates mdbook to 0.4.42
Changelog: https://github.com/rust-lang/mdBook/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#mdbook-0441
There were some significant changes that I would like to get early testing on.
This also updates rust-by-example which was required due to an update to the theme file.
Don't use `maybe_unwrap_block` when checking for macro calls in a block expr
Fixes#131915
Using `maybe_unwrap_block` to determine if we are looking at a `{ mac_call!{} }` will fail sometimes as `mac_call!{}` could be a `StmtKind::MacCall` not a `StmtKind::Expr`. This caused the def collector to think that `{ mac_call!{} }` was a non-trivial const argument and create a definition for it even though it should not.
r? `@compiler-errors` cc `@camelid`
cleanup: Remove outdated comment of `thir_body`
When typeck fails, `thir_body` returns `ErrorGuaranteed` rather than empty body.
No other code follows this outdated description except `check_unsafety`, which is also cleaned up in this PR.
Provide placeholder generics for traits in "no method found for type parameter" suggestions
In the diagnostics for the error ``no method named `method` found for type parameter `T` in the current scope [E0599]``, the compiler will suggest adding bounds on `T` for traits that define a method named `method`. However, these suggestions didn't include any generic arguments, so applying them would result in a `missing generics for trait` or `missing lifetime specifier` error. This PR adds placeholder arguments to the suggestion in such cases. Specifically, I tried to base the placeholders off of what's done in suggestions for when generics are missing or too few are provided:
- The placeholder for a parameter without a default is the name of the parameter.
- Placeholders are not provided for parameters with defaults.
Placeholder arguments are enclosed in `/*` and `*/`, and the applicability of the suggestion is downgraded to `Applicability::HasPlaceholders` if any placeholders are provided.
Fixes#132407
Add a default implementation for CodegenBackend::link
As a side effect this should add raw-dylib support to cg_gcc as the default ArchiveBuilderBuilder that is used implements create_dll_import_lib. I haven't tested if the raw-dylib support actually works however.
Document some `check_expr` methods, and other misc `hir_typeck` tweaks
Most importantly, make sure that all of the expression checking functions that are called from `check_expr_kind` start with `check_expr_*`. This is super useful to me personally, since I grep these functions all the time, and the ones that *aren't* named consistently are incredibly hard to find.
Also document more of the `check_expr_*` functions, and squash two args for passing data about a call expr into one `Option`.
Arbitrary self types v2: (unused) Receiver trait
This commit contains a new `Receiver` trait, which is the basis for the Arbitrary Self Types v2 RFC. This allows smart pointers to be method receivers even if they're not Deref.
This is currently unused by the compiler - a subsequent PR will start to use this for method resolution if the `arbitrary_self_types` feature gate is enabled. This is being landed first simply to make review simpler: if people feel this should all be in an atomic PR let me know.
This is a part of the arbitrary self types v2 project, https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3519https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44874
r? `@wesleywiser`
Using "having" in both the leading sentence and the bullets is unnecessary.
It makes it read as "it is only possible to have having several immutable...".
