never patterns: suggest `!` patterns on non-exhaustive matches
When a match is non-exhaustive we now suggest never patterns whenever it makes sense.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
pattern analysis: remove `MaybeInfiniteInt::JustAfterMax`
It was inherited from before half-open ranges, but it doesn't pull its weight anymore. We lose a tiny bit of diagnostic precision as can be seen in the test. I'm generally in favor of half-open ranges over explicit `x..=MAX` ranges anyway.
pattern analysis: abort on arity mismatch
This is one more PR replacing panics by `Err()` aborts. I recently audited all the `unwrap()` calls, but I had forgotten about array accesses. (Again [discovered by rust-analyzer](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/16746)).
r? ```@compiler-errors```
Add stubs in IR and ABI for `f16` and `f128`
This is the very first step toward the changes in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114607 and the [`f16` and `f128` RFC](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3453-f16-and-f128.html). It adds the types to `rustc_type_ir::FloatTy` and `rustc_abi::Primitive`, and just propagates those out as `unimplemented!` stubs where necessary.
These types do not parse yet so there is no feature gate, and it should be okay to use `unimplemented!`.
The next steps will probably be AST support with parsing and the feature gate.
r? `@compiler-errors`
cc `@Nilstrieb` suggested breaking the PR up in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120645#issuecomment-1925900572
pattern_analysis: rework how we hide empty private fields
Consider this:
```rust
mod foo {
pub struct Bar {
pub a: bool,
b: !,
}
}
fn match_a_bar(bar: foo::Bar) -> bool {
match bar {
Bar { a, .. } => a,
}
}
```
Because the field `b` is private, matches outside the module are not allowed to observe the fact that `Bar` is empty. In particular `match bar {}` is valid within the module `foo` but an error outside (assuming `exhaustive_patterns`).
We currently handle this by hiding the field `b` when it's both private and empty. This means that the pattern `Bar { a, .. }` is lowered to `Bar(a, _)` if we're inside of `foo` and to `Bar(a)` outside. This involves a bit of a dance to keep field indices straight. But most importantly this makes pattern lowering depend on the module.
In this PR, I instead do nothing special when lowering. Only during analysis do we track whether a place must be skipped.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Overhaul `Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`
Implements the first part of https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/722, which moves functionality and use away from `Diagnostic`, onto `DiagnosticBuilder`.
Likely follow-ups:
- Move things around, because this PR was written to minimize diff size, so some things end up in sub-optimal places. E.g. `DiagnosticBuilder` has impls in both `diagnostic.rs` and `diagnostic_builder.rs`.
- Rename `Diagnostic` as `DiagInner` and `DiagnosticBuilder` as `Diag`.
r? `@davidtwco`
pattern_analysis: Move constructor selection logic to `PlaceInfo`
This is a small refactor PR. There was a dense bit of constructor-related logic in `compute_exhaustiveness_and_usefulness`. I'm moving it out into a `PlaceInfo` method to make it easier to follow both separately. I also have plans that will complicate it further so it's good that it's somewhat encapsulated.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Currently many diagnostic modifier methods are available on both
`Diagnostic` and `DiagnosticBuilder`. This commit removes most of them
from `Diagnostic`. To minimize the diff size, it keeps them within
`diagnostic.rs` but changes the surrounding `impl Diagnostic` block to
`impl DiagnosticBuilder`. (I intend to move things around later, to give
a more sensible code layout.)
`Diagnostic` keeps a few methods that it still needs, like `sub`,
`arg`, and `replace_args`.
The `forward!` macro, which defined two additional methods per call
(e.g. `note` and `with_note`), is replaced by the `with_fn!` macro,
which defines one additional method per call (e.g. `with_note`). It's
now also only used when necessary -- not all modifier methods currently
need a `with_*` form. (New ones can be easily added as necessary.)
All this also requires changing `trait AddToDiagnostic` so its methods
take `DiagnosticBuilder` instead of `Diagnostic`, which leads to many
mechanical changes. `SubdiagnosticMessageOp` gains a type parameter `G`.
There are three subdiagnostics -- `DelayedAtWithoutNewline`,
`DelayedAtWithNewline`, and `InvalidFlushedDelayedDiagnosticLevel` --
that are created within the diagnostics machinery and appended to
external diagnostics. These are handled at the `Diagnostic` level, which
means it's now hard to construct them via `derive(Diagnostic)`, so
instead we construct them by hand. This has no effect on what they look
like when printed.
There are lots of new `allow` markers for `untranslatable_diagnostics`
and `diagnostics_outside_of_impl`. This is because
`#[rustc_lint_diagnostics]` annotations were present on the `Diagnostic`
modifier methods, but missing from the `DiagnosticBuilder` modifier
methods. They're now present.
pattern_analysis: track usefulness without interior mutability
Because of or-patterns, exhaustiveness needs to be able to lint if a sub-pattern is redundant, e.g. in `Some(_) | Some(true)`. So far the only sane solution I had found was interior mutability. This is a bit of an abstraction leak, and would become a footgun if we ever reused the same `DeconstructedPat`. This PR replaces interior mutability with an address-indexed hashmap, which is logically equivalent.
Invert diagnostic lints.
That is, change `diagnostic_outside_of_impl` and `untranslatable_diagnostic` from `allow` to `deny`, because more than half of the compiler has been converted to use translated diagnostics.
This commit removes more `deny` attributes than it adds `allow` attributes, which proves that this change is warranted.
r? ````@davidtwco````
Remove unused args from functions
`#[instrument]` suppresses the unused arguments from a function, *and* suppresses unused methods too! This PR removes things which are only used via `#[instrument]` calls, and fixes some other errors (privacy?) that I will comment inline.
It's possible that some of these arguments were being passed in for the purposes of being instrumented, but I am unconvinced by most of them.
