Use `is_global` in `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of`
This manifistated in #90195 with compiler being unable to keep
one candidate for a trait impl, if where is a global impl and more
than one trait bound in the where clause.
Before #87280 `candidate_should_be_dropped_in_favor_of` was using
`TypeFoldable::is_global()` that was enough to discard the two
`ParamCandidate`s. But #87280 changed it to use
`TypeFoldable::is_known_global()` instead, which is pessimistic, so
now the compiler drops the global impl instead (because
`is_known_global` is not sure) and then can't decide between the
two `ParamCandidate`s.
Switching it to use `is_global` again solves the issue.
Fixes#90195.
Improve and test cross-crate hygiene
- Decode the parent expansion for traits and enums in `rustc_resolve`, this was already being used for resolution in typeck
- Avoid suggesting importing names with def-site hygiene, since it's often not useful
- Add more tests
r? `@petrochenkov`
Show all Deref implementations recursively
Fixes#87783.
This is a re-implementation of #80653, so taking the original PR comment:
This changes `rustdoc` to recursively follow `Deref` targets so that methods from all levels are added to the rendered output. This implementation displays the methods from all levels in the expanded state with separate sections for each level.
cc `@camelid`
r? `@jyn514`
Make `core::slice::from_raw_parts[_mut]` const
Responses to #90012 seem to allow ``@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`` to decide on use of `const_eval_select`, so we can make `core::slice::from_raw_parts[_mut]` const :)
---
This PR marks the following APIs as const:
```rust
// core::slice
pub const unsafe fn from_raw_parts<'a, T>(data: *const T, len: usize) -> &'a [T];
pub const unsafe fn from_raw_parts_mut<'a, T>(data: *mut T, len: usize) -> &'a mut [T];
```
---
Resolves#90011
r? ``@oli-obk``
Unify titles in rustdoc book doc attributes chapter
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90339.
I wasn't able to find out where the link to the titles was used so let's see if the CI fails. :)
r? ``@camelid``
Make most std::ops traits const on numeric types
This PR makes existing implementations of `std::ops` traits (`Add`, `Sub`, etc) [`impl const`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/67792) where possible.
This affects:
- All numeric primitives (`u*`, `i*`, `f*`)
- `NonZero*`
- `Wrapping`
This is under the `rustc_const_unstable` feature `const_ops`.
I will write tests once I know what can and can't be kept for the final version of this PR.
Since this is my first PR to rustc (and hopefully one of many), please give me feedback on how to better handle the PR process wherever possible. Thanks
[Zulip discussion](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/Const.20std.3A.3Aops.20traits.20PR)
Automatically convert paths to verbatim for filesystem operations that support it
This allows using longer paths without the user needing to `canonicalize` or manually prefix paths. If the path is already verbatim then this has no effect.
Fixes: #32689
rustdoc: Fix generics generation in search index
The generics were not added to the search index as they should, instead they were added as arguments. I used this opportunity to allow generics to have generics themselves (will come in very handy for my current rewrite of the search engine!).
r? `@jyn514`
Replace some operators in libcore with their short-circuiting equivalents
In libcore there are a few occurrences of bitwise operators used in boolean expressions instead of their short-circuiting equivalents. This makes it harder to perform some kinds of source code analysis over libcore, for example [MC/DC] code coverage (a requirement in safety-critical environments).
This PR aims to remove as many bitwise operators in boolean expressions from libcore as possible, without any performance regression and without other changes. This means not all bitwise operators are removed, only the ones that don't have any difference with their short-circuiting counterparts. This already simplifies achieving MC/DC coverage, and the other functions can be changed in future PRs.
The PR is best reviewed commit-by-commit, and each commit has the resulting assembly in the message.
## Checked integer methods
These methods recently switched to bitwise operators in PRs https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89459 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89351. I confirmed bitwise operators are needed in most of the functions, except these two:
* `{integer}::checked_div` ([Godbolt link (nightly)](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/17efh5jPc))
* `{integer}::checked_rem` ([Godbolt link (nightly)](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/85qGWc94K))
`@tspiteri` already mentioned this was the case in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/89459#issuecomment-932728384, but opted to also switch those two to bitwise operators for consistency. As that makes MC/DC analysis harder this PR proposes switching those two back to short-circuiting operators.
## `{unsigned_ints}::carrying_add`
[Godbolt link (1.56.0)](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/vG9vx8x48)
In this instance replacing the `|` with `||` produces the exact same assembly when optimizations are enabled, so switching to the short-circuiting operator shouldn't have any impact.
## `{unsigned_ints}::borrowing_sub`
[Godbolt link (1.56.0)](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/asEfKaGE4)
In this instance replacing the `|` with `||` produces the exact same assembly when optimizations are enabled, so switching to the short-circuiting operator shouldn't have any impact.
## String UTF-8 validation
[Godbolt link (1.56.0)](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/a4rEbTvvx)
In this instance replacing the `|` with `||` produces practically the same assembly, with the two operands for the "or" swapped:
```asm
; Old
mov rax, qword ptr [rdi + rdx + 8]
or rax, qword ptr [rdi + rdx]
test rax, r9
je .LBB0_7
; New
mov rax, qword ptr [rdi + rdx]
or rax, qword ptr [rdi + rdx + 8]
test rax, r8
je .LBB0_7
```
[MC/DC]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modified_condition/decision_coverage
rustdoc: Switch to mainline rayon
The rustc fork of rayon integrates with Cargo's jobserver to limit the
amount of parallelism. However, rustdoc's use case is concurrent I/O,
which is not CPU-heavy, so it should be able to use mainline rayon.
See [this discussion][1] for more details.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90227#issuecomment-952468618
Note: I chose rayon 1.3.1 so that the rayon version used elsewhere in
the workspace does not change.
r? `@Mark-Simulacrum`
cc `@jyn514`
Use type based qualification for unions
Union field access is currently qualified based on the qualification of
a value previously assigned to the union. At the same time, every union
access transmutes the content of the union, which might result in a
different qualification.
For example, consider constants A and B as defined below, under the
current rules neither contains interior mutability, since a value used
in the initial assignment did not contain `UnsafeCell` constructor.
```rust
#![feature(untagged_unions)]
union U { i: u32, c: std::cell::Cell<u32> }
const A: U = U { i: 0 };
const B: std::cell::Cell<u32> = unsafe { U { i: 0 }.c };
```
To avoid the issue, the changes here propose to consider the content of
a union as opaque and use type based qualification for union types.
Fixes#90268.
`@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
Consider indirect mutation during const qualification dataflow
Previously a local would be qualified if either one of two separate data
flow computations indicated so. First determined if a local could
contain the qualif, but ignored any forms of indirect mutation. Second
determined if a local could be mutably borrowed (and so indirectly
mutated), but which in turn ignored the qualif.
The end result was incorrect because the effect of indirect mutation was
effectivelly ignored in the all but the final stage of computation.
In the new implementation the indirect mutation is directly incorporated
into the qualif data flow. The local variable becomes immediately
qualified once it is mutably borrowed and borrowed place type can
contain the qualif.
In general we will now reject additional programs, program that were
prevously unintentionally accepted.
There are also some cases which are now accepted but were previously
rejected, because previous implementation didn't consider whether
borrowed place could have the qualif under the consideration.
Fixes#90124.
r? `@ecstatic-morse`
Revert "Add rustc lint, warning when iterating over hashmaps"
Fixes perf regressions introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/90235 by temporarily reverting the relevant PR.
Improve perf measurements of `build_extern_trait_impl`
Before, it was only measuring one callsite of `build_impl`, and it
incremented the call count even if `build_impl` returned early because
the `did` was already inlined.
Now, it measures all calls, minus calls that return early.
The rustc fork of rayon integrates with Cargo's jobserver to limit the
amount of parallelism. However, rustdoc's use case is concurrent I/O,
which is not CPU-heavy, so it should be able to use mainline rayon.
See this discussion [1] for more details.
[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/90227#issuecomment-952468618
Note: I chose rayon 1.3.1 so that the rayon version used elsewhere in
the workspace does not change.
Various cleanups around opaque types
Best reviewed commit by commit.
This PR has no functional changes.
Mostly it's moving logic from an extension trait in rustc_trait_selection to inherent impls on rustc_infer.
Remove extra lines in examples for `Duration::try_from_secs_*`
None of the other examples have extra lines below the `#![feature(...)]` statements, so I thought it appropriate that these examples shouldn't either.
Add BorrowSet to public api
This PR adds `BorrowSet` to the public api so that verification tools can obtain the activation and reservation points of two phase borrows without having to redo calculations themselves (and thus potentially differently from rustc).
Turns out we already can obtain `MoveData` thanks to the public `HasMoveData` trait, so constructing a `BorrowSet` should not provide much of an issue. However, I can't speak to the soundness of this approach, is it safe to take an under-approximation of `MoveData`?
r? `@nikomatsakis`
