If all subcandidates have never-pattern, we should assign false_edge_start_block to the parent candidate
if it doesn't have. merge_trivial_subcandidates does so, but if the candidate has guard it returns before the assignment.
Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <tkngsnsk313320@gmail.com>
If all subcandidates have never-pattern, the parent candidate should have otherwise_block
because some methods expect the candidate has the block.
Signed-off-by: Shunpoco <tkngsnsk313320@gmail.com>
When we encounter a constant in a pattern, we check if it is non-structural. If so, we check if the type implements `PartialEq`, but for types with escaping bound vars the check would be incorrect as is, so we break early. This is ok because these types would be filtered anyways.
Fix#134764.
Creating a "trimmed DefID path" when no error is being emitted is an ICE (on purpose). If we create a trimmed path for a lint that is then silenced before being emitted causes a known ICE. This side-steps the issue by always using `with_no_trimmed_path!`.
This was verified to fix https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/, but couldn't write a repro case for the test suite.
Fix#135289.
turn rustc_box into an intrinsic
I am not entirely sure why this was made a special magic attribute, but an intrinsic seems like a more natural way to add magic expressions to the language.
rustc_intrinsic: support functions without body
We synthesize a HIR body `loop {}` but such bodyless intrinsics.
Most of the diff is due to turning `ItemKind::Fn` into a brace (named-field) enum variant, because it carries a `bool`-typed field now. This is to remember whether the function has a body. MIR building panics to avoid ever translating the fake `loop {}` body, and the intrinsic logic uses the lack of a body to implicitly mark that intrinsic as must-be-overridden.
I first tried actually having no body rather than generating the fake body, but there's a *lot* of code that assumes that all function items have HIR and MIR, so this didn't work very well. Then I noticed that even `rustc_intrinsic_must_be_overridden` intrinsics have MIR generated (they are filled with an `Unreachable` terminator) so I guess I am not the first to discover this. ;)
r? `@oli-obk`
Make sure we handle `backwards_incompatible_lint` drops appropriately in drop elaboration
In #131326, a new kind of scheduled drop (`drop_kind: DropKind::Value` + `backwards_incompatible_lint: true`) was added so that we could insert a new kind of no-op MIR statement (`backward incompatible drop`) for linting purposes.
These drops were intended to have *no side-effects*, but drop elaboration code forgot to handle these drops specially and they were handled otherwise as normal drops in most of the code. This ends up being **unsound** since we insert more than one drop call for some values, which means that `Drop::drop` could be called more than once.
This PR fixes this by splitting out the `DropKind::ForLint` and adjusting the code. I'm not totally certain if all of the places I've adjusted are either reachable or correct, but I'm pretty certain that it's *more* correct than it was previously.
cc `@dingxiangfei2009`
r? nikomatsakis
Fixes#134482
Do not do if ! else, use unnegated cond and swap the branches instead
I'm tidying up my ergonomic ref counting PR and I'm going to make some small, simple and unrelated changes outside that PR, so the main PR sticks more straight to the point.
Clarify the match ergonomics 2024 migration lint's output
This makes a few changes:
- Rather than using the whole pattern as a span for the lint, this collects spans for each problematic default binding mode reset and labels them with why they're problems.
- The lint's suggestions are now verbose-styled, so that it's clear what's being suggested vs. what's problematic.
- The wording is now less technical, and the hard error version of this diagnostic now links to the same reference material as the lint (currently an unwritten page of the edition guide).
I'm not totally confident in the wording or formatting, so I'd appreciate feedback on that in particular. I tried to draw a connection with word choice between the labels and the suggestion, but it might be imprecise, unclear, or cluttered. If so, it might be worth making the labels more terse and adding notes that explain them, but that's harder to read in a way too.
cc ```@Nadrieril``` ```@Jules-Bertholet```
Closes#133854. For reference, the error from that issue becomes:
```
error: pattern uses features incompatible with edition 2024
--> $DIR/remove-me.rs:6:25
|
LL | map.iter().filter(|(&(_x, _y), &_c)| false);
| ^ ^ cannot implicitly match against multiple layers of reference
| |
| cannot implicitly match against multiple layers of reference
|
help: make the implied reference pattern explicit
|
LL | map.iter().filter(|&(&(_x, _y), &_c)| false);
| +
```
`rustc_span::symbol` defines some things that are re-exported from
`rustc_span`, such as `Symbol` and `sym`. But it doesn't re-export some
closely related things such as `Ident` and `kw`. So you can do `use
rustc_span::{Symbol, sym}` but you have to do `use
rustc_span::symbol::{Ident, kw}`, which is inconsistent for no good
reason.
This commit re-exports `Ident`, `kw`, and `MacroRulesNormalizedIdent`,
and changes many `rustc_span::symbol::` qualifiers in `compiler/` to
`rustc_span::`. This is a 200+ net line of code reduction, mostly
because many files with two `use rustc_span` items can be reduced to
one.
Fix some comments related to upvars handling
I'm tidying up my ergonomic ref counting PR and I'm going to make some small, simple and unrelated changes outside that PR, so the main PR sticks more straight to the point.
Check for array lengths that aren't actually `usize`
I wish typeck wouldn't give us `ty::Array`s that have this problem in the first place, but we can check for it.
Fixes#134352
cc ``@matthiaskrgr``
rustc_mir_build: Clarify that 'mirrored' does not mean 'flipped' or 'reversed'
My intuition for 'mirrored' is that it means 'flipped' or 'reversed'. Clarify that that is not what is meant to 'mirror' the THIR from the HIR.
Make sure to use normalized ty for unevaluated const in default struct value
This cleans up the way that we construct the `mir::Const::Unevaluated` for default struct values. We were previously using `from_unevaluated`, which doesn't normalize the type, and is really only used for inline assembly. Other codepaths (such as `ExprKind::NamedConst`) use the type from the body.
Also, let's stop using `literal_operand`, which also is really not meant for calls other than for literal comparisons in pattern lowering.
Also move all of the tests to a separate subdirectory so they don't need to have the same prefix on all the test files.
Fixes#134298
r? estebank or reassign
Add some convenience helper methods on `hir::Safety`
Makes a lot of call sites simpler and should make any refactorings needed for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/134090#issuecomment-2541332415 simpler, as fewer sites have to be touched in case we end up storing some information in the variants of `hir::Safety`
Bounds-check with PtrMetadata instead of Len in MIR
Rather than emitting `Len(*_n)` in array index bounds checks, emit `PtrMetadata(copy _n)` instead -- with some asterisks for arrays and `&mut` that need it to be done slightly differently.
We're getting pretty close to removing `Len` entirely, actually. I think just one more PR after this (for slice drop shims).
r? mir
Initial implementation of `#[feature(default_field_values]`, proposed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3681.
Support default fields in enum struct variant
Allow default values in an enum struct variant definition:
```rust
pub enum Bar {
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Allow using `..` without a base on an enum struct variant
```rust
Bar::Foo { .. }
```
`#[derive(Default)]` doesn't account for these as it is still gating `#[default]` only being allowed on unit variants.
Support `#[derive(Default)]` on enum struct variants with all defaulted fields
```rust
pub enum Bar {
#[default]
Foo {
bar: S = S,
baz: i32 = 42 + 3,
}
}
```
Check for missing fields in typeck instead of mir_build.
Expand test with `const` param case (needs `generic_const_exprs` enabled).
Properly instantiate MIR const
The following works:
```rust
struct S<A> {
a: Vec<A> = Vec::new(),
}
S::<i32> { .. }
```
Add lint for default fields that will always fail const-eval
We *allow* this to happen for API writers that might want to rely on users'
getting a compile error when using the default field, different to the error
that they would get when the field isn't default. We could change this to
*always* error instead of being a lint, if we wanted.
This will *not* catch errors for partially evaluated consts, like when the
expression relies on a const parameter.
Suggestions when encountering `Foo { .. }` without `#[feature(default_field_values)]`:
- Suggest adding a base expression if there are missing fields.
- Suggest enabling the feature if all the missing fields have optional values.
- Suggest removing `..` if there are no missing fields.
Remove a lit_to_const call
We have so many special cases of `match expr.kind { Lit() => {}, Unary(Neg, Lit()) => {} }`... I'm trying to figure out how to get these all unified, but outright removing some is good, too. So let's try it.
Tho we don't have many `const {}` blocks in the perf test suite... But I also don't know how common `const { 42 }` blocks are, I'd expect these to occur mostly from macros (like `thread_local!`)
implement checks for tail calls
Quoting the [RFC draft](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md):
> The argument to become is a function (or method) call, that exactly matches the function signature and calling convention of the callee. The intent is to ensure a matching ABI. Note that lifetimes may differ as long as they pass borrow checking, see [below](https://github.com/phi-go/rfcs/blob/guaranteed-tco/text/0000-explicit-tail-calls.md#return-type-coercion) for specifics on the return type.
> Tail calling closures and tail calling from closures is not allowed. This is due to the high implementation effort, see below, this restriction can be lifted by a future RFC.
> Invocations of operators were considered as valid targets but were rejected on grounds of being too error-prone. In any case, these can still be called as methods.
> Tail calling [variadic functions](https://doc.rust-lang.org/beta/unstable-book/language-features/c-variadic.html) and tail calling from variadic functions is not allowed. As support for variadic function is stabilized on a per target level, support for tail-calls regarding variadic functions would need to follow a similar approach. To avoid this complexity and to minimize implementation effort for backends, this interaction is currently not allowed but support can be added with a future RFC.
-----
The checks are implemented as a query, similarly to `check_unsafety`.
The code is cherry-picked straight out of #112657 which was written more than a year ago, so I expect we might need to change some things ^^"
Point at types that need to be marked with `#[derive(PartialEq)]`.
We use a visitor to look at a type that isn't structural, looking for all ADTs that don't derive `PartialEq`. These can either be manual `impl PartialEq`s or no `impl` at all, so we differentiate between those two cases to provide more context to the user. We also only point at types and impls from the local crate, otherwise show only a note.
```
error: constant of non-structural type `&[B]` in a pattern
--> $DIR/issue-61188-match-slice-forbidden-without-eq.rs:15:9
|
LL | struct B(i32);
| -------- must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq)]` to be usable in patterns
LL |
LL | const A: &[B] = &[];
| ------------- constant defined here
...
LL | A => (),
| ^ constant of non-structural type
|
= note: see https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/marker/trait.StructuralPartialEq.html for details
```
- Point at type that should derive `PartialEq` to be structural.
- Point at manual `impl PartialEq`, explaining that it is not sufficient to be structural.
```
error: constant of non-structural type `MyType` in a pattern
--> $DIR/const-partial_eq-fallback-ice.rs:14:12
|
LL | struct MyType;
| ------------- `MyType` must be annotated with `#[derive(PartialEq)]` to be usable in patterns
...
LL | const CONSTANT: &&MyType = &&MyType;
| ------------------------ constant defined here
...
LL | if let CONSTANT = &&MyType {
| ^^^^^^^^ constant of non-structural type
|
note: the `PartialEq` trait must be derived, manual `impl`s are not sufficient; see https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/marker/trait.StructuralPartialEq.html for details
--> $DIR/const-partial_eq-fallback-ice.rs:5:1
|
LL | impl PartialEq<usize> for MyType {
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
```
error: trait object `dyn Send` cannot be used in patterns
--> $DIR/issue-70972-dyn-trait.rs:6:9
|
LL | const F: &'static dyn Send = &7u32;
| -------------------------- constant defined here
...
LL | F => panic!(),
| ^ trait object can't be used in patterns
```
- Add primary span labels.
- Point at const generic parameter used as pattern.
- Point at statics used as pattern.
- Point at let bindings used in const pattern.
Centralize emitting an error in `const_to_pat` so that all errors from that evaluating a `const` in a pattern can add addditional information. With this, now point at the `const` item's definition:
```
error[E0158]: constant pattern depends on a generic parameter
--> $DIR/associated-const-type-parameter-pattern.rs:20:9
|
LL | pub trait Foo {
| -------------
LL | const X: EFoo;
| ------------- constant defined here
...
LL | A::X => println!("A::X"),
| ^^^^
```
this implements checks necessary to guarantee that we can actually
perform a tail call. while extremely restrictive, this is what is
documented in the RFC, and all these checks are needed for one reason or
another.
this is funny though! apparently tidy parsed `.gitignore`, but did not
recognize unignore lines (`!...`), so tidy was ignoring `rustc_mir_build`
this whole time (at least for some lints?).
Update TRPL to add new Chapter 17: Async and Await
- Add support to `rustbook` to pass through the `-L`/`--library-path` flag to `mdbook` so that references to the `trpl` crate
- Build the `trpl` crate as part of the book tests. Make it straightforward to add other such book dependencies in the future if needed by implementing that in a fairly general way.
- Update the submodule for the book to pull in the new chapter on async and await, as well as a number of other fixes. This will happen organically/automatically in a week, too, but this lets me group this change with the next one:
- Update the compiler messages which reference the existing chapters 17–20, which are now chapters 18-21. There are only two, both previously referencing chapter 18.
- Update the UI tests which reference the compiler message outputs.
With the insertion of a new chapter 17 on async and await to _The Rust
Programming Language_, references in compiler output to later chapters
need to be updated to avoid confusing users. Redirects exist so that
users who click old links will end up in the right place anyway, but
this way users will be directed to the right URL in the first place.
Detect const in pattern with typo
When writing a constant name incorrectly in a pattern, the pattern will be identified as a new binding. We look for consts in the current crate, consts that where imported in the current crate and for local `let` bindings in case someone got them confused with `const`s.
```
error: unreachable pattern
--> $DIR/const-with-typo-in-pattern-binding.rs:30:9
|
LL | GOOOD => {}
| ----- matches any value
LL |
LL | _ => {}
| ^ no value can reach this
|
help: you might have meant to pattern match against the value of similarly named constant `GOOD` instead of introducing a new catch-all binding
|
LL | GOOD => {}
| ~~~~
```
Fix#132582.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129838 (uefi: process: Add args support)
- #130800 (Mark `get_mut` and `set_position` in `std::io::Cursor` as const.)
- #132708 (Point at `const` definition when used instead of a binding in a `let` statement)
- #133226 (Make `PointerLike` opt-in instead of built-in)
- #133244 (Account for `wasm32v1-none` when exporting TLS symbols)
- #133257 (Add `UnordMap::clear` method)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Point at `const` definition when used instead of a binding in a `let` statement
Modify `PatKind::InlineConstant` to be `ExpandedConstant` standing in not only for inline `const` blocks but also for `const` items. This allows us to track named `const`s used in patterns when the pattern is a single binding. When we detect that there is a refutable pattern involving a `const` that could have been a binding instead, we point at the `const` item, and suggest renaming. We do this for both `let` bindings and `match` expressions missing a catch-all arm if there's at least one single binding pattern referenced.
After:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | const PAT: u32 = 0;
| -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
...
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^ pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
help: introduce a variable instead
|
LL | let PAT_var = v1;
| ~~~~~~~
```
Before:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^
| |
| pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
| missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
| help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```
CC #132582.
When writing a constant name incorrectly in a pattern, the pattern will be identified as a new binding. We look for consts in the current crate, consts that where imported in the current crate and for local `let` bindings in case someone got them confused with `const`s.
```
error: unreachable pattern
--> $DIR/const-with-typo-in-pattern-binding.rs:30:9
|
LL | GOOOD => {}
| ----- matches any value
LL |
LL | _ => {}
| ^ no value can reach this
|
help: you might have meant to pattern match against the value of similarly named constant `GOOD` instead of introducing a new catch-all binding
|
LL | GOOD => {}
| ~~~~
```
Fix#132582.
take 2
open up coroutines
tweak the wordings
the lint works up until 2021
We were missing one case, for ADTs, which was
causing `Result` to yield incorrect results.
only include field spans with significant types
deduplicate and eliminate field spans
switch to emit spans to impl Drops
Co-authored-by: Niko Matsakis <nikomat@amazon.com>
collect drops instead of taking liveness diff
apply some suggestions and add explantory notes
small fix on the cache
let the query recurse through coroutine
new suggestion format with extracted variable name
fine-tune the drop span and messages
bugfix on runtime borrows
tweak message wording
filter out ecosystem types earlier
apply suggestions
clippy
check lint level at session level
further restrict applicability of the lint
translate bid into nop for stable mir
detect cycle in type structure
the behavior of the type system not only depends on the current
assumptions, but also the currentnphase of the compiler. This is
mostly necessary as we need to decide whether and how to reveal
opaque types. We track this via the `TypingMode`.
```
error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered
--> $DIR/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs:2:11
|
LL | match 1 {
| ^ patterns `i32::MIN..=3_i32` and `5_i32..=i32::MAX` not covered
LL | x => {}
| - this pattern doesn't introduce a new catch-all binding, but rather pattern matches against the value of constant `x`
|
= note: the matched value is of type `i32`
note: constant `x` defined here
--> $DIR/intended-binding-pattern-is-const.rs:7:5
|
LL | const x: i32 = 4;
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: if you meant to introduce a binding, use a different name
|
LL | x_var => {}
| ++++
help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms
|
LL | x => {}, i32::MIN..=3_i32 | 5_i32..=i32::MAX => todo!()
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
```
After:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | const PAT: u32 = 0;
| -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
...
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^
| |
| pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
| help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```
Before:
```
error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding
--> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13
|
LL | let PAT = v1;
| ^^^
| |
| pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered
| missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable
| help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var`
|
= note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant
= note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html
= note: the matched value is of type `u32`
```
cleanup: Remove outdated comment of `thir_body`
When typeck fails, `thir_body` returns `ErrorGuaranteed` rather than empty body.
No other code follows this outdated description except `check_unsafety`, which is also cleaned up in this PR.
Remove unnecessary pub enum glob-imports from `rustc_middle::ty`
We used to have an idiom in the compiler where we'd prefix or suffix all the variants of an enum, for example `BoundRegionKind`, with something like `Br`, and then *glob-import* that enum variant directly.
`@noratrieb` brought this up, and I think that it's easier to read when we just use the normal style `EnumName::Variant`.
This PR is a bit large, but it's just naming.
The only somewhat opinionated change that this PR does is rename `BorrowKind::Imm` to `BorrowKind::Immutable` and same for the other variants. I think these enums are used sparingly enough that the extra length is fine.
r? `@noratrieb` or reassign
compiler: Move `rustc_target::spec::abi::Abi` to `rustc_abi::ExternAbi`
Lift `enum Abi` from its rather odd place in the middle of rustc_target, and make it available again from rustc_abi. You know, the crate where you would expect the enum that describes all the ABIs to be? The platform-neutral ones, at least. This will help further refactoring of how we handle ABIs in the near future[^0].
Rename `Abi` to `ExternAbi` because quite a lot of the compiler overloads the concept of "ABI" enough that the existing name is imprecise and it is often renamed _anyway_. Often this was to avoid conflicts with the *other* type formerly known as `Abi` (now named BackendRepr[^1]), but sometimes it is just for clarity, and this name seems more self-explanatory. It does get reexported, though, using its old name, to reduce the odds of merge-conflicting over the entire tree.
All of `ExternAbi`'s friends come along for the ride, which costs adding some optional dependencies to the rustc_abi crate. However, all of this also allows simply moving three crates entirely off rustc_target:
- rustc_hir_pretty
- rustc_lint_defs
- rustc_mir_build
This odd selection is mostly to demonstrate a secondary motivation: The majority of the front-end of the compiler should be as target-agnostic as possible, and it is easier to assure this if they simply don't depend on the crate that describes targets. Note that I didn't migrate crates that don't benefit from it in this way yet, and I didn't survey every last crate.
[^0]: This is being undertaken as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/119183
[^1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/132246
Remove region from adjustments
It's not necessary to store this region, because it's only used in THIR and MemCat/ExprUse, both of which already basically only deal with erased regions anyways.
Rename `rustc_abi::Abi` to `BackendRepr`
Remove the confabulation of `rustc_abi::Abi` with what "ABI" actually means by renaming it to `BackendRepr`, and rename `Abi::Aggregate` to `BackendRepr::Memory`. The type never actually represented how things are passed, as that has to have `PassMode` considered, at minimum, but rather it just is how we represented some things to the backend. This conflation arose because LLVM, the primary backend at the time, would lower certain IR forms using certain ABIs. Even that only somewhat was true, as it broke down when one ventured significantly afield of what is described by the System V AMD64 ABI either by using different architectures, ABI-modifying IR annotations, the same architecture **with different ISA extensions enabled**, or other... unexpected delights.
Unfortunately both names are still somewhat of a misnomer right now, as people have written code for years based on this misunderstanding. Still, their original names are even moreso, and for better or worse, this backend code hasn't received as much maintenance as the rest of the compiler, lately. Actually arriving at a correct end-state will simply require us to disentangle a lot of code in order to fix, much of it pointlessly repeated in several places. Thus this is not an "actual fix", just a way to deflect further misunderstandings.
TypingMode: merge intercrate, reveal, and defining_opaque_types
This adds `TypingMode` and uses it in most places. We do not yet remove `Reveal` from `param_env`s. This and other future work as tracked in #132279 and via `FIXME`s.
Fetching the `TypingMode` of the `InferCtxt` asserts that the `TypingMode` agrees with `ParamEnv::reveal` to make sure we don't introduce any subtle bugs here. This will be unnecessary once `ParamEnv::reveal` no longer exists.
As the `TypingMode` is now a part of the query input, I've merged the coherence and non-coherence caches for the new solver. I've also enabled the local `infcx` cache during coherence by clearing the cache when forking it with a different `TypingMode`.
#### `TypingMode::from_param_env`
I am using this even in cases where I know that the `param_env` will always be `Reveal::UserFacing`. This is to make it easier to correctly refactor this code in the future, any time we use `Reveal::UserFacing` in a body while not defining its opaque types is incorrect and should use a `TypingMode` which only reveals opaques defined by that body instead, cc #124598
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Don't lint `irrefutable_let_patterns` on leading patterns if `else if` let-chains
fixes#128661
Is there any preference where the test goes? There looks to be several places it could fit.
The initial naming of "Abi" was an awful mistake, conveying wrong ideas
about how psABIs worked and even more about what the enum meant.
It was only meant to represent the way the value would be described to
a codegen backend as it was lowered to that intermediate representation.
It was never meant to mean anything about the actual psABI handling!
The conflation is because LLVM typically will associate a certain form
with a certain ABI, but even that does not hold when the special cases
that actually exist arise, plus the IR annotations that modify the ABI.
Reframe `rustc_abi::Abi` as the `BackendRepr` of the type, and rename
`BackendRepr::Aggregate` as `BackendRepr::Memory`. Unfortunately, due to
the persistent misunderstandings, this too is now incorrect:
- Scattered ABI-relevant code is entangled with BackendRepr
- We do not always pre-compute a correct BackendRepr that reflects how
we "actually" want this value to be handled, so we leave the backend
interface to also inject various special-cases here
- In some cases `BackendRepr::Memory` is a "real" aggregate, but in
others it is in fact using memory, and in some cases it is a scalar!
Our rustc-to-backend lowering code handles this sort of thing right now.
That will eventually be addressed by lifting duplicated lowering code
to either rustc_codegen_ssa or rustc_target as appropriate.
Taking a raw ref (`&raw (const|mut)`) of a deref of pointer (`*ptr`) is always safe
T-opsem decided in https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1387 that `*ptr` is only unsafe if the place is accessed. This means that taking a raw ref of a deref expr is always safe, since it doesn't constitute a read.
This also relaxes the `DEREF_NULLPTR` lint to stop warning in the case of raw ref of a deref'd nullptr, and updates its docs to reflect that change in the UB specification.
This does not change the behavior of `addr_of!((*ptr).field)`, since field projections still require the projection is in-bounds.
I'm on the fence whether this requires an FCP, since it's something that is guaranteed by the reference you could ostensibly call this a bugfix since we were counting truly safe operations as unsafe. Perhaps someone on opsem has a strong opinion? cc `@rust-lang/opsem`
"innermost", "outermost", "leftmost", and "rightmost" don't need hyphens
These are all standard dictionary words and don't require hyphenation.
-----
Encountered an instance of this in error messages and it bugged me, so I
figured I'd fix it across the entire codebase.
Implement edition 2024 match ergonomics restrictions
This implements the minimalest version of [match ergonomics for edition 2024](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3627-match-ergonomics-2024.html). This minimal version makes it an error to ever reset the default binding mode. The implemented proposal is described precisely [here](https://hackmd.io/zUqs2ISNQ0Wrnxsa9nhD0Q#RFC-3627-nano), where it is called "RFC 3627-nano".
Rules:
- Rule 1C: When the DBM (default binding mode) is not `move` (whether or not behind a reference), writing `mut`, `ref`, or `ref mut` on a binding is an error.
- Rule 2C: Reference patterns can only match against references in the scrutinee when the DBM is `move`.
This minimal version is forward-compatible with the main proposals for match ergonomics 2024: [RFC3627](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3627-match-ergonomics-2024.html) itself, the alternative [rule 4-early variant](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3627-match-ergonomics-2024.html), and [others](https://hackmd.io/zUqs2ISNQ0Wrnxsa9nhD0Q). The idea is to give us more time to iron out a final proposal.
This includes a migration lint that desugars any offending pattern into one that doesn't make use of match ergonomics. Such patterns have identical meaning across editions.
This PR insta-stabilizes the proposed behavior onto edition 2024.
r? `@ghost`
Tracking:
- https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/123076
Retire the `unnamed_fields` feature for now
`#![feature(unnamed_fields)]` was implemented in part in #115131 and #115367, however work on that feature has (afaict) stalled and in the mean time there have been some concerns raised (e.g.[^1][^2]) about whether `unnamed_fields` is worthwhile to have in the language, especially in its current desugaring. Because it represents a compiler implementation burden including a new kind of anonymous ADT and additional complication to field selection, and is quite prone to bugs today, I'm choosing to remove the feature.
However, since I'm not one to really write a bunch of words, I'm specifically *not* going to de-RFC this feature. This PR essentially *rolls back* the state of this feature to "RFC accepted but not yet implemented"; however if anyone wants to formally unapprove the RFC from the t-lang side, then please be my guest. I'm just not totally willing to summarize the various language-facing reasons for why this feature is or is not worthwhile, since I'm coming from the compiler side mostly.
Fixes#117942Fixes#121161Fixes#121263Fixes#121299Fixes#121722Fixes#121799Fixes#126969Fixes#131041
Tracking:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804
[^1]: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Unnamed.20struct.2Funion.20fields
[^2]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/49804#issuecomment-1972619108
`asm!()` is forced to be wrapped inside unsafe. If there's no special
treatment, the label blocks would also always be unsafe with no way
of opting out.
- fix for divergence
- fix error message
- fix another cranelift test
- fix some cranelift things
- don't set the NORETURN option for naked asm
- fix use of naked_asm! in doc comment
- fix use of naked_asm! in run-make test
- use `span_bug` in unreachable branch
