Esteban Küber ff2f7a7a83 Point at const definition when used instead of a binding in a let statement ... After: ``` error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | LL | const PAT: u32 = 0; | -------------- missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable ... LL | let PAT = v1; | ^^^ | | | pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var` | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` ``` Before: ``` error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding --> $DIR/bad-pattern.rs:19:13 | LL | let PAT = v1; | ^^^ | | | pattern `1_u32..=u32::MAX` not covered | missing patterns are not covered because `PAT` is interpreted as a constant pattern, not a new variable | help: introduce a variable instead: `PAT_var` | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html = note: the matched value is of type `u32` ```		2024-11-17 23:39:59 +00:00
..
src	Point at const definition when used instead of a binding in a let statement	2024-11-17 23:39:59 +00:00
Cargo.toml	compiler: Switch to rustc_abi in hir_pretty, lint_defs, and mir_build	2024-10-30 22:38:49 -07:00
messages.ftl	Change error message	2024-10-08 00:23:28 +02:00