Fix ret > 1 bound if shadowed by const
Prior to a change, it would only look at types in bounds. When it started looking for consts,
shadowing type variables with a const would cause an ICE, so now defer looking at consts only if
there are no types present.
cc ``````@compiler-errors``````
Should Fix#93553
Link `try_exists` docs to `Path::exists`
Links to the existing `Path::exists` method from both `std::Path::try_exists` and `std::fs:try_exists`.
Tracking issue for `path_try_exists`: #83186
Add package.json in gitignore
It happened a few times (last one is https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93537/files#r796757998) so I think it's fine to ignore this file to prevent it to happen again in the future. :)
r? ```@Mark-Simulacrum```
Windows: Disable LLVM crash dialog boxes.
This disables the crash dialog box on Windows. When LLVM hits an assertion, it will open a dialog box with Abort/Retry/Ignore. This is annoying on CI because CI will just hang until it times out (which can take hours).
Instead of opening a dialog box, it will print a message like this:
```
Assertion failed: isa<X>(Val) && "cast<Ty>() argument of incompatible type!", file D:\Proj\rust\rust\src\llvm-project\llvm\include\llvm/Support/Casting.h, line 255
```
Closes#92829
Prior to a change, it would only look at types in bounds. When it started looking for consts,
shadowing type variables with a const would cause an ICE, so now defer looking at consts only if
there are no types present.
The "CI" environment var isn't universal (for example, I think Azure
uses TF_BUILD). However, we are mostly concerned with rust-lang/rust's
own CI which currently is GitHub Actions which does set "CI". And I
think most other providers use "CI" as well.
Correct incorrect description of preorder traversals
The internal documentation for the `Preorder` type gave an incorrect description (the description is not even correct for the example provided, since C is visited after one of its successors). This corrects the description, and adds in a sentence explaining more precisely how the traversals are performed.
Make rustc use `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` by default
Compiler panics should be rare - when they do occur, we want the report
filed by the user to contain as much information as possible. This is
especially important when the panic is due to an incremental compilation
bug, since we may not have enough information to reproduce it.
This PR sets `RUST_BACKTRACE=full` inside `rustc` if the user has not
explicitly set `RUST_BACKTRACE`. This is more verbose than
`RUST_BACKTRACE=1`, but this may make it easier to debug incremental
compilation issues. Users who find this too verbose can still manually
set `RUST_BACKTRACE` before invoking the compiler.
This only affects `rustc` (and any tool using `rustc_driver::install_ice_hook`).
It does *not* affect any user crates or the standard library -
backtraces will continue to be off by default in any application
*compiled* by rustc.
Factor convenience functions out of main printer implementation
The pretty printer in rustc_ast_pretty has a section of methods commented "Convenience functions to talk to the printer". This PR pulls those out to a separate module. This leaves pp.rs with only the minimal API that is core to the pretty printing algorithm.
I found this separation to be helpful in https://github.com/dtolnay/prettyplease because it makes clear when changes are adding some fundamental new capability to the pretty printer algorithm vs just making it more convenient to call some already existing functionality.
rustdoc: Fix ICE report
The ICE report in rustdoc was confusing because it was returning an argument parse error:
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`', compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1212:27
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
error: Unrecognized option: 'crate-version'
```
This is because the ICE reporter was trying to parse the arguments as rustc, not rustdoc. Since an argument error is a fatal error, it was early-exiting with the argument error due to unwinding.
This changes it to be a more primitive scan of the arguments. The arguments being checked are pretty simple, and only have a small handful of forms that are easy to check for.
It now looks like this:
```
thread 'rustc' panicked at 'aborting due to `-Z treat-err-as-bug=1`', compiler/rustc_errors/src/lib.rs:1212:27
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
error: internal compiler error: unexpected panic
note: the compiler unexpectedly panicked. this is a bug.
note: we would appreciate a bug report: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/new?labels=C-bug%2C+I-ICE%2C+T-compiler&template=ice.md
note: rustc 1.59.0-dev running on x86_64-apple-darwin
note: compiler flags: --crate-type lib -Z treat-err-as-bug
note: some of the compiler flags provided by cargo are hidden
query stack during panic:
end of query stack
```
It still says `rustc`, but I can live with that.
Temporary fix for the layout of aligned enums
Fix for the issue #92464
~~I was after this issue for quite some time now, I have a temporary fix for it.
I think the current problem is [here](e75f96763f/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/layout.rs (L1305-L1310)) created `tag` value might be wrong, because when I checked `min` and `max` values it's always between 0..1, which results in wrong size comparison in a few lines down below.
I think `min` and `max` values don't take `#[repr(aligned(8))]` into consideration and just act from base values assigned inside the enum. If what I am saying is true, aligned enums were created with the wrong layout for some time.~~
~~As stated in the title this is only a temporary fix and I think this needs further investigation, if someone wants to mentor it I would like to work on that too.~~ 😸
**Edit: Weird some tests fail now going to close this for now...**
**Edit2: I made it work again.**
I think I figured out the main problem of the issue, layout types of aligned enums with custom discriminant types were not handled, which resulted in confusing(such as this issue) behavior down the line, this is a kinda hacky fix for the issue.
pub use std::simd::StdFloat;
Syncs portable-simd up to commit rust-lang/portable-simd@03f6fbb21e,
Diff: 533f0fc81a...03f6fbb21e
This sync requires a little bit more legwork because it also introduces a trait into `std::simd`, so that it is no longer simply a reexport of `core::simd`. Out of simple-minded consistency and to allow more options, I replicated the pattern for the way `core::simd` is integrated in the first place, however this is not necessary if it doesn't acquire any interdependencies inside `std`: it could be a simple crate reexport. I just don't know yet if that will happen or not.
To summarize other misc changes:
- Shifts no longer panic, now wrap on too-large shifts (like `Simd` integers usually do!)
- mask16x32 will now be many i16s, not many i32s... 🙃
- `#[must_use]` is spread around generously
- Adjusts division, float min/max, and `Mask::{from,to}_array` internally to be faster
- Adds the much-requested `Simd::cast::<U>` function (equivalent to `simd.to_array().map(|lane| lane as U)`)
Compress amount of hashed bytes for `isize` values in StableHasher
This is another attempt to land https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92103, this time hopefully with a correct implementation w.r.t. stable hashing guarantees. The previous PR was [reverted](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93014) because it could produce the [same hash](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92103#issuecomment-1014625442) for different values even in quite simple situations. I have since added a basic [test](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93193) that should guard against that situation, I also added a new test in this PR, specialised for this optimization.
## Why this optimization helps
Since the original PR, I have tried to analyze why this optimization even helps (and why it especially helps for `clap`). I found that the vast majority of stable-hashing `i64` actually comes from hashing `isize` (which is converted to `i64` in the stable hasher). I only found a single place where is this datatype used directly in the compiler, and this place has also been showing up in traces that I used to find out when is `isize` being hashed. This place is `rustc_span::FileName::DocTest`, however, I suppose that isizes also come from other places, but they might not be so easy to find (there were some other entries in the trace). `clap` hashes about 8.5 million `isize`s, and all of them fit into a single byte, which is why this optimization has helped it [quite a lot](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/92103#issuecomment-1005711861).
Now, I'm not sure if special casing `isize` is the correct solution here, maybe something could be done with that `isize` inside `DocTest` or in other places, but that's for another discussion I suppose. In this PR, instead of hardcoding a special case inside `SipHasher128`, I instead put it into `StableHasher`, and only used it for `isize` (I tested that for `i64` it doesn't help, or at least not for `clap` and other few benchmarks that I was testing).
## New approach
Since the most common case is a single byte, I added a fast path for hashing `isize` values which positive value fits within a single byte, and a cold path for the rest of the values.
To avoid the previous correctness problem, we need to make sure that each unique `isize` value will produce a unique hash stream to the hasher. By hash stream I mean a sequence of bytes that will be hashed (a different sequence should produce a different hash, but that is of course not guaranteed).
We have to distinguish different values that produce the same bit pattern when we combine them. For example, if we just simply skipped the leading zero bytes for values that fit within a single byte, `(0xFF, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF)` and `(0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0xFF)` would send the same hash stream to the hasher, which must not happen.
To avoid this situation, values `[0, 0xFE]` are hashed as a single byte. When we hash a larger (treating `isize` as `u64`) value, we first hash an additional byte `0xFF`. Since `0xFF` cannot occur when we apply the single byte optimization, we guarantee that the hash streams will be unique when hashing two values `(a, b)` and `(b, a)` if `a != b`:
1) When both `a` and `b` are within `[0, 0xFE]`, their hash streams will be different.
2) When neither `a` and `b` are within `[0, 0xFE]`, their hash streams will be different.
3) When `a` is within `[0, 0xFE]` and `b` isn't, when we hash `(a, b)`, the hash stream will definitely not begin with `0xFF`. When we hash `(b, a)`, the hash stream will definitely begin with `0xFF`. Therefore the hash streams will be different.
r? `@the8472`
Support configuring whether to capture backtraces at runtime
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93346
This adds a new API to the `std::panic` module which configures whether and how the default panic hook will emit a backtrace when a panic occurs.
After discussion with `@yaahc` on [Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/219381-t-libs/topic/backtrace.20lib.20vs.2E.20panic), this PR chooses to avoid adjusting or seeking to provide a similar API for the (currently unstable) std::backtrace API. It seems likely that the users of that API may wish to expose more specific settings rather than just a global one (e.g., emulating the `env_logger`, `tracing` per-module configuration) to avoid the cost of capture in hot code. The API added here could plausibly be copied and/or re-exported directly from std::backtrace relatively easily, but I don't think that's the right call as of now.
```rust
mod panic {
#[derive(Copy, Clone, Debug, PartialEq, Eq)]
#[non_exhaustive]
pub enum BacktraceStyle {
Short,
Full,
Off,
}
fn set_backtrace_style(BacktraceStyle);
fn get_backtrace_style() -> Option<BacktraceStyle>;
}
```
Several unresolved questions:
* Do we need to move to a thread-local or otherwise more customizable strategy for whether to capture backtraces? See [this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79085#issuecomment-727845826) for some potential use cases for this.
* Proposed answer: no, leave this for third-party hooks.
* Bikeshed on naming of all the options, as usual.
* Should BacktraceStyle be moved into `std::backtrace`?
* It's already somewhat annoying to import and/or re-type the `std::panic::` prefix necessary to use these APIs, probably adding a second module to the mix isn't worth it.
Note that PR #79085 proposed a much simpler API, but particularly in light of the desire to fully replace setting environment variables via `env::set_var` to control the backtrace API, a more complete API seems preferable. This PR likely subsumes that one.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #92528 (Make `Fingerprint::combine_commutative` associative)
- #93221 ([borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns)
- #93542 (Prevent lifetime elision in type alias)
- #93546 (Validate that values in switch int terminator are unique)
- #93571 (better suggestion for duplicated `where` clause)
- #93574 (don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop)
- #93590 (More let_else adoptions)
- #93592 (Remove unused dep from rustc_arena)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
don't suggest adding `let` due to bad assignment expressions inside of `while` loop
adds a check that our `lhs` expression is actually within the conditional part of the `while` loop, instead of anywhere in the `while` body.
fixes#93486
[borrowck] Fix help on mutating &self in async fns
Previously, when rustc was provided an async function that tried to
mutate through a shared reference to an implicit self (as shown in the
ui test), rustc would suggest modifying the parameter signature
to `&mut` + the fully qualified name of the ty (in the case of the repro
`S`). If a user modified their code to match the suggestion, the
compiler would not accept it.
This commit modifies the suggestion so that when rustc is provided the
ui test that is also attached in this commit, it suggests (correctly)
`&mut self`. We try to be careful about distinguishing between implicit
and explicit self annotations, since the latter seem to be handled
correctly already.
This is my first PR here so I'm pretty sure I probably missed something/could use better terminology. I also didn't try to make the match exhaustive since implicit self is the only real special case that I need to handle (that I'm aware of), and I'm pretty sure there's a cleaner way to do this so any advice would be greatly appreciated! (I'm also not terribly confident about how I wrote the ui tests)
here is your cc as requested `@compiler-errors`
This is an attempt to fix#93093
