2020-09-11 19:50:17 +00:00
|
|
|
//! Checking that constant values used in types can be successfully evaluated.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! For concrete constants, this is fairly simple as we can just try and evaluate it.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! When dealing with polymorphic constants, for example `std::mem::size_of::<T>() - 1`,
|
|
|
|
//! this is not as easy.
|
|
|
|
//!
|
|
|
|
//! In this case we try to build an abstract representation of this constant using
|
2021-09-07 00:56:29 +00:00
|
|
|
//! `thir_abstract_const` which can then be checked for structural equality with other
|
2020-09-11 19:50:17 +00:00
|
|
|
//! generic constants mentioned in the `caller_bounds` of the current environment.
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt;
|
2022-07-09 09:35:06 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled;
|
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::abstract_const::{
|
|
|
|
walk_abstract_const, AbstractConst, ConstUnifyCtxt, FailureKind, Node, NotConstEvaluatable,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt, TypeVisitable};
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_session::lint;
|
|
|
|
use rustc_span::Span;
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-28 17:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
use std::cmp;
|
2020-10-21 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
use std::ops::ControlFlow;
|
2020-09-28 17:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Check if a given constant can be evaluated.
|
2022-03-11 11:07:53 +00:00
|
|
|
#[instrument(skip(infcx), level = "debug")]
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
2022-01-12 23:29:10 +00:00
|
|
|
uv: ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()>,
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
span: Span,
|
2021-03-02 15:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
) -> Result<(), NotConstEvaluatable> {
|
2022-03-04 05:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
let tcx = infcx.tcx;
|
|
|
|
|
2022-03-15 15:20:46 +00:00
|
|
|
if tcx.features().generic_const_exprs {
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if let Some(ct) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)? {
|
|
|
|
if satisfied_from_param_env(tcx, ct, param_env)? {
|
|
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-10-25 17:05:37 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
let mut failure_kind = FailureKind::Concrete;
|
|
|
|
walk_abstract_const::<!, _>(tcx, ct, |node| match node.root(tcx) {
|
|
|
|
Node::Leaf(leaf) => {
|
|
|
|
if leaf.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
|
|
|
|
} else if leaf.has_param_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
|
2020-10-21 12:24:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-06-09 18:28:41 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Node::Cast(_, _, ty) => {
|
|
|
|
if ty.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
failure_kind = FailureKind::MentionsInfer;
|
|
|
|
} else if ty.has_param_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
failure_kind = cmp::min(failure_kind, FailureKind::MentionsParam);
|
2021-09-06 22:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-28 17:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
|
2020-09-28 17:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Node::Binop(_, _, _) | Node::UnaryOp(_, _) | Node::FunctionCall(_, _) => {
|
|
|
|
ControlFlow::CONTINUE
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
});
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
match failure_kind {
|
|
|
|
FailureKind::MentionsInfer => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
FailureKind::MentionsParam => {
|
|
|
|
return Err(NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// returned below
|
|
|
|
FailureKind::Concrete => {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-05-17 05:50:16 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv.expand(), Some(span));
|
|
|
|
match concrete {
|
|
|
|
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => Err(if !uv.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
infcx
|
|
|
|
.tcx
|
|
|
|
.sess
|
|
|
|
.delay_span_bug(span, &format!("unexpected `TooGeneric` for {:?}", uv));
|
|
|
|
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
Err(ErrorHandled::Linted) => {
|
|
|
|
let reported = infcx
|
|
|
|
.tcx
|
|
|
|
.sess
|
|
|
|
.delay_span_bug(span, "constant in type had error reported as lint");
|
|
|
|
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(reported))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(e)) => Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(e)),
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => Ok(()),
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: We should only try to evaluate a given constant here if it is fully concrete
|
|
|
|
// as we don't want to allow things like `[u8; std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>()]`.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// We previously did not check this, so we only emit a future compat warning if
|
|
|
|
// const evaluation succeeds and the given constant is still polymorphic for now
|
|
|
|
// and hopefully soon change this to an error.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// See #74595 for more details about this.
|
|
|
|
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv.expand(), Some(span));
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
match concrete {
|
|
|
|
// If we're evaluating a foreign constant, under a nightly compiler without generic
|
|
|
|
// const exprs, AND it would've passed if that expression had been evaluated with
|
|
|
|
// generic const exprs, then suggest using generic const exprs.
|
|
|
|
Err(_) if tcx.sess.is_nightly_build()
|
|
|
|
&& let Ok(Some(ct)) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)
|
|
|
|
&& satisfied_from_param_env(tcx, ct, param_env) == Ok(true) => {
|
|
|
|
tcx.sess
|
|
|
|
.struct_span_fatal(
|
|
|
|
// Slightly better span than just using `span` alone
|
|
|
|
if span == rustc_span::DUMMY_SP { tcx.def_span(uv.def.did) } else { span },
|
|
|
|
"failed to evaluate generic const expression",
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.note("the crate this constant originates from uses `#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]`")
|
|
|
|
.span_suggestion_verbose(
|
|
|
|
rustc_span::DUMMY_SP,
|
|
|
|
"consider enabling this feature",
|
2022-06-13 06:48:40 +00:00
|
|
|
"#![feature(generic_const_exprs)]\n",
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
rustc_errors::Applicability::MaybeIncorrect,
|
|
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
.emit()
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric) => Err(if uv.has_infer_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsInfer
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam
|
|
|
|
}),
|
|
|
|
Err(ErrorHandled::Linted) => {
|
|
|
|
let reported =
|
|
|
|
infcx.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug(span, "constant in type had error reported as lint");
|
|
|
|
Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(reported))
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Err(ErrorHandled::Reported(e)) => Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(e)),
|
|
|
|
Ok(_) => {
|
|
|
|
if uv.substs.has_param_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
assert!(matches!(infcx.tcx.def_kind(uv.def.did), DefKind::AnonConst));
|
|
|
|
let mir_body = infcx.tcx.mir_for_ctfe_opt_const_arg(uv.def);
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
if mir_body.is_polymorphic {
|
|
|
|
let Some(local_def_id) = uv.def.did.as_local() else { return Ok(()) };
|
|
|
|
tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
|
|
|
|
lint::builtin::CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED,
|
|
|
|
tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id),
|
|
|
|
span,
|
|
|
|
|err| {
|
|
|
|
err.build("cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types").emit();
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2022-03-04 05:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-05-19 18:53:01 +00:00
|
|
|
Ok(())
|
|
|
|
},
|
2020-09-28 17:44:23 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-17 10:44:57 +00:00
|
|
|
#[instrument(skip(tcx), level = "debug")]
|
2022-03-04 05:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
fn satisfied_from_param_env<'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
ct: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
) -> Result<bool, NotConstEvaluatable> {
|
|
|
|
for pred in param_env.caller_bounds() {
|
|
|
|
match pred.kind().skip_binder() {
|
|
|
|
ty::PredicateKind::ConstEvaluatable(uv) => {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(b_ct) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, uv)? {
|
2022-03-22 15:13:28 +00:00
|
|
|
let const_unify_ctxt = ConstUnifyCtxt { tcx, param_env };
|
2022-03-22 14:27:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2022-03-04 05:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
// Try to unify with each subtree in the AbstractConst to allow for
|
|
|
|
// `N + 1` being const evaluatable even if theres only a `ConstEvaluatable`
|
|
|
|
// predicate for `(N + 1) * 2`
|
2022-03-17 10:44:57 +00:00
|
|
|
let result = walk_abstract_const(tcx, b_ct, |b_ct| {
|
2022-03-22 14:27:20 +00:00
|
|
|
match const_unify_ctxt.try_unify(ct, b_ct) {
|
2022-03-04 05:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
true => ControlFlow::BREAK,
|
|
|
|
false => ControlFlow::CONTINUE,
|
2022-03-17 10:44:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
});
|
2022-03-04 05:46:45 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let ControlFlow::Break(()) = result {
|
|
|
|
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: abstract_const ~~> ok");
|
|
|
|
return Ok(true);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_ => {} // don't care
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ok(false)
|
|
|
|
}
|