2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_hir::def::DefKind;
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_index::bit_set::BitSet;
|
|
|
|
use rustc_index::vec::IndexVec;
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_infer::infer::InferCtxt;
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::mir::abstract_const::{Node, NodeId};
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::mir::interpret::ErrorHandled;
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::mir::{self, Rvalue, StatementKind, TerminatorKind};
|
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::Subst;
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::subst::SubstsRef;
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_middle::ty::{self, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable};
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_session::lint;
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_span::def_id::{DefId, LocalDefId};
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
use rustc_span::Span;
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'cx, 'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
infcx: &InferCtxt<'cx, 'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
def: ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>,
|
|
|
|
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
span: Span,
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
) -> Result<(), ErrorHandled> {
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
debug!("is_const_evaluatable({:?}, {:?})", def, substs);
|
|
|
|
if infcx.tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
if let Some(ct) = AbstractConst::new(infcx.tcx, def, substs) {
|
|
|
|
for pred in param_env.caller_bounds() {
|
|
|
|
match pred.skip_binders() {
|
|
|
|
ty::PredicateAtom::ConstEvaluatable(b_def, b_substs) => {
|
|
|
|
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound={:?}, {:?}", b_def, b_substs);
|
|
|
|
if b_def == def && b_substs == substs {
|
|
|
|
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: caller_bound ~~> ok");
|
|
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
|
|
} else if AbstractConst::new(infcx.tcx, b_def, b_substs)
|
|
|
|
.map_or(false, |b_ct| try_unify(infcx.tcx, ct, b_ct))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
debug!("is_const_evaluatable: abstract_const ~~> ok");
|
|
|
|
return Ok(());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
_ => {} // don't care
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
let future_compat_lint = || {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(local_def_id) = def.did.as_local() {
|
|
|
|
infcx.tcx.struct_span_lint_hir(
|
|
|
|
lint::builtin::CONST_EVALUATABLE_UNCHECKED,
|
2020-09-01 14:17:41 +00:00
|
|
|
infcx.tcx.hir().local_def_id_to_hir_id(local_def_id),
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
span,
|
|
|
|
|err| {
|
|
|
|
err.build("cannot use constants which depend on generic parameters in types")
|
|
|
|
.emit();
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: We should only try to evaluate a given constant here if it is fully concrete
|
|
|
|
// as we don't want to allow things like `[u8; std::mem::size_of::<*mut T>()]`.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// We previously did not check this, so we only emit a future compat warning if
|
|
|
|
// const evaluation succeeds and the given constant is still polymorphic for now
|
|
|
|
// and hopefully soon change this to an error.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// See #74595 for more details about this.
|
|
|
|
let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, def, substs, None, Some(span));
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
if concrete.is_ok() && substs.has_param_types_or_consts() {
|
|
|
|
match infcx.tcx.def_kind(def.did) {
|
|
|
|
DefKind::AnonConst => {
|
|
|
|
let mir_body = if let Some(def) = def.as_const_arg() {
|
|
|
|
infcx.tcx.optimized_mir_of_const_arg(def)
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
infcx.tcx.optimized_mir(def.did)
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if mir_body.is_polymorphic {
|
|
|
|
future_compat_lint();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 06:52:02 +00:00
|
|
|
_ => future_compat_lint(),
|
2020-08-06 08:00:08 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-10 07:48:02 +00:00
|
|
|
debug!(?concrete, "is_const_evaluatable");
|
2020-08-06 08:48:36 +00:00
|
|
|
concrete.map(drop)
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// A tree representing an anonymous constant.
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// This is only able to represent a subset of `MIR`,
|
|
|
|
/// and should not leak any information about desugarings.
|
|
|
|
#[derive(Clone, Copy)]
|
|
|
|
pub struct AbstractConst<'tcx> {
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: Consider adding something like `IndexSlice`
|
|
|
|
// and use this here.
|
|
|
|
inner: &'tcx [Node<'tcx>],
|
|
|
|
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl AbstractConst<'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
pub fn new(
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
def: ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>,
|
|
|
|
substs: SubstsRef<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
) -> Option<AbstractConst<'tcx>> {
|
|
|
|
let inner = match (def.did.as_local(), def.const_param_did) {
|
|
|
|
(Some(did), Some(param_did)) => {
|
|
|
|
tcx.mir_abstract_const_of_const_arg((did, param_did))?
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_ => tcx.mir_abstract_const(def.did)?,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some(AbstractConst { inner, substs })
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
|
|
pub fn subtree(self, node: NodeId) -> AbstractConst<'tcx> {
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
AbstractConst { inner: &self.inner[..=node.index()], substs: self.substs }
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#[inline]
|
|
|
|
pub fn root(self) -> Node<'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
self.inner.last().copied().unwrap()
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
body: &'a mir::Body<'tcx>,
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes: IndexVec<NodeId, Node<'tcx>>,
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
locals: IndexVec<mir::Local, NodeId>,
|
|
|
|
checked_op_locals: BitSet<mir::Local>,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
impl<'a, 'tcx> AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx> {
|
|
|
|
fn new(tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, body: &'a mir::Body<'tcx>) -> Option<AbstractConstBuilder<'a, 'tcx>> {
|
|
|
|
if body.is_cfg_cyclic() {
|
|
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 19:16:16 +00:00
|
|
|
// We don't have to look at concrete constants, as we
|
|
|
|
// can just evaluate them.
|
|
|
|
if !body.is_polymorphic {
|
|
|
|
return None;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
Some(AbstractConstBuilder {
|
|
|
|
tcx,
|
|
|
|
body,
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
nodes: IndexVec::new(),
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
locals: IndexVec::from_elem(NodeId::MAX, &body.local_decls),
|
|
|
|
checked_op_locals: BitSet::new_empty(body.local_decls.len()),
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn operand_to_node(&mut self, op: &mir::Operand<'tcx>) -> Option<NodeId> {
|
|
|
|
debug!("operand_to_node: op={:?}", op);
|
|
|
|
const ZERO_FIELD: mir::Field = mir::Field::from_usize(0);
|
|
|
|
match op {
|
|
|
|
mir::Operand::Copy(p) | mir::Operand::Move(p) => {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(p) = p.as_local() {
|
|
|
|
debug_assert!(!self.checked_op_locals.contains(p));
|
|
|
|
Some(self.locals[p])
|
|
|
|
} else if let &[mir::ProjectionElem::Field(ZERO_FIELD, _)] = p.projection.as_ref() {
|
|
|
|
// Only allow field accesses on the result of checked operations.
|
|
|
|
if self.checked_op_locals.contains(p.local) {
|
|
|
|
Some(self.locals[p.local])
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
mir::Operand::Constant(ct) => Some(self.nodes.push(Node::Leaf(ct.literal))),
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
/// We do not allow all binary operations in abstract consts, so filter disallowed ones.
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
fn check_binop(op: mir::BinOp) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
use mir::BinOp::*;
|
|
|
|
match op {
|
|
|
|
Add | Sub | Mul | Div | Rem | BitXor | BitAnd | BitOr | Shl | Shr | Eq | Lt | Le
|
|
|
|
| Ne | Ge | Gt => true,
|
|
|
|
Offset => false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
/// While we currently allow all unary operations, we still want to explicitly guard against
|
|
|
|
/// future changes here.
|
|
|
|
fn check_unop(op: mir::UnOp) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
use mir::UnOp::*;
|
|
|
|
match op {
|
|
|
|
Not | Neg => true,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
fn build_statement(&mut self, stmt: &mir::Statement<'tcx>) -> Option<()> {
|
|
|
|
debug!("AbstractConstBuilder: stmt={:?}", stmt);
|
|
|
|
match stmt.kind {
|
|
|
|
StatementKind::Assign(box (ref place, ref rvalue)) => {
|
|
|
|
let local = place.as_local()?;
|
|
|
|
match *rvalue {
|
|
|
|
Rvalue::Use(ref operand) => {
|
|
|
|
self.locals[local] = self.operand_to_node(operand)?;
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
Some(())
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Rvalue::BinaryOp(op, ref lhs, ref rhs) if Self::check_binop(op) => {
|
|
|
|
let lhs = self.operand_to_node(lhs)?;
|
|
|
|
let rhs = self.operand_to_node(rhs)?;
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::Binop(op, lhs, rhs));
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
if op.is_checkable() {
|
|
|
|
bug!("unexpected unchecked checkable binary operation");
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
Some(())
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
Rvalue::CheckedBinaryOp(op, ref lhs, ref rhs) if Self::check_binop(op) => {
|
|
|
|
let lhs = self.operand_to_node(lhs)?;
|
|
|
|
let rhs = self.operand_to_node(rhs)?;
|
2020-09-11 07:18:54 +00:00
|
|
|
self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::Binop(op, lhs, rhs));
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
self.checked_op_locals.insert(local);
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
Some(())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
Rvalue::UnaryOp(op, ref operand) if Self::check_unop(op) => {
|
|
|
|
let operand = self.operand_to_node(operand)?;
|
|
|
|
self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::UnaryOp(op, operand));
|
|
|
|
Some(())
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
_ => None,
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-11 08:00:06 +00:00
|
|
|
// These are not actually relevant for us here, so we can ignore them.
|
|
|
|
StatementKind::StorageLive(_) | StatementKind::StorageDead(_) => Some(()),
|
|
|
|
_ => None,
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
fn build_terminator(
|
|
|
|
&mut self,
|
|
|
|
terminator: &mir::Terminator<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
) -> Option<Option<mir::BasicBlock>> {
|
|
|
|
debug!("AbstractConstBuilder: terminator={:?}", terminator);
|
|
|
|
match terminator.kind {
|
|
|
|
TerminatorKind::Goto { target } => Some(Some(target)),
|
|
|
|
TerminatorKind::Return => Some(None),
|
2020-09-11 08:35:28 +00:00
|
|
|
TerminatorKind::Call {
|
|
|
|
ref func,
|
|
|
|
ref args,
|
|
|
|
destination: Some((ref place, target)),
|
|
|
|
cleanup: _,
|
|
|
|
from_hir_call: true,
|
|
|
|
fn_span: _,
|
|
|
|
} => {
|
|
|
|
let local = place.as_local()?;
|
|
|
|
let func = self.operand_to_node(func)?;
|
|
|
|
let args = self.tcx.arena.alloc_from_iter(
|
|
|
|
args.iter()
|
|
|
|
.map(|arg| self.operand_to_node(arg))
|
|
|
|
.collect::<Option<Vec<NodeId>>>()?,
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
self.locals[local] = self.nodes.push(Node::FunctionCall(func, args));
|
|
|
|
Some(Some(target))
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
TerminatorKind::Assert { ref cond, expected: false, target, .. } => {
|
|
|
|
let p = match cond {
|
|
|
|
mir::Operand::Copy(p) | mir::Operand::Move(p) => p,
|
|
|
|
mir::Operand::Constant(_) => bug!("Unexpected assert"),
|
|
|
|
};
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
const ONE_FIELD: mir::Field = mir::Field::from_usize(1);
|
|
|
|
debug!("proj: {:?}", p.projection);
|
|
|
|
if let &[mir::ProjectionElem::Field(ONE_FIELD, _)] = p.projection.as_ref() {
|
|
|
|
// Only allow asserts checking the result of a checked operation.
|
|
|
|
if self.checked_op_locals.contains(p.local) {
|
|
|
|
return Some(Some(target));
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
None
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_ => None,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fn build(mut self) -> Option<&'tcx [Node<'tcx>]> {
|
|
|
|
let mut block = &self.body.basic_blocks()[mir::START_BLOCK];
|
|
|
|
loop {
|
|
|
|
debug!("AbstractConstBuilder: block={:?}", block);
|
|
|
|
for stmt in block.statements.iter() {
|
|
|
|
self.build_statement(stmt)?;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if let Some(next) = self.build_terminator(block.terminator())? {
|
|
|
|
block = &self.body.basic_blocks()[next];
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
return Some(self.tcx.arena.alloc_from_iter(self.nodes));
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Builds an abstract const, do not use this directly, but use `AbstractConst::new` instead.
|
|
|
|
pub(super) fn mir_abstract_const<'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
def: ty::WithOptConstParam<LocalDefId>,
|
|
|
|
) -> Option<&'tcx [Node<'tcx>]> {
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
if tcx.features().const_evaluatable_checked {
|
2020-09-11 19:16:16 +00:00
|
|
|
match tcx.def_kind(def.did) {
|
|
|
|
// FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We currently only do this for anonymous constants,
|
|
|
|
// meaning that we do not look into associated constants. I(@lcnr) am not yet sure whether
|
|
|
|
// we want to look into them or treat them as opaque projections.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Right now we do neither of that and simply always fail to unify them.
|
|
|
|
DefKind::AnonConst => (),
|
|
|
|
_ => return None,
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
let body = tcx.mir_const(def).borrow();
|
|
|
|
AbstractConstBuilder::new(tcx, &body)?.build()
|
2020-09-11 07:00:21 +00:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
None
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2020-09-10 16:48:18 +00:00
|
|
|
pub(super) fn try_unify_abstract_consts<'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
((a, a_substs), (b, b_substs)): (
|
|
|
|
(ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>, SubstsRef<'tcx>),
|
|
|
|
(ty::WithOptConstParam<DefId>, SubstsRef<'tcx>),
|
|
|
|
),
|
|
|
|
) -> bool {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(a) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, a, a_substs) {
|
|
|
|
if let Some(b) = AbstractConst::new(tcx, b, b_substs) {
|
|
|
|
return try_unify(tcx, a, b);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
false
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pub(super) fn try_unify<'tcx>(
|
|
|
|
tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
a: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
b: AbstractConst<'tcx>,
|
|
|
|
) -> bool {
|
2020-09-10 07:06:30 +00:00
|
|
|
match (a.root(), b.root()) {
|
|
|
|
(Node::Leaf(a_ct), Node::Leaf(b_ct)) => {
|
|
|
|
let a_ct = a_ct.subst(tcx, a.substs);
|
|
|
|
let b_ct = b_ct.subst(tcx, b.substs);
|
|
|
|
match (a_ct.val, b_ct.val) {
|
|
|
|
(ty::ConstKind::Param(a_param), ty::ConstKind::Param(b_param)) => {
|
|
|
|
a_param == b_param
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
(ty::ConstKind::Value(a_val), ty::ConstKind::Value(b_val)) => a_val == b_val,
|
|
|
|
// If we have `fn a<const N: usize>() -> [u8; N + 1]` and `fn b<const M: usize>() -> [u8; 1 + M]`
|
|
|
|
// we do not want to use `assert_eq!(a(), b())` to infer that `N` and `M` have to be `1`. This
|
|
|
|
// means that we can't do anything with inference variables here.
|
|
|
|
(ty::ConstKind::Infer(_), _) | (_, ty::ConstKind::Infer(_)) => false,
|
|
|
|
// FIXME(const_evaluatable_checked): We may want to either actually try
|
|
|
|
// to evaluate `a_ct` and `b_ct` if they are are fully concrete or something like
|
|
|
|
// this, for now we just return false here.
|
|
|
|
_ => false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
(Node::Binop(a_op, al, ar), Node::Binop(b_op, bl, br)) if a_op == b_op => {
|
|
|
|
try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(al), b.subtree(bl))
|
|
|
|
&& try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(ar), b.subtree(br))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
(Node::UnaryOp(a_op, av), Node::UnaryOp(b_op, bv)) if a_op == b_op => {
|
|
|
|
try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(av), b.subtree(bv))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
(Node::FunctionCall(a_f, a_args), Node::FunctionCall(b_f, b_args))
|
|
|
|
if a_args.len() == b_args.len() =>
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(a_f), b.subtree(b_f))
|
|
|
|
&& a_args
|
|
|
|
.iter()
|
|
|
|
.zip(b_args)
|
|
|
|
.all(|(&an, &bn)| try_unify(tcx, a.subtree(an), b.subtree(bn)))
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
_ => false,
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|