rust/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:41:17
   |
LL |         let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
   |
   = note: `-D clippy::get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings`

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:42:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:43:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:45:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:46:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`

error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10
   |
LL |         *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]`

error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:53:10
   |
LL |         *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]`

error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:54:10
   |
LL |         *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]`

error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:55:10
   |
LL |         *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]`

error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:64:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`

error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65:17
   |
LL |         let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`

error: aborting due to 12 previous errors