mirror of
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust.git
synced 2025-04-13 12:36:47 +00:00
#3006 : Fixing for .get().unwrap().foo()
This commit is contained in:
parent
bc6d85ceaf
commit
de8d233b06
@ -1431,7 +1431,7 @@ fn lint_get_unwrap(cx: &LateContext<'_, '_>, expr: &hir::Expr, get_args: &[hir::
|
||||
),
|
||||
"try this",
|
||||
format!(
|
||||
"{}{}[{}]",
|
||||
"({}{}[{}])",
|
||||
borrow_str,
|
||||
snippet(cx, get_args[0].span, "_"),
|
||||
snippet(cx, get_args[1].span, "_")
|
||||
|
@ -43,4 +43,9 @@ fn main() {
|
||||
*some_btreemap.get_mut(&1).unwrap() = 'b';
|
||||
*false_positive.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
{ // Test `get().unwrap().foo()` and `get_mut().unwrap().bar()`
|
||||
let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
||||
let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more co
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:27:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
27 | let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&boxed_slice[1])`
|
||||
|
|
||||
= note: `-D clippy::get-unwrap` implied by `-D warnings`
|
||||
|
||||
@ -10,55 +10,67 @@ error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more co
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:28:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
28 | let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&some_slice[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:29:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
29 | let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&some_vec[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:30:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
30 | let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&some_vecdeque[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:31:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
31 | let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&some_hashmap[&1])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:32:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
32 | let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&some_btreemap[&1])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
37 | *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut boxed_slice[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&mut boxed_slice[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
38 | *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_slice[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&mut some_slice[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
39 | *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vec[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&mut some_vec[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:10
|
||||
|
|
||||
40 | *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&mut some_vecdeque[0]`
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&mut some_vecdeque[0])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 10 previous errors
|
||||
error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:48:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
48 | let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&some_vec[0..1])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
|
||||
--> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:17
|
||||
|
|
||||
49 | let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
|
||||
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `(&mut some_vec[0..1])`
|
||||
|
||||
error: aborting due to 12 previous errors
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user